This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II in the United States, 2011 (ICPSR 34362)
Principal Investigator(s): Hunt, Dana, Abt Associates
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II, 2011, is a collection of interview and bioassay data on over 5000 arrestees in 10 United States counties within 48 hours of their arrest. The collection took place between April 1 and September 30, 2011 and represents the fifth year of ADAM II data collection under the sponsorship of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. The 10 current ADAM II sites are: Atlanta, GA (Fulton County); Charlotte, NC (Mecklenburg County); Chicago, IL (Cook County); Denver, CO (Denver County); Indianapolis, IN (Marion County); Minneapolis, MN (Hennepin County); New York, NY (Borough of Manhattan); Portland, OR (Multnomah County); Sacramento, CA (Sacramento County); and Washington, DC (District of Columbia). In 2011, 5,051 interviews and 4,412 urine tests were conducted in the 10 ADAM II sites over 14 consecutive days in each of two calendar quarters between April 1 and September 30. The samples across these sites represent 35,459 adult males arrested in the 10 sites during the data collection period. Demographic variables include arrest date and time, gender, date of birth, number and types of offenses, county of arrest, race, education, work status, and language of interview.
One or more files in this study are not available for download due to special restrictions ; consult the restrictions note to learn more. You can apply online for access to the data. A login is required to apply for access.
This data collection may not be used for any purpose other than statistical reporting and analysis. Use of these data to learn the identity of any person or establishment is prohibited. To protect respondent privacy, this data collection is restricted from general dissemination. To obtain this file, researchers must agree to the terms and conditions of a Restricted Data Use Agreement in accordance with existing ICPSR servicing policies.
Hunt, Dana. Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II in the United States, 2011. ICPSR34362-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013-06-13. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34362.v1
Persistent URL: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34362.v1
This study was funded by:
- United States Office of National Drug Control Policy
Scope of Study
Subject Terms: ADAM/DUF Program, arrest records, criminal histories, drug abuse, drug testing, drug use, imprisonment, jails, mental health, substance abuse, urinalysis
Smallest Geographic Unit: county
Geographic Coverage: Atlanta, California, Charlotte, Chicago, Colorado, Denver, District of Columbia, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Indianapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota, New York (state), New York City, North Carolina, Oregon, Portland (Oregon), Sacramento, United States
Date of Collection:
Unit of Observation: individual
Universe: All male arrestees in sampled jails in ten counties in the United States during the second and third quarters of 2011.
Data Types: administrative records data, event/transaction data, survey data
Data Collection Notes:
Additional data was collected via urine sample.
Please refer to the ADAM II 2011 Annual Report for additional information.
For more information on the study design, please refer to the ADAM II 2011 Annual Report.
Probabilty-based sample of male arrestees within each 24 hour period for 14 consecutive days in 2 calendar quarters each year in the central booking faciities of each county; county sample is purposive. For additional information on sampling, please refer to the ADAM II 2011 Annual Report.
Propensity scoring was used to weight samples based on factors known to alter selection probabiities (time of day, day of week, charge at arrest). For additional information on weights, please refer to the ADAM II 2011 Annual Report.
Mode of Data Collection: record abstracts, face-to-face interview, paper and pencil interview (PAPI)
Response Rates: 75 percent of those sampled who are physically in facility at time of interview; 47 percent of all sampled regardless of location.
Presence of Common Scales: Tested interview form used in ADAM since 2000.
Extent of Processing: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Original ICPSR Release: 2013-06-13
- Citations exports are provided above.
Export Study-level metadata (does not include variable-level metadata)
If you're looking for collection-level metadata rather than an individual metadata record, please visit our Metadata Records page.