National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
This dataset is maintained and distributed by the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD), the criminal justice archive within ICPSR. NACJD is primarily sponsored by three agencies within the U.S. Department of Justice: the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Evaluation of the Reasoning and Rehabilitation Cognitive Skills Development Program Implemented in Juvenile Intensive Supervision Probation in Colorado, 1994-1995 (ICPSR 2028)
Principal Investigator(s): Pullen, Suzanne, Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice; English, Kim, Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice
This study was a program evaluation of the Reasoning and Rehabilitation Cognitive Skills Development Program, an educational program that taught cognitive skills to offenders, as implemented in juvenile intensive supervision probation in Colorado. Using an experimental design, researchers sought to measure the extent of change in attitudes and behaviors due to the cognitive skills program by administering pre- and post-test interviews. Researchers also measured recidivism by conducting interviews with probation officers who supervised the offenders in the sample six months after termination from intensive supervision. These interviews were supplemented with administrative records data that provided background information about the sample. In addition, administrative data were collected on all juveniles sentenced to intensive supervision during fiscal years 1994 and 1995 to compare juveniles in the sample with all juveniles in the intensive program. Variables in this collection include cognitive measures, such as impulsivity, problem-solving ability, egocentricity, and cognitive style. Other variables measure emotional responses to various situations, attitudes toward the law, values, drug abuse, program participation, and recidivism. Administrative data include age, gender, ethnicity, offense of conviction, and basic assessment data.
These data are freely available.
Pullen, Suzanne, and Kim English. EVALUATION OF THE REASONING AND REHABILITATION COGNITIVE SKILLS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED IN JUVENILE INTENSIVE SUPERVISION PROBATION IN COLORADO, 1994-1995. ICPSR version. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice [producer], 1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1999. doi:10.3886/ICPSR02028.v1
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02028.v1
This study was funded by:
- United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (93-IJ-CX-K017)
Scope of Study
Date of Collection:
Unit of Observation: Individuals.
Universe: Juveniles sentenced to juvenile intensive supervision probation in Colorado between 1994 and 1995.
Data Types: survey data, and administrative records data
Data Collection Notes:
The codebook and data collection instruments are provided as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file. The PDF file format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided through the ICPSR Website on the Internet.
Study Purpose: The Reasoning and Rehabilitation Cognitive Skills Development Program was developed by Ross and Fabiano in 1985 as an educational program that focused on teaching the following cognitive skills to offenders: problem-solving, consequential thinking, means-end reasoning, social perspective-taking, critical reasoning, abstract reasoning, creative thinking, and values. In 1992 the Colorado Office of Probation Services incorporated the Reasoning and Rehabilitation Program as a requirement for young offenders placed in juvenile intensive supervision probation. While previous research had evaluated this cognitive skills program for adults, this project was designed to evaluate the outcomes of this program as implemented in a juvenile setting. In particular, it sought to answer the following questions: (1) Did the program work to change attitudes, thinking patterns, and behaviors? (2) Did the program have an impact on post-termination rates of recidivism? and (3) For which types of offenders did the program work best?
Study Design: To evaluate how well the Reasoning and Rehabilitation program worked in juvenile intensive supervision probation in Colorado, the researchers developed an experimental design whereby clients were randomly assigned to participate or not participate in the cognitive program. To measure the extent of change in attitudes and behaviors due to the program, clients in both the treatment and control groups were administered pre- and post-test interviews based on two instruments. The first was a slightly modified version of a semi-structured interview developed by the authors of the program as part of a larger cognitive skills assessment battery. The second instrument was a self-administered 70-item battery of statements measuring concepts related to crime and criminal attitudes that respondents were asked to rank on a Likert-scale format. These measures were designed to assess the extent of change in cognitive skills and functioning among the sample in nine areas: (1) ability to recognize that problems exist, (2) ability to solve interpersonal problems, (3) ability to think of and develop alternatives, (4) awareness of consequences, (5) ability to set and achieve goals, (6) level of egocentricity, (7) social perspective-taking, (8) level of impulsivity, and (9) cognitive style. To measure recidivism rates of juveniles in the sample, researchers conducted interviews with probation officers who supervised the offenders in the sample six months after termination from intensive probation. Recidivism was measured by rearrest for a new crime. These interviews were supplemented with administrative records data that provided background information about the sample. In addition, administrative data were collected on all juveniles sentenced to intensive supervision during fiscal years 1994 and 1995 to compare juveniles in the sample with all juveniles on probation.
Sample: Random sampling.
personal interviews, self-enumerated questionnaires, and administrative records
Description of Variables: In Part 1, Pre- and Post-Test Data, variables include cognitive measures such as impulsivity, problem-solving ability, egocentricity, and cognitive style. Other variables measure emotional responses to various situations, attitudes toward the law, values, drug abuse, program participation, and recidivism. Part 2, Background Data, contains variables on age, ethnicity, index crime, risk score, and need score. Part 3, Juvenile Intensive Supervision Probation Data, contains information on all intensive supervision participants at the time of the study, including gender, age, and offense.
Response Rates: Not applicable.
Presence of Common Scales: Several Likert-type scales were used.
Extent of Processing: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Standardized missing values.
- Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Original ICPSR Release: 1999-11-02
- 2006-03-30 File CB2028.ALL.PDF was removed from any previous datasets and flagged as a study-level file, so that it will accompany all downloads.
- 2005-11-04 On 2005-03-14 new files were added to one or more datasets. These files included additional setup files as well as one or more of the following: SAS program, SAS transport, SPSS portable, and Stata system files. The metadata record was revised 2005-11-04 to reflect these additions.
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.