nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27963 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27963 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) [electronic resource] The Criminal Justice Co-Occurring Disorder Screening Instrument (CJ-CODSI), 2002-2008 [United States] Stanley Sacks , Gerald Melnick 2011-07-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 27963 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Currently, there exists an inadequacy in mental and substance use disorder screening instruments. This inadequacy stems from two reasons. First, the instruments are untested for widespread use with criminal justice populations. Second, most test for only one disorder at a time. The Criminal Justice Co-Occurring Disorder Screening Instrument (CODSI) study addresses this issue, investigating new methods by which to quickly, accurately, and easily evaluate individuals in the criminal justice population for COD (Co-Occurring Disorders). After determining that the Texas Christian University Drug Screen (TCUDS) would be the appropriate substance abuse screening component for a COD screen, researchers tested three possible mental disorder screening components: the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GSS, version 1.0); the Mental Health Screening Form (MHSF); and the Modified MINI Screen (MMS). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), generally accepted as an accurate measure of mental disorder, was used as a reference by which to evaluate the three different screeners. Researchers also used items from the three different screeners to create two additional instruments: the CODSI-MD for any mental disorder and the CODSI-SMD for severe mental disorder. Actual testing was conducted at four different sites, taking a total of 280 new admissions to prison-based substance abuse treatment programs. Instruments were evaluated based on their sensitivity (ability to correctly identify those with COD), specificity (ability to correctly identify those without COD), and overall accuracy (percentage of correct identification across all people). Researchers also conducted a study using a sample comprised of a greater proportion of Latinos and African Americans, in order to evaluate the effect of race on the results of the instruments. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27963.v1 correctional facilities icpsr drug abuse icpsr inmate populations icpsr mental disorders icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Sacks, Stanley Melnick, Gerald Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27963 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27963.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29201 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29201 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) [electronic resource] Inmate Pre-Release Assessment (IPASS), 2001 [United States] David Farabee 2011-01-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29201 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs (ISAP), in conjunction with Texas Christian University, the University of Kentucky, and Brown University, proposes to develop and test the Inmate Pre-Release Assessment (IPASS) as a method of (1) prioritizing aftercare treatment need among graduates of prison-based substance abuse treatment programs, and (2) specifying an appropriate level of care (residential, outpatient, or self-help groups). The IPASS was developed specifically as a post-release risk measure for prison-based substance abuse treatment graduates by taking into account the inmates’ historical drug use and criminal activity, as well as his or her performance during the prison-based treatment program. IPASS forms were administered to inmates housed in 14 institutions in four states: California, Maryland, New Mexico, and Oregon. While the IPASS has demonstrated sound psychometric properties as a continuous measure of post-release risk and general treatment need for substance-abusing parolees (Farabee & Knight, 2001), its ability to predict relapse and recidivism risk has not been tested using a prospective design. Part 1 of this study is the main part which is based on the IPASS Intake Form (479) and is designed to provide a quick assessment of criminal risk based on pre-incarceration risk factors. The first part of this form focuses heavily on criminal history, with questions about arrest and incarceration history, revocation history, and age of first criminal activity. It also asks about education level achieved, marital status and happiness, and friends drug use. The next part on the IPASS Intake Form (479) is designed to provide a quick screen for pre-incarceration drug use severity. It is based on the first ten items of the TCU Drug Screen II with the items corresponding to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) classification criteria for Drug Dependence. And the last part of the IPASS Intake form begins by asking inmates if they want to enter a drug treatment program after leaving prison; and if so, which treatment modality is preferred. Inmates were asked to indicate how much they disagree or agree with nine items pertaining to their interactions with the treatment staff. These items include the treatment staff being easy to talk to, easy to understand, listening to you, organized and prepared, treating you with respect, helping you solve problems, supportive of your progress, helping you with your recovery, and happy with your progress. Part 2 of the study mainly focused on arrest information and the number of criminal activities. Part 3 of the study is based on the IPASS Continuing Care Referral Form (484) and begins by asking inmates if they want to enter a drug treatment program after leaving prison; and if so, which treatment modality is preferred. Part 4 of the study is based on the IPASS Continuing Care Admit/Discharge Form (481A) and provides information regarding the Admission and Discharge of the inmates. And finally, Part 5 of the study is completed by the inmates' primary counselor and begins by recording the number of "major" disciplinary acts an inmate committed prior to and during their time at the treatment program. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29201.v1 criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr inmate attitudes icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health Facilities NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Farabee, David Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29201 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29201.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29181 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29181 MiAaI MiAaI Sexual Acquisition and Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program (SATHCAP), 2006-2008 [United States] Restricted Use Files [electronic resource] Martin Y. Iguchi , Sandra H. Berry , Allison J. Ober , Terry Fain , Douglas D. Heckathorn , Pamina M. Gorbach , Robert Heimer , Andrei Kozlov , Lawrence J. Ouellet , Steven Shoptaw , William Zule 2010-12-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 29181 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Sexual Acquisition and Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program (SATHCAP) is a multisite study which was founded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and was designed to assess the role of drug use in the sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from traditional high-risk groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and drug users (DU), to lower risk groups, such as non-drug-using sexual partners. The study was conducted in three United States cities: Los Angeles, CA; Chicago, IL; Raleigh–Durham, NC; and in St. Petersburg, Russia. NIDA brought together researchers from the University of California-Los Angeles; the University of Chicago-Illinois; Research Triangle Institute International in Raleigh–Durham, NC; Yale University, with the Biomedical Center (Yale/BMC) in St. Petersburg, Russia; and the RAND Corporation. SATHCAP conducted a cross-sectional study across the four sites using a respondent-driven sampling (RDS) sampling approach, a common questionnaire, and similar biological testing. The goal of sampling approach was to recruit an RDS sample of MSM, DU, and individuals who were both MSM and DU (MSM/DU), as well as a sample of sex partners of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU, and sex partners of sex partners. The key research questions for SATHCAP were: (1) To what extent do HIV infections among DU and MSM populations spread to uninfected non-DU and non-MSM individuals through sexual activity? (2) What is the role of drugs in this spread? (3) What individual, behavioral, network, and structural characteristics determine the speed, extent, and path of this spread? Respondents were asked questions about their sexual relationships with their partners, method of drug use, name of drugs they used, method of sharing drugs, and method of sexual activities with their partners. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29181.v1 drug use icpsr drugs icpsr HIV icpsr homosexual relationships icpsr relationships icpsr sexual behavior icpsr sexual partner icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Iguchi, Martin Y. Berry, Sandra H. Ober, Allison J. Fain, Terry Heckathorn, Douglas D. Gorbach, Pamina M. Heimer, Robert Kozlov, Andrei Ouellet, Lawrence J. Shoptaw, Steven Zule, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29181 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29181.v1