nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03023 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03023 MiAaI MiAaI Cooperative Agreement for AIDS Community-Based Outreach/Intervention Research Program, 1992-1998 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse 2008-10-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3023 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Cooperative Agreement (CA) Research Program was to monitor risk factors, risk behaviors, and rates of HIV seroprevalence and seroincidence among out-of-treatment, multi-ethnic/racial injection drug users and crack cocaine users. The program evaluated the efficacy of experimental interventions designed to prevent, eliminate, or reduce HIV risk behaviors and developed new treatment interventions. All participants received the standard intervention, which consisted of street-based outreach and HIV prevention counseling. Those assigned to enhanced interventions received more counseling sessions, educational videos, social gatherings, and support group activities. The public-use data file contains 31,088 respondent records, collected from 21 CA program facilities in the United States and one facility each in Puerto Rico and Brazil. Hence, the process data file contains 23 records of facility information that can be linked to individual respondents. Respondent interviews include a baseline Risk Behavior Assessment (completed prior to first intervention) and a Follow-Up Assessment, conducted either three months or six months after the baseline survey. Respondent data were augmented with eligibility information, biological markers of drug use, HIV test results, and intervention assignment. At baseline and post-intervention, the surveys measured drug use and drug treatment, sexual activity and sex for money/drugs, arrests, work/income, HIV/STD/pregnancy status, perceptions of risk, and risk reduction behaviors. The process questionnaires were completed by staff or principal investigators at the 23 site locations. Process data describe the program structure and process, other intervention projects in the community, needle exchange programs and pharmacy syringe sales, and local HIV infection rates. Drugs reported on include alcohol, marijuana/hashish, crack/cocaine, heroin (including speedball), non-prescription methadone, other opiates, and amphetamines. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03023.v1 drug abuse icpsr drug education icpsr drug offenders icpsr health education icpsr HIV icpsr intervention icpsr outreach programs icpsr race icpsr risk assessment icpsr risk factors icpsr treatment icpsr AIDS icpsr counseling icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States RCMD V. Health and Well-Being SAMHDA XVI. Cooperative Agreement for AIDS Community-Based Outreach/Intervention Research Program United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3023 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03023.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29062 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29062 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJDATS) [electronic resource] Detention to Community (DTC), 2006-2008 [United States] Howard A. Liddle 2011-01-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29062 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The Detention to Community (DTC) study addresses several priority areas of the CJDATS collaborative. First, the study will adapt existing science-based interventions in order to develop specialized services that will address drug abuse, delinquency, and sexual risk-taking among juveniles detained in detention facilities. Second, the study proposes to test an innovative, phasic, multiple-systems intervention in which the in-detention work provides a platform for the adolescent's return to the community. This bridge is created by linking the in-detention and outpatient treatment components in ways that reflect the consensus in the literature regarding the need for integrative, comprehensive interventions for criminal justice involved, substance abusing individuals (Cook, 1992; Altschuler and Armstrong, 1999). The interventions meld public health and public safety concerns, and target members in multiple systems influential to a teen’s developmental outcomes, including the adolescent’s family and school, the judiciary, and treatment providers. Thus, they go beyond the fragmented, sometimes competitive treatment models too often seen in standard criminal justice and drug treatment settings (Belenko, 2000). Third, consistent with recommendations from the literature, NIDA has designated HIV/AIDS prevention in juvenile justice facilities as an urgent public health priority (NIDA, 2002). This study would test a family-based HIV/AIDS prevention intervention in comparison to standard HIV prevention. Finally, the systems-change possibilities and public policy implications of the proposed study are high, because the study would examine processes and outcomes of implementing the intervention in the real world settings in which the findings are meant to apply -- juvenile detention centers and outpatient community-based drug treatment agencies that work with young offenders (Armstrong and Altschuler, 1998). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29062.v1 intervention strategies icpsr juvenile detention icpsr prisoner reentry icpsr AIDS icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr drug abuse icpsr HIV icpsr intervention icpsr recidivism icpsr risk factors icpsr sex education icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Liddle, Howard A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29062 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29062.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03077 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03077 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of a Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Dallas County, Texas, 1998-1999 [electronic resource] Matthew L. Hiller , Kevin Knight , Sandhya Rao , Dwayne Simpson 2003-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3077 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study assessed the Dallas County Judicial Treatment Center (DCJTC) in Texas. The DCJTC is a residential substance abuse treatment center for drug-involved felony offenders. It provides a treatment program of approximately six months in three major phases: orientation, main treatment, and re-entry. Data were collected from 429 offenders admitted to the DCJTC between January and December 1998. During their first week of treatment, residents completed a comprehensive intake battery that included (1) the Texas Christian University (TCU) initial assessment, (2) the TCU self-rating form (SRF), and (3) the TCU intake interview. The initial assessment gauged mental status, background and psychosocial functioning, alcohol and other drug use, and psychological status. The SRF assessed psychological functioning, social functioning, and motivation for treatment. The intake interview included detailed questions on the resident's social background, family and peer relations, health and psychological status, criminal history, drug use problems, and behavioral risks for HIV/AIDS. Progress made during treatment was measured by the TCU Resident Evaluation of Self and Treatment (REST) and the TCU Counselor Rating of Client (CRC) forms. The REST included all questions on the SRF, plus questions on offenders' perceptions of the structure of the program and their experiences while in treatment, an evaluation of the counselor, an evaluation of their own personality, and ratings of group and individual treatment sessions. The CRC forms rated residents on a set of attributes related to residents' ability to benefit from treatment and indicated the extent to which counseling activities with each client had focused on certain activities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03077.v1 AIDS icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr counseling icpsr felons icpsr HIV icpsr inmate classification icpsr mental health icpsr offenders icpsr process evaluation icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Hiller, Matthew L. Knight, Kevin Rao, Sandhya Simpson, Dwayne Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3077 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03077.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03404 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03404 MiAaI MiAaI Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study--Adolescent (DATOS-A), 1993-1995 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse 2008-10-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3404 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study - Adolescent (DATOS-A) was a multisite, prospective, community-based, longitudinal study of adolescents entering treatment. It was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of adolescent drug treatment by investigating the characteristics of the adolescent population, the structure and process of drug abuse treatment in adolescent programs, and the relationship of these factors with outcomes. Three major types or modalities of programs included in the study were chemical dependency or short-term inpatient (STI), therapeutic community or residential (RES), and outpatient drug-free (ODF). The adolescent battery of instruments included intake, intreatment, and follow-up questionnaires based largely on the DATOS adult study DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT OUTCOME STUDY (DATOS), 1991-1994: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 2258) instrument format, with considerable tailoring to the adolescent population. Clients entering treatment completed two comprehensive intake interviews (Intake 1 and Intake 2), approximately one week apart. This information is provided in Parts 1 and 2 of the data collection. These interviews were designed to obtain baseline data on drug use and other behaviors, such as illegal involvement, as well as information on background and demographic characteristics, education and training, mental health status, employment, income and expenditures, drug and alcohol dependence, health, religiosity and self-concept, and motivation and readiness for treatment. The one-, three-, and six-month intreatment interviews (Parts 3, 4, and 7) included items on treatment access, intreatment experience, and psychological functioning, as well as questions replicated from some of the domains in the Intake 1 and 2 questionnaires. The 12-month post-treatment follow-up interview (Part 5) included questions replicated from the previous interviews, and also included post-treatment status. Part 6 includes variables for time in treatment and interview availability indicators. The Measures Data (Part 8) were generated by using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Rev. 3rd ed., DSM-III-R) (American Psychiatric Association, 1987). The variables in Part 8 give either the DSM-III-R level of dependence to a drug category or they describe whether the subject meets the DSM-III-R standard for a particular disorder. The 12-Month Follow-up Urine Result data (Part 9) provide the results from urine sample tests that were given to a sample of subjects at the time of the 12-Month Follow-up Interview. The urine test was used to ascertain the nature and extent of bias in the self-reports of the respondents. Urine specimens were tested for eight categories of drugs (amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine metabolite, methaqualone, opiates, and phencyclidine). The drugs covered in the study were alcohol, tobacco, marijuana (hashish, THC), cocaine (including crack), heroin, narcotics or opiates such as morphine, codeine, Demerol, Dilaudid, and Talwin, illegal methadone, sedatives and tranquilizers such as barbiturates and depressants, amphetamines or other stimulants such as speed or diet pills, methamphetamines, LSD, PCP, and other hallucinogens or psychedelics, and inhalants such as glue, gasoline, paint thinner, and aerosol sprays. The study also included drug of choice, frequency, and route of administration. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03404.v3 adolescents icpsr AIDS icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr education icpsr employment icpsr health icpsr HIV icpsr mental health icpsr sexual behavior icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr tobacco use icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr SAMHDA XXII. Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study - Adolescent (DATOS-A) ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3404 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03404.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03088 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03088 MiAaI MiAaI Alcohol and Drug Services Study (ADSS), 1996-1999 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies 2009-04-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3088 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Alcohol and Drug Services Study (ADSS) was a national study of substance abuse treatment facilities and clients. The study was designed to develop estimates of the duration and costs of treatment and to describe the post-treatment status of substance abuse clients. ADSS continues and extends upon data collected in the Drug Services Research Survey, 1990: [United States] (ICPSR 3393) and the Services Research Outcome Study, 1995-1996: [United States] (ICPSR 2691) with a more complete sampling frame, an enhanced sampling design, and more detailed measures of treatment services provided, the costs of treatment, and clients in treatment. ADSS was implemented in three phases. In Phase I, a nationally representative sample of treatment facilities was surveyed to assess characteristics of treatment services and clients including treatment type, costs, program capacity, the number of clients served, waiting lists, and services provided to special populations. In Phase II, records were abstracted from a sample of clients in a subsample of Phase I facilities. This phase included four sub-components: (1) the Main Study, an analysis of abstracted records to assess the treatment process and characteristics of discharged clients, (2) the Incentive Study, which assessed the impact of varying financial payments on follow-up interview participation among non-methadone outpatient clients, (3) the In-Treatment Methadone Client study (ITMC), which assessed the treatment process of methadone maintenance, and (4) the comparison study of Early Dropout clients (EDO), which provided a proxy comparison group of records from substance abusers that went untreated. Phase III involved follow-up personal interviews with Phase II clients who could be located. This interview sought to determine post-treatment status in terms of substance use, economic condition, criminal justice involvement, and further substance abuse treatment episodes. Urine testing was conducted to validate self-reported drug use. Drugs included in the survey were alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, crack cocaine, heroin, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, amphetamines, non-prescribed use of prescription medications, abuse of over-the-counter medications, and other drugs. ADSS also included a cost study, which involved obtaining additional financial information from the Phase II facilities. A computerized desktop audit was used in the cost study to conduct consistency and accuracy checks on selected questionnaire data from Phases I and II. Variables were subsequently updated to represent the most accurate data available. Additional analysis variables were then created using combinations of the revised Phase I and II data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03088.v5 AIDS icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug treatment icpsr health care services icpsr HIV icpsr intervention icpsr methadone maintenance icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment compliance icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program SAMHDA XV. Alcohol and Drug Services Study United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3088 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03088.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02258 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02258 MiAaI MiAaI Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS), 1991-1994 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2258 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Drug-Abuse Treatment Outcomes Study (DATOS) is a prospective study designed to determine the outcomes of adult drug abuse treatment delivered in typical, stable, community-based programs and to provide comprehensive information on continuing and new questions about the effectiveness of drug abuse treatment for adults currently available in a variety of publicly funded and private programs. The study examined the role of treatment outcomes and program type, client characteristics (including dependence, treatment history, and physical and mental health comorbidities), treatment received (e.g., length and intensity of services provided), therapeutic approaches, provision of aftercare, and research on the components of effective treatment, including factors that engage and retain clients in programs. Four types of programs were included: outpatient methadone (OPM), short-term inpatient (STI), long-term residential (LTR), and outpatient drug-free (ODF). Respondents were sampled from among adults admitted to drug abuse treatment programs in 11 representative U.S. cities during 1991-1993. Clients entering treatment completed two comprehensive intake interviews (Intake 1 and Intake 2), approximately one week apart. This information is provided in Parts 1 and 2 of the data collection. These interviews were designed to obtain baseline data on drug use and other behaviors, as well as information on background and demographic characteristics, patterns of dependence, living situation and child custody status, education and training, income and expenditures, and HIV risk behaviors, along with assessments of dependence, mental health, physical health, and social functioning. Data on criminal justice status and criminal behavior are reported in Part 5, Illegal Activities Data, and are drawn from the Intake 1 interview. Data reflecting during-treatment progress, including service delivery and client satisfaction, were collected in the one-, three-, and six-month in-treatment interviews (Parts 3, 4, and 8). The 12-Month Post-Treatment Follow-Up Interview (Part 6) replicated many of the intake questions and focused on key behaviors in the year following treatment. Part 7 includes variables for time in treatment and interview availability indicators. The 12-Month Follow-Up Urine Result data (Part 9) provide the results from urine sample tests that were given to a sample of subjects at the time of the 12-Month Follow-Up Interview. Urine specimens were tested for eight categories of drugs (amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine metabolite, methaqualone, opiates, and phencyclidine). The drugs covered in the study were alcohol, tobacco, marijuana (hashish, THC), hallucinogens or psychedelics such as LSD, mescaline, and PCP, cocaine (including crack), heroin, narcotics or opiates such as morphine, codeine, Demerol, Dilaudid, and Talwin, downers or depressants such as sedatives, barbiturates, and tranquilizers, amphetamines or other stimulants such as speed or diet pills, and other drugs. Part 10 contains data for 1393 clients who were interviewed 5 years post treatment. This part contains many of the same types of questions asked during previous interviews. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02258.v5 AIDS icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug treatment icpsr HIV icpsr mental health icpsr physical condition icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr SAMHDA VII. Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS) NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2258 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02258.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34296 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34296 MiAaI MiAaI Older Drug Users [electronic resource] A Life Course Study of Turning Points in Drug Use [in a large Southeastern Metropolitan Area], 2009-2010 Miriam Boeri , Thor Whalen 2012-07-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34296 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Older Drug Users study was a mixed method, retrospective longitudinal study that interviewed 92 respondents in a large southeastern metropolitan area from January 2009 to August 2010. The goal of the study was to provide in-depth life history on the drug use trajectories of older drug users, specific turning points in drug use patterns, and drug-related health risks over a person's life course. Quantitiave and qualititative data was collected from each respondent. Two questionnaires were used to collect the quantitative data. The first questionnaire asked about the person's basic demographic information (gender, race, age, and education), health history (has the person been diagnosed with HIV, AIDS, or Hepatitis C), and drug use (route and frequency) and treatment in the past 30 days across ten different substances (tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, hallucinogens/LSD/Ecstasy/club drugs, prescription pills, cocaine, crack, heroin, amphetamines, and methamphetamine). A second questionnaire was used to serve as a retrospective life history of the person. The questionnaire asked about the same drug use and treatment of the same ten drugs but this time looking at the entire year. Questions were also asked concerning the person's living arrangement, employment, family roles, drug roles, and sexual activity over the course of the year. The questions were repeated for every year of the person's life from birth up to the time the person was interviewed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34296.v1 AIDS icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug use icpsr family relationships icpsr HIV icpsr living arrangements icpsr sexual behavior icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr substance use icpsr tobacco use icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life Cycle Boeri, Miriam Whalen, Thor Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34296 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34296.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29061 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29061 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) [electronic resource] HIV/HEPATITIS Prevention for Re-Entering Drug Offenders James A. Inciardi 2011-01-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29061 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The development of the CJ-DATS Targeted Intervention program, targeting a policy change to incorporate public health concerns into the parole and release process, has prompted this study to analyze the effectiveness of the intervention and to determine how it might best be integrated into the current corrections administration. Primarily, the study seeks to consider the effectiveness of one-on-one peer intervention against group intervention moderated by a peer. The study is set up to interview former inmates as they re-enter society through parole or work release. The first phase of the study is to determine their history of drug use, before incarceration and during their time in a corrections facility. These respondents were chosen because of the particular danger faced by those re-entering to engage in "make up for lost time" behavior as access to illicit activity becomes more readily available. Additionally, this portion tests the respondents' knowledge of HIV/AIDS and their utilization of resources designed to improve their health. Following this survey, as well as a blood examination to determine whether they have the illnesses associated with the study, the subjects engaged in counseling based on the subgroup to which they had been randomly assigned. The control group received a standard one-hour, non-interactive CDC intervention, while the experimental group received the CJ-DATS Targeted Intervention. The intention was to determine if individual intervention is more effective, given the need for brief, effective interventions as a result of the large volume of the relevant population. Following the interventions, followup interviews were issued at 30 and 90 days. The intention was to determine not merely if there was an aggregate change in behavior as a result of the intervention, but furthermore, if the intervention led to a negative trend. Of particular concern to the outcome of the study and its analysis was the relative effectiveness of the peer interventions, as well as how officers and administration within the corrections and parole process might incorporate an attitude of public health into the process. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29061.v1 AIDS icpsr correctional facilities icpsr disease prevention icpsr HIV icpsr intervention strategies icpsr prison inmates icpsr sexual behavior icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment compliance icpsr treatment programs icpsr DATAPASS I. NDIIPP ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health Facilities ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Inciardi, James A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29061 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29061.v1