The Source for Crime and Justice Data

Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search .

Your query returned 118 variables.

Name
Label/Question
1.

CASE IDENTIFIER CREATED BY ICPSR

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

2.

TYPE OF DISPOSITION

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

3.

PRISON SENTENCE?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

4.

LENGTH OF PRISON SENTENCE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

5.

LOG OF PRISON LENGTH

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

6.

LOG OF STATMAX

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

7.

STATUTORY MAXIMUM

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

8.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL A

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

9.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL B

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

10.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL C

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

11.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL D

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

12.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL E

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

13.

PRIOR RECORD LEVEL F

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

14.

OFFENSE LEVEL I

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

15.

OFFENSE LEVEL II

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

16.

OFFENSE LEVEL III

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

17.

OFFENSE LEVEL IV

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

18.

OFFENSE LEVEL V

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

19.

OFFENSE LEVEL VI

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

20.

CRIME CLASS A AND MURDER 2

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

21.

CRIME CLASS B

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

22.

CRIME CLASS C

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

23.

CRIME CLASS D

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

24.

CRIME CLASS E

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

25.

CRIME CLASS F

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

26.

CRIME CLASS G

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

27.

CRIME CLASS H

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

28.

STRADDLE CELL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

29.

PRISON CELL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

30.

HABITUAL 2ND

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

31.

HABITUAL 3RD

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

32.

HABITUAL 4TH

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

33.

PROPERTY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

34.

PERSON

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

35.

CON SUB

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

36.

PUBLIC SAFETY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

37.

PUBLIC ORDER

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

38.

PUBLIC TRUST

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

39.

DEPARTURE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

40.

NON WHITE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

41.

FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

42.

EDUCATION

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

43.

EMPLOYED

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

44.

ASSETS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

45.

INCOME

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

46.

SINGLE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

47.

DEPENDENTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

48.

DRUG USE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

49.

ALCOHOL USE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

50.

NON US CITIZEN

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data.

Results 1 - 50 of 118