National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997 (ICPSR 3959)
Principal Investigator(s): Ohio State University. Center for Human Resource Research
Summary: The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97) is one of six surveys, designed by the United States Department of Labor, comprising the National Longitudinal Survey (NLS) Series. Created to be representative of United States residents in 1997 who were born between the years of 1980 and 1984, the NLSY97 documents the transition from school to work experienced by today's youths through seven rounds of data collection spanning the time period 1997-2003. The majority of the olde... (more info)
Access Notes
These data are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions. Because you are not logged in, we cannot verify that you will be able to download the data.
This study was originally provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
Dataset(s)
WARNING: This study is over 150MB in size and may take several minutes to download on a typical internet connection.
Study Description
Citation
Ohio State University. Center for Human Resource Research. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997. ICPSR03959-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2007-06-04. doi:10.3886/ICPSR03959.v2
Persistent URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03959.v2
Export Citation:
- RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
- EndNote XML (EndNote X4.0.1 or higher)
Funding
This survey was funded by:
- United States Department of Education. National School to Work Office (J-9-J-9-0007)
- United States Department of Defense
- United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
- United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD037078)
Scope of Study
Summary: The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97) is one of six surveys, designed by the United States Department of Labor, comprising the National Longitudinal Survey (NLS) Series. Created to be representative of United States residents in 1997 who were born between the years of 1980 and 1984, the NLSY97 documents the transition from school to work experienced by today's youths through seven rounds of data collection spanning the time period 1997-2003. The majority of the oldest cohort members (age 16 as of December 31, 1996) were still in school during the first survey round and the youngest respondents (age 12) had not yet entered the labor market. The NLSY97 addresses eleven main topics of interest including: employment, schooling, vocational training, income and assets, family formation, family background, future expectations, attitudes, behaviors, and time use, health, political participation, and environmental characteristics. Respondents were asked about their employment status including hours worked per week, job history, benefits, job satisfaction, freelance employment opportunities, occupation and pay during military service, and periods of unemployment. Respondents were also asked about their education history, current enrollment status, high school curriculum, whether they received a diploma or GED, participation in any school-based learning programs, whether they attended college or university and whether or not they graduated, the cost of tuition, their grade point average, and field of study. Respondents were asked to give information about training programs in which they had participated such as the type of training program, amount of time spent in training, skills obtained, and whether or not the training programs were completed. The survey also addressed the topic of income and assets with questions focusing on the respondents' wages or salary, other sources of income, assets such as real estate, stock or mutual funds, retirement plans, and income from sources such as workers compensation, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), and Food Stamps. Respondents were asked about their family including their marital status, number, sex, and ages of any biological or adopted children, outcomes of pregnancies not ending in live births. Respondents were asked to answer a series of questions pertaining to their family history such as their parents nationality and place of birth, grandparents place of birth, native language spoken by parents, parents education, whether or not the respondents lived with their parents, other relatives living in the household, as well as questions about the household environment. Respondents were asked about their expectations for the future and specifically, where they expected to be in the next year, in the next five years, by the age of 20 and by the age of 30. Respondents were asked about their attitudes, behaviors, and time use. They were asked about their perception of teachers, school, peers, as well as their sexual activity, drug and alcohol use, crimes committed, and how much time they devoted to homework, classes, reading, and watching television. Respondents were asked questions about their general physical health, mental health, any chronic health conditions, and any health conditions that limited school or work activities. Respondents were asked if they were interested in government and public affairs, whether they were registered to vote, and whether they voted in recent elections. Finally, respondents were asked questions about their living environment, residential moves, whether their current residence was urban or rural, whether their current residence was in a metropolitan area, and the region of residence.
Subject Terms: attitudes, demographic characteristics, economic indicators, educational background, expectations, family background, health, high school students, household composition, income, job history, job training, labor (work), labor force, labor markets, occupational mobility, political participation, secondary education, time allocation, training, wages and salaries, work experience, young adults, youths
Geographic Coverage: United States
Time Period:
- 1997--2003
Date of Collection:
- 1997--2003
Unit of Observation: individual
Universe: All household residents aged 12 to 16 as of December 31, 1996, in the United States.
Data Types: survey data
Data Collection Notes:
(1) The data belonging to the NATIONAL LONGITUDINAL SURVEY OF YOUTH, 1997, was previously archived as part of the NATIONAL LONGITUDINAL SURVEYS OF LABOR MARKET EXPERIENCES, 1966-1992 (ICPSR 7610). In an effort to make the NATIONAL LONGITUDINAL SURVEY (NLS) SERIES data more usable, the six cohorts comprising the NLS have been reorganized so that data and documentation for each study can now be found under the following ICPSR study titles: NATIONAL LONGITUDINAL SURVEY OF YOUTH, 1979 (ICPSR 4683), NATIONAL LONGITUDINAL SURVEY OF OLDER MEN, 1966-1990 (ICPSR 4675), NATIONAL LONGITUDINAL SURVEY OF YOUNGER MEN, 1966-1981 (ICPSR 4678), NATIONAL LONGITUDINAL SURVEY OF MATURE WOMEN, 1967 (ICPSR 4681), and NATIONAL LONGITUDINAL SURVEY OF YOUNG WOMEN, 1968 (ICPSR 4680). (2) The original NATIONAL LONGITUDINAL SURVEYS OF LABOR MARKET EXPERIENCES data and documentation files remain available in their original form. Please see ICPSR 7610. (3) Due to the size of the data files Stata setup files and system files are not available for the years 2001, 2002, and 2003. (4) Additional information pertaining to the NLSY97 can be found at the Bureau of Labor Statistics Web site for NLS497.
Methodology
Sample: During the initial NLSY97 interview period, interviewers visited randomly selected households to identify all youths eligible for the NLSY97. All household residents aged 12 to 16 as of December 31, 1996, were considered eligible. The sample included those who usually resided in a household in the sample area but were away at school or college, as well as those in a hospital, correctional facility, or other type of institution. If an eligible youth lived in the household, the interviewer also asked one of the youth's parents to participate. To draw the sample of 8,984 respondents, interviewers screened 75,291 households in 147 nonoverlapping primary sampling units. Two samples were drawn -- a cross-sectional sample representative of the United States population born between 1980 and 1984 and a supplemental sample of Black or Hispanic youths in that age range. This oversample allows for analysis across race or ethnicity. Individual sample weights created by the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago permit comparisons between the full NLSY97 sample, which includes both the cross-sectional sample and the oversample, and the national population in the same age range. In the NLSY97 cohort, 8,984 respondents originated from 6,819 unique households. Because the sample design selected all household residents in the appropriate age range, 1,862 households included more than one NLSY97 respondent. Sibling was the most common relationship between multiple respondents living in the same household during the initial round. The NLSY97 does not contain nationally representative samples of siblings of all ages and living arrangements. Users should exercise caution when generalizing from the findings of NLSY97 sibling studies.
Mode of Data Collection: face-to-face interview, self-enumerated questionnaire
Version(s)
Original ICPSR Release: 2004-08-02
Version History:
- 2007-06-04 This study has been updated to include the data and documentation from rounds 6 (2002) and 7 (2003) of the National Longitudinal Study of Youth (NLSY) 1997. In addition, data from previous rounds (1-5) have been updated and now include the SAS, SPSS, and Stata setup files and SAS (XPORT), SPSS portable, and Stata system files when possible (please see COLLECT.NOTE for more information).
Related Publications
- List all ~295 citations associated with this study
- List ~19 citations that match your query
- View citations for the entire series
Top Publications that Match your Query
Variables
Browse Matching Variables
DS1: 1997
COMMENT: youth has committed other property crimes
How many times have you committed other property crimes in the last 12 months?
How old were you the last time you committed other property crimes?
What is the percent chance that you will be the victim of a violent crime at least once in the next year?
You indicated earlier that you had committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheating someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said. How old were you the first time you did this?
COMMENT: youth was charged with other property offenses
COMMENT: youth was charged with other property offenses
COMMENT: youth was charged with other property offenses
DS2: 1998
([YSAQ-392] = 1) OR ([YSAQ-392b] = 1) COMMENT: R has committed other property crimes
Have you ever committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheated someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said it was?
In 1997, what was your total cash income from other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property? The amounts reported are actual whole dollar amounts with no implied decimal places.
You indicated earlier that you had committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheating someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said. How many times have you committed other property crimes since the last interview on [date of last interview]?
Since the last interview on [date of last interview], have you committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheated someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said it was? R21959.00 [YSAQ-392C] Survey Year: 1998 ([R answered questions about attacking someone as of DLI] less than 0) COMMENT: R didn't answer or answered refused/don't know about ever attacking someone
Was it 3 or more times?
Would you say it was ...
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
DS3: 1999
([YSAQ-392] = 1) OR ([YSAQ-392b] = 1) COMMENT: R has committed other property crimes
Have you ever committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheated someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said it was?
In 1998, what was your total cash income from other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property? The amounts reported are actual whole dollar amounts with no implied decimal places.
You indicated earlier that you had committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheating someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said. How many times have you committed other property crimes since the last interview on [date of last interview]?
Since the last interview on [date of last interview], have you committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheated someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said it was?
Was it 3 or more times?
Would you say it was ...
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
DS4: 2000
([YSAQ-392] = 1) OR ([YSAQ-392b] = 1) COMMENT: R has committed other property crimes
What is the percent chance that you will be the victim of a violent crime at least once in the next year?
What is the percent chance that you will be the victim of a violent crime at least once in the next five years?
Have you ever committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheated someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said it was?
In 1999, what was your total cash income from other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property? The amounts reported are actual whole dollar amounts with no implied decimal places.
You indicated earlier that you had committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheating someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said. How many times have you committed other property crimes since the last interview on [date of last interview]?
Since the last interview on [date of last interview], have you committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheated someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said it was?
Was it 3 or more times?
Would you say it was ...
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
DS5: 2001
([YSAQ-392] = 1) OR ([YSAQ-392b] = 1) COMMENT: R has committed other property crimes
In 2000, what was your total cash income from other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property? The amounts reported are actual whole dollar amounts with no implied decimal places.
You indicated earlier that you had committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheating someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said. How many times have you committed other property crimes since the last interview on [date of last interview]?
Since the last interview on [date of last interview], have you committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheated someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said it was?
Was it 3 or more times?
Would you say it was ...
([YSAQ-461]=1) OR ([{ysaq-467H}]=1) COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
([YSAQ-461]=1) OR ([{ysaq-467H}]=1) COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
([YSAQ-461]=1) OR ([{ysaq-467H}]=1) COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
([YSAQ-461]=1) OR ([{ysaq-467H}]=1) COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
DS6: 2002
([YSAQ-392] = 1) OR ([YSAQ-392b] = 1) COMMENT: R has committed other property crimes
You indicated earlier that you had committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheating someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said. How many times have you committed other property crimes since the last interview on [date of last interview]?
Since the last interview on [date of last interview], have you committed other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property, or cheated someone by selling them something that was worthless or worth much less than what you said it was?
In 2001, what was your total cash income from other property crimes such as fencing, receiving, possessing or selling stolen property? The amounts reported are actual whole dollar amounts with no implied decimal places. Truncated values are applied to the top 2 percent of respondents with valid non-missing responses. The lowest value for the top 2 percent of cases is used as the truncation level ($40,000 for this variable). Values for all cases at or over that level are averaged. That average is then assigned to each of the top 2 percent of the cases.
Was it 3 or more times?
Would you say it was ...
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
COMMENT: R was charged with other property offenses
DS7: 2003
Utilities
Update Notification
Use any of the notification links to add this study to your RSS feed; you will then receive notification if the study is substantively updated.
Metadata Exports
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.
