This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
CBS News/New York Times National Poll, January #1, 2013 (ICPSR 34991)
This poll, the first of two fielded in January of 2013, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way Barack Obama was handling foreign policy, the economy, the federal budget deficit, taxes, and his job as president. Respondents were also asked whether they approved of the way Democrats in Congress, and Republicans in Congress were handling their jobs. Respondents' opinions were solicited on whether things were going better than they were five years prior, their predictions about how the United States would be five years in the future, whether they thought things in the country were going in the right direction, the condition of the national economy, and whether the economy was getting better. Opinions were also solicited on Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, John Boehner, Harry Reid, the National Riffle Association, and gun control laws. Respondents were asked how confident they were in Barack Obama's ability to make the right decisions about the economy, Afghanistan, protecting the country, and illegal immigration. Questions were asked about Obama's second term in office including whether respondents were optimistic about the next four years with Barack Obama as president, what they wanted to see Obama accomplish in the next four years, and whether they expected the economy and the health care system to improve by the end of Obama's second term as president. Opinions on the federal budget deficit were collected including the best way to reduce it, which programs respondents would be willing to change in order to cut spending, and who respondents trusted more to make the right decisions about the deficit. Multiple questions addressed the topic of firearms including bans on semi-automatic weapons, high capacity magazines, and people other than law enforcement carrying concealed weapons. Additionally questions were asked regarding background checks on potential gun buyers, the creation of a national database to track gun sales, and gun violence prevention. Additional topics covered include personal finance, job security, and consumer attitudes. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, education level, household income, social class, employment status, religious preference and participation, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), whether respondents thought of themselves as born-again Christians, marital status, household composition, political party affiliation, political philosophy, voter registration status, voting behavior, and the number of phones in respondents' household.
Data in this collection are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions. Please log in so we can determine if you are with a member institution and have access to these data files.
CBS News, and The New York Times. CBS News/New York Times National Poll, January #1, 2013. ICPSR34991-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2014-04-01. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34991.v1
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34991.v1
Scope of Study
Subject Terms: attitudes, Biden, Joe, Boehner, John, consumer attitudes, Democratic Party (USA), federal budget deficit, firearms, gun control, gun control legislation, gun regulation, national economy, National Rifle Association, Obama Administration (2009- ), Obama, Barack, Obama, Michelle, personal finances, presidential performance, public opinion, Reid, Harry, Republican Party (USA), United States Congress
Geographic Coverage: United States
Sample: This poll was conducted among 1,110 adults nationwide. Phone numbers were dialed from samples of both standard land-line and cell phones. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The error for subgroups may be higher.
Weight: The data contain a weight (WGHT) variable that should be used in analyzing the data. The data were weighted to match United States Census Bureau breakdowns on age, sex, race, education, and region of the country. The data were also adjusted for the fact that people who share a telephone with others have less chance to be contacted than people who live alone and have their own telephones, and that households with more than one telephone number have more chances to be called than households with only one telephone number.
Extent of Processing: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Created online analysis version with question text.
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Original ICPSR Release: 2014-04-01
Browse Matching Variables
What do you think is the main reason most gun owners possess a gun? Is it mainly for protection, hunting, target or sport shooting, work, or for some other reason?
In general, do you think gun control laws should be made more strict, less strict, or kept as they are now?
Who do you trust more to make the right decisions about gun laws -- the Republicans in Congress or Barack Obama?
Do you favor or oppose a federal law requiring background checks on all potential gun buyers?
Do you favor or oppose creating a national database that would track all gun sales in the United States?
What is the main reason there is a gun in your household? Is it mainly for protection, hunting, target or sport shooting, work, or for some other reason?
Do any of your relatives or close friends own a handgun, rifle, shot gun, or any other kind of firearm?
How much do you think stricter gun laws would do to help prevent gun violence? Would stricter laws help a lot, some, not much, or not at all?
How much do you think more police or armed security guards would do to help prevent mass shootings in public places such as schools, movie theaters, and malls? Would more police or armed security guards help a lot, some, not much or not at all?
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.