The Source for Crime and Justice Data

Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search .

Your query returned 113 variables.

Click on the Variable Name for more detail


Name
Label/Question
1.

CASE IDENTIFIER CREATED BY ICPSR

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
2.

PRISON SENTENCE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
3.

LENGTH OF PRISON SENTENCE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
4.

LOG OF PRISLEN

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
5.

SECTION C PRIMARY OFFENSE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
6.

LOG OF BASE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
7.

BLACK

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
8.

FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
9.

TRIAL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
10.

DEPART ABOVE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
11.

DEPART BELOW

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
12.

AGE < 19

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
13.

AGE 19-29

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
14.

AGE 30-39

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
15.

BLACK MALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
16.

BLACK FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
17.

WHITE FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
18.

REGION 1

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
19.

REGION 2

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
20.

REGION 3

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
21.

REGION 4

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
22.

REGION 5

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
23.

REGION 6

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
24.

PRIMARY OFFENSE 1 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
25.

PRIMARY OFFENSE 2 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
26.

PRIMARY OFFENSE 3 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
27.

PRIMARY OFFENSE 4 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
28.

PRIMARY OFFENSE 6 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
29.

PRIMIARY OFFENSE 7 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
30.

ADDITIONAL COUNTS 1 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
31.

ADDITIONAL COUNTS 2 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
32.

ADDITIONAL COUNTS 3 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
33.

ADDITIONAL COUNTS 4 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
34.

ADDITIONAL COUNTS 5-6 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
35.

ADDIITNOAL OFFENSES 1 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
36.

ADDIITONAL OFFENSES 2 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
37.

ADDITIONAL OFFENSES 3 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
38.

ADDITIONAL OFFENSES 4 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
39.

ADDITIONAL OFFENSES 5 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
40.

ADDITONAL OFFENSES 6 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
41.

SIMULATED WEAPON

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
42.

FIREARM

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
43.

SERIOUS VICTIM INJURY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
44.

PRIOR CONVICTIONS 1 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
45.

PRIOR CONVICTIONS 2 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
46.

PRIOR CONVICTIONS 3 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
47.

PRIOR INCARCERATIONS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
48.

PRIOR JUVENILE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
49.

LEGAL RESTRAINT LO

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
50.

LEGAL RESTRAINT MED

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data.

Results 1 - 50 of 113