This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
United States House of Representatives Committee Assignment Request Data, 80th-103rd Congress (ICPSR 21080)
Principal Investigator(s): Frisch, Scott A., California State University-Channel Islands; Kelly, Sean Q., California State University-Channel Islands
These data were collected by Scott Frisch and Sean Kelly between 2000 and 2004 from the archived papers of former members of the United States Congress. In most cases, Frisch, Kelly, or both traveled to archives to collect the textual materials from which the data were generated. In most cases, the request data come from the committee request summaries (briefing books) compiled for the Democratic Members of the Committee on Ways and Means, the Democratic Steering and Policy Committee, and the Republican Executive Committee on Committees. In addition to Committee notebooks, copies of the letters that individual members wrote in support of their assignment requests were collected. The format of these letters typically consists of a lengthy justification of the member's qualifications and need for his or her first request, with perhaps a paragraph devoted to a list of additional committees to which assignment would be acceptable. In a few instances, when no briefing book was available, preferences were reconstructed from the request letters submitted by the members to their party committees. In these cases, the most recent letter was considered the definitive statement of the member's preferences. Data regarding subcommittee assignments are not included in these data, nor are temporary committee assignments, nor are assignments that were not made at the beginning of a Congressional term. Committee requests for temporary, joint committees, boards, select committees and the like are also not included. The total number of committee preference listings is 2,480. Included are the committee preferences of 1,163 first-term members, as well as committee transfer requests made by 1,317 incumbents. For Democrats, the data cover the 80th through the 103rd Congress (but not the 85th Congress, which has not been located), comprising the committee preferences of 1,366 members, 655 first-term Democrats, and 711 incumbent Democrats. For the Republicans, the data cover the 86th through the 102nd Congress, reflecting the committee preferences of 1,114 Republican members, including 452 first-term Republicans and 662 incumbent Republicans. Republican data prior to the 86th Congress could not be located and were apparently lost during an effort to consolidate the records of congressional leaders prior to the 86th Congress. Data for Republicans from the 103rd Congress have not been located.
These data are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions. Because you are not logged in, we cannot verify that you will be able to download the data.
Frisch, Scott A., and Sean Q. Kelly. United States House of Representatives Committee Assignment Request Data, 80th-103rd Congress. ICPSR21080-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2008-02-26. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21080.v1
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21080.v1
This study was funded by:
- Dirksen Congressional Center
- California State University-Bakersfield
- California State University-Channel Islands
- Niagara University Research Council
- Gerald Ford Library
- University of Oklahoma. Carl Albert Center
- Washington State University. Foley Institute for Public Policy and Public Service
- George Mason University. Institute for Humane Studies
Scope of Study
Geographic Coverage: United States
Date of Collection:
Unit of Observation: individual
Universe: Democratic and Republican members of the United States House of Representatives.
Data Types: administrative records data
Mode of Data Collection: record abstracts
archived papers of members of Congress
Original ICPSR Release: 2008-02-26
Related Publications (see Notes)
- List all ~20 citations associated with this study
Most Recent Publications
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.