The Source for Crime and Justice Data

Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search .

Your query returned 87 variables.

Click on the Variable Name for more detail


Name
Label/Question
1.

ICPSR UNIQUE SEQUENTIAL IDENTIFIER

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
2.

TYPE OF GOVERNMENT

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
3.

AGENCY IDENTIFIER

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
4.

AGENCY ID-NUMERIC (F16)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
5.

FIPS

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
6.

POPULATION

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
7.

TYPE OF AGENCY

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
8.

CITY-COUNTY FLAG (1=COUNTY/2=CITY)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
9.

FBI-UORI CODE (F7)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
10.

FBI GEOGRAPHIC GROUP CODE (F2)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
11.

UCR: POPULATION COVERED

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
12.

GOVERNMENT ID-NUMBER (F9)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
13.

FIPS: STATE CODE

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
14.

FIPS: COUNTY CODE

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
15.

FIPS: PLACE CODE

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
16.

STATE+COUNTY FIPS CODE (F5)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
17.

NUMERIC FBI COUNTY CODE (ST+CO)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
18.

NUMERIC FBI CITY CODE

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
19.

NAME OF AGENCY

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
20.

TYPE OF AGENCY

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
21.

UCR REGIONS OF U.S.

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
22.

BASE SAMPLE WGHT FCTR (BFORE ADJSTMNTS)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
23.

FINAL ADJUSTED SAMPLE WEIGHTING FACTOR

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
24.

TASK SCOPE INDEX

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
25.

NO. FACILITIES/SITES OPERATED BY AGENCY

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
26.

NUMBER OF STATIONS & FIXED SUBSTATIONS

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
27.

DIVERSITY OF PATROL TYPES USED

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
28.

# TASKS FOR WHICH COMPUTERS USED

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
29.

# FILES WHICH ARE COMPUTERIZED

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
30.

DEPARTMENTAL WWW HOME PAGE

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
31.

TOTAL FT (FULL-TIME) SWORN OFFICERS

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
32.

TOTAL FT EMPLOYEES (SWRN+NONSWRN)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
33.

TOTAL FT NON-SWORN (CIVILIAN) EMPLOYEES

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
34.

% FT EMPLOYEES = CIVILIAN (NON-SWORN)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
35.

% OF EMPLOYEES IN FIELD OPERATIONS

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
36.

% OF EMPLOYEES IN ADMINISTRATION

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
37.

% OF EMPLOYEES IN TECH SUPPORT

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
38.

% OF FT SWORN RESOND TO CALLS

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
39.

% OF FT SWORN COP ASSIGNED

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
40.

FTS PER 1000 POPULATION

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
41.

FNCTNL HETEROGENEITY INDX (ALL ASGNMNTS)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
42.

ADMIINISTRATIVE INTENSITY (100 = MAX)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
43.

FRMLZTION INDX # FRML WRTN POLICIES '99

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
44.

FRMLZTION INDX # FRML WRTN POLICIES '97

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
45.

FORM CODE FOR 1997 SURVEY

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
46.

COVERAGE OF DRUG TESTING (1997 SURVEY)

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
47.

SELECTION SCREENING TECHNIQUES

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
48.

EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW OFFICERS

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
49.

HRS REQUIRED TRAINING FOR NEW RECRUITS

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.


Name
Label/Question
50.

COLLECTIVE BARGAINING FOR EMPLOYEES

Taken from: Developing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999.

Results 1 - 50 of 87