The Source for Crime and Justice Data

Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search .

Your query returned 55 variables.

Click on the Variable Name for more detail


Name
Label/Question
1.

CASE IDENTIFIER CREATED BY ICPSR

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
2.

EXECUTED PRISON SENTENCE?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
3.

LOG OF LENGTH OF PRISON SENTENCE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
4.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 0 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
5.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 1 POINT

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
6.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 2 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
7.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 3 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
8.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 4 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
9.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 5 POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
10.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY 6+ POINTS

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
11.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 11

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
12.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 10

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
13.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 9

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
14.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 8

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
15.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 7

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
16.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 6

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
17.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 5

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
18.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 4

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
19.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 3

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
20.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 2

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
21.

OFFENSE SEVERITY LEVEL 1

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
22.

CRIME AGAINST PERSON

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
23.

CRIME AGAIN PROPERTY

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
24.

DRUG CRIME

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
25.

WEAPON MODIFER 1

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
26.

WEAPON MODIFER 2

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
27.

WEAPON MODIFIER 3

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
28.

ATTEMPT?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
29.

CONSPIRACY?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
30.

GRID CELL TYPE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
31.

SUBSEQUENT_WEAPON_MODIFIER_IND

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
32.

SUBSEQUENT_SEX_MODIFIER_IND

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
33.

SUBSEQUENT_DRUG_MODIFIER_IND

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
34.

SOLICIT JUV?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
35.

GANG RELATED?

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
36.

DEPARTURE ABOVE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
37.

DEPARTURE BELOW

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
38.

TRIAL

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
39.

BLACK

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
40.

NON WHITE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
41.

FEMALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
42.

YOUNG OFFENDER (AGE < 19)

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
43.

AGE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
44.

AGE SQUARED

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
45.

YOUNG BLACK MALE

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
46.

DISTRICT 1

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
47.

DISTRICT 2

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
48.

DISTRICT 3

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
49.

DISTRICT 4

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.


Name
Label/Question
50.

DISTRICT 5

Taken from: Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 - 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data.

Results 1 - 50 of 55