Incapacitation Effects of Incarcerating Drug Offenders: Longitudinal Arrest Histories of Adults Arrested in Washington, DC, 1985-1986 (ICPSR 2741)
Version Date: Jul 27, 2000 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Jacqueline Cohen, Carnegie Mellon University, H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02741.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
This study examined differences in criminal career parameters that determine the potential incapacitative effects of alternative sentencing policies directed at drug-involved offenders. In particular, the researchers explored three key aspects of offenders' criminal careers: participation, frequency of offending, and termination rates from active offending. The study focused on differences in levels of serious offending by drug-using and nonusing drug offenders compared to drug-using and nonusing predatory offenders. Longitudinal arrest data for a sample of arrestees were collected to characterize the offending patterns of drug-using and nonusing drug offenders and predatory offenders. The sample was drawn from adults arrested in Washington, DC, on any charge from July 1, 1985, to June 30, 1986. Data were collected from case files maintained by the Washington, DC, Pretrial Services Agency for 883 arrestees and 5,387 arrests. Previous and subsequent arrests of the same individual were linked to form an arrest history. Within the sample of arrestees, three main types of offenders were distinguished based on offense charge at target arrest: (1) drug offenders, (2) predatory offenders (persons charged with robbery or burglary), and (3) all others. This study focused on the first two groups and distinguished drug users from non-users based on the results of a urine drug screen administered following the target arrest. Variables regarding arrests include date of arrest, drug test result, charges filed, disposition date, disposition type, and sentence length imposed. Demographic variables include race, sex, and place of birth.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
HideTime Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
-
(1) The dataset is hierarchical and contains three record types. Record Type 1, comprised of 13 variables and 883 records, contains stable personal information. Each unique individual represented in the data has a single Record Type 1. Record Type 2, comprised of 49 variables and 5,387 records, contains changing personal information at the time of arrest. Record Type 3, comprised of 78 variables and 5,387 records, contains arrest and court information. Each occurrence of Record Type 1 has at least one associated Record Type 2. Each occurrence of Record Type 2 has exactly one associated Record Type 3. (2) The user guide and codebook are provided as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file. The PDF file format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided on the ICPSR Website.
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
Growing public concern about the spread of illicit drug use spawned a variety of efforts in the 1980s to increase the severity of sentences imposed on convicted drug offenders. These increases in sanctions were also motivated by related concerns about reducing the predatory crimes, especially robbery and burglary, often associated with drug use. While it was commonly believed that crime control policies directed at drug offenders would be effective in reducing predatory crimes, these policies ignored the potential complexity of the relationships among drug use, drug trafficking, and predatory crimes. In particular, rather than serving as an indicator of high levels of predatory crime, drug trafficking may represent an alternative to predatory crime for many drug users. This study examined differences in criminal career parameters that determine the potential incapacitative effects of alternative sentencing policies directed at drug-involved offenders. In particular, the researchers explored three key aspects of offenders' criminal careers: participation, frequency of offending, and termination rates from active offending. The study focused on differences in levels of serious offending by drug-using from nonusing drug offenders compared to drug-using and nonusing predatory offenders.
Study Design View help for Study Design
Longitudinal arrest data for a sample of arrestees were collected to characterize the offending patterns of drug-using and nonusing drug offenders and predatory offenders. The sample was drawn from adults arrested in Washington, DC, on any charge from July 1, 1985, to June 30, 1986. Data were collected from case files maintained by the Washington, DC, Pretrial Services Agency for 883 arrestees and 5,387 arrests. Previous and subsequent arrests of the same individual were linked to form an arrest history. Within the sample of arrestees, three main types of offenders were distinguished based on offense charge at target arrest: (1) drug offenders, (2) predatory offenders (persons charged with robbery or burglary), and (3) all others. This study focused on the first two groups and distinguished drug users from nonusers based on the results of a urine drug screen administered following the target arrest.
Sample View help for Sample
Stratified random sample of adult arrestees.
Universe View help for Universe
Adult arrestees in Washington, DC, from the period July 1, 1985, to June 30, 1986.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Source View help for Data Source
case files of the Washington, DC, Pretrial Services Agency
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
Not applicable.
Presence of Common Scales View help for Presence of Common Scales
None.
HideOriginal Release Date View help for Original Release Date
2000-07-27
Version History View help for Version History
- Cohen, Jacqueline. INCAPACITATION EFFECTS OF INCARCERATING DRUG OFFENDERS: LONGITUDINAL ARREST HISTORIES OF ADULTS ARRESTED IN WASHINGTON, DC, 1985-1986. ICPSR version. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management [producer], 1995. Ann Arbor MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2000. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02741.v1
2000-07-27 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Standardized missing values.
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Notes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
This dataset is maintained and distributed by the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD), the criminal justice archive within ICPSR. NACJD is primarily sponsored by three agencies within the U.S. Department of Justice: the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.