National Review of Stalking Laws and Implementation Practices in the United States, 1998-2001 (ICPSR 3411)
Version Date: Mar 30, 2006 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Neal Miller, Institute for Law and Justice
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03411.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
This study was designed to clarify the status of stalking laws and their implementation needs. To accomplish this, the principal investigator conducted a survey of police and prosecutor agencies across the country to determine how stalking laws were being implemented. While there had been significant federal support for state and local agencies to adopt anti-stalking laws and implement anti-stalking initiatives, no comprehensive review of the status of such efforts had been done. Thus, there had been no way of knowing what additional measures might be needed to enhance local anti-stalking efforts. Two national surveys on stalking were conducted. The first survey of 204 law enforcement agencies (Part 1, Initial Law Enforcement Survey Data) and 222 prosecution offices (Part 3, Initial Prosecutor Survey Data) in jurisdictions with populations over 250,000 was conducted by mail in November of 1998. The survey briefly asked what special efforts the agencies had undertaken against stalking, including special units, training, or written policies and procedures. A replication of the first national survey was conducted in November of 2000. Part 2, Follow-Up Law Enforcement Survey Data, contains the follow-up data for law enforcement agencies and Part 4, Follow-Up Prosecutor Survey Data, contains the second survey data for prosecutors. Parts 1 to 4 include variables about the unit that handled stalking cases, types of stalking training provided, written policies on stalking cases, and whether statistics were collected on stalking and harassment. Parts 2 and 4 also include variables about the type of funding received by agencies. Part 4 also contains variables about other charges that might be filed in stalking cases, such as harassment, threats, criminal trespass, and protection order violation.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
HideTime Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
-
The user guide, codebook, and data collection instruments are provided by ICPSR as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file. The PDF file format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided on the ICPSR Web site.
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
Stalking has gained considerable attention from the mass media. However, notwithstanding a sizable literature about stalking as a legal construct and as a medical issue, systematic information about this crime and what has been done about it was largely missing. Most significantly, a policy analysis of what needed to be done to improve anti-stalking investigation, prosecution, and provision of services to stalking victims was totally absent. This study of the status of stalking laws and their implementation in the United States was conducted to fill this knowledge gap. The premises for this research are that stalking is a serious crime against persons and that it is widely prevalent. While there had been significant federal support for state and local agencies to adopt anti-stalking laws and implement anti-stalking initiatives, no comprehensive review of the status of such efforts had been done. Thus, there had been no way of knowing what additional measures might be needed to enhance local anti-stalking efforts. This study was designed to clarify the status of stalking laws and their implementation needs. To accomplish this goal, the principal investigator conducted a survey of police and prosecutor agencies across the country to determine how stalking laws were being implemented.
Study Design View help for Study Design
Two national surveys on stalking were conducted. The first survey of 204 law enforcement agencies (Part 1, Initial Law Enforcement Survey Data) and 222 prosecution offices (Part 3, Initial Prosecutor Survey Data) in jurisdictions with populations over 250,000 was conducted by mail in November of 1998. The survey briefly asked what special efforts the agencies had undertaken against stalking, including special units, training, or written policies and procedures. Mail reminders were sent to nonrespondent agencies six weeks after the initial mailing. A replication of the first national survey was conducted in November of 2000. Part 2, Followg-Up Law Enforcement Survey Data, contains the follow-up data for law enforcement agencies and Part 4, Follow-Up Prosecutor Survey Data, contains the second survey data for prosecutors. The survey mailing was identical to that conducted in 1998 except that the municipal prosecutor agencies that had reported no responsibility for handling stalking cases were dropped from the survey. Telephone follow-ups were conducted for nonrespondents in March of 2001.
Sample View help for Sample
Not applicable.
Universe View help for Universe
All law enforcement agencies and prosecutors in jurisdictions with more than 250,000 people.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Source View help for Data Source
mailback questionnaires
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Description of Variables View help for Description of Variables
Parts 1-4 include variables about the unit that handled stalking cases, types of stalking training provided, written policies on stalking cases, and whether statistics were collected on stalking and harassment. Parts 2 and 4 also include variables about the type of funding received by agencies. Part 4 also contains variables about other charges that might be filed in stalking cases, such as harassment, threats, criminal trespass, and protection order violation.
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
For Parts 1 and 3, the surveys had about a 60- percent response rate to the first mailing. A second mailing was sent out to the nonrespondents, resulting in a final response rate of over 80 percent. For Parts 2 and 4, the combined response rate was 82 percent.
Presence of Common Scales View help for Presence of Common Scales
None.
HideOriginal Release Date View help for Original Release Date
2002-11-27
Version History View help for Version History
- Miller, Neal. NATIONAL REVIEW OF STALKING LAWS AND IMPLEMENTATION PRACTICES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1998-2001. ICPSR version. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Law and Justice [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2002. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03411.v1
2006-03-30 File CQ3411.ALL.PDF was removed from any previous datasets and flagged as a study-level file, so that it will accompany all downloads.
2005-11-04 On 2005-03-14 new files were added to one or more datasets. These files included additional setup files as well as one or more of the following: SAS program, SAS transport, SPSS portable, and Stata system files. The metadata record was revised 2005-11-04 to reflect these additions.
2002-11-27 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Created online analysis version with question text.
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Notes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.