The Source for Crime and Justice Data

Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search .

Your query returned 404 variables.

Click on the Variable Name for more detail


Name
Label/Question
26.

CRIME CLASS G

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
27.

CRIME CLASS H

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
28.

STRADDLE CELL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
29.

PRISON CELL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
30.

HABITUAL 2ND

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
31.

HABITUAL 3RD

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
32.

HABITUAL 4TH

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
33.

PROPERTY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
34.

PERSON

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
35.

CON SUB

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
36.

PUBLIC SAFETY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
37.

PUBLIC ORDER

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
38.

PUBLIC TRUST

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
39.

DEPARTURE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
40.

NON WHITE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
41.

FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
42.

EDUCATION

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
43.

EMPLOYED

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
44.

ASSETS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
45.

INCOME

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
46.

SINGLE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
47.

DEPENDENTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
48.

DRUG USE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
49.

ALCOHOL USE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
50.

NON US CITIZEN

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
51.

HONORABLE DISCHARGE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
52.

MENTAL HEALTH

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
53.

YOUNG BLACK MALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
54.

YOUNG DRUG USER

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
55.

PRIVATE ATTORNEY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
56.

CONVICTED AT TRIAL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
57.

HIGH VOLUME JUDGE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
58.

AGE < 19

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
59.

AGE 20-29

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
60.

AGE 30-39

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
61.

AGE 40-49

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
62.

HILLSDALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
63.

BERRIEN

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
64.

WAYNE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
65.

JACKSON

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
66.

BARRY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
67.

OAKLAND

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
68.

GENESEE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
69.

IONMONT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
70.

KALAMAZOO

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
71.

SAGINAW

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
72.

ALGLUSC

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
73.

BARHOKE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
74.

ANGTLEE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
75.

MUSKEGON

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

Results 26 - 75 of 404
2 3 4