Utilization for Data on International Election Monitoring: Three Global Datasets on Election Quality, Election Events and International Election Observation

By default, the reports below show utilization for the last 12 months. To view a different range, please enter dates below.

Please note that this study was first released on 2011-12-01, and that our current reporting model only goes back three years (from today's date).

General Information

Unique Sessions

Total
Data/Documentation
Sessions
Data &
Documentation
Documentation
Only
Any Datasets/Files 555 = 111 444
DS0: Study-Level Files 508 = 0 508
DS1: Data on International Election Monitoring 216 = 76 140
DS2: Quality of Elections Data 213 = 77 136
DS3: Supplementary Election Data 142 = 47 95

Notes

The numbers above are counts of unique sessions, not counts of how many files were downloaded. I.e., a value of 12 implies that users downloaded 1 or more files from the study as part of 12 discrete sessions/visits in this time period.

Please note that the numbers above do not include distribution of restricted-use or public-use data that are not web downloadable. E.g., data distributed on CD-ROM.

Unique Users

Total
Unique
Users
Faculty Grad.
Students
Undergrads Univ.
Staff
Other Anon.
Downloads
Any Datasets/Files 346 = 48 76 19 8 19 176
DS0: Study-Level Files 309 = 48 76 19 8 19 139
DS1: Data on International Election Monitoring 125 = 22 41 11 4 12 35
DS2: Quality of Elections Data 116 = 22 37 9 5 9 34
DS3: Supplementary Election Data 69 = 14 22 5 2 7 19

Notes

All numbers in the table above are the number of unique users who downloaded one or more files from this study/dataset in the time period specified.

"Anon. Downloads" refers to users who download anonymously. Users who browse/download documentation files (only) are not required to login; some of our topical archives do not require login.

Please note that the numbers above do not include distribution of restricted-use or public-use data that are not web downloadable. E.g., data distributed on CD-ROM.

Downloads by Member Institutions

This study was downloaded by users at 62 institutions during the time period specified.

  • Belmont University
  • Brigham Young University
  • California State University at Dominguez Hills
  • Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas
  • Columbia University
  • Duke University
  • Florida State University
  • Fordham University
  • GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
  • Harvard University
  • Indiana University
  • Instituto Superior das Ciencias do Trabalho e da Empresa (ISCTE)
  • International Christian University
  • London School of Economics
  • Loyola University of Chicago
  • Michigan State University
  • New York University
  • Niagara University
  • Ohio University
  • Osaka University
  • Princeton University
  • Queen's University
  • Sabanci University
  • Santa Clara University
  • Seoul National University
  • Stanford University
  • Swedish National Data Service
  • Swiss Foundation for Research in the Social Sciences (FORS)
  • Texas Tech University
  • The American University
  • Tulane University
  • Universita degli Studi di Milano
  • Universita degli Studi di Salerno
  • Universite De Paris I
  • University College London
  • University of Arizona
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • University of California at Merced
  • University of Colorado at Boulder
  • University of Florida
  • University of Geneva
  • University of Iowa
  • University of Kentucky
  • University of Michigan
  • University of Missouri at Columbia
  • University of Montreal
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Rochester
  • University of South Carolina
  • University of Texas at Arlington
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • University of Tokyo
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Twente
  • University of Zurich
  • Villanova University
  • Washington University in St. Louis
  • Wayne State University
  • Williams College
  • Yale University

Notes

Institutions are only listed when users from that institution authenticated/logged in. Non-authenticated members constitute a large portion of our users and are represented in the Unique Users/Unique Sessions tables, but not in the Downloads by Member Institutions table.

Found a problem? Use our Report Problem form to let us know.