This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
Seeing Through the Smoke and Mirrors: A Response to Palmer and Whitten, British Journal of Political Science, January 2003 (ICPSR 1258)
Principal Investigator(s): Royed, Terry J., University of Alabama; Leyden, Kevin M., West Virginia University; Borrelli, Stephen A., University of Alabama
This is a corrected version of IS CLARITY OF RESPONSIBILITY IMPORTANT FOR ECONOMIC VOTING? REVISITING POWELL AND WHITTEN'S HYPOTHESIS (ICPSR 1206), used to write two responses to criticisms made by Harvey Palmer and Guy Whitten in an exchange in the January 2003 issue of the British Journal of Political Science.
These data are flagged as replication datasets and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.
These data are freely available.
Royed, Terry J., Kevin M. Leyden, and Stephen A. Borrelli. Seeing Through the Smoke and Mirrors: A Response to Palmer and Whitten, British Journal of Political Science, January 2003. ICPSR01258-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2003-04-25. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01258.v1
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01258.v1
Scope of Study
Data Collection Notes:
(1) Files submitted are response.xls (Excel 97 file), response.sav (SPSS Version 8 data file), and codebk.doc (Codebook in MS Word 97 format). (2) These data are part of ICPSR's Publication-Related Archive and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.
Original ICPSR Release: 2003-04-25
Related Publications (?)
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.