This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
Indianapolis-St. Louis Election Study, 1996-1997 (ICPSR 2962)
Alternate Title: The 1996 Political Network Election Study
Principal Investigator(s): Huckfeldt, Robert, University of California-Davis; Sprague, John, Washington University-St. Louis
This study was conducted by the Indiana University Center for Survey Research in Bloomington, Indiana, and is primarily concerned with patterns of social communication and influence over the course of the 1996 United States presidential election campaign. Computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) for the study began in March of 1996 and ended in early January of 1997, with a follow-up wave of interviews in the fall of 1997. A total of 4,352 interviews were completed from two separate samples: a sample of main respondents drawn from lists of registered voters in the St. Louis and Indianapolis metropolitan areas (2,612), plus a one-stage "snowball" sample of these main respondents' discussion partners (1,740). Data collection occurred in four waves: The first wave was conducted between March 3 and July 14, 1996, the second wave between July 1 and November 4, 1996, the third wave between November 6, 1996, and January 12, 1997, and the fourth wave between October 17 and December 12, 1997. Respondents were asked for their opinions of President Bill Clinton, Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, former Tennessee Governor Lamar Alexander, conservative commentator Pat Buchanan, Reform Party founder Ross Perot, and publisher Steve Forbes were elicited. Other topics covered include respondents' perceptions of the quality of their personal lives and of the health of the national economy, exposure to newspaper and television news, preferences on how federal tax money should be spent, views on the country's most important problem, and opinions on trade barriers, the death penalty, United States aid for Latin America, equal rights for women, government aid for minorities, organized prayer in public schools, a woman's right to abortion, and reconciling the disparate goals of balancing the federal budget, cutting federal taxes, and maintaining government programs for the elderly and disadvantaged. Respondents were also asked to comment on their involvement in community groups and organizations and their contacts with political parties and campaigns during the 1996 election campaign, and to predict how named members of their social network ("discussants") would answer similar questions and how those discussants would be voting in 1996. The Discussant files contain the responses of these discussion partners, who were interviewed on the same topics. Background information on respondents includes age, sex, race, education, religion, employment status, home ownership, Hispanic descent, marital status, income, years of residence at present address, voter registration and participation history, political party, and political orientation. Part 25, Interviewer Data, consists of the ID number and gender of the interviewer for each case in the collection organized by respondent CASEID number.
One or more files in this study are not available for download due to special restrictions ; consult the restrictions note to learn more. You can apply online for access to the data. A login is required to apply for access.Excel and ASCII text files containing verbatim responses to the Substantive and Important Matters questions are restricted from general dissemination. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete an Agreement for the Use of Confidential Data, specify the reasons for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research. Apply for access to these data through the ICPSR Restricted Data Contract Portal, which can be accessed via the study home page.
WARNING: Because this study has many datasets, the download all files option has been suppressed, and you will need to download one dataset at a time.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. Indianapolis-St. Louis Election Study, 1996-1997. ICPSR02962-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2007-05-07. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02962.v2
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02962.v2
Scope of Study
Subject Terms: abortion, Alexander, Lamar, Buchanan, Pat, Clinton, Bill, community involvement, Dole, Bob, economic conditions, Forbes, Steve, Gingrich, Newt, government performance, interpersonal communication, Perot, Ross, political campaigns, political issues, political parties, public opinion, quality of life, school prayer, social networks, tax cuts, womens rights
Geographic Coverage: Indiana, Indianapolis, Missouri, St. Louis, United States
Date of Collection:
Unit of Observation: individual
Universe: Adult population of registered voters in St. Louis, Missouri and Indianapolis, Indiana
Data Types: survey data
Data Collection Notes:
(1) The data files in this collection do not contain value labels. Value labels can, however, be obtained from the codebooks which contain the actual questionnaires used in the interviews. (2) Previously unreleased Excel and text files containing respondent comments are now available in restricted form. Please see the RESTRICTIONS field for additional information.
Sample: The sample of respondents was drawn from lists of registered voters in the St. Louis and Indianapolis metropolitan areas
Mode of Data Collection: computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI)
Response Rates: The rate of response across all four waves was approximately 63 percent.
Original ICPSR Release: 2001-04-18
- 2007-05-07 This collection has been re-released with the full product suite and now includes SAS, SPSS, and Stata setup files as well as SAS (XPORT), SPSS portable, and Stata system files. In addition, Excel and text files containing respondent comments are being released as restricted files.
Related Publications (?)
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.