nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28921 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28921 MiAaI MiAaI Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation [Restricted Use] [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention 2012-06-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 28921 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation was conducted to evaluate the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP)'s SPF SIG initiative, which sought to: (1) prevent the onset and reduce the progression of substance abuse, including childhood and underage drinking; (2) reduce substance abuse-related problems in communities; and (3) build prevention capacity and infrastructure at the state and community levels. This cross-site evaluation included the 21 states and territories CSAP funded in FY2004 (Cohort 1) and an additional 5 States funded in Cohort 2 in FY2005 that were funded for up to 5 years to implement the SPF. The SPF is a five-step prevention planning model that requires states to: (1) conduct a statewide needs assessment, including the establishment of a State Epidemiological and Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW); (2) mobilize and build state and community capacity to address needs; (3) develop a statewide strategic plan for prevention; (4) implement evidence-based prevention, policies, and practices (EBPPP) to meet state and community needs; and (5) monitor and evaluate the implementation of their SPF SIG project. Under contract to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) with funding provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Westat, in collaboration with the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE) and The MayaTech Corporation, implemented a multilevel, multi-method quasi-experimental design to evaluate SPF SIG's impact. The scope of the evaluation encompassed national, state, and community levels. The design included comparison conditions at both the state and community levels. These data represent Phase I of the restricted use data release and contains extensive data on state-level implementation, community-level implementation, and state-level infrastructure, as well as other reference elements. A subsequent release (Phase II) will include state- and community-level outcomes, as well as data on community-level implementation, community-level implementation fidelity, state-level sustainability, and mediating variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28921.v1 alcohol abuse icpsr client characteristics icpsr college students icpsr community participation icpsr community health icpsr community involvement icpsr community service programs icpsr continuing education icpsr African Americans icpsr counties icpsr crime icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr health policy icpsr human services icpsr illigal drugs icpsr intervention icpsr juveniles icpsr labor force icpsr law enforcement icpsr liquor law violations icpsr middle school icpsr Native Americans icpsr needs assessment icpsr organizational structure icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr outreach programs icpsr parents icpsr planning icpsr policies and procedures icpsr pregnancy icpsr program evaluation icpsr public health icpsr race icpsr risk factors icpsr schools icpsr skill development icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr tobacco use icpsr training icpsr treatment programs icpsr young adults icpsr zip code areas icpsr ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health Facilities NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28921 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28921.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02686 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02686 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Children at Risk Program in Austin, Texas, Bridgeport, Connecticut, Memphis, Tennessee, Savannah, Georgia, and Seattle, Washington, 1993-1997 [electronic resource] Adele V. Harrell , Shannon Cavanagh , Sanjeev Sridharan 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2686 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. s about the police, occasions of skipping school and why, if the youth thought he or she would be promoted to the next grade, would graduate from high school, or would go to college, knowledge of children engaging in various problem activities and if the youth was pressured to join them, and experiences with and attitudes toward consumption of cigarettes, alcohol, and various drugs. Three sections of the questionnaire were completed by the youths. Section A asked questions about the youth's attitudes toward various statements about self, life, the home environment, rules, and norms. Section B asked questions about the number of times that various crimes had been committed against the youth, his or her sexual activity, number of times the youth ran away from home, number of times he or she had committed various criminal acts, and what weapons he or she had carried. Items in Section C covered the youth's alcohol and drug use, and participation in drug sales. Part 3 provides data from both caretaker interviews (baseline and end-of-program). Questions elicited the caretaker's assessments of the presence of various positive and negative neighborhood characteristics, safety of the child in the neighborhood, attitudes toward and interactions with the police, if the caretaker had been arrested, had been on probation, or in jail, whether various crimes had been committed against the caretaker or others in the household in the past year, activities that the youth currently participated in, curfews set by the caretaker, if the caretaker had visited the school for various reasons, school performance or problems by the youth and the youth's siblings, amount of the caretaker's involvement with activities, clubs, and groups, the caretaker's financial, medical, and personal problems and assistance received in the past year, if he or she was not able to obtain help, why not, and information on the caretaker's education, employment, income level, income sources, and where he or she sought medical treatment for themselves or for the youth. Two sections of the data collection instruments were completed by the caretaker. Section A dealt with the youth's personal problems or problems with others, and the youth's friends. Additional questions focused on the family's interactions, rules, and norms. Section B items asked about the caretaker's alcohol and drug use, and any alcohol and drug use or criminal justice involvement by others in the household older than the youth. Part 4 consists of data from schools, police, and courts. School data include the youth's grades, grade-point average (GPA), absentee rate, reasons for absences, and whether the youth was promoted each school year. Data from police records include police contacts, detentions, violent offenses, drug-related offenses, and arrests prior to recruitment in the CAR program and in Years 1-4 after recruitment, court contacts and charges prior to recruitment and in Years 1-4 after recruitment, and how the charges were disposed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02686.v1 intervention icpsr intervention strategies icpsr case management icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr neighborhoods icpsr program evaluation icpsr student attitudes icpsr student behavior icpsr treatment programs icpsr youths at risk icpsr children icpsr cities icpsr crime prevention icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr drug use icpsr family services icpsr NACJD II. Community Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Harrell, Adele V. Cavanagh, Shannon Sridharan, Sanjeev Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2686 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02686.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30842 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30842 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) [electronic resource] Restructuring Risky Relationships-HIV (RRR-HIV), 2005-2008 [United States] Carl Leukefeld 2011-07-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30842 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In recent years, women have had a growing presence in the prison system, largely for drug-related offenses. Few interventions are geared towards reentering female offenders, for whom HIV and drug use are intimately tied to risky relationships and thinking errors surrounding criminal activity and risky behavior. This study aimed to develop a manual-driven intervention for the criminal justice system geared towards female drug abusers, specifically reducing HIV risk behavior. Using focus groups to develop the manual, interventionists were then trained and supervised. The intervention focused on reducing risky behavior through cognitive restructuring and the relationship model. The intervention takes place through a two-group design, one with three community reentry sessions, the other without reentry sessions. Outcomes of the study were to develop a manual for women reentering society, to contribute to the literature on the unique factors affecting women and risky behavior, to expand on the existing knowledge of the issues faced by reentering women, and to offer information about the connection between community-based reentry resources and the criminal justice system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30842.v1 abuse icpsr behavior modification icpsr cognitive processes icpsr drug offenders icpsr HIV icpsr intervention strategies icpsr prisoner reentry icpsr sexual behavior icpsr treatment compliance icpsr women icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Leukefeld, Carl Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30842 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30842.v1