Search Results

Use the search box below to revise your search , or start a new search .

Your query returned 374 variables.

Name
Label/Question
1.

CASE IDENTIFIER CREATED BY THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

2.

WEIGHT

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

3.

Q1. STRAIGHT HANDLE BATON - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

4.

Q1. STRAIGHT HANDLE BATON - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

5.

Q1. STRAIGHT HANDLE BATON - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

6.

Q1. STRAIGHT HANDLE BATON - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

7.

Q1. EXPANDABLE BATON - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

8.

Q1. EXPANDABLE BATON - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

9.

Q1. EXPANDABLE BATON - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

10.

Q1. EXPANDABLE BATON - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

11.

Q1. CED - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

12.

Q1. CED - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

13.

Q1. CED - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

14.

Q1. CED - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

15.

Q1. PERSONAL ISSUE CHEMICAL AGENTS - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

16.

Q1. PERSONAL ISSUE CHEMICAL AGENTS - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

17.

Q1. PERSONAL ISSUE CHEMICAL AGENTS - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

18.

Q1. PERSONAL ISSUE CHEMICAL AGENTS - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

19.

Q1. WEAPON DEPLOYED CHEMICAL AGENTS - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

20.

Q1. WEAPON DEPLOYED CHEMICAL AGENTS - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

21.

Q1. WEAPON DEPLOYED CHEMICAL AGENTS - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

22.

Q1. WEAPON DEPLOYED CHEMICAL AGENTS - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

23.

Q1. OTHER IMPACT MUNITIONS - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

24.

Q1. OTHER IMPACT MUNITIONS - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

25.

Q1. OTHER IMPACT MUNITIONS - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

26.

Q1. OTHER IMPACT MUNITIONS - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

27.

Q1. OTHER (1) - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

28.

Q1. OTHER (1) - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

29.

Q1. OTHER (1) - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

30.

Q1. OTHER (1) - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

31.

Q1. OTHER (1) - DESCRIPTION

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

32.

Q1. OTHER (2) - NA

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

33.

Q1. OTHER (2) - INDICATE WHETHER LESS THAN 50% OR MORE THAN 50% CARRY THIS WEAPON

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

34.

Q1. OTHER (2) - INDICATE WHETHER MOST CARRY THIS WEAPON ON THEIR PERSON OR IN THEIR VEHICLES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

35.

Q1. OTHER (2) - MARK IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAD THIS WEAPON IN USE IN 2000

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

36.

Q1. OTHER (2) - DESCRIPTION

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

37.

Q2. DO YOU USE A USE OF FORCE CONTINUUM/MODEL IN POLICY OR TRAINING?

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

38.

Q2. IF NO, PLEASE EXPLAIN:

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

39.

Q2. IF NO, PLEASE EXPLAIN: (CONTINUED)

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

40.

Q2. IF YES, PLEASE INDICATE WHICH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING BEST DESCRIBES YOUR CONTINUUM OR MODEL:

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

41.

Q2. OTHER CONTINUUM OR MODEL DESCRIPTION

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

42.

Q2. OPTIONAL COMMENTS

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

43.

Q2. OPTIONAL COMMENTS (CONTINUED)

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

44.

Q3. PLEASE INDICATE WHETHER YOUR DEPARTMENT HAS CHANGED ITS CONTINUUM OR MODEL DURING THE LAST TWO YEARS OR IS CONTEMPLATING A CHANGE.

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

45.

Q3. OPTIONAL COMMENTS.

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

46.

Q3. OPTIONAL COMMENTS. (CONTINUED)

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

47.

Q4. ARE YOUR OFFICERS/DEPUTIES REQUIRED TO EXPERIENCE THE EFFECTS OF CHEMICAL SPRAYS BEFORE THEY ARE AUTHORIZED TO CARRY THEM?

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

48.

Q4. ARE YOUR OFFICERS/DEPUTIES REQUIRED TO EXPERIENCE THE EFFECTS OF CEDS BEFORE THEY ARE AUTHORIZED TO CARRY THEM?

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

49.

Q5. SCENARIO A. SOFT EMPTY-HAND TACTICS/CONTROL

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

50.

Q5. SCENARIO A. HARD EMPTY-HAND TACTICS/STRIKE/PUNCHES

Taken from: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes: Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] - National Use of Force Survey Data.

Results 1 - 50 of 374
2 3 4

Report a problem