Principal Investigator(s): Pearson, Frank S., Rutgers University, Department of Sociology, Institute for Criminological Research
These data were collected to measure the degree to which subjective deterrence and rational choice are effective in reducing drug-use recidivism rates. Baseline interviews were conducted with participants upon entering a drug rehabilitation program in New Jersey. Under the terms of this program, which was an alternative to prison, any incident of drug use occurring during the rehabilitation period would result in the participant's returning to prison. Follow-up interviews were conducted when the participant either had a drug/alcohol use relapse or successfully completed a year in the program without a drug-use incident. Baseline interviews included questions about criminal and drug-use history, as well as initial reactions to the drug rehabilitation program. Follow-up interviews probed for participants' feelings about the drug rehabilitation program experience. Further questions concerned participants' failure or success at staying away from drugs or alcohol.
One or more data files in this study are set up in a non-standard format, such as card image format. Users may need help converting these files before they can be used for analysis.
These data are freely available.
Pearson, Frank S. DETERRING DRUG USE WITH INTENSIVE PROBATION IN NEW JERSEY, 1989-1990. ICPSR version. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Department of Sociology, Institute for Criminological Research [producer], 1990. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2002. doi:10.3886/ICPSR09919.v1
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09919.v1
This study was funded by:
- United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (88-IJ-CX-0048)
Scope of Study
Date of Collection:
Unit of Observation: Individuals.
Universe: Individuals in the Intensive Supervision Program in New Jersey.
Data Types: survey data
Data Collection Notes:
The codebook and user guide are provided by ICPSR as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file. The PDF file format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided on the ICPSR Web site.
Study Purpose: The Institute for Criminological Research conducted this study with the aim of gauging the degree to which subjective deterrence and rational choice affect drug-use recidivism. A secondary goal was to explore the effect of other social and psychological factors (e.g., those related to drug rehabilitation counseling) upon drug-use recidivism. The Intensive Supervision Program (ISP) in New Jersey was chosen because participants were aware that new drug-use incidents would most likely result in a return to prison. The main hypotheses of this study maintained that drug use in ISP was an inverse function of both the degree to which participants preferred ISP to prison and of the participants' belief that drug use would result in a return to prison.
Study Design: The Intensive Supervision Program (ISP) was chosen for this study because participants in ISP were generally aware that new drug-use incidents would result in punishment, possibly including a return to prison. All participants who entered the program between January 1, 1989, and April 30, 1990, were potential interviewees. Interviews were conducted a few weeks after the individual's arrival in the program. The aim was to interview participants once they had begun to settle into the program, but before any drug-use recidivism had occurred. Follow-up interviews were conducted when the participant either relapsed or successfully completed a year drug-free.
Sample: All individuals who entered the Intensive Supervision Program in New Jersey between January 1, 1989, and April 30, 1990, were interviewed.
Description of Variables: Interviews covered participants' feelings about the Intensive Supervision Program, risk of and reasons for drug-use recidivism, and history of alcohol and drug use.
Response Rates: Successful baseline interviews were completed with 516, or 94.5 percent, of the 546 felons. Follow-up interviews were conducted and completed with 128 out of 158, or 81 percent, of participants who tested positive for drugs and 38 out of 76, or 50 percent, of those who screened positive for alcohol. Of the program participants who had no positive urine screens for at least a year, follow-up interviews were conducted and completed with 84 out of 107, or 78.5 percent.
Presence of Common Scales: Several Likert-type scales were used.
Extent of Processing: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Performed consistency checks.
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Original ICPSR Release: 1993-10-02
- 2002-06-27 The user guide and codebook were converted from ASCII to PDF and combined into one file.
Related Publications (?)
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.