nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33722 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33722 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2011 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-04-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33722 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2011 Annual Survey of Jails is the 24th such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. Starting in 2010, BJS enhanced the ASJ survey instruments to address topics on the number of convicted inmates that are unsentenced or sentenced and the number of unconvicted inmates awaiting trial/arraignment, or transfers/holds for other authorities. In order to reduce respondent burden, the ASJ no longer collects data on conviction status by sex. Also new to the survey, data are collected on jails’ operational capacity and design capacity. Incorporating enhanced capacity measurements enables BJS to describe more accurately the variation and volatility of inmate bed space and crowding, especially as they relate to safety and security in jails. To address more directly issues related to overcrowding and safety and security in jails, BJS started collecting data on staff and assaults against staff from the largest jails. In the modifications to the ASJ, starting in 2010, 335 jail jurisdictions (370 respondents) included with certainty in the ASJ sample survey were asked to provide additional information (forms CJ-5D or CJ-5DA) on the flow of inmates going through jails and the distribution of time served, staff characteristics and assaults on staff resulting in death, and inmate misconduct. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2011. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2011. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33722.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33722 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33722.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32181 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32181 MiAaI MiAaI Influence of Eyewitness Memory Factors on Plea Bargaining Decisions by Prosecution and Defense Attorneys in California, 2010-2011 [electronic resource] Kathy Pezdek 2012-07-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 32181 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to assess how the strength of eyewitness evidence affects plea bargaining decisions by prosecutors and defense attorneys. Surveys were administered to 93 defense attorneys and 46 prosecutors from matched counties in California. On the questionnaire, each participant was asked four background questions and read four versions of a crime scenario in which two specific eyewitness factors -- (a) same- versus cross-race identification and (b) prior contact or not -- were experimentally manipulated in a factorial design. The scenarios described a store robbery in which identification by one eyewitness was the only evidence against the defendant. After reading each scenario, attorneys were asked to respond to five questions in light of the facts presented. The study contains 28 variables including background data on the study participants and responses to questions relating to four crime scenarios that differ in terms of the details of the eyewitness evidence. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32181.v1 attorneys icpsr evidence icpsr eyewitness memory icpsr identity icpsr legal representation icpsr plea negotiations icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr prosecution icpsr public defenders icpsr suspect identification icpsr witnesses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Pezdek, Kathy Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32181 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32181.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34354 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34354 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2011 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34354 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2011, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34354.v1 correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr correctional facilities icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34354 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34354.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33622 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33622 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2011 Federal Judicial Center 2013-01-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33622 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of appellate and civil cases: filing and termination. The termination data (archived in this data collection) contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data (archived as a separate data collection) contain only filing information on the most recent pending cases. The unit of analysis for the appellate and civil terminations data is the case. This collection also contains data on criminal cases in federal courts. However, the unit of analysis for the criminal data is the defendant, and a defendant can be included in several cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33622.v2 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33622 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33622.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29281 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29281 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Appellate and Civil Pending Data, 2011 Federal Judicial Center 2013-02-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 29281 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of appellate and civil cases: filing and termination. The termination data (archived as separate data collections each year) contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data (archived as this data collection and updated annually) contain only filing information on the most recent pending cases. The unit of analysis for the appellate and civil pending data is the case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29281.v2 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29281 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29281.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33081 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33081 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Victimization Survey [electronic resource] School Crime Supplement, 2011 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 33081 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The primary purpose of the School Crime Supplement (SCS) is to obtain additional information about school-related victimizations so that policymakers; academic researchers; practitioners at the federal, state, and local levels; and special interest groups who are concerned with crime in schools can make informed decisions concerning policies and programs. The SCS asks questions related to students' experiences with, and perceptions of crime and safety at school, including preventive measures employed by schools; students' participation in after school activities; students' perception of school rules and enforcement of these rules; the presence of weapons, drugs, alcohol, and gangs in school; student bullying; hate-related incidents; and attitudinal questions relating to the fear of victimization at school. These responses are linked to the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) survey instrument responses for a more complete understanding of the individual student's circumstances. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33081.v1 crime icpsr crime in schools icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr drugs icpsr educational environment icpsr fear of crime icpsr juvenile crime icpsr offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr reactions to crime icpsr robbery icpsr school attendance icpsr school security icpsr school violence icpsr student attitudes icpsr student behavior icpsr vandalism icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations NACJD X. Victimization United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33081 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33081.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34588 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34588 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Supplementary Homicide Reports, 2011 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2013-04-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34588 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA: SUPPLEMENTARY HOMICIDE REPORTS, 2011 (SHR) provide detailed information on criminal homicides reported to the police. These homicides consist of murders; non-negligent killings also called non-negligent manslaughter; and justifiable homicides. UCR Program contributors compile and submit their crime data by one of two means: either directly to the FBI or through their State UCR Programs. State UCR Programs frequently impose mandatory reporting requirements which have been effective in increasing both the number of reporting agencies as well as the number and accuracy of each participating agency's reports. Each agency may be identified by its numeric state code, alpha-numeric agency ("ORI") code, jurisdiction population, and population group. In addition, each homicide incident is identified by month of occurrence and situation type, allowing flexibility in creating aggregations and subsets. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34588.v1 arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr homicide icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34588 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34588.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34586 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34586 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, 2011 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2013-04-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34586 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA: OFFENSES KNOWN AND CLEARANCES BY ARREST, 2011 dataset is a compilation of offenses reported to law enforcement agencies in the United States. Due to the vast number of categories of crime committed in the United States, the FBI has limited the type of crimes included in this compilation to those crimes which people are most likely to report to police and those crimes which occur frequently enough to be analyzed across time. Crimes included are criminal homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft. Much information about these crimes is provided in this dataset. The number of times an offense has been reported, the number of reported offenses that have been cleared by arrests, and the number of cleared offenses which involved offenders under the age of 18 are the major items of information collected. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34586.v1 offenses icpsr arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr law enforcement icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34586 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34586.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34584 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34584 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Police Employee (LEOKA) Data, 2011 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2013-05-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34584 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data, Police Employee Data, 2011 file contains monthly data on felonious or accidental killings and assaults upon United States law enforcement officers acting in the line of duty. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) assembled the data and processed them from UCR Master Police Employee (LEOKA) data tapes. Each agency record included in the file includes the following summary variables: state code, population group code, geographic division, Metropolitan Statistical Area code, and agency name. These variables afford considerable flexibility in creating subsets or aggregations of the data. Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as a periodic nationwide assessment of reported crimes not available elsewhere in the criminal justice system. Each year, this information is reported in four types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, (2) Property Stolen and Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), and (4) Police Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Police Employee (LEOKA) Data provide information about law enforcement officers killed or assaulted (hence the acronym, LEOKA) in the line of duty. The variables created from the LEOKA forms provide in-depth information on the circumstances surrounding killings or assaults, including type of call answered, type of weapon used, and type of patrol the officers were on. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34584.v1 arrests icpsr assaults on police icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenses icpsr police deaths icpsr police officers icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System DSDR VI. Population Characteristics NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34584 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34584.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34481 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34481 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2011 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality 2013-03-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34481 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2011 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34481.v1 addiction icpsr alcohol icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr amphetamines icpsr barbiturates icpsr cocaine icpsr controlled drugs icpsr crack cocaine icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr depression (psychology) icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr employment icpsr hallucinogens icpsr health care icpsr heroin icpsr households icpsr income icpsr inhalants icpsr marijuana icpsr mental health icpsr mental health services icpsr methamphetamine icpsr pregnancy icpsr prescription drugs icpsr sedatives icpsr smoking icpsr stimulants icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr tobacco use icpsr tranquilizers icpsr youths icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime SAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program RCMD V. Health and Well-Being RCMD I. Crime DSDR III. Health United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34481 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34481.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34409 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34409 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring the Future [electronic resource] A Continuing Study of American Youth (12th-Grade Survey), 2011 Lloyd D. Johnston , Jerald G. Bachman , Patrick M. O'Malley , John E. Schulenberg 2012-11-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34409 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey of 12th-grade students is part of a series that explores changes in important values, behaviors, and lifestyle orientations of contemporary American youth. Students are randomly assigned to complete one of six questionnaires, each with a different subset of topical questions, but all containing a set of "core" questions on demographics and drug use. There are about 1,400 variables across the questionnaires. Drugs covered by this survey include tobacco, smokeless tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, hashish, prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, LSD, hallucinogens, amphetamines (stimulants), Ritalin (methylphenidate), Quaaludes (methaqualone), barbiturates (tranquilizers), cocaine, crack cocaine, GHB (gamma hydroxy butyrate), ecstasy, methamphetamine, and heroin. Other topics include attitudes toward religion, changing roles for women, educational aspirations, self-esteem, exposure to drug education, and violence and crime (both in and out of school). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34409.v2 alcohol icpsr attitudes icpsr crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug education icpsr drug use icpsr self esteem icpsr educational objectives icpsr family background icpsr gender roles icpsr high school students icpsr human behavior icpsr lifestyles icpsr prescription drugs icpsr religious attitudes icpsr social change icpsr tobacco use icpsr values icpsr youths icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States RCMD IX. Minority Populations NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Johnston, Lloyd D. Bachman, Jerald G. O'Malley, Patrick M. Schulenberg, John E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34409 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34409.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34061 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34061 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Victimization Survey, 2011 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-10-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34061 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Series, previously called the National Crime Surveys (NCS), has been collecting data on personal and household victimization through an ongoing survey of a nationally-representative sample of residential addresses since 1973. The NCVS was designed with four primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas. The survey categorizes crimes as "personal" or "property." Personal crimes include rape and sexual attack, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and purse-snatching/pocket-picking, while property crimes include burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and vandalism. Each respondent is asked a series of screen questions designed to determine whether she or he was victimized during the six-month period preceding the first day of the month of the interview. A "household respondent" is also asked to report on crimes against the household as a whole (e.g., burglary, motor vehicle theft). The data include type of crime, month, time, and location of the crime, relationship between victim and offender, characteristics of the offender, self-protective actions taken by the victim during the incident and results of those actions, consequences of the victimization, type of property lost, whether the crime was reported to police and reasons for reporting or not reporting, and offender use of weapons, drugs, and alcohol. Basic demographic information such as age, race, gender, and income is also collected, to enable analysis of crime by various subpopulations. This version of the NCVS, referred to as the collection year, contains records from interviews conducted in the 12 months of the given year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34061.v1 assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr crime icpsr crime costs icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr rape icpsr reactions to crime icpsr robbery icpsr sexual offenses icpsr vandalism icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34061 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34061.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33902 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33902 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring the Future [electronic resource] A Continuing Study of American Youth (8th- and 10th-Grade Surveys), 2011 Lloyd D. Johnston , Jerald G. Bachman , Patrick M. O'Malley , John E. Schulenberg 2012-10-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33902 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These surveys of 8th- and 10th-grade students are part of a series that explores changes in important values, behaviors, and lifestyle orientations of contemporary American youth. Students in each grade are randomly assigned to complete one of four questionnaires, each with a different subset of topical questions but containing a set of "core" questions on demographics and drug use. There are more than 450 variables across the questionnaires. Drugs covered by this survey include amphetamines (stimulants), barbiturates (tranquilizers), other prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, tobacco, smokeless tobacco, alcohol, inhalants, steroids, marijuana, hashish, LSD, hallucinogens, cocaine, crack, ecstasy, methamphetamine, and injectable drugs such as heroin. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33902.v1 alcohol icpsr attitudes icpsr crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug education icpsr drug use icpsr educational objectives icpsr family background icpsr gender roles icpsr high school students icpsr human behavior icpsr lifestyles icpsr prescription drugs icpsr religious attitudes icpsr self esteem icpsr social change icpsr tobacco use icpsr values icpsr youths icpsr RCMD IX. Minority Populations NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Johnston, Lloyd D. Bachman, Jerald G. O'Malley, Patrick M. Schulenberg, John E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33902 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33902.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34321 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2010 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2010, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2010. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34321.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34339 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34339 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Statutes for Counts of Convictions for Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34339 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data contain records of statutes for each count of conviction for criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2010. The data are one of two supplementary files that should be used in conjunction with the primary analysis file, which contains records for all defendants sentenced under the guidelines. These data can be linked to the primary analysis file using the unique identifier variable USSCIDN. The number of records for a defendant in the current data corresponds to the total number of counts of conviction for that defendant, and that total is recorded in the NOCOUNT variable. As an example, if a defendant has five counts of conviction (NOCOUNT=5), he or she will have five records in the current data. As it is possible for defendants to have multiple statutes applying to a single count of conviction, up to three statutes (STA1-STA3) are recorded for each count of conviction. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34339.v1 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34339 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34339.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34336 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34336 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Arrests and Bookings for Federal Offenses, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34336 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of arrests and bookings for federal offenses in the United States during fiscal year 2010. The data were constructed from the United States Marshals Service (USMS) Prisoner Tracking System database. Records include arrests made by federal law enforcement agencies (including the USMS), state and local agencies, and self-surrenders. Offenders arrested for federal offenses are transferred to the custody of the USMS for processing, transportation, and detention. The Prisoner Tracking System contains data on all offenders within the custody of the USMS. The data file contains variables from the original USMS files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 1.1-1.3. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34336.v1 arrest records icpsr arrests icpsr federal offenses icpsr federal prisoners icpsr offenders icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34336 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34336.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34335 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34335 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Suspects in Federal Criminal Matters, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34335 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of suspects in federal criminal matters received by United States attorneys or filed before the United States magistrates during fiscal year 2010. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. Records include suspects in criminal matters, and are limited to suspects whose matters were not declined immediately by the United States attorneys. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Table 1.1. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34335.v1 federal courts icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34335 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34335.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34334 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34334 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases -- Terminated, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34334 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases terminated in United States District Court during fiscal year 2010. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34334.v1 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34334 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34334.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34333 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34333 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants Charged in Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34333 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2010. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34333.v1 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34333 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34333.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34332 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34332 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Suspects in Federal Criminal Matters Concluded, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34332 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of suspects in federal criminal matters concluded by United States attorneys or United States magistrates during fiscal year 2010. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. Records include suspects in criminal matters, and are limited to suspects whose matters were not declined immediately by the United States attorneys. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 1.2-1.5. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34332.v1 defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34332 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34332.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34331 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34331 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34331 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were terminated by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2010. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34331.v1 district courts icpsr offenses icpsr defendants icpsr prosecution icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34331 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34331.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34330 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34330 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34330 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were filed by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2010. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34330.v1 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34330 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34330.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34329 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34329 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Offenders in Prison at Year-End, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34329 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of sentenced offenders in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at year-end of fiscal year 2010. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34329.v1 correctional system icpsr offenders icpsr prisons icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34329 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34329.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34328 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34328 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Offenders Released From Prison, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34328 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of sentenced offenders released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2010. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. Records of offenders who exit federal prison temporarily, such as for transit to another location, to serve a weekend sentence, or for health care, are not included in the exiting cohort. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34328.v1 correctional system icpsr offenders icpsr prisons icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34328 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34328.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34327 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34327 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Offenders Admitted to Prison, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34327 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of sentenced offenders committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2010. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34327.v1 correctional system icpsr offenders icpsr prisons icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34327 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34327.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34326 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34326 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34326 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases terminated in United States District Court during fiscal year 2010. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34326.v1 criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr district courts icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial courts icpsr administration icpsr court cases icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34326 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34326.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34325 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34325 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Pending, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34325 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court before or during fiscal year 2010 and still pending as of year-end. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34325.v1 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr district courts icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34325 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34325.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34324 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34324 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34324 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2010. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34324.v1 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr district courts icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34324 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34324.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34323 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34323 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Criminal Appeals Cases in Courts of Appeals -- Terminated, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34323 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of criminal appeals cases terminated in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2010. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. Appeals may be terminated on the merits or on procedural grounds. Of those that are terminated on the merits, the district court ruling may be affirmed, reversed, remanded to criminal court, or dismissed. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34323.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34323 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34323.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30701 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30701 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Paired-Agency Linked Files, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30701 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The new FJSRC linking system, implemented with the 2008 FJSRC data, includes sets of agency dyad linked files created by improved methods of algorithmic matching. There are both inter-agency linked files and intra-agency dyad linked files. The inter-agency matched pair files (or "dyads") permit the linking of records from two different source agencies for adjacent stages of federal case processing by providing a crosswalk of the agency-specific key ID variables for the two agency data files in the pair. These agency ID variables (sequential ID numbers) may be used to link records from one agency's standard analysis file (SAF) to the next. The system enables users to track individual defendant-cases through stages of the federal criminal justice system (from arrest to prosecution, adjudication, sentencing, and corrections) sequentially, one agency dyad pair at a time. Each inter-agency paired linked file relates the sequential record numbers (i.e. SEQ_NUM) included in the SAFs from one agency/stage to another. The intra-agency matched pair files (also dyads) permit the same type of linking as described above except that the linkages are within the same federal agency. The linkages are to different stages of case processing withing a particular agency. The system covers all data years from 1994-2010. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, D.C.) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30701.v4 case processing icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30701 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30701.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31261 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31261 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-08-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31261 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2010 Annual Survey of Jails is the 23rd such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. Starting in 2010, BJS enhanced the ASJ survey instruments to address topics on the number of convicted inmates that are unsentenced or sentenced and the number of unconvicted inmates awaiting trial/arraignment, or transfers/holds for other authorities. In order to reduce respondent burden, the ASJ no longer collects data on conviction status by sex. Also new to 2010, data is collected on jails’ operational capacity and design capacity. Incorporating enhanced capacity measurements enables BJS to describe more accurately the variation and volatility of inmate bed space and crowding, especially as they relate to safety and security in jails. To address more directly issues related to overcrowding and safety and security in jails, BJS started collecting data on staff and assaults against staff from the largest jails. In the modifications to the ASJ, starting in 2010, 335 jail jurisdictions (370 respondents) included with certainty in the ASJ sample survey were asked to provide additional information (forms CJ-5D or CJ-5DA) on the flow of inmates going through jails and the distribution of time served, staff characteristics and assaults on staff resulting in death, and inmate misconduct. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2010. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2010. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31261.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31261 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31261.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32901 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32901 MiAaI MiAaI Experimental Evaluation of a Youth Dating Violence Prevention Program in New York City Middle Schools, 2009-2010 [electronic resource] Bruce Taylor , Nan D. Stein , Dan Woods , Elizabeth Mumford 2012-05-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 32901 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The study sought to measure knowledge about laws related to domestic violence and harassment, resources for help, rape myths, and skills such as conflict resolution; attitudes about the acceptability of violent, abusive, and harassing behaviors; behavioral intentions to avoid committing violent acts in the future as well as intentions to intervene when in the position of a bystander; behavioral measures about peer and dating partner physical and sexual violence experienced as a victim or perpetrator, and sexual harassment experienced as a victim or perpetrator; and other items covering a demographic profile of the students and questions on prior attendance at an educational program about sexual assault, harassment, or violence, and prior history of dating. Researchers randomly assigned a school-based intervention to 6th and 7th grade classes (over 2,500 students) in 30 public middle schools in New York City to one of four conditions: (1) a classroom-based intervention; (2) a school-wide intervention; (3) interventions that included both classroom and school-wide components; or (4) a (no treatment) control group. The classroom based intervention was delivered through a six session curriculum that emphasized the consquences for perpetrators of domestic violence and harassment, state laws and penalties for domestic violence and harassment, the construction of gender roles, and healthy relationships. The school-wide intervention included the development and use of temporary school-based restraining orders, higher levels of faculty and security presence in areas identified by students and school personnel as unsafe "hot spots", and the use of posters to increase awareness and reporting of domestic violence and harassment to school personnel. Pencil and paper surveys were distributed to students at three different times: (1) immediately before the assignment to one of the four study conditions, (2) immediately after the treatment (or control condition) was completed, and (3) between five and six months after assignment to one of the four study conditions. The surveys took about 40 minutes to complete and were completed in the classroom during one class period. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32901.v1 children icpsr dating (social) icpsr domestic violence icpsr middle schools icpsr school age children icpsr sexual harassment icpsr social interaction icpsr social life icpsr students icpsr youths icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD I. Attitude Surveys ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Taylor, Bruce Stein, Nan D. Woods, Dan Mumford, Elizabeth Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32901 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32901.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28861 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28861 MiAaI MiAaI Reducing Courts' Failure to Appear Rate [electronic resource] A Procedural Justice Approach [Nebraska Statewide, Select Counties, 2009-2010] Brian H. Bornstein , Alan J. Tomkins , Elizabeth M. Neeley 2011-06-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28861 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness of using different kinds of written reminders to reduce misdemeanants' failure to appear (FTA) rates. The study examined the problem of FTA via a two-stage experiment. In Phase 1, 7,865 misdemeanor defendants from 14 Nebraska counties were randomly assigned to one of four reminder conditions: (1) a no-reminder (control) condition; (2) a reminder-only condition; (3) a condition in which the reminder also made them aware of possible sanctions should they fail to appear (reminder-sanctions); or (4) a condition in which the reminder mentioned sanctions but also highlighted aspects of procedural justice (PJ), such as voice, neutrality, respect, and public interest (reminder-combined). Data collection began in March 2009 and continued through May 2010. Files were received daily from the Nebraska Administrative Office of the Courts containing information about cases filed in each of the 14 counties included in the study. Upon receipt of this file, researchers screened participants using certain eligibility criteria. Researchers mailed postcard reminders two to five business days prior to the scheduled court appearance. Approximately one week after each scheduled court appearance researchers accessed the courts' administrative database (JUSTICE) to determine whether the defendant actually appeared for the scheduled hearing. Upon accessing this information, researchers recorded this variable, which is the primary dependent variable in the study. At the same time researchers recorded the appearance variable, they selected participants for Phase 2 of the study -- a mail survey administered after their scheduled appearance (or non-appearance) to assess their perceptions of procedural fairness and their level of trust/confidence in the courts. To do so, researchers selected all participants who failed to appear for their court date to receive a survey. Twenty percent of defendants who did appear were also randomly selected to receive a survey. Surveys were sent to a total of 2,360 individuals and were received from a total of 452 defendants. The study contains a total of 197 variables including demographics, court appearance characteristics, experiment characteristics, charge/offense variables, and variables from surveys about experiences with the court system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28861.v1 case processing icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr courts icpsr criminal courts icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr failure to appear icpsr justice icpsr legal proceedings icpsr offense classification icpsr procedural justice icpsr trust in government icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Bornstein, Brian H. Tomkins, Alan J. Neeley, Elizabeth M. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28861 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28861.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29981 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29981 MiAaI MiAaI Crime Incident Data for Selected HOPE VI Sites in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2002-2010, and Washington, DC, 2000-2009 [electronic resource] Meagan Cahill 2011-07-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29981 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this project was to conduct an evaluation of the impact on crime of the closing, renovation, and subsequent reopening of selected public housing developments under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Housing Opportunities for People Everywhere (HOPE VI) initiative. The study examined crime displacement and potential diffusion of benefits in and around five public housing developments that, since 2000, had been redeveloped using funds from HUD’s HOPE VI initiative and other sources. In Milwaukee, Wisconsin, three sites were selected for inclusion in the study. However, due to substantial overlap between the various target sites and displacement zones, the research team ultimately decided to aggregate the three sites into a single target area. A comparison area was then chosen based on recommendations from the Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee (HACM). In Washington, DC, two HOPE VI sites were selected for inclusion in the study. Based on recommendations from the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA), the research team selected a comparison site for each of the two target areas. Displacement areas were then drawn as concentric rings ("buffers") around the target areas in both Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Washington, DC. Address-level incident data were collected for the city of Milwaukee from the Milwaukee Police Department for the period January 2002 through February 2010. Incident data included all "Group A" offenses as classified under National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS). The research team classified the offenses into personal and property offenses. The offenses were aggregated into monthly counts, yielding 98 months of data (Part 1: Milwaukee, Wisconsin Data). Address-level data were also collected for Washington, DC from the Metropolitan Police Department for the time period January 2000 through September 2009. Incident data included all Part I offenses as classified under the Uniform Crime Report (UCR) system. The data were classified by researchers into personal and property offenses and aggregated by month, yielding 117 months of data (Part 2: Washington, DC Data). Part 1 contains 15 variables, while Part 2 contains a total of 27 variables. Both datasets include variables on the number of personal offenses reported per month, the number of property offenses reported per month, and the total number of incidents reported per month for each target site, buffer zone area (1000 feet or 2000 feet), and comparison site. Month and year indicators are also included in each dataset. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29981.v1 community development icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime rates icpsr crime statistics icpsr federal housing programs icpsr low income housing icpsr public housing icpsr urban development icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Cahill, Meagan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29981 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29981.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32821 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32821 MiAaI MiAaI Outcome Evaluation of Tribes Learning Communities in California, 2007-2010 [electronic resource] Thomas L. Hanson , Jo Ann Izu , Anthony Petrosino , Bo Delong-Cotty , Hong Zheng 2012-12-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 32821 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was an outcome evaluation that employed a group randomized experimental design to assess the effectiveness of a school-based violence prevention program known as Tribes in preventing youth violence. The study took place in elementary schools in the San Francisco Unified School District and targeted students in Kindergarten through Fifth grade. Within each school, teachers (and their students) were randomly assigned to the experimental condition, with teachers assigned to the intervention condition using Tribes in their classrooms and control teachers delivering usual lessons. Multiple, repeated measures, including teacher surveys and checklists, parent checklists, direct evaluator observations of classrooms, and individual student interviews were employed between May 2007 and November 2010. Researchers gathered data in four major outcome areas: classroom environment, teacher practices, and student behavior and reasoning. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32821.v1 children icpsr classroom environment icpsr educational environment icpsr elementary school students icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parents icpsr school age children icpsr school violence icpsr student attitudes icpsr student behavior icpsr students icpsr teacher attitudes icpsr teacher student relationship icpsr teachers icpsr NACJD II. Community Studies ICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth NACJD X. Victimization Hanson, Thomas L. Izu, Jo Ann Petrosino, Anthony Delong-Cotty, Bo Zheng, Hong Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32821 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32821.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33201 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33201 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring Drug Epidemics and the Markets That Sustain Them, Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) and ADAM II Data, 2000-2003 and 2007-2010 [electronic resource] Andrew Golub , Henry H. Brownstein , Eloise Dunlap 2012-12-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33201 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined trends in the use of five widely abused drugs among arrestees at 10 geographically diverse locations from 2000 to 2010: Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Denver, Indianapolis, Manhattan, Minneapolis, Portland Oregon, Sacramento, and Washington DC. The data came from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program reintroduced in 2007 (ADAM II) and its predecessor the ADAM program. ADAM data included urinalysis results that provided an objective measure of recent drug use, provided location specific estimates over time, and provided sample weights that yielded unbiased estimates for each location. The ADAM data were analyzed according to a drug epidemics framework, which has been previously employed to understand the decline of the crack epidemic, the growth of marijuana use in the 1990s, and the persistence of heroin use. Similar to other diffusion of innovation processes, drug epidemics tend to follow a natural course passing through four distinct phases: incubation, expansion, plateau, and decline. The study also searched for changes in drug markets over the course of a drug epidemic. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33201.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr arrests icpsr cocaine icpsr crack cocaine icpsr crime patterns icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr methamphetamine icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Golub, Andrew Brownstein, Henry H. Dunlap, Eloise Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33201 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33201.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34366 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34366 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-11-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34366 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES, 1973-2010 provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death, as well as those who had their sentences commuted or vacated and prisoners who were executed. This study examines basic sociodemographic classifications including age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status at time of imprisonment, level of education, and State and region of incarceration. Criminal history information includes prior felony convictions and prior convictions for criminal homicide and the legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is provided on those inmates removed from death row by yearend 2010. The dataset consists of one part which contains 9,058 cases. The file provides information on inmates whose death sentences were removed in addition to information on those inmates who were executed. The file also gives information about inmates who received a second death sentence by yearend 2010 as well as inmates who were already on death row. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34366.v1 capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34366 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34366.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32321 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2010 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2011-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 8,332 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2010. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2010. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr susbstance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32501 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32501 MiAaI MiAaI Civil Justice Survey of Trials on Appeal, 2005 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-01-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 32501 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Bureau of Justice Statistics’ (BJS) Civil Justice Survey of Trials on Appeal (CJSTA) was based on 26,950 general civil (i.e., tort, contract, and real property) cases that were disposed by bench or jury trial in 156 counties participating in the 2005 Civil Justice Survey of State Courts (ICPSR 23862). Subsequently, 3,970 of those cases were appealed to 84 appellate courts in 35 states. This data collection examines civil bench and jury trials concluded in state trial courts in 2005 that were appealed to an intermediate appellate court or court of last resort. It is the first report based on data collected in the Bureau of Justice Statistics' (BJS) Civil Justice Survey of Trials on Appeal (CJSTA). The CJSTA included information from court records on civil trials concluded in 2005 and tracked the subsequent appeals from 2005 through March 2010. Information collected included the types of civil cases appealed, appeals dismissed or withdrawn before being decided on the merits, and appeals resulting in the trial court decision being reversed or affirmed. The time from the filing of an appeal to final appellate court disposition was also measured. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32501.v1 case processing icpsr civil courts icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr lawsuits icpsr state courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32501 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32501.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34449 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34449 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34449 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2010, the JRFC used three modules to collect information on the educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34449 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32841 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32841 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-12-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32841 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2010, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32841.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32841 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32841.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30401 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30401 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2010 Federal Judicial Center 2012-11-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30401 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of appellate and civil cases: filing and termination. The termination data (archived in this data collection) contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data (archived as a separate data collection) contain only filing information on the most recent pending cases. The unit of analysis for the appellate and civil terminations data is the case. This collection also contains data on criminal cases in federal courts. However, the unit of analysis for the criminal data is the defendant, and a defendant can be included in several cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30401.v2 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr legal systems icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30401 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30401.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34605 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34605 MiAaI MiAaI Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA] [electronic resource] Official Arrest Records, 2000-2010 [Restricted] Edward P. Mulvey 2013-05-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34605 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654), and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700). The official arrests records of all 1,354 youth were obtained from multiple sources. For arrest/petitions under the age of 18, this information is based on petitions appearing in the juvenile and adult court records in each site. In Philadelphia, this information was gathered based on a hand review of juvenile and adult court documents; in Phoenix, the information is based on reports from two computerized court tracking systems (JOLTS--Juvenile On-Line Tracking System for juvenile court information, ICIS--Maricopa County Superior Court database for adult court information). For arrests/petitions over 18, FBI arrest records are the source of information. There is no self-reported information contained in this set of data. Information from these different data sources is consolidated into the following categories: Information regarding petitions with a date that falls prior to the baseline interview date ("prior petitions"). Information regarding the study index petition (also called the "initial referring petition"; this is the adjudication that prompted study enrollment). Information regarding the study index petition can be found by accessing the "type" variable associated with the prior petitions (specific variable name: Official Record Prior PetitionXX: Petition type). Depending on the investigator's needs, this petition can remain combined with the "priors" or be used as a stand-alone petition. Information regarding arrests and court petitions with a date which falls after the baseline interview date in the Pathways study ("rearrests"). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v1 arrest records icpsr felony offenses icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr sex offenses icpsr weapons offenses icpsr substance abuse icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Mulvey, Edward P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34605 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34488 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34488 MiAaI MiAaI Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA] [electronic resource] Release Measures, 2000-2010 [Restricted] Edward P. Mulvey 2013-02-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34488 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700). The Release data portion of the Pathways study contains information from 1,130 interviews ("release interviews") reflecting the youths' perceptions regarding various aspects of the residential experience and institutional environment (e.g., accounts of program operations and services provided, ratings regarding the participant's feelings of his or her safety in the facility). The release interview was conducted within 30 days prior to or after release from a facility and in a separate session apart from the time point interview. This was done to minimize the burden on the research participant and to ensure adequate attention to institutional ratings. The restricted time period within which to conduct the release interview reduced the likelihood that intervening events and experiences would skew the participant's recall of the stay. Study participants could contribute more than one release interview, depending upon the number of institutional placements he/she had over the seven-year follow-up period. The current release data reflects ratings from 686 unique individuals. It should be recognized that not every institutional stay for every youth produced a release interview. On the basis of the number of reported institutional stays in the sample, it is estimated that a release interview was obtained for approximately 54 percent of the total number of residential stays experienced by study participants. Release interviews were missed if the research interviewer was not aware of the institutional stay (e.g. it occurred between time point interviews) or if the interviewer only became aware of the institutional stay at a point that was too late to schedule a release interview within the required window surrounding the release date. The 686 individuals reflected in the release data represent 51 percent of the Pathway study participants (n=1,354) and 56 percent of Pathways participants who had a least one institutional stay (n=1,234; 120 Pathways youths had no institutional stays). On average, these 686 youths had 1.6 interviews. The number of interviews per unique person ranges from one to eight. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34488.v1 academic achievement icpsr community involvement icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr friendships icpsr gangs icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr medications icpsr religion icpsr social behavior icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment outcome icpsr vocational education icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Mulvey, Edward P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34488 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34488.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34448 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34448 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34448 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34448 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27546 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27546 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27546 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were aggregated to the state level. The JRFC collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bed space in the facility to indicate whether the facility is experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the JRFC concatenated data file (ICPSR 27542) were aggregated to the state level and variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27546 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27545 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27545 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27545 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the state level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the state level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched state-level data provide information about the characteristics of juvenile residential facilities in the state from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in these facilities from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date were included in the concatenated matched file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not have been included in the file used for the aggregation. Variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were also added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27545 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27544 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27544 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Facility-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27544 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the facility level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the facility level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched facility-level data provide information about the characteristics of the facility from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in that facility from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched facility-level file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27544 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27543 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27543 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27543 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27541) and the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were matched on the facility identifier to create one data file. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Each record in the concatenated matched data file provides information about the juvenile and also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held from both the CJRP and JRFC collections. Therefore, these data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27543 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27542 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27542 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27542 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 pregnancy icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27542 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27541 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27541 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-02-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27541 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP, which is conducted biennially, asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. The concatenated data include the seven years of CJRP data in one file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27541 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31202 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31202 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Victimization Survey, 2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-06-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31202 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Series, previously called the National Crime Surveys (NCS), has been collecting data on personal and household victimization through an ongoing survey of a nationally-representative sample of residential addresses since 1973. The NCVS was designed with four primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas. The survey categorizes crimes as "personal" or "property." Personal crimes include rape and sexual attack, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and purse-snatching/pocket-picking, while property crimes include burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and vandalism. Each respondent is asked a series of screen questions designed to determine whether she or he was victimized during the six-month period preceding the first day of the month of the interview. A "household respondent" is also asked to report on crimes against the household as a whole (e.g., burglary, motor vehicle theft). The data include type of crime, month, time, and location of the crime, relationship between victim and offender, characteristics of the offender, self-protective actions taken by the victim during the incident and results of those actions, consequences of the victimization, type of property lost, whether the crime was reported to police and reasons for reporting or not reporting, and offender use of weapons, drugs, and alcohol. Basic demographic information such as age, race, gender, and income is also collected, to enable analysis of crime by various subpopulations. This version of the NCVS, referred to as the collection year, contains records from interviews conducted in the 12 months of the given year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31202.v2 property crimes icpsr rape icpsr reactions to crime icpsr robbery icpsr sexual offenses icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr crime icpsr crime costs icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr vandalism icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31202 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31202.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30984 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30984 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring the Future [electronic resource] A Continuing Study of American Youth (8th- and 10th-Grade Surveys), 2010 Lloyd D. Johnston , Jerald G. Bachman , Patrick M. O'Malley , John E. Schulenberg 2011-10-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30984 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These surveys of 8th- and 10th-grade students are part of a series that explores changes in important values, behaviors, and lifestyle orientations of contemporary American youth. Students in each grade are randomly assigned to complete one of four questionnaires, each with a different subset of topical questions but containing a set of "core" questions on demographics and drug use. There are more than 450 variables across the questionnaires. Drugs covered by this survey include amphetamines (stimulants), barbiturates (tranquilizers), other prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, tobacco, smokeless tobacco, alcohol, inhalants, steroids, marijuana, hashish, LSD, hallucinogens, cocaine, crack, ecstasy, methamphetamine, and injectable drugs such as heroin. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30984.v1 alcohol icpsr attitudes icpsr crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug education icpsr drug use icpsr educational objectives icpsr family background icpsr gender roles icpsr high school students icpsr human behavior icpsr lifestyles icpsr prescription drugs icpsr religious attitudes icpsr self esteem icpsr social change icpsr tobacco use icpsr values icpsr youths icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime RCMD IX. Minority Populations ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States Johnston, Lloyd D. Bachman, Jerald G. O'Malley, Patrick M. Schulenberg, John E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30984 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30984.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33601 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33601 MiAaI MiAaI National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2010 [electronic resource] Extract Files National Archive of Criminal Justice Data 2012-06-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33601 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a part of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The extract files version of NIBRS was created to simplify working with NIBRS data. Data management issues with NIBRS are significant, especially when two or more segment levels are being merged. These issues require skills separate from data analysis. NIBRS data as formatted by the FBI are stored in a single file. These data are organized by various segment levels (record types). There are six main segment levels: administrative, offense, property, victim, offender, and arrestee. Each segment level has a different length and layout. There are other segment levels that occur with less frequency than the six main levels. Significant computing resources are necessary to work with the data in its single-file format. In addition, the user must be sophisticated in working with data in complex file types. For these reasons and the desire to facilitate the use of NIBRS data, ICPSR created the extract files. The data are not a representative sample of crime in the United States. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33601.v1 arrests icpsr crime icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr property crime icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr victims icpsr violent crime icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD X. Victimization National Archive of Criminal Justice Data Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33601 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33601.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33530 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33530 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting [electronic resource] National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2012-06-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33530 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a part of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In the late 1970s, the law enforcement community called for a thorough evaluative study of the UCR with the objective of recommending an expanded and enhanced UCR program to meet law enforcement needs into the 21st century. The FBI fully concurred with the need for an updated program to meet contemporary needs and provided its support, formulating a comprehensive redesign effort. Following a multiyear study, a "Blueprint for the Future of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program" was developed. Using the "Blueprint," and in consultation with local and state law enforcement executives, the FBI formulated new guidelines for the Uniform Crime Reports. The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) was implemented to meet these guidelines. NIBRS data are archived at ICPSR as 13 separate data files per year, which may be merged by using linkage variables. The data focus on a variety of aspects of a crime incident. Part 4, Administrative Segment, offers data on the incident itself (date and time). Each crime incident is delineated by one administrative segment record. Also provided are Part 5, Offense Segment (offense type, location, weapon use, and bias motivation), Part 6, Property Segment (type of property loss, property description, property value, drug type and quantity), Part 7, Victim Segment (age, sex, race, ethnicity, and injuries), Part 8, Offender Segment (age, sex, and race), and Part 9, Arrestee Segment (arrest date, age, sex, race, and weapon use). The Batch Header Segment (Parts 1-3) separates and identifies individual police agencies by Originating Agency Identifier (ORI). Batch Header information, which is contained on three records for each ORI, includes agency name, geographic location, and population of the area. Part 10, Group B Arrest Report Segment, includes arrestee data for Group B crimes. Window Segments files (Parts 11-13) pertain to incidents for which the complete Group A Incident Report was not submitted to the FBI. In general, a Window Segment record will be generated if the incident occurred prior to January 1 of the previous year or if the incident occurred prior to when the agency started NIBRS reporting. As with the UCR, participation in NIBRS is voluntary on the part of law enforcement agencies. The data are not a representative sample of crime in the United States. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33530.v1 arrests icpsr crime icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr property crime icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr victims icpsr violent crime icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33530 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33530.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33527 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33527 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Supplementary Homicide Reports, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2012-06-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33527 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA: SUPPLEMENTARY HOMICIDE REPORTS, 2010 (SHR) provide detailed information on criminal homicides reported to the police. These homicides consist of murders; non-negligent killings also called non-negligent manslaughter; and justifiable homicides. UCR Program contributors compile and submit their crime data by one of two means: either directly to the FBI or through their State UCR Programs. State UCR Programs frequently impose mandatory reporting requirements which have been effective in increasing both the number of reporting agencies as well as the number and accuracy of each participating agency's reports. Each agency may be identified by its numeric state code, alpha-numeric agency ("ORI") code, jurisdiction population, and population group. In addition, each homicide incident is identified by month of occurrence and situation type, allowing flexibility in creating aggregations and subsets. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33527.v1 arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr homicide icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr victims icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33527 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33527.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33526 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33526 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2012-06-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33526 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA: OFFENSES KNOWN AND CLEARANCES BY ARREST, 2010 dataset is a compilation of offenses reported to law enforcement agencies in the United States. Due to the vast number of categories of crime committed in the United States, the FBI has limited the type of crimes included in this compilation to those crimes which people are most likely to report to police and those crimes which occur frequently enough to be analyzed across time. Crimes included are criminal homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft. Much information about these crimes is provided in this dataset. The number of times an offense has been reported, the number of reported offenses that have been cleared by arrests, and the number of cleared offenses which involved offenders under the age of 18 are the major items of information collected. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33526.v1 arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33526 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33526.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33525 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33525 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Police Employee (LEOKA) Data, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2012-06-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33525 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data, Police Employee Data, 2010 file contains monthly data on felonious or accidental killings and assaults upon United States law enforcement officers acting in the line of duty. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) assembled the data and processed them from UCR Master Police Employee (LEOKA) data tapes. Each agency record included in the file includes the following summary variables: state code, population group code, geographic division, Metropolitan Statistical Area code, and agency name. These variables afford considerable flexibility in creating subsets or aggregations of the data. Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as a periodic nationwide assessment of reported crimes not available elsewhere in the criminal justice system. Each year, this information is reported in four types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, (2) Property Stolen and Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), and (4) Police Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Police Employee (LEOKA) Data provide information about law enforcement officers killed or assaulted (hence the acronym, LEOKA) in the line of duty. The variables created from the LEOKA forms provide in-depth information on the circumstances surrounding killings or assaults, including type of call answered, type of weapon used, and type of patrol the officers were on. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33525.v1 offenses icpsr law enforcement icpsr police deaths icpsr police officers icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr arrests icpsr assaults on police icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr DSDR VI. Population Characteristics NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33525 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33525.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33524 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33524 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Hate Crime Data, 2010 [Record-Type Files] United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2012-06-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33524 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In response to a growing concern about hate crimes, the United States Congress enacted the Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990. The Act requires the attorney general to establish guidelines and collect, as part of the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, data "about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on race, religion, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, including where appropriate the crimes of murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, aggravated assault, simple assault, intimidation, arson, and destruction, damage or vandalism of property." Hate crime data collection was required by the Act to begin in calendar year 1990 and to continue for four successive years. In September 1994, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act amended the Hate Crime Statistics Act to add disabilities, both physical and mental, as factors that could be considered a basis for hate crimes. Although the Act originally mandated data collection for five years, the Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996 amended the collection duration "for each calendar year," making hate crime statistics a permanent addition to the UCR program. As with the other UCR data, law enforcement agencies contribute reports either directly or through their state reporting programs. Information contained in the data includes number of victims and offenders involved in each hate crime incident, type of victims, bias motivation, offense type, and location type. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33524.v1 Uniform Crime Reports icpsr arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr disabilities icpsr discrimination icpsr ethnicity icpsr hate crimes icpsr homophobia icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenses icpsr prejudice icpsr racial tensions icpsr religion icpsr violence icpsr FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System TPDRC I. Terrorism NACJD VIII. Official Statistics NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33524 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33524.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33523 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33523 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2012-06-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33523 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection contains county-level counts of arrests and offenses for Part I offenses (murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, and arson) and counts of arrests for Part II offenses (forgery, fraud, embezzlement, vandalism, weapons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol abuse violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew violations, and runaways). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33523.v1 burglary icpsr counties icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr drug abuse icpsr embezzlement icpsr forgery icpsr fraud icpsr illegal gambling icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr murder icpsr offenses icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sex offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr vagrancy icpsr vandalism icpsr weapons offenses icpsr aggravated assault icpsr alcohol icpsr arrests icpsr arson icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33523 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33523.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33522 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33522 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, Summarized Yearly, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2012-06-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33522 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the number of arrests reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing, per reporting police agency: an agency header record, and 1 to 43 detail offense records containing the counts of arrests by age, sex, and race for a particular offense. ICPSR restructured the original data to logical record length format with the agency header record variables copied onto the detail records. Consequently, each record contains arrest counts for a particular agency-offense. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33522.v1 arrest records icpsr arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr drug abuse icpsr illegal gambling icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr violent crime icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33522 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33522.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33521 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33521 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2012-06-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33521 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the number of arrests reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing (per reporting police agency) an agency header record, and 1 to 12 monthly header reports, and 1 to 43 detail offense records containing the counts of arrests by age, sex, and race for a particular offense. ICPSR restructured the original data to a rectangular format. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33521.v1 arrests icpsr arson icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr counties icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr drug abuse icpsr fraud icpsr illegal gambling icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr murder icpsr offenses icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sex offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr vandalism icpsr weapons icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33521 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33521.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32722 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32722 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality 2012-11-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32722 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2010 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32722.v3 youths icpsr barbiturates icpsr cocaine icpsr controlled drugs icpsr crack cocaine icpsr demographics icpsr depression icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug abuse icpsr addiction icpsr sedatives icpsr pregnancy icpsr prescription drugs icpsr smoking icpsr stimulants icpsr tobacco use icpsr tranquilizers icpsr alcohol icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr amphetamines icpsr employment icpsr hallucinogens icpsr health care icpsr heroin icpsr households icpsr income icpsr inhalants icpsr marijuana icpsr mental health icpsr mental health services icpsr methamphetamine icpsr pain relievers icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug treatment icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr DSDR III. Health SAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime RCMD V. Health and Well-Being NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32722 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32722.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30985 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30985 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring the Future [electronic resource] A Continuing Study of American Youth (12th-Grade Survey), 2010 Lloyd D. Johnston , Jerald G. Bachman , Patrick M. O'Malley , John E. Schulenberg 2011-10-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30985 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey of 12th-grade students is part of a series that explores changes in important values, behaviors, and lifestyle orientations of contemporary American youth. Students are randomly assigned to complete one of six questionnaires, each with a different subset of topical questions, but all containing a set of "core" questions on demographics and drug use. There are about 1,400 variables across the questionnaires. Drugs covered by this survey include tobacco, smokeless tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, hashish, prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, LSD, hallucinogens, amphetamines (stimulants), Ritalin (methylphenidate), Quaaludes (methaqualone), barbiturates (tranquilizers), cocaine, crack cocaine, GHB (gamma hydroxy butyrate), ecstasy, methamphetamine, and heroin. Other topics include attitudes toward religion, changing roles for women, educational aspirations, self-esteem, exposure to drug education, and violence and crime (both in and out of school). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30985.v1 gender roles icpsr high school students icpsr human behavior icpsr lifestyles icpsr alcohol icpsr attitudes icpsr crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug education icpsr drug use icpsr educational objectives icpsr family background icpsr prescription drugs icpsr religious attitudes icpsr self esteem icpsr social change icpsr tobacco use icpsr values icpsr youths icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States RCMD IX. Minority Populations Johnston, Lloyd D. Bachman, Jerald G. O'Malley, Patrick M. Schulenberg, John E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30985 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30985.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29961 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29961 MiAaI MiAaI Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA] [electronic resource] Subject Measures, 2000-2010 Edward P. Mulvey 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29961 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700). Respondents were enrolled and baseline interviews conducted from November 2000 to January 2003. Follow-up interviews were then scheduled with the respondents at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 84 months past their baseline interview. The enrolled youth were at least 14 years old and under 18 years old at the time of their committing offense and were found guilty of a serious offense (predominantly felonies, with a few exceptions for some misdemeanor property offenses, sexual assault, or weapons offenses). The baseline interview was conducted within 75 days of the youth's adjudication hearing. For youths in the adult system, the baseline interview was conducted within 90 days of either (a) the decertification hearing in Philadelphia, a hearing at which it is determined if the case will remain in adult court or if it will be sent back to juvenile court; or (b) the adult arraignment hearing in Phoenix, the point in the Arizona adult system at which charges have been formally presented. The aims of the investigation were to identify initial patterns of how serious adolescent offenders stop antisocial activity, to describe the role of social context and developmental changes in promoting these positive changes, and to compare the effects of sanctions and interventions in promoting these changes. The larger goals of the Pathways to Desistance study were to improve decision-making by court and social service personnel and to clarify policy debates about alternatives for serious adolescent offenders. The study relied primarily on self-report information from study participants. Each wave of data collection covered six domains: (1) background characteristics (e.g., demographics, academic achievement, psychiatric diagnoses, offense history, neurological functioning, psychopathy, personality), (2) indicators of individual functioning (e.g., work and school status and performance, substance abuse, mental disorder, antisocial behavior), (3) psychosocial development and attitudes (e.g., impulse control, susceptibility to peer influence, perceptions of opportunity, perceptions of procedural justice, moral disengagement), (4) family context (e.g., household composition, quality of family relationships), (5) personal relationships (e.g., quality of romantic relationships and friendships, peer delinquency, contacts with caring adults), and (6) community context (e.g., neighborhood conditions, personal capital, and community involvement). Information about the measures used to capture this information can be found on the Pathways to Desistance website. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29961.v2 family life icpsr friendships icpsr gangs icpsr household composition icpsr income icpsr interpersonal relations icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr personal adjustment icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr psychosocial assessment icpsr religion icpsr social behavior icpsr substance abuse icpsr academic achievement icpsr community involvement icpsr crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Mulvey, Edward P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29961 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29961.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34320 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34320 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34320 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2009 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2009, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2009. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34320.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34320 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34320.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30799 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30799 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30799 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Corrections Reporting Program gathers data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. The dataset is comprised of four types of data: prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), released from parole (Part 3), or in prison at year end (Part 4). The National Prison Statistics (NPS) program was established in 1926 by the Bureau of the Census in response to a congressional mandate to compile national information on the populations confined in correctional institutions. This program described the characteristics and counts of prison inmates during each calendar year. Since its initiation, responsibility for this program has shifted among several agencies -- in 1950 it was transferred to the Federal Bureau of Prisons and to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration in 1971. Since 1972, the Bureau of Census, under agreement with the Department of Justice, has had responsibility for compiling the statistical data. Census staff negotiates directly with each state, assembles and edits the data, and prepares the data for analysis and publication. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30799.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30799 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30799.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29041 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29041 MiAaI MiAaI Course of Domestic Abuse Among Chicago's Elderly [electronic resource] Risk Factors, Protective Behaviors, and Police Intervention, 2006-2009 Karen L. Amendola , Meghan G. Slipka , Edwin E. Hamilton , Julie L. Whitman 2013-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 29041 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The study was conducted to examine if and how risk factors and protective behaviors affect the course of elder abuse over time, and the role of police in intervening with elderly victims of domestic abuse and/or neglect. It also examined the prevalence rates for various types of abuse using a stratified sample of Chicago's elderly population. The study involved in-depth interviews with 328 elderly (aged 60 and over) residents of Chicago from three sample groups: (1) 159 community nonvictims; (2) 121 community victims; and (3) a police sample consisting of 48 elderly victims who had been visited by trained domestic violence/senior citizen victimization officers in the Chicago Police Department. The interviews were conducted using a survey instrument designed to assess victimization. The survey included questions about various characteristics and risk factors associated both with victims and perpetrators of abuse and/or neglect, specific types of abuse, and protective behaviors of victims. Victimization was examined twice over a 10-month period to evaluate the course of abuse over time. The efficacy of police intervention was also examined. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29041.v1 abuse icpsr domestic violence icpsr elder abuse icpsr family violence icpsr older adults icpsr police intervention icpsr spouse abuse icpsr victimization icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization Amendola, Karen L. Slipka, Meghan G. Hamilton, Edwin E. Whitman, Julie L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29041 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29041.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30791 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30791 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants Charged in Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30791 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2009. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30791.v1 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30791 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30791.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31083 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31083 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Criminal Appeals Cases in Courts of Appeals -- Terminated, 2009 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31083 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of criminal appeals cases terminated in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2009. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. Appeals may be terminated on the merits or on procedural grounds. Of those that are terminated on the merits, the district court ruling may be affirmed, reversed, remanded to criminal court, or dismissed. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31083.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31083 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31083.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30797 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30797 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Statutes for Counts of Convictions for Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30797 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data contain records of statutes for each count of conviction for criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2009. The data are one of two supplementary files that should be used in conjunction with the primary analysis file, which contains records for all defendants sentenced under the guidelines. These data can be linked to the primary analysis file using the unique identifier variable USSCIDN. The number of records for a defendant in the current data corresponds to the total number of counts of conviction for that defendant, and that total is recorded in the NOCOUNT variable. As an example, if a defendant has five counts of conviction (NOCOUNT=5), he or she will have five records in the current data. As it is possible for defendants to have multiple statutes applying to a single count of conviction, up to three statutes (STA1-STA3) are recorded for each count of conviction. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30797.v1 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr trial courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30797 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30797.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30796 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30796 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Guideline Computations for Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30796 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data contain records of guideline computations and adjustments for each count of conviction for criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2009. The data are one of two supplementary files that should be used in conjunction with the primary analysis file, which contains records for all defendants sentenced under the guidelines. These data can be linked to the primary analysis file using the unique identifier variable USSCIDN. The number of records for a defendant in the current data corresponds to the total number of guideline computations, which may or may not equal the total counts of conviction for that defendant, dependent upon the grouping rules of the particular guideline in question (see Section 3D1.2 of the guidelines manual). As an example, a defendant with five counts of drug trafficking will only have one guideline computation because each of the drug weights for each count are simply added together and only one calculation is necessary. However, if a defendant has five counts of bank robbery, he or she will have five separate guideline computations because bank robbery is considered to be a nongroupable offense. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30796.v1 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr trial courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30796 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30796.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30795 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30795 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30795 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data contain records of criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2009. It is estimated that over 90 percent of felony defendants in the federal criminal justice system are sentenced pursuant to the SRA of 1984. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. The Standardized Research Data File consists of variables from the Monitoring Department's database, which is limited to those defendants whose records have been furnished to the USSC by United States district courts and United States magistrates, as well as variables created by the OPA specifically for research purposes. The data include variables from the Judgement and Conviction (J and C) order submitted by the court, background and guideline information collected from the Presentencing Report (PSR), and the report on sentencing hearing in the Statement of Reasons (SOR). These data contain detailed information such as the guideline base offense level, offense level adjustments, criminal history, departure status, statement of reasons given for departure, and basic demographic information. These data are the primary analysis file and include only statute, guideline computation, and adjustment variables for the most serious offense of conviction. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30795.v1 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr trial courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30795 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30795.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30794 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30794 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Arrests and Bookings for Federal Offenses, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-07-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30794 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of arrests and bookings for federal offenses in the United States during fiscal year 2009. The data were constructed from the United States Marshals Service (USMS) Prisoner Tracking System database. Records include arrests made by federal law enforcement agencies (including the USMS), state and local agencies, and self-surrenders. Offenders arrested for federal offenses are transferred to the custody of the USMS for processing, transportation, and detention. The Prisoner Tracking System contains data on all offenders within the custody of the USMS. The data file contains variables from the original USMS files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 1.1-1.3. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30794.v1 arrest records icpsr arrests icpsr federal offenses icpsr federal prisoners icpsr offenders icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30794 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30794.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30793 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30793 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Suspects in Federal Criminal Matters, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30793 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of suspects in federal criminal matters received by United States attorneys or filed before the United States magistrates during fiscal year 2009. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. Records include suspects in criminal matters, and are limited to suspects whose matters were not declined immediately by the United States attorneys. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Table 1.1. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30793.v1 federal courts icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30793 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30793.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30792 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30792 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases -- Terminated, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30792 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases terminated in United States District Court during fiscal year 2009. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30792.v1 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30792 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30792.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30790 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30790 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Suspects in Federal Criminal Matters Concluded, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30790 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of suspects in federal criminal matters concluded by United States attorneys or United States magistrates during fiscal year 2009. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. Records include suspects in criminal matters, and are limited to suspects whose matters were not declined immediately by the United States attorneys. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 1.2-1.5. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30790.v1 defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30790 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30790.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30789 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30789 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30789 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were terminated by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2009. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30789.v1 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30789 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30789.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30788 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30788 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30788 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were filed by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2009. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30788.v1 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30788 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30788.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30787 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30787 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Offenders in Prison at Year-End, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30787 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of sentenced offenders in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at year-end of fiscal year 2009. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30787.v1 prisons icpsr correctional system icpsr offenders icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30787 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30787.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30786 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30786 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Offenders Released From Prison, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30786 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of sentenced offenders released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2009. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. Records of offenders who exit federal prison temporarily, such as for transit to another location, to serve a weekend sentence, or for health care, are not included in the exiting cohort. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30786.v1 correctional system icpsr offenders icpsr prisons icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30786 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30786.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30785 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30785 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Offenders Admitted to Prison, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30785 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of sentenced offenders committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2009. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30785.v1 correctional system icpsr offenders icpsr prisons icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30785 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30785.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30784 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30784 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30784 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases terminated in United States District Court during fiscal year 2009. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30784.v1 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr district courts icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30784 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30784.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30782 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30782 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Pending, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30782 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court before or during fiscal year 2009 and still pending as of year-end. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30782.v1 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr district courts icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30782 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30782.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30781 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30781 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30781 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2009. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30781.v1 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr district courts icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30781 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30781.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29081 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29081 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-05-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29081 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2009 Annual Survey of Jails is the 22nd such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2009. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2009. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29081.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29081 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29081.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30441 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30441 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Healthy Families New York Home Visiting Program, Age Seven Follow Up, 2007-2009 [electronic resource] Kimberly DuMont , Monica L. Rodriguez , Kristen Kirkland , Susan Mitchell-Herzfeld , Susan Ehrhard-Dietzel , Eunju Lee , China Layne , Rose Greene 2012-04-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30441 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Healthy Families New York (HFNY), which was based on the Healthy Families America (HFA) model, was established as a strengths-based, intensive home visitation program with the explicit goals of promoting positive parenting skills and parent-child interaction; preventing child abuse and neglect; supporting optimal prenatal care, and child health and development; and improving parent's self-sufficiency. In 2000, a randomized controlled trial was initiated at three sites with the HFNY home visiting program. Families eligible for HFNY at each site were randomly assigned to either an intervention group that was offered HFNY services or to a control group that was given information on and referral to appropriate services other than home visiting. Baseline interviews were conducted with 1,173 of the eligible women (intervention, n=579; control, n=594), and follow up interviews at Years 1, 2, and 3. In addition to data gathered during the follow up interviews, information regarding study participants' involvement in reports of child maltreatment was also extracted and coded from Child Protection Services records. For the current study, mothers in both the intervention and control groups were re-interviewed at the time of the target child's seventh birthday. Interviews (Dataset 1: Mother Interview Data, n=942) included information about parenting, the child, earnings, and household composition. Interviewers also completed face-to-face assessments (Dataset 2: Target Child Interview Data) with 800 of the children who were born and reached the age of 7 at the time of interview. The target child interviews assessed children's receptive vocabulary skills, emotional health, self-regulatory abilities, and problem behaviors. The research team also extracted or obtained administrative data pertaining to Child Protective Service reports, foster care placements, federal and state supported benefits, and programs services and costs (Datasets 3-8). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30441.v1 behavior problems icpsr child abuse icpsr child development icpsr child rearing icpsr child welfare icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr intervention icpsr outreach programs icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr parenting skills icpsr school age children icpsr service providers icpsr social services icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD X. Victimization DuMont, Kimberly Rodriguez, Monica L. Kirkland, Kristen Mitchell-Herzfeld, Susan Ehrhard-Dietzel, Susan Lee, Eunju Layne, China Greene, Rose Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30441 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30441.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30321 MiAaI MiAaI Custody Evaluations When There Are Allegations of Domestic Violence [electronic resource] Practices, Beliefs and Recommendations of Professional Evaluators in New York City, 1997-2009 Michael S. Davis , Chris S. O'Sullivan , Kim Susser , Marjory D. Fields 2013-01-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 30321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the beliefs and investigative practices of psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers who had been appointed by a court to evaluate families in disputed custody cases when there were allegations of domestic violence. The research team conducted a Case Review study (Part 1) and administered an Evaluator Survey to corresponding case evaluators (Part 2) between August 2007 and December 2009. The case review study was implemented through four private non-profit legal services agencies in New York City that provide free legal representation to domestic violence victims in civil proceedings including custody and visitation litigation. A total of 69 cases involving custody or visitation issues that were litigated and resolved between 1997 and 2007 were identified for inclusion in the study. The case review study involved the development of a Coding Scale for Custody Evaluations with Domestic Violence (DV) Allegations in order to rate the characteristics of the custody evaluations and the court outcomes. Raters coded each of the 69 cases in the case review sample with the Evaluation Coding Scale. The research team administered the Evaluator Survey (Part 2) to 14 custody evaluators who had completed evaluation reports for the cases in the Part 1 case review study. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30321.v1 abuse icpsr child custody icpsr child custody hearings icpsr courts icpsr divorce icpsr domestic assault icpsr domestic violence icpsr evaluation icpsr family courts icpsr family relationships icpsr family violence icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr legal aid icpsr parents icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr social services icpsr social work icpsr spouse abuse icpsr violence icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Davis, Michael S. O'Sullivan, Chris S. Susser, Kim Fields, Marjory D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33942 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33942 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey of Youth in Custody, 2008-2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-04-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 33942 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Survey of Youth in Custody (NSYC) is part of the BJS National Prison Rape Statistics Program to gather mandated data on the incidence of prevalence of sexual assault in juvenile facilities under the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA; P.L. 108-79). The Act requires a 10 percent sample of juvenile facilities to be listed by incidence of sexual assault. Data are collected directly from youth in a private setting using audio computer-assisted self interview (ACASI) technology with a touch-screen laptop and an audio feed to maximize inmate confidentiality and minimize literacy issues. The first year of collection includes nearly 200 juvenile facilities, with an estimated 10,000 completed interviews with youth. The NSYC utilized two questionnaires, based on the age of the respondent. The Older Youth questionnaire was administered to youths ages 15 and older, and the Younger Youth questionnaire was administered to those 14 and younger. The survey was divided into five sections. Section A collected background information, such as details of admission to facility and demographics including education, height, weight, race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and history of any forced sexual contact. Section B, Facility Perceptions and Victimization, included respondents' opinions of the facility and staff, any incidence of gang activity, and any injuries that had occurred. Section C, Sexual Activity Within Facility, captured the types of sexual contact that occurred and the circumstances of sexual contact. Section D, Description of Events with Youth, and Section E, Description of Events with Staff Member, focused on when and where the contact occurred, the race and gender of the other youths or staff members, if threats or coersion were involved, and outcomes, included whether or not the sexual contact was reported. Other variables include debriefing questions about respondents' experiences completing the survey, interviewer observations, created variables to summarize victimization reports (due to the complicated routing in Section C), weight and stratification data, and administrative data about the facilities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33942.v1 correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional guards icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juvenile victims icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison violence icpsr rape icpsr sex offenders icpsr sex offenses icpsr sexual abuse icpsr sexual assault icpsr sexual behavior icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33942 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33942.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29742 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29742 MiAaI MiAaI Developing Uniform Performance Measures for Policing in the United States [electronic resource] A Pilot Project in Four Agencies, 2008-2009 Robert C. Davis , Chris Ortiz , Gary Cordner , Craig Hartley , Reggie Newell 2013-04-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 29742 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Between 2008 and 2009, the research team gathered survey data from 458 members of the community (Part 1), 312 police officers (Part 2), and 804 individuals who had voluntary contact (Part 3), and 761 individuals who had involuntary contact (Part 4) with police departments in Dallas, Texas, Knoxville, Tennessee, and Kettering, Ohio, and the Broward County, Florida Sheriff's Office. The surveys were designed to look at nine dimensions of police performance: delivering quality services; fear, safety, and order; ethics and values; legitimacy and customer satisfaction; organizational competence and commitment to high standards; reducing crime and victimization; resource use; responding to offenders; and use of authority. The community surveys included questions about police effectiveness, police professionalism, neighborhood problems, and victimization. The officer surveys had three parts: job satisfaction items, procedural knowledge items, and questions about the culture of integrity. The voluntary police contact and involuntary police contact surveys included questions on satisfaction with the way the police officer or deputy sheriff handled the encounter. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29742.v1 decision making icpsr employment practices icpsr law enforcement icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr performance icpsr police icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police community relations icpsr police performance icpsr professionalism icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Davis, Robert C. Ortiz, Chris Cordner, Gary Hartley, Craig Newell, Reggie Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29742 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29742.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34081 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34081 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 2009 [electronic resource] National Center for State Courts 2012-11-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34081 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. The trial caseload consists of civil, domestic relations, criminal, juvenile, and traffic violation cases. The appellate caseload consists of appeal by right, appeal by permission, death penalty, and original proceeding/other appellate matter cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34081.v1 appellate courts icpsr case processing icpsr caseloads icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34081 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34081.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27921 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27921 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Hawaii Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) Community Supervision Strategy, 2007-2009 [electronic resource] Angela Hawken 2011-07-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 27921 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the Hawaii Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) community supervision strategy for substance-abusing probationers. The study involved the administration of key stakeholder surveys as part of a process evaluation of the HOPE program and the comparison of HOPE probationers with control-group probationers on two primary outcome measures: no-shows for probation appointments and positive urine tests for illicit-substance use. For Part 1 and Part 2, data were collected from administrative data sources. Missed Appointments Data (Part 1) were collected from 2007 to 2009 on a total of 1,174 probationers including 1,078 HOPE probationers, 78 comparison probationers, and 18 probationers for which study group information was not available. Specifically, for Part 1, the research team compiled data on the proportion of missed appointments in the three-month period before the study start date (baseline), in the three-month period following baseline, and in the six-month period following baseline. Drug Test Results Data (Part 2) were collected from 2007 to 2009 on the same 1,174 probationers. Specifically, for Part 2, the research team compiled data on the proportion of positive urine tests in the three-month period before the study start date (baseline), in the three-month period following baseline, and in the six-month period following baseline. Stakeholder survey data were collected from September 2008 through March 2009 on 50 Integrated Community Sanctions or "Specialized Unit" probationers (Part 3), 28 probationers in treatment (Part 4), 16 probationers in jail (Part 5), 20 probation officers in the Integrated Community Sanctions Unit (Part 6), 11 public defenders (Part 7), 12 prosecutors (Part 8), 7 judges (Part 9), and 11 court staff (Part 10). Part 1 contains a total of eight variables including group (high intensity or control), demographics, and mean missed appointments scores for three periods. Part 2 contains a total of eight variables including group (high intensity or control), demographics, and mean positive urine tests for illicit-substance use scores for three periods. The Integrated Community Sanctions Probationers Survey Data (Part 3), the Probationers in Treatment Survey Data (Part 4), and the Probationers in Jail Survey Data (Part 5) each include variables about the respondent's general perceptions and opinions of the HOPE program. Part 3 contains 24 variables, Part 4 contains 30 variables, and Part 5 contains 30 variables. The Probation Officers Survey Data (Part 6), Public Defenders Survey Data (Part 7), Prosecutors Survey Data (Part 8), Judges Survey Data (Part 9), and Court Staff Survey Data (Part 10) include variables about workload issues and the respondent's general perceptions and opinions of the HOPE program. Part 6 contains 65 variables, Part 7 contains 45 variables, Part 8 contains 55 variables, Part 9 contains 36 variables, and Part 10 contains 36 variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27921.v1 drug offenders icpsr drug testing icpsr evaluation icpsr judges icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr probation icpsr probation conditions icpsr probation officers icpsr probationers icpsr process evaluation icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr public defenders icpsr sanctions icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD V. Courts NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hawken, Angela Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27921 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27921.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34340 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34340 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Publicly Funded Forensic Crime Laboratories, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-11-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34340 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection contains data from censuses of publicly funded crime laboratories in 2009. The data were collected to examine change and stability in the operations of crime laboratories serving federal, state, and local jurisdictions. The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) first surveyed forensic crime laboratories in 1998, focusing solely on agencies that performed DNA analysis. The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) funded the 1998 study as part of its DNA Laboratory Improvement Program. The BJS' National Study of DNA Laboratories was repeated in 2001. An expanded version of the data collection, called the Census of Publicly Funded Forensic Crime Laboratories, was first conducted among all forensic crime laboratories in 2002. For the 2009 study, data were collected from 2010 to 2011 on the organization, functions, budget, staffing, workload, and performance expectations of the nation's forensic crime laboratories operating in 2009. A total of 397 of the 411 eligible crime laboratories operating in 2009 responded to the census, including at least 1 laboratory from every state. The nation's publicly funded forensic crime laboratories performed a variety of forensic services in 2009, including DNA testing and controlled substance identification for federal, state, and local jurisdictions. The 2009 Census of Publicly Funded Forensic Crime Laboratories obtained detailed information on the types of forensic requests received by these laboratories and the resources needed to complete them. The census also collected data on crime laboratory budgets, personnel, accreditations, and backlogged cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34340.v1 budgets icpsr crime laboratories icpsr criminal investigations icpsr DNA fingerprinting icpsr expenditures icpsr forensic sciences icpsr personnel icpsr policies and procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34340 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34340.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31741 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31741 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-08-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31741 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2009, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31741.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31741 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31741.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30061 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30061 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2009 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2011-02-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30061 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 7,794 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2009. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 2009. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr susbstance abuse icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30061 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29661 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29661 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2009 Federal Judicial Center 2012-11-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29661 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29661.v3 case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29661 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29661.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28543 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28543 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Victimization Survey, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-07-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28543 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Series, previously called the National Crime Surveys (NCS), has been collecting data on personal and household victimization through an ongoing survey of a nationally-representative sample of residential addresses since 1973. The NCVS was designed with four primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas. The survey categorizes crimes as "personal" or "property." Personal crimes include rape and sexual attack, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and purse-snatching/pocket-picking, while property crimes include burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and vandalism. Each respondent is asked a series of screen questions designed to determine whether she or he was victimized during the six-month period preceding the first day of the month of the interview. A "household respondent" is also asked to report on crimes against the household as a whole (e.g., burglary, motor vehicle theft). The data include type of crime, month, time, and location of the crime, relationship between victim and offender, characteristics of the offender, self-protective actions taken by the victim during the incident and results of those actions, consequences of the victimization, type of property lost, whether the crime was reported to police and reasons for reporting or not reporting, and offender use of weapons, drugs, and alcohol. Basic demographic information such as age, race, gender, and income is also collected, to enable analysis of crime by various subpopulations. This version of the NCVS, referred to as the collection year, contains records from interviews conducted in the 12 months of the given year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28543.v1 assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr crime icpsr crime costs icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr rape icpsr reactions to crime icpsr robbery icpsr sexual offenses icpsr vandalism icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr NACJD X. Victimization FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28543 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28543.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28402 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28402 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring the Future [electronic resource] A Continuing Study of American Youth (8th- and 10th-Grade Surveys), 2009 Lloyd D. Johnston , Jerald G. Bachman , Patrick M. O'Malley , John E. Schulenberg 2010-10-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 28402 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These surveys of 8th- and 10th-grade students are part of a series that explores changes in important values, behaviors, and lifestyle orientations of contemporary American youth. Students in each grade are randomly assigned to complete one of four questionnaires, each with a different subset of topical questions but containing a set of "core" questions on demographics and drug use. There are more than 450 variables across the questionnaires. Drugs covered by this survey include amphetamines (stimulants), barbiturates (tranquilizers), other prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, tobacco, smokeless tobacco, alcohol, inhalants, steroids, marijuana, hashish, LSD, hallucinogens, cocaine, crack, ecstasy, methamphetamine, and injectable drugs such as heroin. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28402.v1 alcohol icpsr attitudes icpsr crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug education icpsr drug use icpsr educational objectives icpsr family background icpsr gender roles icpsr high school students icpsr human behavior icpsr lifestyles icpsr prescription drugs icpsr religious attitudes icpsr self esteem icpsr social change icpsr tobacco use icpsr values icpsr youths icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime RCMD IX. Minority Populations NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States Johnston, Lloyd D. Bachman, Jerald G. O'Malley, Patrick M. Schulenberg, John E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28402 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28402.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28201 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28201 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Victimization Survey [electronic resource] School Crime Supplement, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-01-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28201 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The primary purpose of the School Crime Supplement (SCS) is to obtain additional information about school-related victimizations so that policymakers; academic researchers; practitioners at the federal, state, and local levels; and special interest groups who are concerned with crime in schools can make informed decisions concerning policies and programs. The SCS asks questions related to students' experiences with, and perceptions of crime and safety at school, including preventive measures employed by schools; students' participation in after school activities; students' perception of school rules and enforcement of these rules; the presence of weapons, drugs, alcohol, and gangs in school; student bullying; hate-related incidents; and attitudinal questions relating to the fear of victimization at school. These responses are linked to the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) survey instrument responses for a more complete understanding of the individual student's circumstances. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28201.v1 property crimes icpsr reactions to crime icpsr robbery icpsr school attendance icpsr school security icpsr school violence icpsr student attitudes icpsr student behavior icpsr vandalism icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr crime statistics icpsr drugs icpsr educational environment icpsr fear of crime icpsr juvenile crime icpsr offenses icpsr crime icpsr crime in schools icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations NACJD X. Victimization United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28201 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28201.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32562 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32562 MiAaI MiAaI National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2009 [electronic resource] Extract Files National Archive of Criminal Justice Data 2012-01-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 32562 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a part of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The extract files version of NIBRS was created to simplify working with NIBRS data. Data management issues with NIBRS are significant, especially when two or more segment levels are being merged. These issues require skills separate from data analysis. NIBRS data as formatted by the FBI are stored in a single file. These data are organized by various segment levels (record types). There are six main segment levels: administrative, offense, property, victim, offender, and arrestee. Each segment level has a different length and layout. There are other segment levels that occur with less frequency than the six main levels. Significant computing resources are necessary to work with the data in its single-file format. In addition, the user must be sophisticated in working with data in complex file types. For these reasons and the desire to facilitate the use of NIBRS data, ICPSR created the extract files. The data are not a representative sample of crime in the United States. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32562.v1 crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr property crime icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr arrests icpsr crime icpsr violent crime icpsr victims icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics National Archive of Criminal Justice Data Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32562 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32562.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31443 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31443 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-12-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31443 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2009. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2009 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31443.v2 capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31443 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31443.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30770 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30770 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting [electronic resource] National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2011-11-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30770 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a part of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In the late 1970s, the law enforcement community called for a thorough evaluative study of the UCR with the objective of recommending an expanded and enhanced UCR program to meet law enforcement needs into the 21st century. The FBI fully concurred with the need for an updated program to meet contemporary needs and provided its support, formulating a comprehensive redesign effort. Following a multiyear study, a "Blueprint for the Future of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program" was developed. Using the "Blueprint," and in consultation with local and state law enforcement executives, the FBI formulated new guidelines for the Uniform Crime Reports. The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) was implemented to meet these guidelines. NIBRS data are archived at ICPSR as 13 separate data files per year, which may be merged by using linkage variables. The data focus on a variety of aspects of a crime incident. Part 4, Administrative Segment, offers data on the incident itself (date and time). Each crime incident is delineated by one administrative segment record. Also provided are Part 5, Offense Segment (offense type, location, weapon use, and bias motivation), Part 6, Property Segment (type of property loss, property description, property value, drug type and quantity), Part 7, Victim Segment (age, sex, race, ethnicity, and injuries), Part 8, Offender Segment (age, sex, and race), and Part 9, Arrestee Segment (arrest date, age, sex, race, and weapon use). The Batch Header Segment (Parts 1-3) separates and identifies individual police agencies by Originating Agency Identifier (ORI). Batch Header information, which is contained on three records for each ORI, includes agency name, geographic location, and population of the area. Part 10, Group B Arrest Report Segment, includes arrestee data for Group B crimes. Window Segments files (Parts 11-13) pertain to incidents for which the complete Group A Incident Report was not submitted to the FBI. In general, a Window Segment record will be generated if the incident occurred prior to January 1 of the previous year or if the incident occurred prior to when the agency started NIBRS reporting. As with the UCR, participation in NIBRS is voluntary on the part of law enforcement agencies. The data are not a representative sample of crime in the United States. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30770.v1 arrests icpsr crime icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr property crime icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr victims icpsr violent crime icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30770 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30770.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29621 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29621 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies 2012-11-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 29621 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2009 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, Adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. In the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29621.v3 addiction icpsr alcohol icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr amphetamines icpsr barbiturates icpsr cocaine icpsr controlled drugs icpsr crack cocaine icpsr demographics icpsr depression icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr employment icpsr hallucinogens icpsr health care icpsr heroin icpsr households icpsr income icpsr inhalants icpsr marijuana icpsr mental health icpsr mental health services icpsr methamphetamine icpsr pain relievers icpsr pregnancy icpsr prescription drugs icpsr sedatives icpsr smoking icpsr stimulants icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr tobacco use icpsr tranquilizers icpsr youths icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program RCMD V. Health and Well-Being RCMD I. Crime NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime DSDR III. Health SAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29621 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29621.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30767 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30767 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Supplementary Homicide Reports, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2011-08-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30767 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as a periodic nationwide assessment of reported crimes not available elsewhere in the criminal justice system. Each year, this information is reported in four types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, (2) Property Stolen and Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), and (4) Police Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Supplementary Homicide Reports provide incident-based information on criminal homicides reported to the police. These homicides consist of murders, non-negligent manslaughter, and justifiable homicides. The data, provided monthly by UCR agencies, contain information describing the victim of the homicide, the offender, and the relationship between victim and offender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30767.v1 arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr homicide icpsr justifiable homicide icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr victims icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30767 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30767.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30766 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30766 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2011-09-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30766 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic nationwide assessments of reported crimes not available elsewhere in the criminal justice system. Law enforcement agencies contribute reports either directly or through their state reporting programs. Each year, summary data are reported in four types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, (2) Property Stolen and Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), and (4) Police Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest data files include monthly data on the number of Crime Index offenses reported and the number of offenses cleared by arrest or other means. The counts include all reports of Index crimes (excluding arson) received from victims, officers who discovered infractions, or other sources. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30766.v1 arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30766 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30766.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30765 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30765 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States] [electronic resource] Police Employee (LEOKA) Data, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2011-07-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30765 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as a periodic nationwide assessment of reported crimes not available elsewhere in the criminal justice system. Each year, this information is reported in four types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, (2) Property Stolen and Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), and (4) Police Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Police Employee (LEOKA) Data provide information about law enforcement officers killed or assaulted (hence the acronym, LEOKA) in the line of duty. The variables created from the LEOKA forms provide in-depth information on the circumstances surrounding killings or assaults, including type of call answered, type of weapon used, and type of patrol the officers were on. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30765.v1 arrests icpsr assaults on police icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenses icpsr police deaths icpsr police officers icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics DSDR VI. Population Characteristics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30765 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30765.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30764 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30764 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Hate Crime Data, 2009 [Record-Type Files] United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2011-09-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30764 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In response to a growing concern about hate crimes, the United States Congress enacted the Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990. The Act requires the attorney general to establish guidelines and collect, as part of the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, data "about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on race, religion, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, including where appropriate the crimes of murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, aggravated assault, simple assault, intimidation, arson, and destruction, damage or vandalism of property." Hate crime data collection was required by the Act to begin in calendar year 1990 and to continue for four successive years. In September 1994, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act amended the Hate Crime Statistics Act to add disabilities, both physical and mental, as factors that could be considered a basis for hate crimes. Although the Act originally mandated data collection for five years, the Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996 amended the collection duration "for each calendar year," making hate crime statistics a permanent addition to the UCR program. As with the other UCR data, law enforcement agencies contribute reports either directly or through their state reporting programs. Information contained in the data includes number of victims and offenders involved in each hate crime incident, type of victims, bias motivation, offense type, and location type. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30764.v1 arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr disabilities icpsr discrimination icpsr ethnicity icpsr hate crimes icpsr homophobia icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenses icpsr prejudice icpsr racial tensions icpsr religion icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr violence icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations TPDRC I. Terrorism United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30764 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30764.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30763 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30763 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2012-01-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30763 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection contains county-level counts of arrests and offenses for Part I offenses (murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, and arson) and counts of arrests for Part II offenses (forgery, fraud, embezzlement, vandalism, weapons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol abuse violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew violations, and runaways). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30763.v1 aggravated assault icpsr alcohol icpsr arrests icpsr arson icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr counties icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr drug abuse icpsr embezzlement icpsr forgery icpsr fraud icpsr illegal gambling icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr murder icpsr offenses icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sex offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr vagrancy icpsr vandalism icpsr weapons offenses icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30763 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30763.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30762 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30762 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, Summarized Yearly, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2011-09-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30762 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the number of arrests reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing, per reporting police agency: an agency header record, and 1 to 43 detail offense records containing the counts of arrests by age, sex, and race for a particular offense. ICPSR restructured the original data to logical record length format with the agency header record variables copied onto the detail records. Consequently, each record contains arrest counts for a particular agency-offense. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30762.v1 arrest records icpsr arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr drug abuse icpsr illegal gambling icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr violent crime icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30762 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30762.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30761 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30761 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2011-09-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30761 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the number of arrests reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing (per reporting police agency) an agency header record, 1 to 12 monthly header records, and 1 to 43 detail offense records containing the counts of arrests by age, sex, and race for a particular offense. ICPSR restructured the original data to a rectangular format. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30761.v1 arrests icpsr arson icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr counties icpsr crime rates icpsr vandalism icpsr weapons icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr drug abuse icpsr fraud icpsr illegal gambling icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr murder icpsr offenses icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sex offenses icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30761 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30761.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28401 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28401 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring the Future [electronic resource] A Continuing Study of American Youth (12th-Grade Survey), 2009 Lloyd D. Johnston , Jerald G. Bachman , Patrick M. O'Malley , John E. Schulenberg 2010-10-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 28401 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey of 12th-grade students is part of a series that explores changes in important values, behaviors, and lifestyle orientations of contemporary American youth. Students are randomly assigned to complete one of six questionnaires, each with a different subset of topical questions, but all containing a set of "core" questions on demographics and drug use. There are about 1,400 variables across the questionnaires. Drugs covered by this survey include tobacco, smokeless tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, hashish, prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, LSD, hallucinogens, amphetamines (stimulants), Ritalin (methylphenidate), Quaaludes (methaqualone), barbiturates (tranquilizers), cocaine, crack cocaine, GHB (gamma hydroxy butyrate), ecstasy, methamphetamine, and heroin. Other topics include attitudes toward religion, changing roles for women, educational aspirations, self-esteem, exposure to drug education, and violence and crime (both in and out of school). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28401.v1 alcohol icpsr attitudes icpsr crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug education icpsr drug use icpsr educational objectives icpsr family background icpsr gender roles icpsr high school students icpsr human behavior icpsr lifestyles icpsr prescription drugs icpsr religious attitudes icpsr self esteem icpsr social change icpsr tobacco use icpsr values icpsr youths icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program RCMD IX. Minority Populations ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Johnston, Lloyd D. Bachman, Jerald G. O'Malley, Patrick M. Schulenberg, John E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28401 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28401.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26441 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26441 MiAaI MiAaI Data-Driven Supervision Protocols for Positive Parole Outcomes in Georgia, 2007-2008 [electronic resource] Tammy Meredith , John Prevost 2010-04-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 26441 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of this study was to identify and evaluate case management and supervision strategies most effective in achieving successful parole outcomes. As part of an evaluation of 3 new supervision practice protocols on a cohort of parolees, a total of 1,964 parolees who began supervision in Georgia between March 1, 2007, and December 31, 2007, were assigned to experimental and control groups. Parolees in the experimental group were subjected to the new practice protocols: positive drug test resulting in a referral to treatment, job loss followed by referral to an employment program and increased contact, and chronic technical violations responded to with an administrative hearing and enrollment in a cognitive skills program. In the control sites, the parole officer's response to a parolee's violation or success was still defined by the Board's Behavior Response and Adjustment Guide (BRAG). Each parolee was tracked for a 12-month follow-up period. The research team collected data on the parolees using two Georgia Department of Corrections and Board of Pardons and Paroles agency databases: the Offender Tracking Information System (OTIS) and the Parole Field Log of Interaction Data (FLOID) database. Outcomes during a 12-month follow-up period were defined as employment, general violations of the conditions of supervision, positive drug tests, arrests for technical violations, misdemeanor and felony arrests, and revocation of parole. The dataset includes a total of 218 variables including supervision protocol variables, demographic and other parolee characteristics variables, offense and parole supervision variables, drug test results, employment activity, as well as arrests, violations, sanctions, programs, and referrals information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26441.v1 case management icpsr inmate release plans icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr parole icpsr parole violation icpsr parolees icpsr sanctions icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Meredith, Tammy Prevost, John Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26441 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26441.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34319 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34319 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34319 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2008 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2008, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2008. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34319.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34319 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34319.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30082 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30082 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-01-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30082 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Corrections Reporting Program gathers data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. The dataset is comprised of four types of data: prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), released from parole (Part 3), or in prison at year end (Part 4). The National Prison Statistics (NPS) program was established in 1926 by the Bureau of the Census in response to a congressional mandate to compile national information on the populations confined in correctional institutions. This program described the characteristics and counts of prison inmates during each calendar year. Since its initiation, responsibility for this program has shifted among several agencies -- in 1950 it was transferred to the Federal Bureau of Prisons and to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration in 1971. Since 1972, the Bureau of Census, under agreement with the Department of Justice, has had responsibility for compiling the statistical data. Census staff negotiates directly with each state, assembles and edits the data, and prepares the data for analysis and publication. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30082.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30082 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30082.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30544 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30544 MiAaI MiAaI National Electronic Injury Surveillance System All Injury Program, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control , United States Consumer Product Safety Commission 2011-08-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30544 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Beginning in July 2000, the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in collaboration with the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), expanded the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) to collect data on all types and causes of injuries treated in a representative sample of United States hospitals with emergency departments (ED). This system is called the NEISS-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP). The NEISS-AIP is designed to provide national incidence estimates of all types and external causes of nonfatal injuries and poisonings treated in United States hospital EDs. Data on injury-related visits are being obtained from a national sample of 66 out of 100 NEISS hospitals that were selected as a stratified probability sample of hospitals in the United States and its territories with a minimum of 6 beds and a 24-hour ED. The sample includes separate strata for very large, large, medium, and small hospitals, defined by the number of annual ED visits per hospital, and children's hospitals. The scope of reporting goes beyond routine reporting of injuries associated with consumer-related products in CPSC's jurisdiction to include all injuries and poisonings. The data can be used to (1) measure the magnitude and distribution of nonfatal injuries in the United States, (2) monitor unintentional and violence-related nonfatal injuries over time, (3) identify emerging injury problems, (4) identify specific cases for follow-up investigations of particular injury-related problems, and (5) set national priorities. A fundamental principle of this expansion effort is that preliminary surveillance data will be made available in a timely manner to a number of different federal agencies with unique and overlapping public health responsibilities and concerns. Also, annually, the final edited data are released as public use data files for use by other public health professionals and researchers. These public use data files provide NEISS AIP data on nonfatal injuries collected from July through December 2000 (ICPSR 3582), from January through December 2001 (ICPSR 3817), from January through December 2002 (ICPSR 4085), from January through December 2003 (ICPSR 4352), from January through December 2004 (ICPSR 4598), from January through December 2005 (ICPSR 21280), from January through December 2006 (ICPSR 24421), from January through December 2007 (ICPSR 26941), and from January through December 2008 (ICPSR 30544). Variables in the datasets include body part affected by injury, diagnosis, case disposition, fire involvement, immediate cause of injury, injury as determined by the CDC, intent of injury, intent with sexual/other assault, locales where injured, precipitating cause of injury, perpetrator to victim relationship in assault, reason for assault, whether injury was sports-related or traffic-related, whether it was a violent injury, and date of injury. Demographic information specifies race, sex, and age of patient. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30544.v1 accidents icpsr medical care icpsr nonfatal injuries icpsr poisoning icpsr product safety icpsr public health icpsr public safety icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions DSDR III. Health United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control United States Consumer Product Safety Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30544 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30544.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28044 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28044 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Target Corporation's Safe City Initiative in Chula Vista, California, and Cincinnati, Ohio, 2004-2008 [electronic resource] Nancy LaVigne 2010-09-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 28044 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. he specified type of crime in the displacement area, the cost of the specified type of crime in a matched comparison area, the city, and the crime type. The Safe City Business Survey Data (Part 3) contain 132 variables relating to perceptions of safety, contact with local police, experience and reporting of crime, impact of crime, crime prevention, community connections, and business/employee information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28044.v1 crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime reporting icpsr community involvement icpsr cost effectiveness icpsr crime control icpsr crime control programs icpsr crime costs icpsr crime impact icpsr evaluation icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police community relations icpsr program evaluation icpsr reactions to crime icpsr retail industry icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD II. Community Studies LaVigne, Nancy Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28044 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28044.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31441 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31441 MiAaI MiAaI National Former Prisoner Survey, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-08-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 31441 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Under the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003, Congress mandated that the United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) investigate former prisoners' experiences in prison to assist in understanding the incidence and prevalence of sexual victimization within the prison setting. BJS and its subcontractor, NORC at the University of Chicago, led a national data collection effort focusing on prison sexual assault as reported by former state prisoners. The focus of the National Former Prisoner Survey (NFPS) was sexual victimization among former state prisoners. The survey was divided into 6 sections. The first two sections were administered using a computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) method and focused on demographic and criminal history information. The remaining sections, covering more sensitive information, were administered using a touch-screen-audio-assisted-computer-self-interviewing (TACASI) method. Sections A and B of the instrument collected demographic and criminal history information, as well as information on placements during the last continuous incarceration. Sections C and D captured detailed inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization during the last continuous incarceration, including the type of sexual activity, identification of facilities at which such incidents occurred, frequency of occurrences, and other specifics regarding sexual victimization. Section E addressed staff-on-inmate sexual victimization and misconduct, whether considered willing or unwilling, and gathered specifics of activity indicated. The last section, F, focused on the impacts of sexual assault on victimized respondents, as well as parole supervision characteristics for all respondents. The National Former Prisoner Survey (NFPS) began in January 2008 and concluded in October 2008, and involved the random selection of approximately 250 parole offices across the country using probability proportional-to-size (PPS) sampling procedures. Completed interviews were obtained for 17,738 respondents; supplemental data was collected on all former prisoners sampled in order to develop weights for national estimations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31441.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional guards icpsr criminal histories icpsr inmates icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison violence icpsr rape icpsr sex offenders icpsr sex offenses icpsr sexual abuse icpsr sexual assault icpsr sexual behavior icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31441 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31441.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29433 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29433 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases -- Terminated, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29433 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases terminated in United States District Court during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29433.v2 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29433 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29433.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29432 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29432 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Statutes for Counts of Convictions for Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2008 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29432 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data contain records of statutes for each count of conviction for criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2008. The data are one of two supplementary files that should be used in conjunction with the primary analysis file, which contains records for all defendants sentenced under the guidelines. These data can be linked to the primary analysis file using the unique identifier variable USSCIDN. The number of records for a defendant in the current data corresponds to the total number of counts of conviction for that defendant, and that total is recorded in the NOCOUNT variable. As an example, if a defendant has five counts of conviction (NOCOUNT=5), he or she will have five records in the current data. As it is possible for defendants to have multiple statutes applying to a single count of conviction, up to three statutes (STA1-STA3) are recorded for each count of conviction. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29432.v2 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29432 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29432.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29431 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29431 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Guideline Computations for Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2008 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29431 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data contain records of guideline computations and adjustments for each count of conviction for criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2008. The data are one of two supplementary files that should be used in conjunction with the primary analysis file, which contains records for all defendants sentenced under the guidelines. These data can be linked to the primary analysis file using the unique identifier variable USSCIDN. The number of records for a defendant in the current data corresponds to the total number of guideline computations, which may or may not equal the total counts of conviction for that defendant, dependent upon the grouping rules of the particular guideline in question (see Section 3D1.2 of the guidelines manual). As an example, a defendant with five counts of drug trafficking will only have one guideline computation because each of the drug weights for each count are simply added together and only one calculation is necessary. However, if a defendant has five counts of bank robbery, he or she will have five separate guideline computations because bank robbery is considered to be a nongroupable offense. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29431.v2 criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr trial courts icpsr administration icpsr court cases icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29431 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29431.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29428 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29428 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Arrests and Bookings for Federal Offenses, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29428 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of arrests and bookings for federal offenses in the United States during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the United States Marshals Service (USMS) Prisoner Tracking System database. Records include arrests made by federal law enforcement agencies (including the USMS), state and local agencies, and self-surrenders. Offenders arrested for federal offenses are transferred to the custody of the USMS for processing, transportation, and detention. The Prisoner Tracking System contains data on all offenders within the custody of the USMS. The data file contains variables from the original USMS files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 1.1-1.3. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29428.v2 arrest records icpsr arrests icpsr federal offenses icpsr federal prisoners icpsr offenders icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29428 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29428.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29427 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29427 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Suspects in Federal Criminal Matters, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29427 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of suspects in federal criminal matters received by United States attorneys or filed before the United States magistrates during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. Records include suspects in criminal matters, and are limited to suspects whose matters were not declined immediately by the United States attorneys. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Table 1.1. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29427.v2 federal courts icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29427 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29427.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29426 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29426 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants Charged in Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29426 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29426.v2 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29426 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29426.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29424 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29424 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Suspects in Federal Criminal Matters Concluded, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29424 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of suspects in federal criminal matters concluded by United States attorneys or United States magistrates during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. Records include suspects in criminal matters, and are limited to suspects whose matters were not declined immediately by the United States attorneys. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 1.2-1.5. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29424.v2 prosecution icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29424 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29424.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29423 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29423 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29423 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were terminated by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2008. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29423.v2 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29423 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29423.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29421 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29421 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29421 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were filed by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2008. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29421.v2 defendants icpsr district courts icpsr offenses icpsr prosecution icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29421 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29421.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29406 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29406 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Offenders in Prison at Year-End, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29406 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of sentenced offenders in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at year-end of fiscal year 2008. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29406.v2 correctional system icpsr offenders icpsr prisons icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29406 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29406.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29405 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29405 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Offenders Released From Prison, 2008 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-07-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29405 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of sentenced offenders released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2008. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. Records of offenders who exit federal prison temporarily, such as for transit to another location, to serve a weekend sentence, or for health care, are not included in the exiting cohort. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29405.v1 correctional system icpsr offenders icpsr prisons icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29405 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29405.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29404 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29404 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Offenders Admitted to Prison, 2008 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29404 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of sentenced offenders committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2008. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29404.v2 correctional system icpsr offenders icpsr prisons icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29404 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29404.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29403 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29403 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Pending, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29403 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court before or during fiscal year 2008 and still pending as of year-end. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29403.v2 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29403 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29403.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29402 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29402 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29402 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF variables," that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29402.v2 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29402 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29402.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29381 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29381 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29381 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data contain records of criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2008. It is estimated that over 90 percent of felony defendants in the federal criminal justice system are sentenced pursuant to the SRA of 1984. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. The Standardized Research Data File consists of variables from the Monitoring Department's database, which is limited to those defendants whose records have been furnished to the USSC by United States district courts and United States magistrates, as well as variables created by the OPA specifically for research purposes. The data include variables from the Judgement and Conviction (J and C) order submitted by the court, background and guideline information collected from the Presentencing Report (PSR), and the report on sentencing hearing in the Statement of Reasons (SOR). These data contain detailed information such as the guideline base offense level, offense level adjustments, criminal history, departure status, statement of reasons given for departure, and basic demographic information. These data are the primary analysis file and include only statute, guideline computation, and adjustment variables for the most serious offense of conviction. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29381.v2 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29381 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29381.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29242 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29242 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2008 [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29242 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases terminated in United States District Court during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF variables," that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29242.v2 administration icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29242 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29242.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26202 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26202 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Criminal Appeals Cases in Courts of Appeals -- Terminated, 2008 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-07-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 26202 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of criminal appeals cases terminated in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. Appeals may be terminated on the merits or on procedural grounds. Of those that are terminated on the merits, the district court ruling may be affirmed, reversed, remanded to criminal court, or dismissed. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26202.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26202 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26202.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26201 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26201 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program [electronic resource] Criminal Appeals Cases in Courts of Appeals, 2008 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-07-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 26201 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data contain records of criminal appeals cases filed in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26201.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26201 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26201.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25425 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25425 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences [electronic resource] Appeals Data, 2008 United States Sentencing Commission 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 25425 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection contains appellate information from the 12 circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this collection as units of analysis. Each case comprises individual records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related issues corresponding to that particular defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25425.v2 appeal procedures icpsr appellate courts icpsr convictions (law) icpsr court cases icpsr federal courts icpsr habeas corpus icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal appeals icpsr offenses icpsr sentence review icpsr sentencing icpsr criminal histories icpsr defendants icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25425 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25425.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25424 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25424 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25424 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection contains information on federal criminal cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2007, and September 30, 2008, and were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event. Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the highest occurrences of each iterating variable. Part 2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25424.v2 convictions (law) icpsr criminal histories icpsr defendants icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr offenses icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25424 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25424.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25426 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25426 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25426 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2008. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational defendants data, 2008, covers fiscal year October 1, 2007, through September 30, 2008. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25426.v2 convictions (law) icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25426 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25426.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28561 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28561 MiAaI MiAaI National Elder Mistreatment Study, 2008 [United States] [electronic resource] Ronald Acierno , Heidi Resnick , Dean Kilpatrick , John Boyle , Kenneth Steve , Wendy Muzzy 2013-02-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28561 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The overall aim of this project was to conduct a national epidemiological study to determine prevalence and risk factors for elder mistreatment in community residing older adults, defined generally as physical, sexual, emotional, neglectful, or financial mistreatment of a person aged 60 years or older. A second goal was to determine whether proxy reports of mistreatment would yield prevalence estimates similar to those of older adult respondents themselves, thereby demonstrating the validity of an alternate method of assessing elder mistreatment. Random Digit Dialing methodology was used to derive a nationally representative sample (based on age, race, and gender) of 6,052 older adults (target goal 4,000) and 538 proxy respondents (target goal 500) for this study. Participants were interviewed via telephone in English or Spanish about a variety of mistreatment types and mistreatment risk factors, in addition to questions regarding health, social support, and demographics. Specific elder mistreatment categories included emotional, physical, sexual, financial, and neglect. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28561.v1 assault icpsr elder abuse icpsr eldercare icpsr emotional abuse icpsr exploitation icpsr older adults icpsr sexual assault icpsr social support icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Acierno, Ronald Resnick, Heidi Kilpatrick, Dean Boyle, John Steve, Kenneth Muzzy, Wendy Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28561 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28561.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28142 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28142 MiAaI MiAaI Sexual Assault Among Latinas (SALAS) Study, May-September 2008 [United States] [electronic resource] Carlos A. Cuevas , Chiara Sabina 2012-10-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 28142 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This Sexual Assault Among Latinas (SALAS) study was designed to examine interpersonal victimization among a national sample of Latino women, particularly focusing on help-seeking behaviors, culturally relevant factors, and psychosocial impacts. A national sample of 2,000 adult Latino women living in the United States participated in the study. An experienced survey research firm with specialization in doing surveys that ask about sensitive subjects conducted interviews between May 28, 2008 and September 3, 2008 using a Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI) system. The data contain a total of 1,388 variables including demographics, victimization history, help-seeking efforts, mental health status, and religious behavior and beliefs variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28142.v1 acculturation icpsr assault icpsr coping icpsr crime reporting icpsr gender roles icpsr Hispanic or Latino Americans icpsr kidnapping icpsr mental health icpsr post-traumatic stress disorder icpsr psychological effects icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr rape icpsr reactions to crime icpsr religious behavior icpsr religious beliefs icpsr sex offenses icpsr sexual abuse icpsr sexual assault icpsr sexual harassment icpsr social issues icpsr stalking icpsr threats icpsr victim services icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr violence against women icpsr women icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization NACJD I. Attitude Surveys Cuevas, Carlos A. Sabina, Chiara Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28142 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28142.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25881 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25881 MiAaI MiAaI Systems Change Analysis of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Programs in One Midwestern County of the United States, 1994-2007 [electronic resource] Rebecca Campbell , Deborah Bybee , J. Kevin Ford , Debra Patterson 2011-07-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 25881 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. (4) victims' experiences with law enforcement, prosecutors, and judicial proceedings, and if/how the forensic nurses and advocates influenced those interactions. Part 6 (Study 6: Forensic Nurse Interview Qualitative Data) examined forensic nurses' perspectives on how the SANE program could affect survivor participation with prosecution indirectly and how the interactions between SANEs and law enforcement could be contributing to increased investigational effort. Between July and August of 2008, six Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANEs) were interviewed. The interviews explored three topics: (1) the nurses' philosophy on victim reporting and participating in prosecution, (2) their perceptions regarding how patient care may or may not affect victim participation in the criminal justice system, and (3) their perception of how the SANE programs influence the work of law enforcement investigational practices.The interviews explored three topics: (1) the nurses' philosophy on victim reporting and participating in prosecution, (2) their perceptions regarding how patient care may or may not affect victim participation in the criminal justice system, and (3) their perception of how the SANE programs influence the work of law enforcement investigational practices. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25881.v1 case processing icpsr court cases icpsr criminal justice system icpsr forensic medicine icpsr judicial decisions icpsr medical evaluation icpsr police icpsr police reports icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sex offenses icpsr sexual assault icpsr victim advocates icpsr victim services icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization Campbell, Rebecca Bybee, Deborah Ford, J. Kevin Patterson, Debra Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25881 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25881.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28281 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28281 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2008 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-05-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28281 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2008 Annual Survey of Jails is the 21st such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2008. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2008. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28281.v1 jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28281 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28281.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28144 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28144 MiAaI MiAaI Bruising as a Forensic Marker of Physical Elder Abuse in Orange County, California, 2006-2008 [electronic resource] Laura Mosqueda 2012-12-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 28144 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to describe bruising as a marker of physical elder abuse. Consenting older adults were examined to document location and size of bruises and assess whether they were inflicted during physical abuse. An expert panel confirmed physical abuse. A research nurse conducted study assessments on 67 adults aged 65 and older reported to Adult Protective Services for suspected physical elder abuse in Orange County, California between July 2006 and May 2008. The study contains a total of 142 variables including age, sex, ethnicity, functional status, medical conditions, cognitive status, history of falls, bruise size, bruise location and color, recall of cause, and responses to the Revised Conflicts Tactics Scales (CTS2) and to the Elder Abuse Inventory (EAI). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28144.v1 abuse icpsr accidents icpsr adult care services icpsr assault icpsr cognitive processes icpsr conflict icpsr elder abuse icpsr eldercare icpsr evaluation icpsr injuries icpsr medical evaluation icpsr medical history icpsr medications icpsr nonfatal injuries icpsr older adults icpsr prescription drugs icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Mosqueda, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28144 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28144.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31601 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31601 MiAaI MiAaI New York City Trafficking Assessment Project, 2007-2008 [electronic resource] Neil Weiner , Nicole Hala 2011-07-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31601 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the New York City Trafficking Assessment Project (NYCTAP) was to develop a screening tool to identify likely victims of trafficking and an accompanying toolkit for service providers to support the administration of the screening tool. The NYCTAP Community Advisory Board (CAB) consisted of twelve local organizations, including four social service agencies, four legal service agencies, three community-based organizations, and one advocacy organization. In May and June of 2007, (Part 1, Community Advisory Board (CAB) Agency Reviews Qualitative Data) a draft of the screening tool was circulated among the CAB agencies for review. The reviewers were asked to evaluate the screening tool for comprehensiveness, section organization, question wording, and question placement. The draft NYCTAP screening tool was also circulated among law enforcement agencies at the federal and local level in November and December of 2007. Reviewers (Part 3, Law Enforcement Agency Reviews Qualitative Data) were asked to review the screening tool from the perspective of federal and local law enforcement and to suggest modifications and additions to screening tool content. In October and November of 2007, semi-structured interviews (Part 2, Community Advisory Board (CAB) Agency Interviews Qualitative Data) were conducted with two CAB agencies that were unable to participate in the field application of the screening tool, but had extensive experience in trafficking victim assistance that could be shared. In January and February of 2008, (Part 4, Community Advisory Board (CAB) De-briefings Qualitative Data) six of participating CAB agencies that applied the draft NYCTAP screening tool in their work with clients were asked to provide feedback on the overall usability of the screening tool, as well as tool content and tool administration. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31601.v1 exploitation icpsr human rights icpsr human rights violations icpsr human services icpsr human trafficking icpsr identured servants icpsr law enforcement icpsr service providers icpsr sex trafficking icpsr slavery icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Weiner, Neil Hala, Nicole Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31601 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31601.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27781 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27781 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Recidivism in a Large Cohort of Offenders Released from Prison in Florida, 2004-2008 [electronic resource] Avinash Bhati 2010-07-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27781 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to quantify the effect of the embrace of DNA technology on offender behavior. In particular, researchers examined whether an offender’s knowledge that their DNA profile was entered into a database deterred them from offending in the future and if probative effects resulted from DNA sampling. The researchers coded information using criminal history records and data from Florida's DNA database, both of which are maintained by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), and also utilized court docket information acquired through the Florida Department of Corrections (FDOC) to create a dataset of 156,702 cases involving offenders released from the FDOC in the state of Florida between January 1996 and December 2004. The data contain a total of 50 variables. Major categories of variables include demographic variables regarding the offender, descriptive variables relating to the initial crime committed by the offender, and time-specific variables regarding cases of recidivism. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27781.v1 conviction rates icpsr conviction records icpsr crime icpsr crime prevention icpsr criminal histories icpsr deterrence icpsr DNA fingerprinting icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr recidivism rates icpsr recidivists icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Bhati, Avinash Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27781 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27781.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26881 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26881 MiAaI MiAaI Financial Exploitation and Psychological Abuse of Older Adults in the Chicago Metropolitan Area, 2007-2008 [United States] [electronic resource] Kendon Conrad , Madelyn Iris 2013-01-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 26881 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The research team developed two self-reporting questionnaires, the Older Adult Mistreatment Assessment (OAMA) Client Questionnaire and the OAMA Staff Questionnaire, in order to measure for financial exploitation and psychological abuse of the elderly. The OAMA Client Questionnaire was administered to clients aged 60 years and over who had been substantiated for at least one form of elderly mistreatment within the Chicago metropolitan area. In addition, a corresponding Staff Questionnaire was administered to each evaluator involved in the field test and submitted on behalf of each client in the study. In all, 227 client interviews with 227 corresponding staff questionnaires were compiled between 2007 and 2008, and scales were developed for measurements of both financial exploitation and psychological abuse. Financial exploitation of the elderly was measured through variables related to theft, scams, coercion, signs of abuse or financial entitlement by trusted friends or family members, and money management difficulties. Psychological abuse of the elderly was measured through variables related to isolation, disrespect, exploited vulnerability, shame, threats and intimidation, and risk factors related to the client's trusted friends or family. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26881.v1 abuse icpsr adult care services icpsr aging icpsr caregivers icpsr elder abuse icpsr eldercare icpsr emotional abuse icpsr exploitation icpsr older adults icpsr personal finances icpsr psychological effects icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr self evaluation icpsr victimization icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD I. Attitude Surveys ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Conrad, Kendon Iris, Madelyn Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26881 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26881.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25941 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25941 MiAaI MiAaI Florida Elder Abuse Survey in Seven Sites, 2007-2008 [United States] [electronic resource] Laurence G. Branch , Lawrence Schonfeld , Lisa M. Brown 2010-10-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 25941 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this project was to develop and pilot test an interviewer-administered self-report questionnaire that might be used in a subsequent national survey to scientifically establish the prevalence of second-party elder abuse or neglect. The project focused only on those living in the communities who were capable of accurately self-reporting their knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Through focus groups of adult protective services and abuse hot-line staff, questionnaire items were generated and later tested through interviews of clients of aging services in Florida. Aging services case managers screened and recruited 95 clients, aged 65 and older, with 25 clients who had reports of mistreatment within the hotline database, and 70 comparison clients (no reports of mistreatment). Groups were matched by gender and age within 10 years. The interviews were conducted over an 18-month period, of which 3 interviews were conducted in-person and 92 interviews were conducted by telephone. All interviews were conducted by trained interviewers of the research team. Twenty-six interviews were conducted in Spanish. Interviews focused on demographics; activities of daily living; 19 possible types of elder abuse or neglect within the previous year, and, for each positive response, questions about the perpetrators and their relationship to the older adult; a description of when the mistreatment happened, how often, what the respondent did, and whether it was related to the perpetrator's anger, neglect, or carelessness. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25941.v1 abuse icpsr activities of daily living icpsr caregivers icpsr cognitive functioning icpsr elder abuse icpsr family violence icpsr living arrangements icpsr older adults icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Branch, Laurence G. Schonfeld, Lawrence Brown, Lisa M. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25941 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25941.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31923 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31923 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-10-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31923 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2008, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31923.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31923 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31923.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27221 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27221 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2008 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2010-03-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27221 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc. have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implements two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collects data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Data collection has been conducted across two back-to-back quarters in each of 10 counties from a county-based representative sample of 250 male arrestees per quarter for a total of 500 arrestees annually per site or a total of 5,000 arrestees across sites annually. A total of 7,717 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2008. Collection occurs in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2007 and ending March 31, 2008. Additional data collection periods were optioned by ONDCP, and subsequent cycles of back-to-back data collection (not yet available) began April 1, 2008. Participation is voluntary and confidential, and the procedures include a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr methamphetamine icpsr urinalysis icpsr addiction icpsr alcoholism icpsr cocaine icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug use icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27221 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32601 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32601 MiAaI MiAaI Police Decision Making in Sexual Assault Cases [electronic resource] An Analysis of Crime Reported to the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, 2008 Cassia Spohn , Katharine Tellis 2012-04-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 32601 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study used a mixed-methods approach to pursue five interrelated objectives: (1) to document the extent of case attrition and to identify the stages of the criminal justice process where attrition is most likely to occur; (2) to identify the case complexities and evidentiary factors that affect the likelihood of attrition in sexual assault cases; (3) to identify the predictors of case outcomes in sexual assault cases; (4) to provide a comprehensive analysis of the factors that lead police to unfound the charges in sexual assault cases; and (5) to identify the situations in which sexual assault cases are being cleared by exceptional means. Toward this end, three primary data sources were used: (1) quantitative data on the outcomes of sexual assaults reported to the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) from 2005 to 2009, (2) qualitative data from interviews with detectives and with deputy district attorneys with the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office who handled sexual assault cases during this time period, and (3) detailed quantitative and qualitative data from case files for a sample of cases reported to the two agencies in 2008. For confidentiality reasons, only the quantitative data from the 2008 case files are included in this collection. The complete case files for sexual assaults that were reported to the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department in 2008 were obtained by members of the research team and very detailed information (quantitative and qualitative data) was extracted from the files on each case. The case file included the crime report prepared by the patrol officer who responded to the crime and took the initial report from the complainant, all follow-up reports prepared by the detective to whom the case was assigned for investigation, and the detective's reasons for unfounding the report or for clearing the case by arrest or by exceptional means. The case files also included either verbatim accounts or summaries of statements made by the complainant, by witnesses (if any), and by the suspect (if the suspect was interviewed); a description of physical evidence recovered from the alleged crime scene, and the results of the physical exam (Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) exam) of the victim (if the victim reported the crime within 72 hours of the alleged assault). Members of the research team read through each case file and recorded data in an SPSS data file. There are 650 cases and 261 variables in the data file. The variables in the data file include administrative police information and charges listed on the police report. There is also information related to the victim, the suspect, and the case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32601.v1 crime reporting icpsr criminal investigations icpsr domestic violence icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr police icpsr police reports icpsr rape icpsr sexual assault icpsr violence icpsr violence against women icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Spohn, Cassia Tellis, Katharine Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32601 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32601.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30983 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30983 MiAaI MiAaI Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation (MADCE), 2003-2009 [electronic resource] Shelli B. Rossman , John K. Roman , Janine M. Zweig , Michael Rempel , Christine H. Lindquist 2012-11-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30983 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation (MADCE) study included 23 drug courts and 6 comparison sites selected from 8 states across the country. The purpose of the study was to: (1) Test whether drug courts reduce drug use, crime, and multiple other problems associated with drug abuse, in comparision with similar offenders not exposed to drug courts, (2) address how drug courts work and for whom by isolating key individual and program factors that make drug courts more or less effective in achieving their desired outcomes, (3) explain how offender attitudes and behaviors change when they are exposed to drug courts and how these changes help explain the effectiveness of drug court programs, and (4) examine whether drug courts generate cost savings. Offenders in all 29 sites were surveyed in 3 waves, at baseline, 6 months later, and 18 months after enrollment. The research comprises three major components: process evaluation, impact evaluation, and a cost-benefit analysis. The process evaluation describes how the 23 drug court sites vary in program eligibility, supervision, treatment, team collaboration, and other key policies and practices. The impact evaluation examines whether drug courts produce better outcomes than comparison sites and tests which court policies and offender attitudes might explain those effects. The cost-benefit analysis evaluates drug court costs and benefits. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30983.v1 cost effectiveness icpsr court system icpsr courts icpsr crime control icpsr crime control policies icpsr crime control programs icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug courts icpsr drug law enforcement icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr process evaluation icpsr NACJD V. Courts NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Rossman, Shelli B. Roman, John K. Zweig, Janine M. Rempel, Michael Lindquist, Christine H. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30983 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30983.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25002 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25002 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2008 Federal Judicial Center 2012-11-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25002 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25002.v5 pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25002 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25002.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34402 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34402 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2008 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34402 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34402 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30543 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30543 MiAaI MiAaI Firearm Injury Surveillance Study, 1993-2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 2011-08-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30543 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data were collected using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), the primary data system of the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). CPSC began operating NEISS in 1972 to monitor product-related injuries treated in United States hospital emergency departments (EDs). In June 1992, the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, established an interagency agreement with CPSC to begin collecting data on nonfatal firearm-related injuries in order to monitor the incidents and the characteristics of persons with nonfatal firearm-related injuries treated in United States hospital EDs over time. This dataset represents all nonfatal firearm-related injuries (i.e., injuries associated with powder-charged guns) and all nonfatal BB and pellet gun-related injuries reported through NEISS from 1993 through 2008. The cases consist of initial ED visits for treatment of the injuries. Cases were reported even if the patients subsequently died. Secondary visits and transfers from other hospitals were excluded. Information is available on injury diagnosis, firearm type, use of drugs or alcohol, criminal incident, and locale of the incident. Demographic information includes age, sex, and race of the injured person. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30543.v1 accidents icpsr firearms icpsr handguns icpsr medical care icpsr nonfatal injuries icpsr product safety icpsr public health icpsr public safety icpsr DSDR III. Health NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30543 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30543.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27982 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27982 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-09-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27982 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2008. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2008 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27982.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27982 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27982.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32022 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32022 MiAaI MiAaI Police-Public Contact Survey, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-10-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32022 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Police-Public Contact Survey (PPCS) provides detailed information on the nature and characteristics of face-to-face contacts between police and the public, including the reason for and outcome of the contact. The PPCS interviews a nationally representative sample of United States residents aged 16 years or older as a supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey. To date, the PPCS has been conducted five times by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS): The first survey -- described in the BJS publication Police Use of Force: Collection of National Data (NCJ 165040) -- documented levels of contacts with police during 1996. The second survey -- described in Contacts between Police and the Public: Findings from the 1999 National Survey (NCJ 184957) -- recorded police-citizen contacts in 1999. These data are archived as POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 1999: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 3151). The third survey -- described in Contacts between Police and the Public: Findings from the 2002 National Survey (NCJ 207845) -- covered interactions between police and the public in 2002. These data are archived as POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 2002: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 4273). The fourth survey -- described in the BJS publication, Contacts between Police and the Public, 2005 (NCJ 215243) -- covered interactions between police and the public in 2005. These data are archived as POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 2005: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 20020). The fifth survey -- described in the BJS publication, Contacts between Police and the Public, 2008 (NCJ 234599) -- covered interactions between police and the public in 2008. These data are archived as POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 2008 (ICPSR 32022). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32022.v1 police citizen interactions icpsr police community relations icpsr police officers icpsr police use of force icpsr public interest icpsr public opinion icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32022 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32022.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27382 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27382 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) [electronic resource] National Criminal Justice Treatment Program (NCJTP) Survey in the United States, 2002-2008 Faye S. Taxman 2010-08-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27382 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices (NCJTP) Survey provides a comprehensive inquiry into the nature of programs and services provided to adult and juvenile offenders involved in the justice system in the United States. Participants included key criminal justice administrators, operations managers, and staff. This survey was conducted in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The survey involved a myriad of state, regional, and local organizations employing a mix of their own staff and contracted personnel, and services that might involve multiple levels of government. It was a self-administrated, paper-and-pencil questionnaire. The methodology included a multilevel approach that captured the perspective of executives, front-line administrators, and line staff about current practices in a range of institutional and community correctional settings for adults and juveniles. The goals for this survey were: to describe current drug treatment practices, policies, and delivery systems for offenders on probation or parole supervision, and in jails, prisons, and youth institutions; to examine agency structures, resources, and other organizational factors that may affect service delivery, including mission, leadership, climate, culture, and beliefs about rehabilitation versus punishment; and to assess coordination and integration across criminal justice agencies and between corrections and treatment systems. Items in the survey included: respondent characteristics, organizational characteristics, correctional programs characteristics (e.g., size, nature, etc.), substance abuse treatment programs characteristics, social networks/agencies collaboration, integration of services with other agencies, attitudes toward punishment and rehabilitation (personal values), organizational needs assessment, organizational culture and climate for treatment, cynicism toward change, organizational commitment to treatment, and perspectives on intradepartmental coordination. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27382.v1 addiction icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr cocaine icpsr controlled drugs icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug overdose icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr hallucinogens icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr steroid use icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Taxman, Faye S. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27382 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27382.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26701 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26701 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies 2012-12-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 26701 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. Detailed NSDUH 2008 documentation is available from SAMHSA. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2008 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For this 2008 survey, Adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. A split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26701.v3 alcohol consumption icpsr amphetamines icpsr barbiturates icpsr cocaine icpsr controlled drugs icpsr crack cocaine icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr depression (psychology) icpsr drinking behavior icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr employment icpsr hallucinogens icpsr health care icpsr heroin icpsr households icpsr income icpsr inhalants icpsr marijuana icpsr mental health icpsr mental health services icpsr methamphetamine icpsr pregnancy icpsr prescription drugs icpsr sedatives icpsr smoking icpsr stimulants icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr tobacco use icpsr tranquilizers icpsr youths icpsr addiction icpsr alcohol icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program SAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) DSDR III. Health ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime RCMD V. Health and Well-Being United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26701 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26701.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25461 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25461 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Victimization Survey, 2008 [Collection Year Record-Type Files] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2009-09-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25461 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Series, previously called the National Crime Surveys (NCS), has been collecting data on personal and household victimization through an ongoing survey of a nationally-representative sample of residential addresses since 1973. The NCVS was designed with four primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas. The survey categorizes crimes as "personal" or "property." Personal crimes include rape and sexual attack, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and purse-snatching/pocket-picking, while property crimes include burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and vandalism. Each respondent is asked a series of screen questions designed to determine whether she or he was victimized during the six-month period preceding the first day of the month of the interview. A "household respondent" is also asked to report on crimes against the household as a whole (e.g., burglary, motor vehicle theft). The data include type of crime, month, time, and location of the crime, relationship between victim and offender, characteristics of the offender, self-protective actions taken by the victim during the incident and results of those actions, consequences of the victimization, type of property lost, whether the crime was reported to police and reasons for reporting or not reporting, and offender use of weapons, drugs, and alcohol. Basic demographic information such as age, race, gender, and income is also collected, to enable analysis of crime by various subpopulations. This version of the NCVS, referred to as the collection year, contains records from interviews conducted in the 12 months of the given year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25461.v2 offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr rape icpsr reactions to crime icpsr robbery icpsr sexual offenses icpsr vandalism icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr crime icpsr crime costs icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr offenders icpsr assault icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25461 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25461.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25422 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25422 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring the Future [electronic resource] A Continuing Study of American Youth (8th- and 10th-Grade Surveys), 2008 Lloyd D. Johnston , Jerald G. Bachman , Patrick M. O'Malley , John E. Schulenberg 2009-11-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25422 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These surveys of 8th- and 10th-grade students are part of a series that explores changes in important values, behaviors, and lifestyle orientations of contemporary American youth. Students in each grade are randomly assigned to complete one of four questionnaires, each with a different subset of topical questions but containing a set of "core" questions on demographics and drug use. There are more than 450 variables across the questionnaires. Drugs covered by this survey include amphetamines (stimulants), barbiturates (tranquilizers), other prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, tobacco, smokeless tobacco, alcohol, inhalants, steroids, marijuana, hashish, LSD, hallucinogens, cocaine, crack, ecstasy, methamphetamine, and injectable drugs such as heroin. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25422.v2 alcohol icpsr attitudes icpsr crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug education icpsr drug use icpsr educational objectives icpsr family background icpsr gender roles icpsr high school students icpsr human behavior icpsr lifestyles icpsr prescription drugs icpsr religious attitudes icpsr self esteem icpsr social change icpsr tobacco use icpsr values icpsr youths icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States DSDR VI. Population Characteristics RCMD IX. Minority Populations NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Johnston, Lloyd D. Bachman, Jerald G. O'Malley, Patrick M. Schulenberg, John E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25422 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25422.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30481 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30481 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 2008 [electronic resource] National Center for State Courts 2012-05-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30481 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. The trial caseload consists of civil, domestic relations, criminal, juvenile, and traffic violation cases. The appellate caseload consists of appeal by right, appeal by permission, death penalty, and original proceeding/other appellate matter cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30481.v1 appellate courts icpsr case processing icpsr caseloads icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30481 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30481.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27741 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27741 MiAaI MiAaI National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2008 [electronic resource] Extract Files National Archive of Criminal Justice Data 2010-08-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27741 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a part of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The extract files version of NIBRS was created to simplify working with NIBRS data. Data management issues with NIBRS are significant, especially when two or more segment levels are being merged. These issues require skills separate from data analysis. NIBRS data as formatted by the FBI are stored in a single file. These data are organized by various segment levels (record types). There are six main segment levels: administrative, offense, property, victim, offender, and arrestee. Each segment level has a different length and layout. There are other segment levels that occur with less frequency than the six main levels. Significant computing resources are necessary to work with the data in its single-file format. In addition, the user must be sophisticated in working with data in complex file types. For these reasons and the desire to facilitate the use of NIBRS data, ICPSR created the extract files. The data are not a representative sample of crime in the United States. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27741.v1 arrests icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr victims icpsr violent crime icpsr crime icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr property crime icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies National Archive of Criminal Justice Data Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27741 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27741.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26382 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26382 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Victimization Survey, 2008 [Record-Type Files] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 26382 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Series, previously called the National Crime Surveys (NCS), has been collecting data on personal and household victimization through an ongoing survey of a nationally-representative sample of residential addresses since 1973. The NCVS was designed with four primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas. The survey categorizes crimes as "personal" or "property." Personal crimes include rape and sexual attack, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and purse-snatching/pocket-picking, while property crimes include burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and vandalism. Each respondent is asked a series of screen questions designed to determine whether she or he was victimized during the six-month period preceding the first day of the month of the interview. A "household respondent" is also asked to report on crimes against the household as a whole (e.g., burglary, motor vehicle theft). The data include type of crime, month, time, and location of the crime, relationship between victim and offender, characteristics of the offender, self-protective actions taken by the victim during the incident and results of those actions, consequences of the victimization, type of property lost, whether the crime was reported to police and reasons for reporting or not reporting, and offender use of weapons, drugs, and alcohol. Basic demographic information such as age, race, gender, and income is also collected, to enable analysis of crime by various subpopulations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26382.v2 vandalism icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr crime icpsr assault icpsr offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr rape icpsr reactions to crime icpsr robbery icpsr sexual offenses icpsr crime costs icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr offenders icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization FENWAY I. Fenway Archive Project FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26382 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26382.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31704 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130518s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31704 MiAaI MiAaI Systematic Review of the Effects of Parental Imprisonment on Child Antisocial Behavior and Mental Health, 1960-2008 [electronic resource] Joseph Murray , David P. Farrington , Ivana Sekol , Rikke F. Olsen 2012-05-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 31704 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The two main aims for the review were to assess evidence on whether parental imprisonment is a risk factor for undesirable child outcomes and to assess evidence on whether parental imprisonment is a causal risk factor. A third aim of the review was to investigate whether associations between parental imprisonment and child outcomes differ according to child, parent, and environmental characteristics. Between June and September 2008, researchers searched for studies that met the eligibility criteria. Several strategies were used to conduct an exhaustive search for eligible studies. Researchers started with an existing set of documents collected by Joseph Murray during his previous research on the effects of parental imprisonment on children and then used three methods to search for additional studies. First, researchers searched 23 electronic databases for the years 1960-2008. The same keywords were used to search each database. Second, researchers examined bibliographies of previous reviews of studies on the effects of parental imprisonment on children. Third, researchers contacted experts in the field. Two groups of researchers and practitioners were emailed and asked to inform researchers of any studies they thought might be eligible for the review. The 16 studies included in the review were coded for the following key features: reference information, sample characteristics, details about the measure of parental imprisonment, details of subsamples, and multiple comparisons made in the study, details of the comparison group(s) used to derive effect sizes, types of outcome measured, and measurement details, methods used to control for confounding variables to estimate causal effects, methodological quality of the study for drawing conclusions about risk factors and causal risk factors, and statistical information used to derive an effect size. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31704.v1 behavior problems icpsr child rearing icpsr child welfare icpsr children icpsr imprisonment icpsr