Evaluation of the Bureau of Justice Assistance Mental Health Court Initiative at Seven Sites in the United States, 2003-2004 (ICPSR 4114)
Principal Investigator(s): Steadman, Henry J., Policy Research Associates, Inc.
This study evaluated seven mental health courts that were partially funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. Data were collected on 285 formal referrals to the seven courts between November 1, 2003, and January 31, 2004. For every referral, court staff completed a one-page questionnaire that covered (1) identification of the referring agent, (2) characteristics of the referred person, including age, gender, race, criminal charges, and type of mental disorder, and (3) the disposition decision.
One or more files in this study are not available for download due to special restrictions ; consult the restrictions note to learn more. You can apply online for access to the data. A login is required to apply for access.
Access to these data is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Data Use Agreement, specify the reasons for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.
Steadman, Henry J. Evaluation of the Bureau of Justice Assistance Mental Health Court Initiative at Seven Sites in the United States, 2003-2004. ICPSR04114-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research[distributor], 2005. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04114.v1
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04114.v1
This study was funded by:
- United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (2003-DD-BX-1012)
Scope of Study
Smallest Geographic Unit: None.
Date of Collection:
Unit of Observation: Individuals.
Universe: Individuals formally referred to the seven mental health courts covered by this study between November 1, 2003, and January 31, 2004.
Data Types: survey data
Study Purpose: This study evaluated seven mental health courts that were partially funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. They were located in Santa Clara County, California, Orange County, North Carolina, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Washoe County, Nevada, Brooklyn, New York, Bonneville County, Idaho, and Orange County, California. Research questions concerned (1) how cases were referred, processed, and disposed of by the courts and (2) whether there were factors that distinguished cases accepted by the court from cases referred to the court but not accepted. The researchers were also interested in whether mental health courts, like the majority of other jail diversion programs, would have older, white women disproportionately represented in comparison to their numbers in the criminal justice system as a whole.
Study Design: Data were collected on 285 people who were formally referred to the seven courts between November 1, 2003, and January 31, 2004. A formal referral was defined slightly differently for each court, but, in general, it was a person who passed through that court's pre-determined referral process. Court staff completed a one-page questionnaire for every formal referral during the study period. The questionnaire had three parts: (1) identification of the referring agent, (2) characteristics of the referred person, and (3) the disposition decision. The questionnaires were received back from the courts between November 2003 and March 2004.
Sample: In 2002 the Bureau of Justice Assistance began funding 23 mental health courts in the United States. This study covered the seven that were operational at the time the study began.
Data were gathered through questionnaires filled out by staff at the seven mental health courts.
Description of Variables: Variables include referral date, referring agent, age, gender, race, most serious criminal charge, type of crime, number of current misdemeanors and felonies, whether the person had a major mental disorder, type of disorder, primary Axis I diagnosis, whether the person had substance abuse problems, date of referral disposition, referral disposition outcome, if accepted, whether the person enrolled, reason if not accepted, and several derived variables.
Response Rates: Completed surveys were received from all seven sites involved in the study.
Presence of Common Scales: None
Original ICPSR Release: 2005-03-15
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)