nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27881 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27881 MiAaI MiAaI National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), 1994-2008 [electronic resource] Obesity and Neighborhood Environment Files [Restricted Use] Kathleen Mullan Harris , J. Richard Udry 2011-02-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27881 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Obesity and Neighborhood Environment (ONE) database is a collection of variables derived using spatial analysis techniques that link community-level data to individual Add Health respondent residential locations in both space and time. The database provides physical, social, and economic neighborhood environment measures corresponding with Add Health respondent locations in Waves I and III. Community-level data include density and proximity to recreational facilities, land use patterning, population, economic, climate, and crime statistics, which are linked spatially and temporally to individual-level Add Health behavior and health outcome data. Request for these files must include a brief justification explaining the necessity and relevance of the data to the research agenda. There are no special security requirements. For more information, please see the study website. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27881.v4 academic achievement icpsr adolescents icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr birth control icpsr census tract level icpsr classroom environment icpsr climate icpsr contraception icpsr cost of living icpsr crime rates icpsr crime statistics icpsr dating (social) icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug use icpsr eating habits icpsr educational environment icpsr employment icpsr families icpsr family planning icpsr family relationships icpsr family structure icpsr friendships icpsr health icpsr health behavior icpsr health care access icpsr health status icpsr household composition icpsr interpersonal relations icpsr living arrangements icpsr marriage icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr parental influence icpsr physical characteristics icpsr physical condition icpsr physical fitness icpsr physical limitations icpsr population density icpsr pregnancy history icpsr public assistance programs icpsr religious behavior icpsr religious beliefs icpsr school attendance icpsr self concept icpsr self esteem icpsr sexual attitudes icpsr sexual behavior icpsr smoking icpsr social environment icpsr social networks icpsr tobacco use icpsr violent behavior icpsr welfare services icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr neighborhoods icpsr obesity icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations DSDR I. Fertility DSDR III. Health ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies ICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth Harris, Kathleen Mullan Udry, J. Richard Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27881 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27881.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34605 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34605 MiAaI MiAaI Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA] [electronic resource] Official Arrest Records, 2000-2010 [Restricted] Edward P. Mulvey 2013-05-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34605 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654), and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700). The official arrests records of all 1,354 youth were obtained from multiple sources. For arrest/petitions under the age of 18, this information is based on petitions appearing in the juvenile and adult court records in each site. In Philadelphia, this information was gathered based on a hand review of juvenile and adult court documents; in Phoenix, the information is based on reports from two computerized court tracking systems (JOLTS--Juvenile On-Line Tracking System for juvenile court information, ICIS--Maricopa County Superior Court database for adult court information). For arrests/petitions over 18, FBI arrest records are the source of information. There is no self-reported information contained in this set of data. Information from these different data sources is consolidated into the following categories: Information regarding petitions with a date that falls prior to the baseline interview date ("prior petitions"). Information regarding the study index petition (also called the "initial referring petition"; this is the adjudication that prompted study enrollment). Information regarding the study index petition can be found by accessing the "type" variable associated with the prior petitions (specific variable name: Official Record Prior PetitionXX: Petition type). Depending on the investigator's needs, this petition can remain combined with the "priors" or be used as a stand-alone petition. Information regarding arrests and court petitions with a date which falls after the baseline interview date in the Pathways study ("rearrests"). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v1 arrest records icpsr felony offenses icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr sex offenses icpsr weapons offenses icpsr substance abuse icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Mulvey, Edward P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34605 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34488 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34488 MiAaI MiAaI Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA] [electronic resource] Release Measures, 2000-2010 [Restricted] Edward P. Mulvey 2013-02-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34488 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700). The Release data portion of the Pathways study contains information from 1,130 interviews ("release interviews") reflecting the youths' perceptions regarding various aspects of the residential experience and institutional environment (e.g., accounts of program operations and services provided, ratings regarding the participant's feelings of his or her safety in the facility). The release interview was conducted within 30 days prior to or after release from a facility and in a separate session apart from the time point interview. This was done to minimize the burden on the research participant and to ensure adequate attention to institutional ratings. The restricted time period within which to conduct the release interview reduced the likelihood that intervening events and experiences would skew the participant's recall of the stay. Study participants could contribute more than one release interview, depending upon the number of institutional placements he/she had over the seven-year follow-up period. The current release data reflects ratings from 686 unique individuals. It should be recognized that not every institutional stay for every youth produced a release interview. On the basis of the number of reported institutional stays in the sample, it is estimated that a release interview was obtained for approximately 54 percent of the total number of residential stays experienced by study participants. Release interviews were missed if the research interviewer was not aware of the institutional stay (e.g. it occurred between time point interviews) or if the interviewer only became aware of the institutional stay at a point that was too late to schedule a release interview within the required window surrounding the release date. The 686 individuals reflected in the release data represent 51 percent of the Pathway study participants (n=1,354) and 56 percent of Pathways participants who had a least one institutional stay (n=1,234; 120 Pathways youths had no institutional stays). On average, these 686 youths had 1.6 interviews. The number of interviews per unique person ranges from one to eight. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34488.v1 academic achievement icpsr community involvement icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr friendships icpsr gangs icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr medications icpsr religion icpsr social behavior icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment outcome icpsr vocational education icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Mulvey, Edward P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34488 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34488.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09477 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09477 MiAaI MiAaI Drug Use Forecasting in 24 Cities in the United States, 1987-1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 1998-07-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9477 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program measures levels of and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in the United States. The data address the following topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs, (3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the relationship between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5) the relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age, race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge at the time of booking. The recently modified DUF interview instrument (used for part of the 1995 data and all of the 1996 and 1997 data) also collected information about the arrestee's use of 15 drugs, including recent and past use (e.g., 3-day and 30-day drug use) of each of these drugs, age at first use, and whether the arrestee had ever been dependent on drugs. In the original DUF interview instrument (used for the 1987 to 1994 data and part of the 1995 data), the information collected was the same as above except that the use of 22 drugs was queried, and the age at which the arrestee first became dependent on the drug was included. Arrestees also were questioned in the original instrument about their history of intravenous drug use, whether the consideration of AIDS influenced whether they shared needles, history of drug and alcohol treatment, their past and current drug treatment needs, and how many persons they had sex with during the past 12 months. Finally, arrestees were asked to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). The Gun Addendum Data (Parts 27, 35, and 37) contain variables on topics such as arrestees' encounters with guns, whether they agreed or disagreed with statements about guns, gun possession, how they obtained handgun(s), whether they were armed with a gun at their arrest or during crimes, and if they had ever used a gun against another person. The Heroin Addendum Data, 1995 (Part 29) contains information that was formerly covered in the main annual file in 1992-1994, but in 1995 was revised and prepared as a separate dataset. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09477.v2 drug related crimes icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr substance abuse icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr criminal histories icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9477 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09477.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03794 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03794 MiAaI MiAaI Outcome Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program for State Prisoners in Massachusetts, 1999-2002 [electronic resource] Ann Marie Rocheleau , Diana Brensilber , Andrew Klein , Douglas Wilson 2003-10-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3794 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was an outcome evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program at the Barnstable House of Corrections in Massachusetts. The study is based on the 188 inmates referred to the RSAT program at Barnstable between January 1, 1999, and June 6, 2001. Data on participants' criminal histories were gathered from the Criminal History Systems Board through March 2002. Data on offender age, entry, and discharge dates were supplied by the Barnstable County House of Corrections. Data from offender scores on psychological inventories and offender outcomes in the RSAT program were supplied by AdCare Criminal Justice Services. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03794.v1 addiction icpsr adjustment icpsr aftercare icpsr crime icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr rehabilitation icpsr residential programs icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Rocheleau, Ann Marie Brensilber, Diana Klein, Andrew Wilson, Douglas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3794 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03794.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03368 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03368 MiAaI MiAaI Outcome Evaluation of the Iowa State Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program, 1997-2001 [electronic resource] Remi Cadoret 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3368 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Other Way (TOW) program is an intensive residential substance abuse treatment program housed at the Clarinda Correctional Facility in Clarinda, Iowa. TOW is a voluntary, six-month program that works with inmates to identify the causes of their addictive behaviors and encourage changes in unacceptable behaviors and criminal thinking. The Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse Research and Evaluation conducted an evaluation of TOW from October 1997 through March 2001. The Iowa Consortium worked extensively with the Clarinda TWO treatment staff to identify valid and reliable instruments that measured substance use and abuse, mental health and personality characteristics, criminal behavior and attitudes, social support, and involvement in education, employment, and therapeutic activities. These instruments were used to collect data at intake and discharge. Additionally, the researchers conducted a six-month follow-up of inmates to determine their post-program experiences as well as recidivism. Part 1 (Clinical and Recidivism Data) consists of selected variables gathered during the clinical interviews administered to program participants at intake and discharge, as well as recidivism data from the Department of Corrections. Part 2 (Follow-Up Data) consists of variables from the Addiction Severity Index, which were collected during the six-month follow-up telephone interview. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03368.v1 addiction icpsr adjustment icpsr aftercare icpsr crime icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr rehabilitation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Cadoret, Remi Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3368 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03368.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02994 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02994 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 1999 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2994 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, the successor to the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]), measures levels of and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in 35 sites across the United States. The data address the following topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs, (3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the relationship between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5) the relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age, race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge at the time of booking. The modified ADAM/DUF interview instrument (used for part of the 1995 data and all of the 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999 data) also collected information about the arrestee's use of 15 drugs, including recent and past use (e.g., 3-day and 30-day drug use), age at first use, and whether the arrestee had ever been dependent on drugs. As part of the ADAM program, arrestees were asked to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02994.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2994 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02994.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02826 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02826 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 1999-11-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2826 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program measures levels of and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in the United States. The ADAM Program is a redesigned version of the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]), upgraded methodologically and expanded to include 35 cities. The data address the following topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs, (3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the relationship between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5) the relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age, race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge at the time of booking. The recently modified ADAM/DUF interview instrument (used for part of the 1995 DUF data and all of the DUF 1996, DUF 1997, and ADAM 1998 data) also collected information about the arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type, arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the interview. Data from the new interview instrument also included information about whether arrestees had ever injected drugs and whether they were influenced by drugs when they allegedly committed the crimes for which they were arrested. The data also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had prior arrests in the last 12 months. Data that continue to be collected with the new version of the ADAM/DUF interview provide information about arrestees' histories of drug/alcohol treatment, including whether they ever received drug/alcohol treatment and whether they needed drug/alcohol treatment. As part of the ADAM program, arrestees were asked to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of the following ten drug types: marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02826.v1 drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2826 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02826.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03270 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03270 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2000 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3270 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. thadone, methaqualone, barbiturates, amphetamines, and methamphetamine. The adult data files include several derived variables. The male data also include four sampling weights, and stratum identifications and percents. For the juvenile data, demographic variables include age, race, sex, educational attainment, employment status, and living circumstances. Data also include each juvenile arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs (alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, powder cocaine, crack, heroin, PCP, amphetamines, barbiturates, quaaludes, methadone, crystal methamphetamine, Valium, LSD, and inhalants). For each drug type, arrestees reported whether they had ever used the drug, age of first use, whether they had used the drug in the past 30 days and past 72 hours, number of days they used the drug in past month, whether they tried to cut down or quit using the drug, if they were successful, whether they felt dependent on the drug, whether they were receiving treatment for the drug, whether they had received treatment for the drug in the past, and whether they thought they could use treatment for that drug. Additional variables include whether juvenile respondents had ever injected drugs, whether they were influenced by drugs when they allegedly committed the crime for which they were arrested, whether they had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents, and if so, whether in the past 12 months, and information on arrests and charges in the past 12 months. As with the adult data, urine test results are also provided. Finally, variables covering precinct (precinct of arrest) and law (penal law code associated with the crime for which the juvenile was arrested) are also provided for use by local law enforcement officials at each site. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03270.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3270 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03270.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03141 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03141 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Texas Youth Commission's Chemical Dependency Treatment Program, 1998-1999 [electronic resource] William R. Kelly 2003-03-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3141 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study consists of data from both the process evaluation and the outcome evaluation of the Texas Youth Commission's (TYC) Chemical Dependency Treatment Program (CDTP). The research goal of the first part of the study was to provide a systematic and empirical process evaluation of appropriate program placement and whether and to what extent selected individual-level factors were related to key measures of program progress, as well as to variations in process outcomes across each of five treatment sites. The research goal of the second part of the study was to provide a systematic and empirical outcome evaluation of the impact of the TYC Chemical Dependency Treatment Program, including determination of the extent to which certain risk, need, amenability, program performance and delivery, and aftercare factors affected treatment impact. Data were obtained from the Texas Youth Commission, the state corrections agency responsible for serving violent and serious delinquent youth committed to the custody of the state. TYC collects a range of information on the risk, needs, and treatment amenability of its youths. Also, program performance is measured through the use of an exit assessment conducted by program staff, which essentially provides a report card summarizing each youth's involvement and progress in treatment. Data in this evaluation cover all juveniles who entered the CDTP from January through October 1998, and who were discharged by April 1, 1999. The treatment group consists of youths who invariably had a high need for chemical dependency treatment. The control group consists of youths who were eligible for treatment in the CDTP during this same time period but who did not receive it due to limited CDTP bed space. To obtain measures of drug use/abuse relapse, aftercare participation, and parole performance, a parolee data worksheet was created. TYC was able to provide information on who received chemical dependency treatment while on parole. Five core variables of the process evaluation data are program completion, program expulsion, days to completion, days to expulsion, and number of behavior infractions. The process evaluation includes the following variables from individual exit assessments: the youth's overall participation, whether the youth understood the curriculum, understood addiction, sought help, acknowledged addiction, and acknowledged impact, the youth's performance grade, whether the youth committed to be drug-free, family involvement, special circumstances, and performance index. Demographic variables are race, age, parents' marital status, and gender. Variables addressing risk factors include classifying offense, offender class, risk level, number of felony referrals, number of felony adjudications, number of previous TYC commitments, and number of parole revocations. Other variables in the process evaluation address the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI), the Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV (DSM-IV) chemical dependency treatment need, TYC treatment amenability score, and the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Variables available in the outcome evaluation data address issues of rearrest, higher custody level, aftercare sessions, drug tests, and parole compliance. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03141.v1 addiction icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr process evaluation icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment compliance icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment outcome icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Kelly, William R. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3141 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03141.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03499 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03499 MiAaI MiAaI Pathological Gambling in Arrestee Populations in Des Moines, Iowa, and Las Vegas, Nevada, 2000-2001 [electronic resource] Richard McCorkle 2003-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3499 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought to examine the extent, nature, and consequences of pathological gambling disorders in arrestee populations. Five research questions were addressed: (1) What is the prevalence of pathological gambling in arrestee populations? (2) What is the profile of the pathological gambler arrested for felony and misdemeanor offenses? (3) How does the nature and level of criminal activity among pathological gamblers compare to that of non- pathological gamblers? (4) What proportion of the crime committed by offenders with pathological gambling disorders is linked to their gambling activities (either to fund gambling or pay off gambling debts)? and (5) How does substance abuse interact with pathological gambling to affect the nature and extent of criminal activity? The data for this research were collected in conjunction with the National Institute of Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) programs. Arrestees in Las Vegas, Nevada, and Des Moines, Iowa, who had completed the ADAM interview and provided a urine specimen were asked if they would be willing to answer an additional set of questions concerning their gambling behavior. Data from the ADAM interview and drug screening were merged with data collected using the gambling addendum, producing the dataset for this study. Variables from the ADAM instruments were comprised of demographic data on each arrestee, calendar of admissions to drug treatment-related programs, data on dependence and abuse, drug market and use data, and urine test results. The gambling addendum was used to collect data on five topics: (1) past-year gambling activity, (2) the use of alcohol and illegal drugs prior to and during gambling, (3) substance abuse and/or self-reported gambling problems, (4) past-year criminal activity (property, drug, and violent offending), and (5) motivations for criminal activity (gambling or non-gambling related). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03499.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr addiction icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr gambling icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program McCorkle, Richard Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3499 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03499.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02564 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02564 MiAaI MiAaI Crack, Powder Cocaine, and Heroin [electronic resource] Drug Purchase and Use Patterns in Six Cities in the United States, 1995-1996 K. Jack Riley 2012-08-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2564 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was designed to address the practical and policy implications of various drug market participation patterns. In 1995, the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) collaborated on a project called the Procurement Study. This study was executed as an addendum to NIJ's Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]) with the goal of extending previous research in which heroin users were interviewed on various aspects of drug market activity. The present study sought to explore additional features of drug market participation and use, both within and across drug types and cities, and included two additional drugs -- powder cocaine and crack cocaine. Data were collected from recently arrested users of powder cocaine, crack cocaine, and heroin in six DUF cities (Chicago, New York, Portland, San Diego, San Antonio, and Washington, DC). Each of the three files in this collection, Crack Data (Part 1), Heroin Data (Part 2), and Powder Cocaine Data (Part 3), is comprised of data from a procurement interview, urine test variables, and a DUF interview. During the procurement interview, information was collected on purchase and use patterns for specific drugs. Variables from the procurement interview include the respondent's method of using the drug, the term used to refer to the drug, whether the respondent bought the drug in the neighborhood, the number of different dealers the respondent bought the drug from, how the respondent made the connection with the dealer (i.e., street, house, phone, beeper, business/store, or friends), their main drug source, whether the respondent went to someone else if the source was not available, how the respondent coped with not being able to find drugs to buy, whether the respondent got the drug for free, the means by which the respondent obtained money, the quantity and packaging of the drug, and the number of minutes spent searching for, traveling to, and waiting for their last purchase. Urine tests screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Data from the DUF interview provide detailed information about each arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type, arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the interview. Data from the DUF interview instrument also included alcohol/drug treatment history, information about whether arrestees had ever injected drugs, and whether they were influenced by drugs when the crime that they were charged with was committed. The data also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had had prior arrests in the past 12 months. Demographic data include the age, race, sex, educational attainment, marital status, employment status, and living circumstances of each respondent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 crack cocaine icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr heroin icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr arrests icpsr cocaine icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Riley, K. Jack Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2564 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04020 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04020 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4020 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2003 up to four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 39 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. The ADAM program in 2003 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult male and female files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) for males, weights. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug dependence icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4020 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR22381 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR22381 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring Drug Markets in Manhattan [New York City], With the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, 1998-2002 [electronic resource] Andrew Golub , Bruce D. Johnson 2009-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 22381 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to determine how much Manhattan (New York City) arrestees surveyed by the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program spend on drug expenses. The program obtained both self-report and urinalysis data from a total of 5,210 Manhattan arrestees surveyed by the ADAM program from 1998 to 2002. The principal investigators developed a formula for an episodic estimator of a respondent’s drug expense for cash, noncash, and cash-combination transactions. The dataset contains a total of 267 variables relating to Manhattan arrestees' demographics, interview information, criminal history, urinalysis test results, drug use, drug market transactions, and drug expenses. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22381.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Golub, Andrew Johnson, Bruce D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 22381 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22381.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03688 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03688 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3688 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2001 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 33 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2001 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3688 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28141 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28141 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Project in Rural Nebraska, 1998 [electronic resource] Denise C. Herz 2011-01-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28141 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. A pilot outreach project of the National Intstitute of Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program, the rural Nebraska ADAM program examined the prevalence and type of arrestee drug use in four rural Nebraska counties and compared the results to those found in Omaha, Nebraska, an established ADAM site. The data were collected in Madison (n=78), Dawson (n=50), Hall (n=53), and Scotts Bluff (n=149) counties, and Omaha, Nebraska, (n=202) in October and November of 1998. The catchment area for Omaha was the central city. The ADAM interview provided demographic and descriptive data, including race, age, marital status, source of income, screens of substance abuse and dependency, treatment history, arrest and incarceration experiences, and participation in local drug markets. At the conclusion of the interview, respondents were asked to provide a urine specimen. The current study included a supplemental questionnaire about methamphetamine use. The methamphetamine addendum included variables on why the respondent began and continued the use of methamphetamines, how often and how much methamphetamine was used, if and why the respondent had ever sought and completed treatment, source of the methamphetamine, and if the respondent had ever made or sold methamphetamine. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28141.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr methamphetamine icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Herz, Denise C. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28141 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28141.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32321 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2010 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2011-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 8,332 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2010. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2010. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr susbstance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03815 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03815 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3815 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2002 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 36 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2002 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3815 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30061 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30061 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2009 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2011-02-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30061 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 7,794 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2009. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 2009. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr susbstance abuse icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30061 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03585 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03585 MiAaI MiAaI Domestic Violence and Substance Abuse Among the Arrestee Population in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1999-2001 [electronic resource] Paul Guerin 2003-06-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3585 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The focus of this study was to examine levels of aggressive behavior during incidents of domestic violence in relation to self-reported drug and alcohol use among an arrestee population from Bernalillo County in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The research questions motivating this project were: (1) Are acts of domestic violence committed while the offender is taking illicit psychoactive substances, as ascertained by self-reports? (2) For those individuals with domestic violence charges, do urinalyses conducted within 48 hours of an individual's arrest indicate the recent use of a psychoactive substance? (3) Which substances are most prevalently associated with incidents of domestic violence? (4) Is there a difference in levels of aggressive behavior that is dependent on the individual? (5) Does the severity of domestic violence increase with the presence of psychoactive substances? (6) What differences (if any) exists between batterers who take psychoactive substances and batterers who do not? The data for this research were collected in conjunction with the National Institute of Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) programs. The domestic violence survey addendum was administered to all arrestees from Bernalillo County in Albuquerque, New Mexico, who had completed the ADAM interview and provided a urine specimen and were willing to answer additional questions concerning domestic violence. Variables from the ADAM instruments were comprised of demographic data on each arrestee, calendar of admissions to drug treatment-related programs, data on dependence and abuse, drug market and use data, and urine test results. Variables from the domestic violence addendum include demographics on the intimate partner, whether specific physical events occurred, whether specific injuries had been sustained by both arrestee and partner, and the specific circumstances surrounding the physical abuse event. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03585.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr aggression icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr domestic violence icpsr drug use icpsr offenders icpsr substance abuse icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Guerin, Paul Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3585 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03585.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02765 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02765 MiAaI MiAaI Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Kyle, Texas, 1993-1995 [electronic resource] Kevin Knight , Matthew Hiller , D. Dwayne Simpson 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 2765 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. drug use, and arrests within the last six months, whether the counselor was easy to talk to, helped in motivating or building confidence, or assisted in making a treatment plan, whether the respondent felt a sense of family or closeness, if his family got along, enjoyed being together, got drunk together, used drugs together, or had arguments or fights, if the respondent had a job in the last six months to a year and if he enjoyed working, whether he was on time for his job, whether he had new friends or associated with old friends, and which specific drugs he had used in the last six months (e.g., hallucinogens, heroin, methadone, or other opiates). Part 10 (Treatment Background Data, Comparison Group): Treatment condition of the comparison group. Part 11 (Educational Demographic Data, Comparison Group): Whether respondents completed a GED and their highest grade completed. Parts 12 and 13 (Six-Month Follow-Up Interview Data, Comparison Group, and One-Year Follow-Up Interview Data, Comparison Group): How important church was to the respondent, whether the respondent had any educational or vocational training, if he had friends that had used drugs, got drunk, dealt drugs, or had been arrested, if within the last six months to a year the respondent had been arrested for drug use, drug sales, forgery, fencing, gambling, burglary, robbery, sexual offense, arson, or vandalism, whether drugs or alcohol affected the respondent's health, relations, attitude, attention, or ability to work, whether the respondent experienced symptoms of withdrawal, the number of drug treatment programs and AA or CA meetings the respondent attended, whether the respondent received help from parents, siblings, or other relatives, if treatment was considered helpful, and risky behavior engaged in (e.g., sharing needles, using dirty needles, and unprotected sex). Parts 14 and 16 (Probation Officer Data, Six-Month Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group, and Probation Officer Data, One-Year Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Date of departure from prison, supervision level, number of treatment team meetings, whether there was evidence of job hunting, problems with transportation, child care, or finding work, number of drug tests in the last six months, times tested positive for marijuana, cocaine, heroin, opiates, crack, or other drugs, and number of arrests, charges, convictions, and technicals. Parts 15 and 17 (Hair Specimen Data, Six-Month Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group, and Hair Specimen Data, One-Year Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Hair collection and its source at the six-month follow-up (Part 15) and one-year follow-up (Part 17) and whether parolee was positive or negative for cocaine or opiates. Part 18 (Texas Department of Public Safety Data, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Dates of first, second, and third offenses, if parolee was arrested, and first, second, and third offenses from the National Crime Information Center. Part 19 (Texas Department of Criminal Justice Data, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Treatment condition, date of release, race, and a Texas Department of Criminal Justice Salient Factor Risk Score. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02765.v2 recidivism icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr process evaluation icpsr addiction icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug use icpsr inmate programs icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Knight, Kevin Hiller, Matthew Simpson, D. Dwayne Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2765 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02765.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02888 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02888 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at the Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility, 1997-1998 [electronic resource] Paul Guerin , Robert Hyde , Mitzi Wyatt 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 2888 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal for this study was to conduct a process evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program, called the Genesis program, at the Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility (SNMCD) by examining the program's structure and assessing its intermediate impact upon participating inmates. The study focuses on answering three research questions: (1) Who were the program participants? (2) What were the characteristics of the program? (3) Was the program reaching the most appropriate offenders, or were its participants primarily offenders who were not likely to become recidivists? The study contains information on every inmate who entered the Genesis program from July 31, 1997, to July 31, 1998. For evaluation purposes, the researchers designed their own data collection form which they used to collect relevant information from each participant's treatment program file. Each participant's file was maintained by Genesis program staff and was kept for the duration each inmate was in the program. From each program participant at intake, using the data collection instrument, the researchers collected demographic information, substance abuse history, and criminal history. The data are provided in two parts. Both parts are from the same data collection instrument. Part 1 covers Questions 1 through 15 of the data collection instrument, while Part 2 covers Questions 16 through 34 of the data collection instrument. Part 1 includes demographic variables about the inmate such as birth date, age, ethnicity, citizenship, years of education, prior employment status, longest employment, and average weekly income. It also includes incarceration information such as confinement date, length of current sentence, RSAT admission date, and expected parole date, and criminal history information such as age at first adult arrest, number of juvenile arrests, number of adult arrests, date of first adult arrest, date of last adult arrest, and number of years served in prison. There are also variables to address the inmate's drug use history as a juvenile and as an adult. Part 2 continues with the drug use history of the inmate as an adult with information about drugs used by IV injection, number of alcohol withdrawals, number of drug overdoses, number of detoxes, inpatient treatment received, outpatient treatment received, average amount of money spent on drugs, percentage of income spent on drugs, number of family members who use alcohol or drugs, and how they were related to the inmate. In addition, the file contains demographic information, such as current marital status and number of children, and the inmate's psychological history including depression, anxiety, anger, trouble understanding, concentrating, or remembering, attempted suicide, prescribed medication, and hospitalization. Criminal career variables include length of criminal career, all past charges, weapons used during any crime, number of times a weapon was used, and total number of convictions. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02888.v1 recidivism icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr addiction icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug use icpsr inmate programs icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr process evaluation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Guerin, Paul Hyde, Robert Wyatt, Mitzi Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2888 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02888.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27221 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27221 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2008 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2010-03-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27221 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc. have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implements two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collects data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Data collection has been conducted across two back-to-back quarters in each of 10 counties from a county-based representative sample of 250 male arrestees per quarter for a total of 500 arrestees annually per site or a total of 5,000 arrestees across sites annually. A total of 7,717 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2008. Collection occurs in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2007 and ending March 31, 2008. Additional data collection periods were optioned by ONDCP, and subsequent cycles of back-to-back data collection (not yet available) began April 1, 2008. Participation is voluntary and confidential, and the procedures include a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr methamphetamine icpsr urinalysis icpsr addiction icpsr alcoholism icpsr cocaine icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug use icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27221 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25821 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25821 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2007 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt 2010-01-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25821 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) II program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, the ONDCP and Abt Associates have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. A total of 8,296 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2007. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25821.v2 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr methamphetamine icpsr urinalysis icpsr addiction icpsr alcoholism icpsr cocaine icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug use icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Hunt, Dana Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25821 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25821.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03077 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03077 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of a Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Dallas County, Texas, 1998-1999 [electronic resource] Matthew L. Hiller , Kevin Knight , Sandhya Rao , Dwayne Simpson 2003-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3077 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study assessed the Dallas County Judicial Treatment Center (DCJTC) in Texas. The DCJTC is a residential substance abuse treatment center for drug-involved felony offenders. It provides a treatment program of approximately six months in three major phases: orientation, main treatment, and re-entry. Data were collected from 429 offenders admitted to the DCJTC between January and December 1998. During their first week of treatment, residents completed a comprehensive intake battery that included (1) the Texas Christian University (TCU) initial assessment, (2) the TCU self-rating form (SRF), and (3) the TCU intake interview. The initial assessment gauged mental status, background and psychosocial functioning, alcohol and other drug use, and psychological status. The SRF assessed psychological functioning, social functioning, and motivation for treatment. The intake interview included detailed questions on the resident's social background, family and peer relations, health and psychological status, criminal history, drug use problems, and behavioral risks for HIV/AIDS. Progress made during treatment was measured by the TCU Resident Evaluation of Self and Treatment (REST) and the TCU Counselor Rating of Client (CRC) forms. The REST included all questions on the SRF, plus questions on offenders' perceptions of the structure of the program and their experiences while in treatment, an evaluation of the counselor, an evaluation of their own personality, and ratings of group and individual treatment sessions. The CRC forms rated residents on a set of attributes related to residents' ability to benefit from treatment and indicated the extent to which counseling activities with each client had focused on certain activities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03077.v1 AIDS icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr counseling icpsr felons icpsr HIV icpsr inmate classification icpsr mental health icpsr offenders icpsr process evaluation icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hiller, Matthew L. Knight, Kevin Rao, Sandhya Simpson, Dwayne Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3077 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03077.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20352 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20352 MiAaI MiAaI Characteristics of Arrestees at Risk for Co-Existing Substance Abuse and Mental Disorder in Cleveland, Ohio, 2003 [electronic resource] Sonia A. Alemagno , Elizabeth Shaffer-King , Peggy Tonkin , Rachel Hammel 2009-02-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 20352 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The current study was conducted as a supplemental study to the Cleveland/Cuyahoga County Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program in the second quarter of 2003 (April-June). A risk screening instrument was implemented to classify Cleveland/Cuyahoga County adult arrestees into four groups: arrestees at no risk for substance abuse or dependence or mental disorder; arrestees at risk for substance abuse or dependence with no risk for mental disorder; arrestees at risk for mental disorder with no risk for substance abuse or dependence; and arrestees at risk for both mental disorder and substance abuse or dependence. A total of 311 adult arrestees were interviewed and provided a urine sample submitted for testing. The dual risk screening instrument includes six mental disorder risk questions and six substance abuse risk questions. The mental disorder risk questions include questions on having feelings or emotions that make it difficult to complete normal day to day activities, feeling hopeless or depressed, having thoughts of hurting oneself or committing suicide, and hearing or seeing things that others cannot hear or see. The substance abuse risk questions include questions on problems caused by drinking or drug use, arrests due to alcohol or drug use, time spent on thinking about or trying to get alcohol or drugs, and feelings of guilt about drinking or drug use. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20352.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr addiction icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr mental disorders icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Alemagno, Sonia A. Shaffer-King, Elizabeth Tonkin, Peggy Hammel, Rachel Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20352 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20352.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03541 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03541 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing the Texas Christian University Drug Screen Instrument with Texas Department of Criminal Justice Inmates, 1999-2000 [electronic resource] Kevin D. Knight , Dwayne Simpson , Janis Rhodes 2003-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3541 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The overall purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties and credibility of the Texas Christian University (TCU) Drug Screen as an instrument to assess drug use severity for treatment referral decisions in correctional settings. TCU Drug Screen data were collected on 18,364 Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) inmates (15,816 males and 2,548 females) who completed the screen between January 1 and April 30, 1999. Of the 18,364 subjects, 13,902 were Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID) inmates and 4,462 were State Jail Division (TDCJ-SJD) inmates. The TCU Drug Screen was administered by TDCJ staff almost exclusively in a small group setting (12-25 inmates per group) as part of a larger battery of assessments during the intake process at a TDCJ facility. The level and intensity of treatment services needed was then determined and a referral decision was made. As part of this study, the relationship between TCU Drug Screen information and post-release reincarceration was examined. Although one original goal in the study was to assess the comparability, or concurrent validity, of the TCU Drug Screen with the lengthier, more comprehensive Addiction Severity Index (ASI), TDCJ changed the administration protocol for the ASI so that it was given only to a subsample of 3,245 inmates who failed to disclose drug use problems on the TCU Drug Screen. The data include inmate responses to all items of the TCU Drug Screen and the overall drug screen score. There is also demographic information as well as incarceration, release, and reincarceration data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03541.v1 drug treatment icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmates icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr substance abuse icpsr testing and measurement icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr addiction icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Knight, Kevin D. Simpson, Dwayne Rhodes, Janis Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3541 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03541.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13585 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13585 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Deviance of Peers, Wave 1, 1994-1997 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2006-02-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 13585 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. The Deviance of Peers was a self-report interview that obtained information about peer involvement in conventional and delinquent activities. Information about peer pressure to use drugs and/or alcohol was also collected. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13585.v1 social behavior icpsr truancy icpsr adolescents icpsr after school programs icpsr aggravated assault icpsr armed robbery icpsr assault icpsr assault and battery icpsr auto theft icpsr child development icpsr childhood icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug use icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr neighborhoods icpsr peer groups icpsr peer influence icpsr property crimes icpsr robbery icpsr sexual behavior icpsr DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD IX. Minority Populations DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR VI. Population Characteristics RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States CCEERC II.B. Child Development CCEERC II.A. Age Groups Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13585 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13585.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13615 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13615 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Deviance of Peers, Wave 2, 1997-2000 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2006-03-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 13615 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. The Deviance of Peers was a self-report interview that obtained information about peer involvement in conventional and delinquent activities. Compared to the Wave 1 version, a reduced set of items was included in Wave 2, but Wave 2 had additional questions regarding the age and gender of peers involved in particular behaviors. Information about peer pressure to use drugs and/or alcohol was also collected. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13615.v1 young adults icpsr adolescents icpsr aggravated assault icpsr assault icpsr assault and battery icpsr child development icpsr childhood icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr drug use icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr neighborhoods icpsr peer groups icpsr peer influence icpsr property crimes icpsr robbery icpsr sexual behavior icpsr social behavior icpsr DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD IX. Minority Populations DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency CCEERC II.B. Child Development DSDR VI. Population Characteristics NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program CCEERC II.A. Age Groups RCMD I. Crime Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13615 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13615.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34304 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34304 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Youth in Residential Placement (SYRP) 2003 [United States] [electronic resource] Andrea Sedlak 2013-03-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34304 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Survey of Youth in Residential Placement (SYRP) is the only national survey that gathers data directly from youth in the juvenile justice system. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) designed the survey in 2000 and 2001 to survey offender youth between the ages of 10 and 20. SYRP asks the youth about their backgrounds, offense histories and problems; the facility environment; experiences in the facility; experiences with alcohol and drugs; experiences of victimization in placement; medical needs and services received; and their expectations for the future. SYRP research provides answers to a number of questions about the characteristics and experiences of youth in custody including: Who are the youth in placement? What are their offenses? What are their family backgrounds? What are their expectations for the future? How are youth grouped in living units and programs? What activities are available in each facility? How accessible are social, emotional, and legal supports? What is the quality of the youth-staff relationships? How clear are the facility's rules? How clear is the facility's commitment to justice and due process? What methods of control and discipline do staff use? SYRP's findings are based on anonymous interviews with a nationally representative sample of youth in custody during the spring of 2003 using audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) technology. SYRP is the latest addition to two ongoing data collections that OJJDP designed and implemented in the 1990s. It joins the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and the Juvenile Residential Facility Census to provide updated statistics on youth in custody in the juvenile justice system. SYRP bulletins, reports, and a simplified online analysis tool are available from the SYRP Project Web site. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34304.v1 juvenile justice icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juvenile victims icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr social support icpsr substance abuse icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr educational background icpsr emotional problems icpsr expectations icpsr family background icpsr juvenile detention icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Sedlak, Andrea Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34304 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34304.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13602 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13602 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Substance Use, Wave 1, 1994-1997 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2006-03-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 13602 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. The Substance Use interview was a self-report measure administered to Cohorts 9, 12, 15, and 18 to obtain information regarding the subject's use of specific drugs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13602.v1 child development icpsr cocaine icpsr crack cocaine icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr hallucinogens icpsr heroin icpsr inhalants icpsr marijuana icpsr sedatives icpsr smoking icpsr stimulants icpsr steroids icpsr social behavior icpsr tobacco use icpsr tranquilizers icpsr adolescents icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr amphetamines icpsr barbiturates icpsr alcohol icpsr DSDR VI. Population Characteristics NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency CCEERC II.B. Child Development CCEERC II.A. Age Groups RCMD I. Crime RCMD IX. Minority Populations PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13602 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13602.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13643 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13643 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Perceptions of Drug Risk, Wave 2, 1997-2000 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2006-04-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 13643 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Perceptions of Drug Risk instrument. This instrument obtained information about the perceived harm in using substances, the difficulty of obtaining substances, and the experience of being approached to buy drugs. It was administered to Cohorts 9, 12, 15, and 18. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13643.v1 inhalants icpsr marijuana icpsr smoking icpsr social behavior icpsr steroids icpsr tobacco use icpsr cocaine icpsr crack cocaine icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr hallucinogens icpsr heroin icpsr adolescents icpsr alcohol icpsr childhood icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program RCMD IX. Minority Populations DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies DSDR VI. Population Characteristics DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13643 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13643.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13659 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13659 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Substance Use, Wave 2, 1997-2000 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2006-05-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 13659 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. The Substance Use interview was a self-report measure administered to Cohorts 9, 12, 15, and 18 to obtain information regarding the subject's use of specific drugs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13659.v1 adolescents icpsr alcohol icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr amphetamines icpsr barbiturates icpsr caregivers icpsr child development icpsr cocaine icpsr crack cocaine icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr hallucinogens icpsr heroin icpsr inhalants icpsr marijuana icpsr sedatives icpsr smoking icpsr social behavior icpsr steroids icpsr stimulants icpsr tobacco use icpsr tranquilizers icpsr RCMD I. Crime CCEERC II.A. Age Groups NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior RCMD IX. Minority Populations DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies CCEERC II.B. Child Development DSDR VI. Population Characteristics DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13659 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13659.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13693 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13693 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Deviance of Peers, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2007-02-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 13693 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Deviance of Peers instrument. It was a self-report interview that obtained information about peer involvement in conventional and delinquent activities. Compared to the Wave 1 version (PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): DEVIANCE OF PEERS, WAVE 1, 1994-1997 [ICPSR 13585]), a reduced set of items was included in Wave 3, but Wave 3 had additional questions regarding the age and gender of peers involved in particular behaviors. Information about peer pressure to use drugs and/or alcohol was also collected. It was administered to subjects in Cohorts 6, 9, and 12. The Wave 3 survey questions were identical to those asked in Wave 2 (PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): DEVIANCE OF PEERS, WAVE 2, 1997-2000 [ICPSR 13615]). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13693.v1 assault and battery icpsr child development icpsr childhood icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr drug use icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr neighborhoods icpsr peer groups icpsr peer influence icpsr property crimes icpsr robbery icpsr sexual behavior icpsr social behavior icpsr young adults icpsr adolescents icpsr aggravated assault icpsr assault icpsr DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency CCEERC II.B. Child Development NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States CCEERC II.A. Age Groups DSDR VI. Population Characteristics DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13693 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13693.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03604 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03604 MiAaI MiAaI Modeling Impacts of Policing Initiatives on Drug and Criminal Careers of Arrestees in New York City, New York, 1999 [electronic resource] Bruce D. Johnson , Andrew Golub 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3604 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought to understand the accuracy and validity of arrestee self-reports of drug use and the overall contact of arrestees with the criminal justice system, with a secondary focus on how arrestee self-reports of drug use correspond to urinalysis results. Moreover, this study investigated whether arrestees were aware of the New York City Police Department's Quality-of-Life (QOL) policing efforts and whether they had changed their criminal behavior as a result. A QOL Policing Supplement, designed to explore new means of evaluating police behavior, was administered to all adult arrestees in the five boroughs of New York City (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Staten Island, and Queens) who had completed an Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program interview, provided a urine specimen, and were willing to answer additional questions concerning QOL policing. Part 1, Policing Study Data, is a large integrated dataset containing all of the variables derived from the 1999 ADAM interviews, the Policing Supplement instrument, and administrative records data from the Criminal Justice Agency (CJA) and the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. This dataset is linked, via an anonymous case number, to Part 2, Arrestee Criminal History Data, which contains each arrestee's official criminal history. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03604.v1 arrest records icpsr career criminals icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD IX. Police NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Johnson, Bruce D. Golub, Andrew Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3604 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03604.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13656 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13656 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Service Use, Wave 2, 1997-2000 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2006-05-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 13656 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Service Use protocol. This was adapted from the Service Utilization module of the Use, Need, Outcomes, and Costs in Children and Adolescent Population study and obtained information about services the subject had received for emotional, behavioral, drug, or alcohol problems. It was administered to subjects' primary caregivers in Cohorts 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 and to subjects, themselves, in Cohort 18. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13656.v1 adolescents icpsr behavior problems icpsr child development icpsr childhood icpsr counseling services icpsr drug treatment icpsr emotional problems icpsr mental health services icpsr psychiatric services icpsr social behavior icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure DSDR VI. Population Characteristics DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13656 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13656.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13728 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13728 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Perceptions of Drug Risk, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2007-02-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 13728 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Perceptions of Drug Risk instrument. This instrument obtained information about the perceived harm in using substances, the difficulty of obtaining substances, and the experience of being approached to buy drugs. It was administered to Cohorts 6, 9, and 12. It is closely related to PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): PERCEPTIONS OF DRUG RISK, WAVE 2, 1997-2000 (ICPSR 13643). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13728.v1 marijuana icpsr inhalants icpsr social behavior icpsr steroids icpsr tobacco use icpsr smoking icpsr adolescents icpsr alcohol icpsr childhood icpsr cocaine icpsr crack cocaine icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr hallucinogens icpsr heroin icpsr DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure DSDR VI. Population Characteristics PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13728 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13728.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13677 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13677 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Alcohol Use Follow-Up, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2007-02-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 13677 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Alcohol Use Follow-Up survey. It was adapted from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS-IV) Alcohol Module and was administered to subjects in Cohorts 15 and 18. It collected information regarding the use of alcohol by the subjects as well as social or health problems resulting from drinking. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13677.v1 alcohol abuse icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr alcohol icpsr alcoholism icpsr adolescents icpsr child development icpsr childhood icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drunkenness icpsr neighborhoods icpsr social behavior icpsr DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study DSDR VI. Population Characteristics NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13677 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13677.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13673 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13673 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Alcohol Use, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2007-02-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 13673 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Alcohol Use survey. It was adapted from the short form of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (UM-CIDI Short Form), and it obtained information about the use of alcohol by the subjects' primary caregivers (PCs). It was administered to PCs in Cohorts 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13673.v1 alcohol abuse icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr alcohol icpsr alcoholism icpsr caregivers icpsr child development icpsr childhood icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drunkenness icpsr neighborhoods icpsr social behavior icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior DSDR VI. Population Characteristics PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13673 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13673.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20361 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20361 MiAaI MiAaI Impact Evaluation of a Special Session Domestic Violence Intervention Program in Connecticut, 2001-2004 [electronic resource] Eleanor Lyon 2012-08-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 20361 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study focused on an evaluation of EVOLVE, a newly developed 26-week, 52-session skill building, culturally competent, psycho-educational curriculum-based intervention for male domestic violence offenders with female victims. The curriculum was implemented in three large urban courts that have specialized domestic violence court sessions, judicial monitoring, specialized court staff throughout the judicial process, enhanced advocacy for victims, a collaborative team approach to case processing, and collaboration with networks of involved community service providers. The comparison site (called Explore), also a large urban court, had some specialized court staff and enhanced victim advocacy, as well. It was selected as the comparison because of these court features, the use of a more traditional 26-week intervention (that met just once each week), its high volume, and the high rate of involvement of men of color, which was similar to rates found at the EVOLVE sites at the time the evaluation was proposed. The data file contains 545 cases and 872 variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20361.v1 domestic violence icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug use icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr violence icpsr violence against women icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Lyon, Eleanor Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20361 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20361.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20349 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20349 MiAaI MiAaI Neuropsychological and Emotional Deficits as Predictors of Correctional Treatment Response in Maryland, 2003-2005 [electronic resource] RTI International 2008-03-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 20349 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The study was designed to elucidate underlying neuropsychological and emotional regulatory mechanisms in variable responses to a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program among prison inmates. This study tested the hypotheses that performance deficits in executive cognitive function (ECF) tasks and emotional responses will characterize aggressive and disruptive inmates and predict treatment response. All subjects were examined using noninvasive behavioral, psychological, ECF, and hormone tests. The data contain a total of 232 cases. Inmates volunteering to participate in the cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program offered by the Maryland correctional system were recruited from three facilities using a pseudo-random selection procedure during intake into the program. Consenting inmates received an extensive baseline testing battery of several complementary dimensions of higher order neuropsychological functions as well as conditions that influence them: (1) three ECF tasks and one emotional perception task, (2) collection of salivary cortisol during an acute stress task and the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) taken beforehand, (3) a short general neuropsychological test, (4) three psychological questionnaires, (5) an historical inventory to assess prior drug use and child and family background, and (6) a treatment readiness, responsivity, and gain scale. An events inventory and a success inventory were also administered. Several additional tests were administered repeatedly throughout treatment. A record review was conducted after program completion to ascertain incidents of institutional misconduct as well as treatment performance outcomes. Variables include IQ, demographics, background information, prior drug use, early trauma, psychopathy, aggression, stressful events, success, reactions to provocation, treatment readiness, emotional perception/regulation, executive cognitive performance, cortisol measures, treatment gain, treatment responsivity, treatment completion, Maryland Offender Based State Correctional Information System (OBSCIS) data, institutional infractions, segregations, and several other computed variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20349.v1 addiction icpsr aggression icpsr behavior modification icpsr behavior problems icpsr cognitive processes icpsr correctional facilities icpsr decision making icpsr emotional states icpsr evaluation icpsr human behavior icpsr inmates icpsr intervention strategies icpsr personality assessment icpsr program evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program RTI International Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20349 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20349.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03978 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03978 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Health Link Program [New York City] [electronic resource] The Community Reintegration Model to Reduce Substance Abuse Among Jail Inmates, 1997-2002 John Burghardt , Karen Needels 2004-08-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3978 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This evaluation study, funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, was designed to provide a rigorous assessment of the effects of making Health Link's community-based services available to former inmates of New York City's jail system at Rikers Island. The goal of the Health Link Project was to promote healthy reintegration of persons leaving Rikers into their communities by (1) providing direct services to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated clients, (2) assisting community organizations that served this population, (3) establishing linkages between organizations, and (4) strengthening linkages between them and public agencies. The signature component of Health Link was case management in the community. Meeting with clients after their release from jail, caseworkers provided a support structure, made referrals to services, offered crisis intervention and counseling, and served as advocates for clients. Only adult females and adolescent males were included in the study. Eligible inmates who volunteered for the evaluation study were assigned to one of two groups: the Jail-and-Community Services group (JC group) or the Jail Services Only group (J group). JC group members were eligible for Health Link's intensive discharge planning and community case management services, while J group members were eligible for less intensive discharge planning services and ineligible for Health Link's community case management services. Evaluation subjects initially completed an intake questionnaire, which collected information on age, race, Hispanic origin, ethnicity, place and type of residence, family relations, criminal background, employment and education, substance abuse, health and medical history, sexual at-risk behavior and reproductive health, and history of trauma. Follow-up interviews were conducted, on average, about 15 months after release from jail, a sufficient time to observe the 12-month period for which clients were eligible for community-based services. Topics covered in the follow-up 12 Month Questionnaire included involvement in the criminal justice system, criminal activity, substance abuse, participation in substance abuse treatment programs, education and employment outcomes, health status, access to and utilization of health care services, sexual activity and HIV risk, housing, and involvement with family and community. Subjects who were not incarcerated at the time of their follow-up interview were asked to voluntarily provide hair samples, which were tested for metabolites of cocaine, opiates, PCP, methamphetamine, and marijuana. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03978.v1 case management icpsr women icpsr youthful offenders icpsr community service programs icpsr female offenders icpsr HIV icpsr jail inmates icpsr postrelease programs icpsr social reintegration icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program HMCA III. Substance Abuse and Health Burghardt, John Needels, Karen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3978 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03978.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34449 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34449 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34449 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2010, the JRFC used three modules to collect information on the educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34449 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34402 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34402 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2008 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34402 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34402 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25981 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25981 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2006 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 25981 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2006, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25981 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23520 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23520 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2002 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 23520 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2002, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the substance abuse treatment and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23520 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04672 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04672 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4672 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2000, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 census data icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4672 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13644 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13644 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Prenatal and Early Health, Wave 2, 1997-2000 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2006-05-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 13644 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Prenatal and Early Health interview. This was adapted from the National Maternal and Infant Health Survey which was developed by the National Institutes of Health (NATIONAL MATERNAL AND INFANT HEALTH SURVEY, 1988 [ICPSR 9730]). It included questions regarding the mother's pregnancy and delivery of the subject, as well as questions regarding the subject's early health. It was administered to the subject's primary caregiver for Cohort 0. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13644.v1 adolescents icpsr caregivers icpsr child development icpsr childhood icpsr prenatal care icpsr pregnancy icpsr infants icpsr pediatrics icpsr CCEERC II.B. Child Development NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior DSDR VI. Population Characteristics PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency CCEERC II.A. Age Groups Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13644 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13644.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13694 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13694 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Drug Use, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2007-02-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 13694 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Drug Use instrument. It was administered to subjects in Cohorts 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 and was a self-report measure used to obtain information regarding the subject's use of specific drugs without a doctor's prescription, in larger amounts than prescribed, or for a longer period than prescribed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13694.v1 stimulants icpsr tranquilizers icpsr adolescents icpsr amphetamines icpsr barbiturates icpsr caregivers icpsr child development icpsr cocaine icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug use icpsr youths icpsr drugs icpsr hallucinogens icpsr heroin icpsr inhalants icpsr marijuana icpsr sedatives icpsr social behavior icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency DSDR VI. Population Characteristics DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure DSDR III. Health ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13694 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13694.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13744 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13744 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Substance Use Follow-Up, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2007-02-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 13744 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Substance Use Follow-Up instrument. It was adapted from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and was administered to subjects in Cohorts 15 and 18. It obtained information regarding the subject's use of specific drugs. It is closely related to PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): SUBSTANCE USE, WAVE 1, 1994-1997 (ICPSR 13602), PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): SUBSTANCE USE, WAVE 2, 1997-2000 (ICPSR 13659), and PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): SUBSTANCE USE, WAVE 3, 2000-2002 (ICPSR 13743). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13744.v1 adolescents icpsr child development icpsr cocaine icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr marijuana icpsr social behavior icpsr CCEERC II.A. Age Groups CCEERC II.B. Child Development PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior DSDR VI. Population Characteristics Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13744 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13744.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13743 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13743 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Substance Use, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2006-10-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 13743 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. The Substance Use interview was a self-report measure administered to Cohorts 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 to obtain information regarding the subject's use of specific drugs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13743.v1 adolescents icpsr barbiturates icpsr caregivers icpsr child development icpsr cocaine icpsr crack cocaine icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr hallucinogens icpsr heroin icpsr inhalants icpsr marijuana icpsr sedatives icpsr smoking icpsr social behavior icpsr steroids icpsr stimulants icpsr tobacco use icpsr alcohol icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr youths icpsr tranquilizers icpsr amphetamines icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency DSDR VI. Population Characteristics PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior CCEERC II.A. Age Groups CCEERC II.B. Child Development DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13743 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13743.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13687 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13687 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Consequences of Substance Use, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2007-02-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 13687 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Consequences of Substance Use interview. It was administered to subjects in Cohorts 9, 12, 15, and 18 and obtained information related to outcomes of the subject being caught, by school officials, police, or their parents, using alcohol or drugs. Subjects in Cohorts 15 and 18 were asked questions from a slightly different instrument than subjects in Cohorts 9 and 12. Cohorts 15 and 18 were asked more detailed questions regarding what substances and what quantity subjects were caught with. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13687.v1 adolescents icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr alcohol icpsr caregivers icpsr child development icpsr childhood icpsr cocaine icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr hallucinogens icpsr heroin icpsr inhalants icpsr marijuana icpsr neighborhoods icpsr social behavior icpsr DSDR VI. Population Characteristics PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency CCEERC II.A. Age Groups CCEERC II.B. Child Development NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13687 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13687.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28921 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28921 MiAaI MiAaI Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation [Restricted Use] [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention 2012-06-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 28921 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation was conducted to evaluate the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP)'s SPF SIG initiative, which sought to: (1) prevent the onset and reduce the progression of substance abuse, including childhood and underage drinking; (2) reduce substance abuse-related problems in communities; and (3) build prevention capacity and infrastructure at the state and community levels. This cross-site evaluation included the 21 states and territories CSAP funded in FY2004 (Cohort 1) and an additional 5 States funded in Cohort 2 in FY2005 that were funded for up to 5 years to implement the SPF. The SPF is a five-step prevention planning model that requires states to: (1) conduct a statewide needs assessment, including the establishment of a State Epidemiological and Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW); (2) mobilize and build state and community capacity to address needs; (3) develop a statewide strategic plan for prevention; (4) implement evidence-based prevention, policies, and practices (EBPPP) to meet state and community needs; and (5) monitor and evaluate the implementation of their SPF SIG project. Under contract to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) with funding provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Westat, in collaboration with the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE) and The MayaTech Corporation, implemented a multilevel, multi-method quasi-experimental design to evaluate SPF SIG's impact. The scope of the evaluation encompassed national, state, and community levels. The design included comparison conditions at both the state and community levels. These data represent Phase I of the restricted use data release and contains extensive data on state-level implementation, community-level implementation, and state-level infrastructure, as well as other reference elements. A subsequent release (Phase II) will include state- and community-level outcomes, as well as data on community-level implementation, community-level implementation fidelity, state-level sustainability, and mediating variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28921.v1 alcohol abuse icpsr client characteristics icpsr college students icpsr community participation icpsr community health icpsr community involvement icpsr community service programs icpsr continuing education icpsr African Americans icpsr counties icpsr crime icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr health policy icpsr human services icpsr illigal drugs icpsr intervention icpsr juveniles icpsr labor force icpsr law enforcement icpsr liquor law violations icpsr middle school icpsr Native Americans icpsr needs assessment icpsr organizational structure icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr outreach programs icpsr parents icpsr planning icpsr policies and procedures icpsr pregnancy icpsr program evaluation icpsr public health icpsr race icpsr risk factors icpsr schools icpsr skill development icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr tobacco use icpsr training icpsr treatment programs icpsr young adults icpsr zip code areas icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health Facilities ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28921 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28921.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04679 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04679 MiAaI MiAaI Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS) [electronic resource] Wave 1, 2001 Peggy C. Giordano , Monica A. Longmore , Wendy D. Manning 2011-09-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 4679 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study explores the relationship qualities and the subjective meanings that motivate adolescent behavior. More specifically, this study seeks to examine the nature and meaning of adolescent relationship experiences (e.g., with family, peers, and dating partners) in an effort to discover how experiences associated with age, gender, race, and ethnicity influence the meaning of dating relationships. The study further investigates the relative impact of dating partners and peers on sexual behavior and contraceptive practices, as well as involvement in other problem behaviors that can contribute independently to sexual risk taking. The longitudinal design of the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS) includes a schedule of follow-up interviews occurring one, three, and five years after the initial interview. Three waves of data have been collected (2001, 2002, and 2004) and a fourth wave is scheduled for collection (2006). Data were collected from adolescent respondents through structured in-home interviews utilizing laptop computers. In-depth interviews were conducted at the first wave with a subsample (n=100) of the respondents. Parent data was collected via a short, self-administered questionnaire at the first wave. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04679.v1 family relationships icpsr family structure icpsr friendships icpsr household composition icpsr living arrangements icpsr marriage icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr parental influence icpsr neighborhoods icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr sexual attitudes icpsr sexual behavior icpsr social environment icpsr adolescents icpsr birth control icpsr contraception icpsr dating (social) icpsr educational environment icpsr families icpsr family planning icpsr DSDR VI. Population Characteristics DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies ICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR I. Fertility NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure Giordano, Peggy C. Longmore, Monica A. Manning, Wendy D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4679 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04679.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32081 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32081 MiAaI MiAaI Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS) [electronic resource] Wave 2, 2002 Peggy C. Giordano , Monica A. Longmore , Wendy D. Manning 2011-10-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32081 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study explores the relationship qualities and the subjective meanings that motivate adolescent behavior. More specifically, this study seeks to examine the nature and meaning of adolescent relationship experiences (e.g., with family, peers, and dating partners) in an effort to discover how experiences associated with age, gender, race, and ethnicity influence the meaning of dating relationships. The study further investigates the relative impact of dating partners and peers on sexual behavior and contraceptive practices, as well as involvement in other problem behaviors that can contribute independently to sexual risk taking. The longitudinal design of the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS) includes a schedule of follow-up interviews occurring one, three, and five years after the initial interview. Three waves of data have been collected (2001, 2002, and 2004) and a fourth wave is scheduled for collection (2006). Data were collected from adolescent respondents through structured in-home interviews utilizing laptop computers. In-depth interviews were conducted at the first wave with a subsample (n=100) of the respondents. Parent data was collected via a short, self-administered questionnaire at the first wave. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32081.v1 neighborhoods icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr parental influence icpsr sexual attitudes icpsr sexual behavior icpsr social environment icpsr adolescents icpsr birth control icpsr contraception icpsr dating (social) icpsr educational environment icpsr families icpsr family planning icpsr family relationships icpsr family structure icpsr friendships icpsr household composition icpsr living arrangements icpsr marriage icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr DSDR I. Fertility NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR VI. Population Characteristics DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender ICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth Giordano, Peggy C. Longmore, Monica A. Manning, Wendy D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32081 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32081.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27868 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27868 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY), 1998-2004 -- Restricted Use Files [electronic resource] Susan David , Robert Hornik , David Maklan 2011-03-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27868 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY) is a survey conducted to evaluate the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign (Campaign). It focuses on the measurement of the outcomes and impact of Phase III of the Campaign on children and their parents concerning illegal drug use among youth. It contains four rounds of Restricted Use Files and includes all NSPY respondents. The Restricted Use Files also contain extensive data on youth, parents, and the Campaign advertisements, as well as other reference files. In addition, NSPY contains Public Use Files which were released in September 2004. The Public Use Files contain only the first three rounds of data and a subsample of respondents. Also, due to confidentiality reasons, the September 2004 Public Use File provides a limited set of variables about youth, and only a handful of variables about parents as it is not possible to link respondents across rounds using the Public Use Files, but it is possible using the Restricted Use Files. The survey was developed and implemented under contract to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Westat conducted the study in collaboration with the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania and, for the first two years of the project, with the National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI). NSPY Round 1 was conducted in three waves, covering the periods November 1999 through May 2000 (Wave 1), July 2000 through December 2000 (Wave 2), and January 2001 through June 2001 (Wave 3). NSPY Round 2, the first follow-up of the initial survey, was conducted in two waves covering the periods July 2001 through December 2001 (Wave 4) and January 2002 through June 2002 (Wave 5). NSPY Round 3, the second follow-up data collection, was conducted in two waves covering the periods July 2002 through December 2002 (Wave 6) and January 2003 through June 2003 (Wave 7). Finally, NSPY Round 4, the third follow-up data collection, was conducted in two waves covering the periods July 2003 through December 2003 (Wave 8) and January 2004 through June 2004 (Wave 9). Youths and their parents were selected for NSPY through a multistage, dual frame probability sample design. The sample was selected in a manner designed to provide an efficient and representative cross-section of American youth. In general, youths living in all types of residential housing units were eligible for the study; however, youths living in institutions, group homes, or dormitories were excluded. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27868.v2 adolescents icpsr detoxification icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug use icpsr families icpsr households icpsr media influence icpsr news media icpsr parents icpsr substance abuse icpsr youths icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States David, Susan Hornik, Robert Maklan, David Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27868 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27868.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27023 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27023 MiAaI MiAaI National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), 1994-2008 [electronic resource] Sibling Files [Restricted Use] Kathleen Mullan Harris , J. Richard Udry 2011-02-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 27023 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) is a longitudinal study of a nationally representative sample of adolescents in grades 7-12 in the United States during the 1994-1995 school year. The Add Health cohort has been followed into young adulthood with four in-home interviews, the most recent in 2008, when the sample was aged 24-32. Add Health combines longitudinal survey data on respondents' social, economic, psychological, and physical well-being with contextual data on the family, neighborhood, community, school, friendships, peer groups, and romantic relationships, providing unique opportunities to study how social environments and behaviors in adolescence are linked to health and achievement outcomes in young adulthood. The fourth wave of interviews expanded the collection of biological data in Add Health to understand the social, behavioral, and biological linkages in health trajectories as the Add Health cohort ages through adulthood. The fourth wave of interviews expanded the collection of biological data in Add Health to understand the social, behavioral, and biological linkages in health trajectories as the Add Health cohort ages through adulthood. The files contained in this component of the Add Health restricted data are the Wave I Adolescent Pair Data and the Wave III Sibling ID Numbers. The Adolescent Pair Data contains information that links and describes the sibling pairs. The Wave III Sibling ID Number data contains the IDs of siblings who also participated in the Wave I or Wave II in-home interviews. For more information, please see the study website. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27023.v2 drinking behavior icpsr drug use icpsr eating habits icpsr educational environment icpsr families icpsr family planning icpsr family relationships icpsr family structure icpsr friendships icpsr health icpsr health behavior icpsr neighborhoods icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr parental influence icpsr physical characteristics icpsr physical condition icpsr physical fitness icpsr academic achievement icpsr adolescents icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr birth control icpsr classroom environment icpsr contraception icpsr dating (social) icpsr physical limitations icpsr pregnancy history icpsr public assistance programs icpsr religious behavior icpsr religious beliefs icpsr school attendance icpsr self concept icpsr self esteem icpsr sexual attitudes icpsr sexual behavior icpsr smoking icpsr social environment icpsr social networks icpsr tobacco use icpsr health care access icpsr health status icpsr household composition icpsr interpersonal relations icpsr living arrangements icpsr marriage icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr violent behavior icpsr welfare services icpsr ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender ICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth DSDR III. Health DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations DSDR I. Fertility DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies Harris, Kathleen Mullan Udry, J. Richard Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27023 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27023.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28581 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28581 MiAaI MiAaI National Comorbidity Survey [electronic resource] Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A), 2001-2004 Ronald C. Kessler 2011-10-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28581 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A) was designed to estimate the lifetime-to-date and current prevalence, age-of-onset distributions, course, and comorbidity of DSM-IV disorders in the child and adolescent years of life among adolescents in the United States; to identify risk and protective factors for the onset and persistence of these disorders; to describe patterns and correlates of service use for these disorders; and to lay the groundwork for subsequent follow-up studies that can be used to identify early expressions of adult mental disorders. In addition to interviewing adolescents, information was collected from a parent or a parent surrogate to obtain an additional perspective on the adolescent's mental health and its correlates. Information from parents focused on the five adolescent disorders for which previous methodological research has most consistently shown that parental reports are important for making diagnoses: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, major depressive episode, and dysthymic disorder. The study contains four data files: (1) data for the adolescent household and school respondents; (2) data for the parents who responded to the long self-administered questionnaire; (3) data for the parents who responded to both the long self-administered questionnaire and the short telephone interview; and (4) diagnostic variables based on information collected from both adolescents and parents. Demographic information includes age, citizenship status, country of birth, criminal history, ethnicity, grandparents' country of birth, language(s) spoken in the home, parents' country of birth, race, religion, and sex. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28581.v4 adolescents icpsr health services utilization icpsr mental disorders icpsr mental health icpsr mental health services icpsr parents icpsr psychiatric services icpsr young adults icpsr ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health Facilities CPES I. Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions RCMD V. Health and Well-Being HMCA V. Other NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Kessler, Ronald C. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28581 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28581.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32421 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32421 MiAaI MiAaI National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), 1994-2008 [electronic resource] Education Transcript Data [Restricted Use, Enclave Only] Kathleen Mullan Harris , J. Richard Udry , Chandra Muller 2012-09-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32421 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) is a longitudinal study of a nationally representative sample of adolescents in grades 7-12 in the United States during the 1994-1995 school year. The Add Health cohort has been followed into young adulthood with four in-home interviews, the most recent in 2008, when the sample was aged 24-32. The additional files contained in this component of the Add Health project are from the Adolescent Health and Academic Achievement (AHAA) study and provide an opportunity to examine the effects of education on adolescent behavior, academic achievement, and cognitive and psychosocial development in the 1990s. The AHAA study contributes to Add Health by providing the high school transcripts of Add Health Wave III sample members. The AHAA data provides indicators of (1) educational achievement, (2) course taking patterns, (3) curricular exposure, and (4) educational contexts within and between schools, all of which can be linked to the Add Health survey data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32421.v1 household composition icpsr drug use icpsr eating habits icpsr educational environment icpsr families icpsr family planning icpsr family relationships icpsr family structure icpsr friendships icpsr health icpsr health behavior icpsr health care access icpsr health status icpsr marriage icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr neighborhoods icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr parental influence icpsr physical characteristics icpsr physical condition icpsr physical fitness icpsr physical limitations icpsr pregnancy history icpsr public assistance programs icpsr religious behavior icpsr religious beliefs icpsr school attendance icpsr self concept icpsr self esteem icpsr sexual attitudes icpsr sexual behavior icpsr smoking icpsr social environment icpsr social networks icpsr tobacco use icpsr violent behavior icpsr welfare services icpsr interpersonal relations icpsr living arrangements icpsr academic achievement icpsr adolescents icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr birth control icpsr classroom environment icpsr contraception icpsr dating (social) icpsr drinking behavior icpsr ICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth DSDR I. Fertility NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender FENWAY I. Fenway Archive Project DSDR III. Health DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations Harris, Kathleen Mullan Udry, J. Richard Muller, Chandra Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32421 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32421.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27024 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27024 MiAaI MiAaI National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), 1994-2008 [electronic resource] Contextual Data [Restricted Use] Kathleen Mullan Harris , J. Richard Udry 2013-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27024 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) is a longitudinal study of a nationally representative sample of adolescents in grades 7-12 in the United States during the 1994-1995 school year. The Add Health cohort has been followed into young adulthood with four in-home interviews, the most recent in 2008, when the sample was aged 24-32. Add Health combines longitudinal survey data on respondents' social, economic, psychological, and physical well-being with contextual data on the family, neighborhood, community, school, friendships, peer groups, and romantic relationships, providing unique opportunities to study how social environments and behaviors in adolescence are linked to health and achievement outcomes in young adulthood. The fourth wave of interviews expanded the collection of biological data in Add Health to understand the social, behavioral, and biological linkages in health trajectories as the Add Health cohort ages through adulthood. The files contained in this component of the Add Health restricted data are Waves I-III Contextual Files Data, Waves I-II Neighborhood Data, Wave I Spatial Analysis Data, Waves III-IV Grouping File Data, and Waves III-IV Census Region data. The contextual files data contain community contextual variables based on state, county, tract, and block group levels derived from Waves I, II, and III addresses. The neighborhood data and grouping file data contain pseudo state, county, tract, and block group variables that allow grouping Add Health respondents geographically. Wave I Spatial Analysis Data include X, Y coordinates that can be used to calculate distances between friends in a school community. For more information, please see the study website. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27024.v4 sexual behavior icpsr smoking icpsr social environment icpsr social networks icpsr tobacco use icpsr religious beliefs icpsr school attendance icpsr violent behavior icpsr welfare services icpsr self concept icpsr self esteem icpsr sexual attitudes icpsr academic achievement icpsr adolescents icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr birth control icpsr classroom environment icpsr contraception icpsr dating (social) icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug use icpsr eating habits icpsr educational environment icpsr families icpsr family planning icpsr family relationships icpsr family structure icpsr friendships icpsr health icpsr health behavior icpsr health care access icpsr health status icpsr household composition icpsr interpersonal relations icpsr living arrangements icpsr marriage icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr neighborhoods icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr parental influence icpsr physical characteristics icpsr physical condition icpsr physical fitness icpsr physical limitations icpsr pregnancy history icpsr public assistance programs icpsr religious behavior icpsr ICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR I. Fertility FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations FENWAY I. Fenway Archive Project DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure DSDR III. Health ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies Harris, Kathleen Mullan Udry, J. Richard Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27024 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27024.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27021 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27021 MiAaI MiAaI National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), 1994-2008 [electronic resource] Core Files [Restricted Use] Kathleen Mullan Harris , J. Richard Udry 2013-01-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27021 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) is a longitudinal study of a nationally representative sample of adolescents in grades 7-12 in the United States during the 1994-1995 school year. The Add Health cohort has been followed into young adulthood with four in-home interviews, the most recent in 2008, when the sample was aged 24-32. Add Health combines longitudinal survey data on respondents' social, economic, psychological, and physical well-being with contextual data on the family, neighborhood, community, school, friendships, peer groups, and romantic relationships, providing unique opportunities to study how social environments and behaviors in adolescence are linked to health and achievement outcomes in young adulthood. The fourth wave of interviews expanded biological linkages in health trajectories as the Add Health cohort ages through adulthood. The Add Health core data files are comprised of the Waves I-IV In-Home Interview data and corresponding In-Home Interview section detail data; Wave I In-School Questionnaire data, Wave I and II School Administrator data; School Information data; and six Add Health Weights file data. For more information, please see the study website. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27021.v11 smoking icpsr living arrangements icpsr marriage icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr neighborhoods icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr parental influence icpsr physical characteristics icpsr physical condition icpsr physical fitness icpsr physical limitations icpsr public assistance programs icpsr religious behavior icpsr religious beliefs icpsr reproductive history icpsr school attendance icpsr self concept icpsr self esteem icpsr sexual attitudes icpsr sexual behavior icpsr social environment icpsr social networks icpsr tobacco use icpsr violence icpsr welfare services icpsr academic achievement icpsr adolescents icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr birth control icpsr classroom environment icpsr dating (social) icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug use icpsr eating habits icpsr educational environment icpsr families icpsr family planning icpsr family relationships icpsr family structure icpsr friendships icpsr health icpsr health behavior icpsr health care access icpsr health status icpsr household composition icpsr interpersonal relations icpsr DSDR III. Health ICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program FENWAY I. Fenway Archive Project ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies DSDR I. Fertility Harris, Kathleen Mullan Udry, J. Richard Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27021 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27021.v11 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33822 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33822 MiAaI MiAaI Integrated Public Health Surveys, 2010-2011 [electronic resource] Jeff A. Jones , Cynthia Lamberth , Martha Riddell , Katie Sellers , Carolyn Leep , Ginger Fenton , Andrew Johnson 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 33822 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection comprises a single data file which was produced as part of the data harmonization efforts of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The file contains merged data from five sources: 2010 National Profile of Local Health Departments, a survey of local health departments conducted by the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO). 2011 National Profile Survey of Local Boards of Health, a survey of local boards of health conducted by the National Association of Local Boards of Health (NALBOH). 2010 State and Territorial Public Health Survey, a survey of state and United States territory health departments conducted by the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO). 2011 County Health Rankings, a compilation of county-level health measures and within-state county health rankings produced by the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. 2010 Census Demographic Profile Summary File, a series of tables with housing and population data from the 2010 Census. Produced by matching data from the last four sources to the NACCHO data, the data file contains one case for each of the 2,107 local health departments (LHD) that responded to the NACCHO survey. Each LHD's record in the file includes the ASTHO data for its state health department and the NALBOH data for its local board of health (LBH), if it had a LBH and the LBH responded to the NALBOH survey. (If a LHD had multiple LBHs, then the first one in the NALBOH data was matched to the LHD). In addition, county (or county equivalent)-level data from the County Health Rankings and Census Demographic Profile Summary File were matched to the records of the 1,535 LHDs represented in the data file with a jurisdiction covering a single county or county equivalent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33822.v1 community health icpsr health care services icpsr health departments icpsr health planning icpsr public health icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health Facilities HMCA I. Health Care Providers Jones, Jeff A. Lamberth, Cynthia Riddell, Martha Sellers, Katie Leep, Carolyn Fenton, Ginger Johnson, Andrew Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33822 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33822.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34263 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34263 MiAaI MiAaI Oregon Youth Substance Use Project (OYSUP), 1998-2010 [electronic resource] Judy Andrews 2013-03-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34263 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Oregon Youth Substance Use Project (OYSUP) began in 1998, with the recruitment of 1,075 first through fifth graders within a single school district in a working class community in western Oregon. OYSUP is an extensive etiological study that provides a multi-method annual assessment of etiological factors from a variety of contextual (including family, peer, neighborhood and school) and individual (personality, biological influences) domains, predictive of children's cognitions regarding substance use, their own substance use and their at-risk sexual behaviors (beginning in middle school). This unique study follows a representative sample of youth with approximately annual assessments from early childhood, through adolescence, and into emerging adulthood (at age 20-22). The primary objective of the original project and its renewals is to identify risk and protective factors predictive of or comorbid with the development of substance use and at-risk sexual behaviors. Quantitative survey data was collected from each respondent from 1998 to 2010. Within the aims of the original OYSUP study and the two subsequent renewals (one of which is ongoing), participants and their parents were followed annually until they were one-year post-high school, with an additional intensive assessment at age 20-22. In each year, the target participant and their parents completed assessments. The intensive assessment at age 20-22 included a diagnostic interview with the target participants and an assessment of cortisol reactivity in response to acute stress. During the school years, teachers completed assessments assessing their student's behavior, and school records for most students were obtained each year. In addition, principals in elementary schools completed school climate assessments and census data is used to obtain measures of neighborhood climate. Finally, respondents' demographic information was also collected. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34263.v1 alcohol consumption icpsr biomeasures icpsr census tract level icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug use icpsr educators icpsr family relationships icpsr health attitudes icpsr mental health icpsr parents icpsr parent child relationship icpsr risk factors icpsr sexual behavior icpsr social environment icpsr student attitudes icpsr student behavior icpsr student evaluation icpsr substance abuse icpsr tobacco use icpsr youths icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth Andrews, Judy Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34263 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34263.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33444 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33444 MiAaI MiAaI Center for Education and Drug Abuse Research (CEDAR) [electronic resource] Etiological and Prospective Family Study in Southwestern Pennsylvania, Baseline Data, 1990-2011 Ralph E. Tarter 2012-08-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33444 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Center for Education and Drug Abuse Research (CEDAR) conducts research on 775 families enrolled in the Center's prospective investigations into the etiology of substance use disorder (SUD). The pro-bands are men with lifetime presence/absence of SUD consequent to use of an illicit drug who have a 10-12 year old biological son or daughter. The biological children of SUD men are assigned to the high average risk (HAR) group whereas offspring of men without SUD, having neither axis 1 disorder ("normal") nor SUD psychiatric disorder, are assigned to the low average risk (LAR) group. A second control group (Psych control) was also collected, in whom the fathers had a lifetime DSM-III-R diagnosis of any psychiatric disorder not related to substance use. The sample sizes are as follows: HAR = 344, LAR = 350, and Psych = 81. The children are currently in varying stages of follow-up evaluation conducted at ages 12-14, 16, 19, and annually thereafter until age 30. CEDAR has already shown that they can predict in 10-12 year old youth cannabis use disorder by age 22 with approximately 70 percent accuracy, thereby substantiating the paradigm, subject recruitment strategy, and measurement protocols. Multidisciplinary research is conducted on family members (father, mother, children) with the objective of elucidating the genetic, bio-behavioral, and environmental factors on development of SUD consequent to use of illegal drugs. Research protocols are organized into three thematically connected research modules (Neurogenetics, Developmental Psychopathology, and Translation) linking etiology and prevention. The research components thus align with the NIH Roadmap model such that basic science informs clinical research leading to prevention guided by an understanding of etiology. In addition to module-level research, faculty also participate in three organizational aims: (1) Devise a practical scale to quantify the transmissible liability to SUD; (2) Empirically test a bio-psychological theory of SUD etiology focusing on off-time maturation leading to psychological dysregulation predisposing to SUD; and, (3) Delineate SUD liability variants within an ontogenetic framework. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33444.v1 families icpsr family relations icpsr health icpsr mental health icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parents icpsr participation icpsr personality assessment icpsr psychiatric services icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr psychosocial assessment icpsr social attitudes icpsr social behavior icpsr social life icpsr substance abuse icpsr aptitude icpsr attitudes icpsr child health icpsr children icpsr cognition icpsr cognitive functioning icpsr domestic relations icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug use icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States Tarter, Ralph E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33444 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33444.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29181 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29181 MiAaI MiAaI Sexual Acquisition and Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program (SATHCAP), 2006-2008 [United States] Restricted Use Files [electronic resource] Martin Y. Iguchi , Sandra H. Berry , Allison J. Ober , Terry Fain , Douglas D. Heckathorn , Pamina M. Gorbach , Robert Heimer , Andrei Kozlov , Lawrence J. Ouellet , Steven Shoptaw , William Zule 2010-12-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 29181 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Sexual Acquisition and Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program (SATHCAP) is a multisite study which was founded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and was designed to assess the role of drug use in the sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from traditional high-risk groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and drug users (DU), to lower risk groups, such as non-drug-using sexual partners. The study was conducted in three United States cities: Los Angeles, CA; Chicago, IL; Raleigh–Durham, NC; and in St. Petersburg, Russia. NIDA brought together researchers from the University of California-Los Angeles; the University of Chicago-Illinois; Research Triangle Institute International in Raleigh–Durham, NC; Yale University, with the Biomedical Center (Yale/BMC) in St. Petersburg, Russia; and the RAND Corporation. SATHCAP conducted a cross-sectional study across the four sites using a respondent-driven sampling (RDS) sampling approach, a common questionnaire, and similar biological testing. The goal of sampling approach was to recruit an RDS sample of MSM, DU, and individuals who were both MSM and DU (MSM/DU), as well as a sample of sex partners of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU, and sex partners of sex partners. The key research questions for SATHCAP were: (1) To what extent do HIV infections among DU and MSM populations spread to uninfected non-DU and non-MSM individuals through sexual activity? (2) What is the role of drugs in this spread? (3) What individual, behavioral, network, and structural characteristics determine the speed, extent, and path of this spread? Respondents were asked questions about their sexual relationships with their partners, method of drug use, name of drugs they used, method of sharing drugs, and method of sexual activities with their partners. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29181.v1 drug use icpsr drugs icpsr HIV icpsr homosexual relationships icpsr relationships icpsr sexual behavior icpsr sexual partner icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Iguchi, Martin Y. Berry, Sandra H. Ober, Allison J. Fain, Terry Heckathorn, Douglas D. Gorbach, Pamina M. Heimer, Robert Kozlov, Andrei Ouellet, Lawrence J. Shoptaw, Steven Zule, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29181 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29181.v1