This data collection examines the impact of caseload
pressures on both intermediate appellate courts and supreme courts for
each state in the nation. The data describe in detail the changes made
by appellate courts and supply information related to each change.
These changes include (1) adding judges, law clerks and staff
attorneys, (2) expanding or creating intermediate appellate courts, (3)
reducing panel size, (4) using summary procedures, (5) curtailing
opinion practices by deciding cases without opinion or unpublished and
memo opinions, and (6) curtailing oral argument length.
One or more data files in this study are set up in a non-standard format, such as card image format. Users
may need help converting these files before they can be used for analysis.
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public.
Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
Marvell, Thomas, and Carlisle Moody. State Appellate Court Adaptation to Caseload Increase, 1968-1984: [United States]. ICPSR08262-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1988. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08262.v1
Persistent URL: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08262.v1
- RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
- EndNote XML (EndNote X4.0.1 or higher)
This study was funded by:
- United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (83-IJ-CX-4046)
Scope of Study
annual reports published by state court administrators'
offices, unpublished internal statistical reports, state rules of
appellate courts, literature describing appellate court operations,
published opinions of case reporters, and multi-state publications
containing survey information for more than one state
Original ICPSR Release: 1988-10-25
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.