The Source for Crime and Justice Data

Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search .

Your query returned 55 variables.

Name
Label/Question
1.

CASE IDENTIFIER CREATED BY ICPSR

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

2.

EXECUTED PRISON SENTENCE?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

3.

LOG OF LENGTH OF PRISON SENTENCE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

4.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 0 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

5.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 1 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

6.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 2 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

7.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 3 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

8.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 4 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

9.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 5 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

10.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 6+ POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

11.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 11

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

12.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 10

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

13.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 9

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

14.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 8

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

15.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 7

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

16.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 6

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

17.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 5

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

18.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 4

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

19.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 3

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

20.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 2

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

21.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 1

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

22.

CRIME AGAINST PERSON

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

23.

CRIME AGAIN PROPERTY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

24.

DRUG CRIME

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

25.

WEAPON MODIFER 1

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

26.

WEAPON MODIFER 2

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

27.

WEAPON MODIFIER 3

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

28.

ATTEMPT?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

29.

CONSPIRACY?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

30.

GRID CELL TYPE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

31.

SUBSEQUENT_WEAPON_MODIFIER_IND

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

32.

SUBSEQUENT_SEX_MODIFIER_IND

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

33.

SUBSEQUENT_DRUG_MODIFIER_IND

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

34.

SOLICIT JUV?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

35.

GANG RELATED?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

36.

DEPARTURE ABOVE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

37.

DEPARTURE BELOW

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

38.

TRIAL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

39.

BLACK

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

40.

NON WHITE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

41.

FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

42.

YOUNG OFFENDER (AGE < 19)

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

43.

AGE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

44.

AGE SQUARED

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

45.

YOUNG BLACK MALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

46.

DISTRICT 1

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

47.

DISTRICT 2

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

48.

DISTRICT 3

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

49.

DISTRICT 4

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

50.

DISTRICT 5

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

Results 1 - 50 of 55