Impact of the No Early Release Act (NERA) on Prosecution and Sentencing in New Jersey, 1996-2000 (ICPSR 4178)

Version Date: Feb 25, 2005 View help for published

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Candace McCoy, Rutgers University--Newark. School of Criminal Justice; Patrick, Jr. McManimon, Kean University

https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04178.v1

Version V1

Slide tabs to view more

This study examined New Jersey's No Early Release Act (NERA), which became effective in 1997. NERA required that offenders convicted of violent crimes serve at least 85 percent of their sentences before becoming eligible for parole. This study's primary goal was to determine whether prosecutors changed their charging and plea bargaining practices in order to obtain sentences under NERA that were roughly equivalent to those imposed before NERA. Data were obtained from the New Jersey Administrative Office of the Courts for 1996 to May 2000. These data included every case in which a crime covered by the No Early Release Act was charged and, for comparison, every case involving a burglary charge, a charge not covered by NERA. These data cover defendants' progress through the New Jersey court system, including the initial charge, indictment, and sentencing.

McCoy, Candace, and McManimon, Patrick, Jr. Impact of the No Early Release Act (NERA) on Prosecution and Sentencing in New Jersey, 1996-2000  . Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2005-02-25. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04178.v1

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (98-CE-VX-0007)

None.

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
Hide

1996 -- 2000
2000
Hide

This study examined New Jersey's No Early Release Act (NERA). This act, which became effective on September 9, 1997, required that offenders convicted of violent crimes serve at least 85 percent of their sentences before becoming eligible for parole. This study's primary goal was to determine whether prosecutors changed their charging and plea bargaining practices in order to obtain sentences under NERA that were roughly equivalent to those imposed before NERA. For comparison purposes, cases involving a burglary charge, a felony not covered under NERA, were examined in addition to cases involving charges covered by NERA. The following questions guided the research: (1) Did prosecutors charge a greater proportion of defendants at offense levels not covered by the law's "violent offender" definitions after the act took effect? (2) As part of plea agreements, did prosecutors reduce charges from those covered by the act to offenses not covered by the act? (3) Did trial rates change for those offenses covered by the act?

Data were obtained from the New Jersey Administrative Office of the Courts for 1996 to May 2000. These data cover defendants' progress through the New Jersey court system, including the initial charge, indictment, and sentencing. The data include every case in which a crime covered by the No Early Release Act was charged and every case involving a burglary charge. Many of these cases also involved other charges, and these charges are also included in the data. From 1996 to May 2000 there were 468,944 charges brought against criminal defendants for crimes covered by the No Early Release Act, burglary, and less serious crimes that were also charged as part of these felony legal cases.

inap.

Every charge in New Jersey from 1996 to May 2000 for a crime covered under the No Early Release Act, every charge for burglary, and all other charges involved in those cases.

Criminal charges

Data were obtained from New Jersey's Administrative Office of the Courts.

Variables include initial charge statute, initial charge date, whether there was a codefendant in the case, initial charge disposition date, initial charge disposition, initial charge disposition reason, indictment statute, indictment date, indictment disposition, indictment disposition reason, amount of fines and compensation paid by offender, statute sentenced under, type of sentence imposed, and sentence date.

Not applicable.

None.

Hide

2005-02-25

2018-02-15 The citation of this study may have changed due to the new version control system that has been implemented. The previous citation was:
  • McCoy, Candace, and Patrick, Jr. McManimon. Impact of the No Early Release Act (NERA) on Prosecution and Sentencing in New Jersey, 1996-2000 . ICPSR04178-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2005. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04178.v1

2005-02-25 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:

  • Standardized missing values.
Hide

Notes

  • The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.

NACJD logo

This dataset is maintained and distributed by the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD), the criminal justice archive within ICPSR. NACJD is primarily sponsored by three agencies within the U.S. Department of Justice: the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.