Citizenship, Democracy, and Drug-Related Violence (CIDENA, 2011) (ICPSR 34670)
Principal Investigator(s): Collective for Security Analysis with Democracy A.C.; Universidad Panamericana (Mexico). IPADE Business School. Center for the Study of Institutional Governance; Sistemas de Inteligencia en Mercados y Opinión (Mexico)
The survey Citizenship, Democracy, and Drug-Related Violence (CIDENA, 2011) was implemented with the goal of providing information towards understanding the complex relationship between society and drug-related violence in Mexico. Cognitive interviews, face-to-face interviews, and list experiments were utilized in Mexico. The survey was conducted in face-to-face interviews (at the residence of the interviewee) based on a sample of men and women over 18 years of age and residents of Mexico. The sample was representative nationwide of 7 states with different levels of violence: High (Chihuahua, Guerrero, Michoacán, and Nuevo León), Intermediate (Jalisco, and Estado de México), and Low (Distrito Federal). These states were selected according to their violence indexes (deaths associated with drug related violence reported in local newspapers). Demographic variables include age, sex, marital status, occupation, party affiliation, territories of residence, education, and income.
Data in this collection are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions. Please log in so we can determine if you are with a member institution and have access to these data files.
Collective for Security Analysis with Democracy A.C., Universidad Panamericana (Mexico). IPADE Business School. Center for the Study of Institutional Governance, and Sistemas de Inteligencia en Mercados y Opinión (Mexico). Citizenship, Democracy, and Drug-Related Violence (CIDENA, 2011). ICPSR34670-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013-10-23. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34670.v1
Persistent URL: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34670.v1
This study was funded by:
- United States Agency for International Development (4935-012-11-008)
Scope of Study
Study Design: The public opinion survey consisted of 7,416 interviews based on a probabilistic sample design. The survey was implemented in areas with high, intermediate, and low levels of local violence. The survey was conducted by face-to-face interviews (at the residence of the interviewee) based on a sample men and women over 18 years of age and residents of Mexico. In Mexico face-to-face interviews are necessary because both telephone and internet have a very low rate of penetration.
Sample: The sample design was based on a list of 64,934 electoral sections defined by the Federal Election Institute for 2011. The selection procedure was a complex, stratified and PPS random sampling design over electoral sections sampling framework (nominal listing 2011). It was a complex selection procedure due to the various stages; the first stage stratified the electoral sections by state. This stage was needed for the oversampling of the selected states. In the second stage 75 electoral sections were selected for: Chihuahua, Distrito Federal, Estado de México, Jalisco, Michoacán, and Nuevo León, 68 for Guerrero, and 100 for the other 25 states with Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) sampling design. The results of this survey at a national level are accurate at the 95 percent confidence level plus or minus 1.1 percentage point. The sampling error for each state: (1) Chihuahua, Distrito Federal, Estado de México, Jalisco, Michoacán, and Nuevo León: accurate at the 95 percent confidence level +/- 3.3 percent, (2) Guerrero: accurate at the 95 percent confidence level +/- 3.5 percent.
Weight: Considering the methodology used for the sampling design of the study data weights were elaborated. These weights consider the probability of selection according to the sampling frame distributions by state, age, and gender. Due to these considerations the following weight correctors were established. The estimators weight observations by the inverse estimate of the selection probability. See Appendix: Weight Section of the Codebook for more information.
- Performed consistency checks.
- Created variable labels and/or value labels.
- Standardized missing values.
- Created online analysis version with question text.
- Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Original ICPSR Release: 2013-10-23
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)