Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search .

Your query returned 134 variables.

Name
Label/Question
1.

BINGE DRINKING RISK FACTOR.

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for binge drinking where binge drinking is defined as having 5 or more drinks on 1 occasion

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

2.

GENERAL RISK FACTOR

Taken from: Longitudinal Study of Violence Against Women: Victimization and Perpetration Among College Students in a State-Supported University in the United States, 1990-1995 - Female Data.

3.

CHOLESTEROL CHECKED RISK FACTOR

Prologue: Description: Cholesterol check within past five years.

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

4.

HIGH CHOLESTEROL RISK FACTOR

Prologue: Description: Had cholesterol checked and told high by doctor, nurse, or other health professional.

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

5.

RISK FACTOR FOR LIFETIME ASTHMA PREVALENCE

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for lifetime asthma prevalence

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

6.

RISK FACTOR FOR CURRENT ASTHMA PREVALENCE

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for current asthma prevalence

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

7.

NO PHYSICAL ACTIVITY OR EXERCISE RISK FACTOR

Prologue: Description: Risk Factor for respondents that do no physical activity or exercise.

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

8.

CURRENT SMOKING STATUS RISK FACTOR.

Prologue: Description: Current smoking status risk factor: Smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and may or may not currently smoke ... (view details)

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

9.

VIGOROUS PHYSICAL ACTIVITY RISK FACTOR

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for vigorous physical activity defined as 20 or more minutes per day at least 3 or more times per week. ... (view details)

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

10.

MODERATE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY RISK FACTOR

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for moderate physical activity defined as 30 or more minutes per day for 5 or more days per week, or vigorous activity for 20 or more minutes per day on 3 or more days. ... (view details)

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

11.

HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE RISK FACTOR

Prologue: Description: Told one has high blood pressure by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional.

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

12.

RECOMMENDED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY RISK FACTOR

Prologue: Description: A 3 level variable which categorizes respondents by their self reported physical activity level.

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

13.

RISK FACTOR FOR OVERWEIGHT OR OBESE [Calculated Variable--2 implied decimal places]

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for overweight or obese

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

14.

HEALTH STATUS

Prologue: Description: Risk Factor for Fair and Poor health

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

15.

HEAVY DRINKING AMONG MEN RISK FACTOR.

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for heavy drinking among men Notes: Heavy drinking is defined as having an average of more than 2 drkinks per day ... (view details)

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

16.

HEAVY DRINKING AMONG FEMALES RISK FACTOR.

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for heavy drinking among women Notes: Heavy drinking is defined as having an average of more than 1 drink per day ... (view details)

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

17.

EVER BEEN TESTED FOR HIV RISK FACTOR.

Prologue: Description: Respondents less than 65 years old that have ever been tested for HIV

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

18.

EVER PARTICIPATED IN HIGH-RISK BEHAVIOR RISK FACTOR.

Prologue: Description: Respondents less than 65 years old that have ever participated in high-risk behavior

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

19.

RISK FACTOR FOR RESPONDENTS AGED 65+ THAT HAVE EVER HAD A PNEUMONIA SHOT.

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for respondents aged 65 or older that have ever had a pneumonia shot

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

20.

RISK FACTOR FOR RESPONDENTS AGED 65+ THAT HAD A FLU SHOT IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS.

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for respondents aged 65 or older that have had a flu shot within the past 12 months

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

21.

CONSUMED ALCOHOL IN PAST 30 DAYS

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for respondents having had at least one drink of alcohol in the past 30 days.

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

22.

HEAVY DRINKING RISK

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for heavy drinking Notes: Heavy drinking is defined as having greater than 2 drinks per day for men, and 1 drink per day for women) ... (view details)

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

23.

BEEN COUNSELED WITHIN THE PAST 12 MONTHS ON PREVENTION OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES THROUGH CONDOM USE.

Prologue: Description: Risk factor for respondents less than 65 years old that have ever been counseled by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional within the past 12 months on prevention of sexually transmitted diseases though condomn use ... (view details)

Taken from: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003.

24.

Intravenous drug use domain included

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

25.

Intravenous drug use service needed

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

26.

Intravenous drug use recommendation

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

27.

Needle sharing domain included

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

28.

Needle sharing service needed

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

29.

Needle sharing recommendation

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

30.

Unsafe sex practices domain included

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

31.

Unsafe sex practices service needed

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

32.

Unsafe sex practices recommendation

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

33.

HIV/AIDS domain included

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

34.

HIV/AIDS service needed

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

35.

HIV/AIDS recommendation

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

36.

Hepatitis C domain included

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

37.

Hepatitis C service needed

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

38.

Hepatitis C recommendation

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

39.

CRF - Employment domain included

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

40.

CRF - Employment service needed

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

41.

CRF - Employment recommendation

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

42.

CRF - Education domain included

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

43.

CRF - Education service needed

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

44.

CRF - Education recommendation

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

45.

CRF - Housing domain included

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

46.

CRF - Housing service needed

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

47.

CRF - Housing recommendation

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

48.

CRF - Family support domain included

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

49.

CRF - Family support service needed

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

50.

CRF - Family support recommendation

A8. Were each of the following domains assessed? (Exclusivity rule: These Domains, Needs, and Recommendations should be considered as mutually exclusive and refer to direct services. For example, a need for housing would not be scored as a recommend... (view details)

Taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 2: Organizational Process Improvement Intervention (OPII), 2010-2013 [United States] - Assessment and Recommendations for Treatment Rating Form (ART RF).

Results 1 - 50 of 134