General Social Surveys, 1972-2006 [Cumulative File] (ICPSR 4697)

Principal Investigator(s): Davis, James A., National Opinion Research Center; Smith, Tom W., National Opinion Research Center; Marsden, Peter V., Harvard University

Summary:

The General Social Surveys (GSS) were designed as part of a data diffusion project in 1972. The GSS replicated questionnaire items and wording in order to facilitate time-trend studies. This data collection includes a cumulative file that merges all 25 General Social Surveys into a single file containing data from 1972 to 2006. The 2006 survey was composed of permanent questions that appeared on each of the previous surveys, rotating questions that appeared on two out of every three surveys (e.g., 1973, 1974, 1976), and a small number of occasional questions that occurred in a single survey. The GSS included 11 topical modules: quality of working life, attitudes towards firearms, shared capitalism, level of disability, use of foreign languages, mental health attitudes and experiences, number of people known, participation in congregations, knowledge about and attitude towards science, religious trends, and sexual behavior. The International Social Survey Program (ISSP) modules included in the 2006 survey were: the role of government, and work orientation. Specific topics included social-welfare and economic regulation, civil liberties, spending priorities, and political efficacy. The data also contain several variables describing the demographic characteristics of the respondents.

Series: General Social Survey Series

Access Notes

  • This data collection has been deaccessioned; it is no longer distributed by ICPSR.

  • These data are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions. Because you are not logged in, we cannot verify that you will be able to download the data.

Study Description

Citation

Davis, James A., Tom W. Smith, and Peter V. Marsden. General Social Surveys, 1972-2006 [Cumulative File]. ICPSR04697-v4. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 2009-12-04. doi:10.3886/ICPSR04697.v4

Persistent URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04697.v4

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote XML (EndNote X4.0.1 or higher)

Funding

This survey was funded by:

  • National Science Foundation (SBR-96-17727)

Scope of Study

Subject Terms:   abortion, citizen participation, civil rights, community participation, compensation, computer literacy, computer use, crime, environmental attitudes, ethnicity, families, family life, feminism, freedom, gender roles, government programs, health status, human rights, information literacy, information systems, law enforcement, life cycle, mental health, military strength, morale, morality, national identity, occupational status, occupations, patients, physicians, political participation, politics, poverty, prejudice, race relations, racial attitudes, reactions to crime, religion, sexual behavior, social attitudes, social control, social indicators, social inequality, social issues, social justice, social mobility, social networks, social services, social values, socioeconomic status, wages and salaries, work, work attitudes

Smallest Geographic Unit:   census region

Geographic Coverage:   United States

Time Period:  

  • 1972--2006

Date of Collection:  

  • 1972--2006

Unit of Observation:   individual

Universe:   All noninstitutionalized, English- and Spanish-speaking persons 18 years of age or older, living in the United States.

Data Types:   survey data

Data Collection Notes:

2011-08-08 This data collection has been deaccessioned and is no longer available.

In 2006 there were two important changes to the General Social Surveys. First, Spanish interviews were conducted, so the target population is now adults living in households in the United States who speak English or Spanish. Second, a third sample was added to accommodate more supplements. This led to a total sample size in 2006 of 4,510.

This data collection includes a searchable, machine-readable PDF codebook. Hard copy versions of the codebook are no longer available.

Please see the codebook for important errata and processing notes.

Additional information regarding the General Social Surveys can be found at the General Social Survey (GSS) Web site and the Roper Center Web site.

Methodology

Sample:   National Opinion Research Center national probability sample. For the 2006 survey, a new sample frame based on the 2000 United States Census was implemented. Block quota sampling was used in 1972-1974 and for half of the 1975 and 1976 surveys. Full probability sampling was employed in the in half of the 1975 and 1976, and the 1977, 1978, 1980, 1982-1991, 1993-1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 surveys. As with the 2004 survey, the 2006 survey subsampled nonrespondents. (See Appendix A of the codebook for more information.)

Weight:   (1) WTSS or WTSSNR: GSS users need to use one of the weight variables for the 2004 and 2006 GSS's. The memo for weight variables can be found in the codebook. (2) WTSSALL: The weight variable WTSSALL is the same as WTSS for 2004 and 2006. It takes into consideration the subsampling of initial nonrespondents and the selection of one adult per household. See Appendix A for further discussion of WTSS. For years 1972-2002, WTSSALL takes into consideration the selection of one adult per household by adjusting for the number of adults in the household. See the general discussion of number of adults adjustment in Appendix A. In order to generalize to adults living in households and including more than just 2004 and 2006, this weight should be utilized. (3) Additional information regarding weight variables for this data collection can be found in Appendix A of the codebook.

Mode of Data Collection:   computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI), computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI), face-to-face interview, telephone interview

Response Rates:   Approximately 71 percent.

Extent of Processing:  ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:

  • Created online analysis version with question text.

Version(s)

Original ICPSR Release:  2007-05-31

Version History:

  • 2009-12-04 In the update of this collection, a compressed Stata system file and SAS transport (CPORT) file replace the uncompressed version of the Stata system file and the SAS transport (XPORT) file, respectively. In addition, the value labels for several variables have been added to the SPSS, SAS, and Stata setup and system files, and the SDA for this collection and the bookmarks in the codebook have been updated.
  • 2009-09-22 This update of the dataset includes variables that were not previously released, the coding of three variables, numerous recodes, corrections to the codebook, and the drop of the variable VIGVER06, among others. Please see the updated codebook for more information regarding all of the changes to this version.
  • 2007-09-10 The data files for the General Social Survey, 1972-2006 have been updated to include corrected missing data specifications for responses of "Don't Know". In addition, the codebook has been updated to include the most up-to-date errata.

Related Publications

Instructional Resources

  • ICPSR has created the following instructional guides that utilize data from this study:

    Additional materials can be found on our Resources for Instructors site.

  • Instructional guides that utilize this dataset are available:

    • Altruism: A Data-Driven Learning Guide - Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

      Prosocial behavior is a term used by social psychologists to refer to a broad category of actions that are considered to be beneficial to others and to have positive social consequences. One type of prosocial behavior is altruism--helping that is intended to provide aid to someone else with no expectations of getting something in return.

      The goal of this exercise is to explore some of the factors that may influence altruistic behavior. Crosstabulation will be used.

    • Social Class and Attitudes about Inequality: A Data-Driven Learning Guide - Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

      Social class is a measure of relative power, privilege, and opportunity in a society. Individuals in higher social classes generally have greater power and access to resources than individuals in lower social classes. Researchers may assign individuals to social classes on the basis of criteria such as occupation, education, income, wealth, and place of residence.

      Americans' attitudes about social class and inequality are often characterized by competitive individualism-the belief that economic success is the result of hard work and ability. Competitive individualism stresses individual responsibility over structural factors as causes of social inequality.

      The goal of this module is to explore the ways in which attitudes about inequality and its causes and solutions differ between social classes. Crosstabulation will be used.

    • Social Capital Over Time and Across Generations: A Data-Driven Learning Guide - Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

      The term social capital is used to refer to connections among people and organizations. These social networks have important implications for social identity, emotional support, as well as the exchange of goods, services, and information.

      In his influential book, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (2000), Robert Putnam identified seven dimensions of social capital (political participation, civic participation, religious participation, workplace networks, informal networks, mutual trust, and altruism), and showed that there are two distinct, though not necessarily mutually exclusive, types of social capital: bridging social capital (inclusive, outward-looking social networks), and bonding social capital (exclusive, inward-looking social networks). In addition Putnam explored changes in social capital over the 20th century, demonstrating that social capital increased between 1900 and the 1960s, then decreased dramatically as a result of pressures of time and money, mobility and sprawl, television, and generational differences.

      Following from Robert Putnam's work, this exercise explores time and generational trends in measures of social capital from 1972 to 2004. Crosstabulation and comparison of means are used.

Found a problem? Use our Report Problem form to let us know.