This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
Afrobarometer Round 4: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Namibia, 2008 (ICPSR 34008)
Principal Investigator(s): Lindeke, Bill, Research Facilitation Services (Namibia); Niikondo, Andrew, Research Facilitation Services (Namibia); Stoman, Lizl, Research Facilitation Services (Namibia); Gyimah-Boadi, E., Ghana Center for Democratic Development; Logan, Carolyn, Michigan State University; Bratton, Michael, Michigan State University; Mattes, Robert, University of Cape Town
The Afrobarometer project was designed to collect and disseminate information regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, economic reform, civil society, and quality of life. This particular survey was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Namibia. Respondents in a face-to-face interview were asked to rate their president and the president's administration in overall performance, to state the most important issues facing their nation, and to evaluate the effectiveness of certain continental and international institutions. Opinions were gathered on the role of the government in improving the economy, whether corruption existed in local and national government, whether government officials were responsive to problems of the general population, and whether local government officials, the police, the courts, the overall criminal justice system, the National Electoral Commission, and the government broadcasting service could be trusted. Respondents were polled on their knowledge of the government, including the identification of government officials, their level of personal involvement in political, governmental, and community affairs, their participation in national elections, and the inclusiveness of the government. Economic questions addressed the past, present, and future of the country's and the respondents' economic conditions, and respondents' living conditions. In addition, opinions were sought on recent conflicts associated with political change within Namibia. Questions addressed the impact on the respondent of the violence that occurred following the December, 2007 general elections in Namibia. In addition, opinions were sought on the Anti-Corruption Commission, the Black Economic Empowerment programs, and the effect of Chinese-owned businesses on the developement of Namibia. Background variables include age, gender, ethnicity, education, religious affiliation and participation, political party affiliation, language spoken most at home, whether the respondent was the head of household, current and past employment status, whether a close friend or relative had died from AIDS, and language used in the interview. In addition, the interviewer's gender, race, and education level is provided.
Series: Afrobarometer Survey Series
These data are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions. Because you are not logged in, we cannot verify that you will be able to download these data.
Lindeke, Bill, Andrew Niikondo, Lizl Stoman, E. Gyimah-Boadi, Carolyn Logan, Michael Bratton, and Robert Mattes. Afrobarometer Round 4: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Namibia, 2008. ICPSR34008-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2012-07-24. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34008.v1
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34008.v1
This study was funded by:
- Danish International Development Agency
- United States Agency for International Development
- Canadian International Development Agency
- Department for International Development (United Kingdom)
- Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
Scope of Study
Subject Terms: AIDS, community involvement, corruption, democracy, economic conditions, government, government performance, HIV, information sources, living conditions, macroeconomics, markets, Members of Parliament, national interests, political attitudes, political change, political corruption, political participation, political systems, presidential performance, presidents, public confidence, public opinion, quality of life, social attitudes, standard of living, trust in government
Smallest Geographic Unit: enumeration area
Date of Collection:
Unit of Observation: individual
Universe: Citizens of Namibia aged 18 years or older, excluding institutions.
Data Types: survey data
Data Collection Notes:
Users may notice that the missing values designations are wider than the variable formats. This is due to optimization of the data. For those variables, there are no cases with those values.
The original data collection was carried out by Research Facilitation Services, Namibia.
Additional information about the Afrobarometer Survey can be found at the Afrobarometer Web site
Sample: The Afrobarometer uses a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, probability sample design. The sample is designed as a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of selection for interview. This objective is reached by (a) strictly applying random selection methods at every stage of sampling and by (b) applying sampling with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible. A randomly selected sample of 1,200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than plus or minus 3 percent with a confidence level of 95 percent. If the sample size is increased to 2,400, the confidence interval shrinks to plus or minus 2 percent.
Time Method: Cross-sectional
Please visit the Afrobarometer Web site for more information regarding weights.
Mode of Data Collection: face-to-face interview
Response Rates: Approximately 60 percent.
Extent of Processing: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Created online analysis version with question text.
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Original ICPSR Release: 2012-07-24
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.