The Source for Crime and Justice Data

Variable Search Results

Your query returned 225 variables. Use the search box below to revise your search .

 
 
 
 
[1]   2   3   4     >    >
Name
Label/Question

SHOULD COURT DEFER TO AGENCY DISCRETION

Did the court conclude that it should defer to agency discretion ? (for example, if the action was committed to agency discretion)

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

ID OF FED REGULATORY AGENCY

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

AGENCY ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION

Did the court rule for the government in an issue related to agency acquisition of information (e.g. physical inspections, searches, subpoenas, records, etc) ? ... (view details)

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

COURT SUPPORT DECISION OF ADMIN LAW

Did the court support the decision of an administrative law judge ?

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Did the court's ruling on an issue arising out of an alternative dispute resolution process (ADR, settlement conference, role of mediator or arbitrator, etc.) favor the appellant ? ... (view details)

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

NO. AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS FILED

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

STATE OF APPELLANT

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

NO. APPELLANTS-PRIVATE BUSINESSES

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

DETAILED NATURE OF 1ST LISTED APPELLANT

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

DETAILED NATURE OF 2ND LISTED APPELLANT

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

NO. APPELLANTS-FED GOVERNMENT

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

NO. APPELLANTS-FIDUCIARIES

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

DISTRICT COURT FINAL JUDGMENT

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

NO. APPELLANTS-NATURAL PERSONS

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

NO. APPELLANTS-NON-PROFIT GROUPS

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

NO. APPELLANTS-STATE GOVERNMENT

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

NO. APPELLANTS-SUB-STATE GOVERNMENTS

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

ATTORNEY'S FEES

Did the court's ruling on attorneys' fees favor the appellant?

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

1ST APPELLANT BANKRUPT

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

SECOND APPELLANT BANKRUPT

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

1ST RESPONDENT BANKRUPT

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

SECOND RESPONDENT BANKRUPT

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

PAGE NO. 1ST PAGE OF CASE

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

ARBITRARY OR CAPRICIOUS STANDARD

Did the courts's use or interpretation of the arbitrary and capricious standard support the government ?

(APA allows courts to overturn agency actions deemed to be arbitrary or capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; Overton Park emphasized this is a narrow standard--one must prove that agency's action is ... (view details)

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

CASE IDENTIFICATION

Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Appeals Data.

[1]   2   3   4     >    >