View Record Details
|Title||Enhancing Police Integrity|
Klockars, Carl B.
Ivkovich, Sanja K.
Haberfeld, Maria R.
|Subtitle/Series Name||NIJ Research for Practice|
|Pub. Date||Dec 2005|
|Abstract||The analysis was based on responses given by 3,235 officers from 30 law enforcement agencies across the Nation in responding to questions about hypothetical scenarios related to police misconduct. The analysis of the responses revealed officers' understanding of agency rules on misconduct, their views about the seriousness of various types of misconduct, their knowledge and opinions about potential disciplinary measures, and their willingness to report prohibited behavior by other officers. The researchers ranked the 30 responding agencies according to their environments of integrity, selecting 3 highly ranked agencies for in-depth evaluation and field observations. Based on the findings, the researchers identified several factors they believe foster integrity within a police agency. One factor is the commitment of police administrators to the creation and maintenance of an organizational culture that gives top priority to officer integrity. One means of promoting such a culture is to educate both police officers and the public by disclosing the entire disciplinary process to maximum public scrutiny. How police managers detect, investigate, and discipline misconduct will also show officers how serious the managers view the misconduct. Finally, police administrators should expressly require all officers to report the misconduct of other officers or risk severe discipline. Rotating and changing officer assignments can help prevent the development of personal bonds among officers that may discourage the reporting of other officers' misconduct. source|
|Producer||United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice|
|Place of Production||Washington, DC|
This publication is related to the following dataset(s):