Affect, Reason, and Decision Making (ICPSR 24610)
This study examines the commonly observed inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. The researchers proposed that this relationship occurs because people rely on affect when judging the risk and benefit of specific hazards. The study tested and confirmed the hypothesis that providing information designed to alter the favorability of one's overall affective evaluation of an item (say nuclear power, natural gas, and food preservatives) would systematically change the risk and benefit judgments for that item. The study suggests that people seem prone to using an "affect heuristic" which improves judgmental efficiency by deriving both risk and benefit evaluations from a common source -- affective reactions to the stimulus item.
Data in this collection are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions. Please log in so we can determine if you are with a member institution and have access to these data files.
This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
Slovic, Paul, Melissa Finucane, and Ali Alhakami. Affect, Reason, and Decision Making. ICPSR24610-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2009-09-22. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24610.v1
Persistent URL: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24610.v1
This study was funded by:
- National Science Foundation (SBR 9422754)
- National Science Foundation (SBR 9709307)
Scope of Study
For a more detailed description of the study design, results, and discussion, please see the Finucane et al. paper included in the ICPSR codebook.
Original ICPSR Release: 2009-09-22
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.