S4BQ40D: Use the "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" principle.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about crime reduction?

Use the "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" principle.
-4 Multiple Response 00.0%
1 Strongly Disagree 12429.5%
2 Disagree 14634.8%
3 Neither agree nor disagree 8620.5%
4 Agree 317.4%
5 Strongly Agree 133.1%
Missing Data
-3 Missing 184.3%
. - 20.5%
Total 420 100%

Based upon 400 valid cases out of 420 total cases.

Summary Statistics

  • mean: 2.16
  • median: 2.00
  • mode: 2.00
  • minimum: 1
  • maximum: 5
  • standard deviation: 1.05

Location: 2467-2477 (width: 11; decimal: 0)

Variable Type: numeric

(Range of) Missing Values: -3 , .


Source: This variable was taken from: Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS): National Criminal Justice Treatment Program (NCJTP) Survey in the United States, 2002-2008.

Copyright: ICPSR has an FAQ on copyright and survey instruments.

Disclaimer: The frequencies for this variable may not be weighted. They are purely descriptive and may not be representative of the study population. Please use with caution and consult the study documentation.

Create a Chart        

To view the relationship between this variable and another of your choosing, perform a crosstab. Results will be displayed as a table and chart.