United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
The Police-Public Contact Survey (PPCS), was designed by
the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) to document contacts between
police and the public that culminated in police using force. The 2005
survey was conducted as a supplement to the National Crime
Victimization Survey (NCVS). To date, the PPCS has been conducted four
times by BJS. The first survey -- described in the BJS publication,
"Police Use of Force: Collection of National Data" (NCJ 165040) --
documented levels of contacts with police during 1996. The second
survey -- described in "Contacts Between Police and the Public:
Findings from the 1999 National Survey" (NCJ 184957) -- recorded
police-citizen contacts in 1999. These data are archived in
POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 1999 (ICPSR 3151). The third survey --
described in the BJS publication, "Contacts Between Police and the
Public, Findings from the 2002 National Survey" (NCJ 207845) --
recorded police-citizen contacts in 2002. These data are archived in
POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 2002: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 4273). The
fourth survey -- described in the BJS publication, "Contacts Between
Police and the Public, 2005" (NCJ 215243) -- covered interactions
between police and the public in 2005. The results of this survey are
contained in this data collection.
National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Series
WARNING: This study is over 150MB in size and may take several minutes to download on a typical internet connection.
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 2005 [UNITED STATES]. ICPSR20020-v2. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics [producer], 2008. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2008-05-06. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20020.v2
Persistent URL: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20020.v2
- RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
- EndNote XML (EndNote X4.0.1 or higher)
This study was funded by:
- United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
Scope of Study
Stratified multistage cluster sample.
To obtain national estimates, the weight variable must be
Mode of Data Collection:
computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI),
Extent of Processing: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of
disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major
statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to
these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
Performed consistency checks.
Standardized missing values.
Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Restrictions: This data collection may not be used for any purpose
other than statistical reporting and analysis. Use of these data to
learn the identity of any person or establishment is prohibited.
Original ICPSR Release: 2007-06-18
- 2008-05-06 The weights for the 2005 PPCS data were revised to reflect a change of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) person weights. An NCVS weighting issue was discovered that resulted in the revision of the NCVS person weights. The NCVS revision directly affected the person weights for 0.8 percent of all households in the 2005 NCVS. Revising the PPCS weights was therefore necessary since the NCVS person weights are the starting point for the PPCS weighting. Due to this correction, some estimates produced by the archived database will differ slightly from those shown in the BJS report Contacts between Police and the Public, 2005. The difference between the published (19.09 percent) and revised (19.14 percent) overall rate of police-public contact in 2005 is about 0.05 percent.
Police Use of Nonfatal Force, 2002-11
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Full Text Options:
Export Options: RIS/EndNote
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.