The Source for Crime and Justice Data

Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search .

Your query returned 374 variables.

Click on the Variable Name for more detail


Name
Label/Question
1.

CASE IDENTIFIER CREATED BY THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
2.

WEIGHT

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
3.

Q1. STRAIGHT HANDLE BATON - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
4.

Q1. STRAIGHT HANDLE BATON - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
5.

Q1. STRAIGHT HANDLE BATON - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
6.

Q1. STRAIGHT HANDLE BATON - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
7.

Q1. EXPANDABLE BATON - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
8.

Q1. EXPANDABLE BATON - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
9.

Q1. EXPANDABLE BATON - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
10.

Q1. EXPANDABLE BATON - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
11.

Q1. CED - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
12.

Q1. CED - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
13.

Q1. CED - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
14.

Q1. CED - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
15.

Q1. PERSONAL ISSUE CHEMICAL AGENTS - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
16.

Q1. PERSONAL ISSUE CHEMICAL AGENTS - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
17.

Q1. PERSONAL ISSUE CHEMICAL AGENTS - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
18.

Q1. PERSONAL ISSUE CHEMICAL AGENTS - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
19.

Q1. WEAPON DEPLOYED CHEMICAL AGENTS - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
20.

Q1. WEAPON DEPLOYED CHEMICAL AGENTS - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
21.

Q1. WEAPON DEPLOYED CHEMICAL AGENTS - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
22.

Q1. WEAPON DEPLOYED CHEMICAL AGENTS - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
23.

Q1. OTHER IMPACT MUNITIONS - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
24.

Q1. OTHER IMPACT MUNITIONS - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
25.

Q1. OTHER IMPACT MUNITIONS - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
26.

Q1. OTHER IMPACT MUNITIONS - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
27.

Q1. OTHER (1) - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
28.

Q1. OTHER (1) - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
29.

Q1. OTHER (1) - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
30.

Q1. OTHER (1) - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
31.

Q1. OTHER (1) - DESCRIPTION

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
32.

Q1. OTHER (2) - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
33.

Q1. OTHER (2) - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
34.

Q1. OTHER (2) - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
35.

Q1. OTHER (2) - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
36.

Q1. OTHER (2) - DESCRIPTION

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
37.

Q2. DO YOU USE A USE OF FORCE CONTINUUM/MODEL IN POLICY OR TRAINING?

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
38.

Q2. IF NO, PLEASE EXPLAIN:

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
39.

Q2. IF NO, PLEASE EXPLAIN: (CONTINUED)

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
40.

Q2. IF YES, PLEASE INDICATE WHICH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING BEST DESCRIBES YOUR CONTINUUM OR MODEL:

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
41.

Q2. OTHER CONTINUUM OR MODEL DESCRIPTION

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
42.

Q2. OPTIONAL COMMENTS

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
43.

Q2. OPTIONAL COMMENTS (CONTINUED)

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
44.

Q3. PLEASE INDICATE WHETHER YOUR DEPARTMENT HAS CHANGED ITS CONTINUUM OR MODEL DURING THE LAST TWO YEARS OR IS CONTEMPLATING A CHANGE.

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
45.

Q3. OPTIONAL COMMENTS.

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
46.

Q3. OPTIONAL COMMENTS. (CONTINUED)

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
47.

Q4. ARE YOUR OFFICERS/DEPUTIES REQUIRED TO EXPERIENCE THE EFFECTS OF CHEMICAL SPRAYS BEFORE THEY ARE AUTHORIZED TO CARRY THEM?

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
48.

Q4. ARE YOUR OFFICERS/DEPUTIES REQUIRED TO EXPERIENCE THE EFFECTS OF CEDS BEFORE THEY ARE AUTHORIZED TO CARRY THEM?

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
49.

Q5. SCENARIO A. SOFT EMPTY-HAND TACTICS/CONTROL

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.


Name
Label/Question
50.

Q5. SCENARIO A. HARD EMPTY-HAND TACTICS/STRIKE/PUNCHES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

Results 1 - 50 of 374
2 3 4