This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
Ithaka 2006 Survey of US Academic Librarian Attitudes and Behaviors (ICPSR 22701)
Principal Investigator(s): Schonfeld, Roger, Ithaka; Guthrie, Kevin, Ithaka
This study is designed to contribute to community understanding of the attitudes and behaviors of United States college and university librarians. This 2006 study builds upon studies that targeted United States faculty members in 2000 and 2003, and complements a similar study of United States faculty members that was conducted in 2006. Topics covered by this study include: the role of the library on the modern campus, impressions about electronic resources, digital institutional repositories, and the preservation of scholarly journals. This study was meant to develop a descriptive overview of librarians' attitudes, behaviors, perceptions, and priorities. It targeted collection development librarians at United States institutes of higher education, as well as some executive-level librarians at larger campuses (included to ensure an accurate reflection of high-level thinking in these types of schools). Respondents were asked questions such as "Which of the following best describes how your repositories are maintained or managed?" and "How important is working with faculty to incorporate information resources into their lectures and curricula?" Demographic information about institutional size was also gathered in this study.
An overview of major findings may be found on the Ithaka Web site.
Data in this collection are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions. Please log in so we can determine if you are with a member institution and have access to these data files.
Schonfeld, Roger, and Kevin Guthrie. Ithaka 2006 Survey of US Academic Librarian Attitudes and Behaviors. ICPSR22701-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013-11-21. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22701.v2
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22701.v2
Scope of Study
Geographic Coverage: United States
Date of Collection:
Unit of Observation: individual
Universe: Collection development librarians and executive librarians at United States colleges and universities.
Data Types: survey data
Sample: Participants were recruited at random from lists of collection librarians and executive directors of libraries at United States institutes of higher education. Before taking the survey, participants were screened by phone to ensure that they played a substantial role in relevant decision-making. The sample was designed to meet quotas that were established to allow consideration of different profiles. The final sample included 373 respondents. Of the collection development librarians surveyed, 29 were at very large institutions, 37 at large, 107 at medium, 90 at small, and 85 at very small. Of the executive librarians surveyed, 12 were at very large institutions and 13 were at large ones.
Mode of Data Collection: web-based survey
Extent of Processing: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Created online analysis version with question text.
Restrictions: One or more files in this study are subjected to special restrictions, and questionnaires are protected under copyright; only ICPSR member users can login and download. The files in this study may not be used for any purpose other than non-commercial statistical reporting and analysis.
Original ICPSR Release: 2008-08-08
- 2013-11-21 The codebook has been updated.
Related Publications (?)
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.