Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search .

Your query returned 118 variables.

Click on the Variable Name for more detail


Name
Label/Question

CASE IDENTIFIER CREATED BY ICPSR

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

LENGTH OF PRISON SENTENCE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

PRISON SENTENCE?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

LOG OF PRISLEN

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
5. BASE

SCHEDULE C PRIMARY OFFENSE IN MONTHS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

LOG OF BASE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
7. BLACK

RACE = BLACK

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

SEX = FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
9. TRIAL

CONVICTED AT TRIAL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
10. AGE18

AGE < 19

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
11. AGE20

AGE 19-29

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
12. AGE30

AGE 30-39

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
13. BM

BLACK MALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
14. BW

BLACK FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
15. WW

WHITE FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

REGION1

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

REGION2

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

REGION3

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

REGION4

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

REGION5

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question

REGION6

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
22. ABOVE

DEPART ABOVE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
23. BELOW

DEPART BELOW

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
24. IO1A

PRIMARY OFFENSE 1 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
25. IO1B

PRIMARY OFFENSE 3 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
26. IO1C

PRIMARY OFFENSE 5 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
27. IO1D

PRIMARY OFFENSE 7 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
28. IO1E

PRIMARY OFFENSE 9 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
29. IO1F

PRIMARY OFFENSE 14 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
30. IO2A

ADDITIONAL COUNTS 1 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
31. IO2B

ADDITIONAL COUNTS 2 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
32. IO2C

ADDITIONAL COUNTS 3 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
33. IO2D

ADDITIONAL COUNTS 4 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
34. IO3A

ADDITIONAL OFFENSES 1 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
35. IO3B

ADDITIONAL OFFENSES 2 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
36. IO3C

ADDITIONAL OFFENSES 3 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
37. IO3D

ADDITIONAL OFFENSES 4 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
38. IO4A

MANDATORY FIREARM CONVICTION

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
39. IO5A

SIMULATED WEAPON

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
40. IO5B

KNIFE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
41. IO5C

FIREARM

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
42. IO6A

PRIOR CONVICTIONS 1 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
43. IO6B

PRIOR CONVICTIONS 2 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
44. IO6C

PRIOR CONVICTIONS 3 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
45. IO6D

PRIOR CONVICTIONS 4 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
46. IO6E

PRIOR CONVICTIONS 5 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
47. IO7A

PRIOR PROP CON 1 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
48. IO7B

PRIOR PROP CON 2 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
49. IO7C

PRIOR PROP CON 3 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
50. IO7D

PRIOR PROP CON 4 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data.

Results 1 - 50 of 118