Validity Assessment of a Machine-Coded Event Dataset for the Middle East, 1982-1992 (ICPSR 1114)

Principal Investigator(s): Schrodt, Philip A.; Gerner, Deborah J.

Summary: These data are part of ICPSR's Publication-Related Archive and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by ICPSR for release, but ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigators if further information is needed. (more info)

• These data are part of ICPSR's Publication-Related Archive and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.

• This data is freely available.

Schrodt, Philip A., and Deborah J. Gerner. Validity Assessment of a Machine-Coded Event Dataset for the Middle East, 1982-1992. ICPSR01114-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1996-01-03. doi:10.3886/ICPSR01114.v1

Persistent URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01114.v1

Export Citation:

• RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
• EndNote XML (EndNote X4.0.1 or higher)

Summary:   These data are part of ICPSR's Publication-Related Archive and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by ICPSR for release, but ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigators if further information is needed.

Geographic Coverage:   Egypt, Global, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, Syria

Time Period:  

• 1982--1992

Original ICPSR Release:  1996-01-03

Use any of the notification links to add this study to your RSS feed; you will then receive notification if the study is substantively updated.

• Citations exports are provided above.

• Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)

  • DDI Codebook or DDI Lifecycle

  • Dublin Core

  • MARC21 XML

  • DataCite XML

If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.

• View Usage of this Study