ICPSR Logo

This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.

Archive of the Controversy Involving Wendy K. Tam Cho and Brian J. Gains, THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (ICPSR 1264)

Principal Investigator(s):

Summary:

The files in this archive document the controversy that led to the withdrawal of a [then] forthcoming AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW article by Cho and Gaines. The materials explain the note offered byAPSR editor Ada Finifter in the December 2001 issue.

Access Notes

  • This data collection has been deaccessioned; it is no longer distributed by ICPSR. Additional information may be available in Data Collection Notes.

    This material was removed at the request of the principal investigators. According to Barry C. Burden, "All of the involved parties believe that the archive has outlived its usefulness. The controversy involved is no longer salient to researchers and over the past decade a variety of new methods have been developed that improve on those used in the study."
  • These data are flagged as replication datasets and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.

Study Description

Citation

Burden, Barry C., Gary King, and David C. Kimball. Archive of the Controversy Involving Wendy K. Tam Cho and Brian J. Gains, THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW . ICPSR01264-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2002-08-13. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01264.v1

Persistent URL:

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote XML (EndNote X4.0.1 or higher)

Scope of Study

Subject Terms:   political science, research

Data Collection Notes:

This material was removed at the request of the principal investigators. According to Barry C. Burden, "All of the involved parties believe that the archive has outlived its usefulness. The controversy involved is no longer salient to researchers and over the past decade a variety of new methods have been developed that improve on those used in the study."

Methodology

Version(s)

Original ICPSR Release:  

Found a problem? Use our Report Problem form to let us know.