Note
The 
icon indicates
that the variable is part of a study that is in a series. As such, you will see quite a few similarly named
variables from different years/waves.
Filter Results
By Time Period
Variable Search Results
If you weren't looking for variables, you can also perform your query against our citations database or our data holdings. You may also wish to look over our searching tips.
You can also choose to execute your search against the broader ICPSR variables database. You can also choose the concise view of variable results.
Additional Filters:
|
||||||
| ABUSEDIS |
SHOULD COURT DEFER TO AGENCY DISCRETION Did the court conclude that it should defer to agency discretion ? (for example, if the action was committed to agency discretion) Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| ADMINREV |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| AGEN_ACQ |
AGENCY ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION Did the court rule for the government in an issue related to agency acquisition of information (e.g. physical inspections, searches, subpoenas, records, etc) ? ... (view details) Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| ALJ |
COURT SUPPORT DECISION OF ADMIN LAW Did the court support the decision of an administrative law judge ? Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| ALTDISP |
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION Did the court's ruling on an issue arising out of an alternative dispute resolution process (ADR, settlement conference, role of mediator or arbitrator, etc.) favor the appellant ? ... (view details) Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| AMICUS |
NO. AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS FILED Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APP_STID |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APPBUS |
NO. APPELLANTS-PRIVATE BUSINESSES Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APPEL1 |
DETAILED NATURE OF 1ST LISTED APPELLANT Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APPEL2 |
DETAILED NATURE OF 2ND LISTED APPELLANT Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APPFED |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APPFIDUC |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APPLFROM |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APPNATPR |
NO. APPELLANTS-NATURAL PERSONS Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APPNONP |
NO. APPELLANTS-NON-PROFIT GROUPS Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APPSTATE |
NO. APPELLANTS-STATE GOVERNMENT Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| APPSUBST |
NO. APPELLANTS-SUB-STATE GOVERNMENTS Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| ATTYFEE |
Did the court's ruling on attorneys' fees favor the appellant? Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| BANK_AP1 |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| BANK_AP2 |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| BANK_R1 |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| BANK_R2 |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| BEGINPG |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| CAPRIC |
ARBITRARY OR CAPRICIOUS STANDARD Did the courts's use or interpretation of the arbitrary and capricious standard support the government ? (APA allows courts to overturn agency actions deemed to be arbitrary or capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; Overton Park emphasized this is a narrow standard--one must prove that agency's action is ... (view details) Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
| CASENUM |
Taken from: United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925-1988 - Weighting Data. |
|||||
|
||||||
