nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02686 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02686 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Children at Risk Program in Austin, Texas, Bridgeport, Connecticut, Memphis, Tennessee, Savannah, Georgia, and Seattle, Washington, 1993-1997 [electronic resource] Adele V. Harrell , Shannon Cavanagh , Sanjeev Sridharan 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2686 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. s about the police, occasions of skipping school and why, if the youth thought he or she would be promoted to the next grade, would graduate from high school, or would go to college, knowledge of children engaging in various problem activities and if the youth was pressured to join them, and experiences with and attitudes toward consumption of cigarettes, alcohol, and various drugs. Three sections of the questionnaire were completed by the youths. Section A asked questions about the youth's attitudes toward various statements about self, life, the home environment, rules, and norms. Section B asked questions about the number of times that various crimes had been committed against the youth, his or her sexual activity, number of times the youth ran away from home, number of times he or she had committed various criminal acts, and what weapons he or she had carried. Items in Section C covered the youth's alcohol and drug use, and participation in drug sales. Part 3 provides data from both caretaker interviews (baseline and end-of-program). Questions elicited the caretaker's assessments of the presence of various positive and negative neighborhood characteristics, safety of the child in the neighborhood, attitudes toward and interactions with the police, if the caretaker had been arrested, had been on probation, or in jail, whether various crimes had been committed against the caretaker or others in the household in the past year, activities that the youth currently participated in, curfews set by the caretaker, if the caretaker had visited the school for various reasons, school performance or problems by the youth and the youth's siblings, amount of the caretaker's involvement with activities, clubs, and groups, the caretaker's financial, medical, and personal problems and assistance received in the past year, if he or she was not able to obtain help, why not, and information on the caretaker's education, employment, income level, income sources, and where he or she sought medical treatment for themselves or for the youth. Two sections of the data collection instruments were completed by the caretaker. Section A dealt with the youth's personal problems or problems with others, and the youth's friends. Additional questions focused on the family's interactions, rules, and norms. Section B items asked about the caretaker's alcohol and drug use, and any alcohol and drug use or criminal justice involvement by others in the household older than the youth. Part 4 consists of data from schools, police, and courts. School data include the youth's grades, grade-point average (GPA), absentee rate, reasons for absences, and whether the youth was promoted each school year. Data from police records include police contacts, detentions, violent offenses, drug-related offenses, and arrests prior to recruitment in the CAR program and in Years 1-4 after recruitment, court contacts and charges prior to recruitment and in Years 1-4 after recruitment, and how the charges were disposed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02686.v1 intervention icpsr intervention strategies icpsr case management icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr neighborhoods icpsr program evaluation icpsr student attitudes icpsr student behavior icpsr treatment programs icpsr youths at risk icpsr children icpsr cities icpsr crime prevention icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr drug use icpsr family services icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD II. Community Studies Harrell, Adele V. Cavanagh, Shannon Sridharan, Sanjeev Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2686 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02686.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07865 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07865 MiAaI MiAaI National Supported Work Evaluation Study, 1975-1979 [electronic resource] Public Use Files Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation 2009-02-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7865 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This study is an evaluation of the National Supported Work Demonstration project, a transitional, subsidized work experience program for four target groups of people with longstanding employment problems: ex-offenders, former drug addicts, women who were long-term recipients of welfare benefits, and school dropouts, many with criminal records. The program provided up to 12-18 months of employment to about 10,000 individuals at 15 locations across the country for four years. In ten of these sites -- Atlanta, Chicago, Hartford, Jersey City, Newark, New York, Philadelphia, Oakland, San Francisco, and Wisconsin, 6,600 eligible applicants were randomly assigned either to experimental groups (offered a job in supported work) or to control groups, and an evaluation was conducted on the effects of the Supported Work Program. At the time of enrollment, each respondent was given a retrospective baseline interview, generally covering the previous two years, followed by up to four follow-up interviews scheduled at nine-month intervals. Two public use files were originally distributed for this data collection: Supported Work Employment and Earnings File, and Supported Work Deviant Behavior File. Each file contained data for up to five interviews, a cross-document dataset and an Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients follow-up. The Employment and Earnings File contains data from all interview modules except the drug and crime sections, and the Deviant Behavior File contains all variables on the Employment and Earnings File as well as additional information on drugs and crime. Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients were further asked about children in school and welfare participation, while all non-AFDC respondents were questioned about any extralegal activities. Demographic items specify age, sex, race, marital status, education, number of children, employment history, job search, job training, mobility, household income, welfare assistance, housing, military discharge status, and drug use. Each respondent has up to six logical, fixed-length records, with each record corresponding to a completed interview (up to five) and one additional short "cross-document" record. A User's Guide describing the collection and its components is available and should be read before the collection or any part of it is ordered. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07865.v2 social attitudes icpsr criminal justice system icpsr deviance icpsr drug law offenses icpsr economic behavior icpsr employment icpsr government programs icpsr job history icpsr labor force icpsr occupations icpsr public assistance programs icpsr quality of life icpsr social behavior icpsr social indicators icpsr unemployment icpsr work environment icpsr workers icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7865 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07865.v2