The Source for Crime and Justice Data

Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search .

Your query returned 118 variables.

Click on the Variable Name for more detail


Name
Label/Question
1.

CASE IDENTIFIER CREATED BY ICPSR

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
2.

TYPE OF DISPOSITION

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
3.

PRISON SENTENCE?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
4.

LENGTH OF PRISON SENTENCE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
5.

LOG OF PRISON LENGTH

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
6.

LOG OF STATMAX

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
7.

STATUTORY MAXIMUM

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
8.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL A

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
9.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL B

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
10.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL C

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
11.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL D

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
12.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL E

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
13.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL F

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
14.

OFFENSE LEVEL I

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
15.

OFFENSE LEVEL II

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
16.

OFFENSE LEVEL III

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
17.

OFFENSE LEVEL IV

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
18.

OFFENSE LEVEL V

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
19.

OFFENSE LEVEL VI

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
20.

CRIME CLASS A AND MURDER 2

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
21.

CRIME CLASS B

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
22.

CRIME CLASS C

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
23.

CRIME CLASS D

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
24.

CRIME CLASS E

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
25.

CRIME CLASS F

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
26.

CRIME CLASS G

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
27.

CRIME CLASS H

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
28.

STRADDLE CELL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
29.

PRISON CELL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
30.

HABITUAL 2ND

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
31.

HABITUAL 3RD

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
32.

HABITUAL 4TH

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
33.

PROPERTY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
34.

PERSON

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
35.

CON SUB

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
36.

PUBLIC SAFETY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
37.

PUBLIC ORDER

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
38.

PUBLIC TRUST

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
39.

DEPARTURE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
40.

NON WHITE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
41.

FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
42.

EDUCATION

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
43.

EMPLOYED

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
44.

ASSETS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
45.

INCOME

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
46.

SINGLE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
47.

DEPENDENTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
48.

DRUG USE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
49.

ALCOHOL USE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
50.

NON US CITIZEN

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

Results 1 - 50 of 118