American National Election Studies: 2006 ANES Pilot Study (ICPSR 21440)
Principal Investigator(s): Krosnick, Jon A., Stanford University; Lupia, Arthur, University of Michigan; National Election Studies
In the fall of 2006 the American National Election Studies (ANES) carried out a pilot study after the 2006 mid-term elections in the United States. The 2006 ANES Pilot Study was conducted for the purpose of testing new questions and conducting methodological research to inform the design of future ANES studies. As such, it is not considered part of the ANES time series that has been conducted since 1948, and the pilot study only includes time series questions necessary to evaluate the new content. The election studies are designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of public policy, and participation in political life. This full release dataset contains all 675 interviews, with the survey portion of the interview lasting just over 37 minutes on average. The study had a re-interview rate of 56.25 percent. Respondents were asked questions over a variety of topics. They were queried on need for closure in various situations including unpredictable ones, how fast important decisions were made, and how often they could see that both people can be right when in disagreement. Respondents were asked many questions pertaining to their values. Some questions dealt with optimism and pessimism. Respondents were asked if they felt that were generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither in regard to the future. They were asked specifically how they felt about the future of the United States. Respondents were also asked about their social networks, about who they talked to in the last six months, and how close they felt to them. Respondents were further queried about how many days in the last six months they talked to these people, their political views, interest in politics, and the amount of time it would take to drive to their homes. Other questions sought respondents' political attitudes including attentiveness to following politics, ambivalence, efficacy, and trust in government. Respondents were asked questions related to the media such as how much time and how many days during a typical week they watched or read news on the Internet, newspaper, radio, or television. Questions that dealt with abortion consisted of giving respondents various scenarios and asking if they favored or opposed it being legal for the women to have an abortion in that circumstance. The issue of justice was also included by asking respondents what percent of people of different backgrounds who are suspected of committing a crime in America are treated fairly. Respondents were also asked to give their opinion on gender in politics, specifically, whether gender played a role in how the respondent would vote for various political offices. Respondents were also queried on whether they would vote for Bill Clinton or George W. Bush and whether they had voted in the elections in November. Respondents were also asked if they approved of the way George W. Bush was handling his job as president, the way he was handling relations with foreign countries, and the way he was dealing with terrorism. Respondents were also asked how upsetting the thought of their own death was, and how likely it was that a majority of all people on Earth would die at once during the next 100 years because of a single event. Demographic variables include age, party affiliation, sex, religious preference, and political party affiliation.
This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
Krosnick, Jon A., Arthur Lupia, and National Election Studies. American National Election Studies: 2006 ANES Pilot Study. ICPSR21440-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2008-11-17. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21440.v1
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21440.v1
This study was funded by:
- National Science Foundation (SES-0535332 and SES-0535334)
- Stanford University
- University of Michigan
Scope of Study
Subject Terms: abortion, ambivalence, Bush Administration (George W., 2001-), Christianity, death, economic conditions, emotional states, foreign policy, government performance, justice, national elections, news media, political affiliation, political attitudes, political efficacy, political partisanship, public approval, public opinion, religion, social networks, social values, taxes, tolerance, trust (psychology), trust in government, voting, voting behavior
Geographic Coverage: United States
Date of Collection:
Universe: United States citizens of voting age on or before Election Day (November 6, 2000), residing in housing units other than military reservations in the 48 coterminous states.
Data Types: survey data
Data Collection Notes:
Further information about this and other National Election Studies is available on the American National Election Studies Web site.
This data was produced by the University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies.
Sample: Individuals who completed a valid interview in the 2004 ANES time series study.
Mode of Data Collection: telephone interview
Extent of Processing: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Performed consistency checks.
- Standardized missing values.
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Original ICPSR Release: 2008-11-12
Related Publications (?)
- List all ~29 citations associated with this study
- View citations for the entire series
Most Recent Publications
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)