This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Survey, January #2, 2013 (ICPSR 34992)
Principal Investigator(s): CBS News; 60 Minutes; Vanity Fair
This poll, the last of two fielded January of 2013, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked their opinions about global warming, immigration, women's role in joining combat units in the military, consumer behaviors, violence in video games, gun use, gun control, arming teachers at school, and whether they thought things in the country were going in the right direction. Opinions were solicited about genetically modified foods, respondents' level of concern regarding genetically modified foods, whether respondents would eat genetically modified food, and whether foods containing genetically modified ingredients should be labeled. Additional topics included information on the respondent's first valentine, TV viewing behaviors (e.g. Oscars, State of the Union address), 2013 Super Bowl, sports and the importance of winning, respondents' opinions on other people's choice to not have children, and the recovery in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, education level, household income, type of residential area (e.g. urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, voting behavior, whether respondents were registered to vote, religious affiliation, and whether respondents thought of themselves as born again Christians.
These data are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions. Because you are not logged in, we cannot verify that you will be able to download these data.
CBS News, 60 Minutes, and Vanity Fair. CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Survey, January #2, 2013. ICPSR34992-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2014-03-20. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34992.v1
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34992.v1
Scope of Study
Subject Terms: attitudes, consumer behavior, Democratic Party (USA), family size, global warming, gun control, gun ownership, gun use, immigration, personal security, political affiliation, politics, public opinion, Republican Party (USA), social issues, sports, Tea Party movement, television viewing, television violence, voting behavior
Smallest Geographic Unit: congressional district
Geographic Coverage: United States
Date of Collection:
Unit of Observation: individual
Universe: Persons aged 18 or older living in households with telephones and cell phones in the United States.
Data Types: survey data
Sample: This poll was conducted among 1,052 adults nationwide. Phone numbers were dialed from samples of both standard land-line and cell phones. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The error for subgroups may be higher. This poll release conforms to the Standards of Disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.
Time Method: Cross-sectional
Weight: The data contain a weight (wght) variable that should be used in analyzing the data. The data were weighted to match United States Census Bureau breakdowns on age, sex, race, education, and region of the country. The data were also adjusted for the fact that people who share a telephone with others have less chance to be contacted than people who live alone and have their own telephones, and that households with more than one telephone number have more chances to be called than households with only one telephone number.
Mode of Data Collection: telephone interview
Extent of Processing: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Original ICPSR Release: 2014-03-20
Browse Matching Variables
How high a priority should stricter gun laws be for the country right now? 1. It should be the single most important issue, 2. It should be a fairly high priority, but there are other issues that are more important, 3. It shouldn't be a very high priority right now, or 4. Stricter gun laws are not needed at all.
Would having stricter gun laws and regulations nationwide make you feel more safe, less safe, or wouldn't it make a difference to you?
According to the 2011 Small Arms survey, how many civilian guns are there for every 100 Americans: 23, 57, 89, or 117?
If you could have only one of the following in your home, which would make you feel the most safe: 1. A gun, 2. An alarm system, 3. A dog, 4. A safe room, or 5. A ninja?
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.