nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29041 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29041 MiAaI MiAaI Course of Domestic Abuse Among Chicago's Elderly [electronic resource] Risk Factors, Protective Behaviors, and Police Intervention, 2006-2009 Karen L. Amendola , Meghan G. Slipka , Edwin E. Hamilton , Julie L. Whitman 2013-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 29041 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The study was conducted to examine if and how risk factors and protective behaviors affect the course of elder abuse over time, and the role of police in intervening with elderly victims of domestic abuse and/or neglect. It also examined the prevalence rates for various types of abuse using a stratified sample of Chicago's elderly population. The study involved in-depth interviews with 328 elderly (aged 60 and over) residents of Chicago from three sample groups: (1) 159 community nonvictims; (2) 121 community victims; and (3) a police sample consisting of 48 elderly victims who had been visited by trained domestic violence/senior citizen victimization officers in the Chicago Police Department. The interviews were conducted using a survey instrument designed to assess victimization. The survey included questions about various characteristics and risk factors associated both with victims and perpetrators of abuse and/or neglect, specific types of abuse, and protective behaviors of victims. Victimization was examined twice over a 10-month period to evaluate the course of abuse over time. The efficacy of police intervention was also examined. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29041.v1 abuse icpsr domestic violence icpsr elder abuse icpsr family violence icpsr older adults icpsr police intervention icpsr spouse abuse icpsr victimization icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization Amendola, Karen L. Slipka, Meghan G. Hamilton, Edwin E. Whitman, Julie L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29041 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29041.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34182 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34182 MiAaI MiAaI Determinants of Chicago Neighborhood Homicide Trends, 1980-2000 [electronic resource] Brian J. Stults 2013-03-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34182 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to examine homicide trends in Chicago neighborhoods from 1980-2000 using HOMICIDES IN CHICAGO, 1965-1995 (ICPSR 6399), 1980-2000 Census data, and PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS: COMMUNITY SURVEY, 1994-1995 (ICPSR 2766). Drawing on the social disorganization and concentrated disadvantage literature, this study used growth-curve modeling and semi-parametric group-based trajectory modeling to: (1) assess neighborhood variation in homicide trends; (2) identify the particular types of homicide trajectory that Chicago neighborhoods follow; (3) assess whether structural characteristics of neighborhoods influence homicide trends and trajectories; and (4) determine the extent to which the influence of structural characteristics is mediated by neighborhood levels of collective efficacy. This project extended prior research by not only describing the homicide trends and trajectories of Chicago neighborhoods, but also identifying the neighborhood characteristics that directly and indirectly influence those trends. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34182.v1 crime patterns icpsr homicide icpsr neighborhood change icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr NACJD II. Community Studies NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Stults, Brian J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34182 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34182.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27546 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27546 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27546 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were aggregated to the state level. The JRFC collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bed space in the facility to indicate whether the facility is experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the JRFC concatenated data file (ICPSR 27542) were aggregated to the state level and variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27546 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27545 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27545 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27545 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the state level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the state level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched state-level data provide information about the characteristics of juvenile residential facilities in the state from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in these facilities from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date were included in the concatenated matched file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not have been included in the file used for the aggregation. Variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were also added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27545 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27544 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27544 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Facility-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27544 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the facility level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the facility level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched facility-level data provide information about the characteristics of the facility from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in that facility from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched facility-level file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27544 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27543 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27543 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27543 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27541) and the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were matched on the facility identifier to create one data file. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Each record in the concatenated matched data file provides information about the juvenile and also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held from both the CJRP and JRFC collections. Therefore, these data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27543 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27542 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27542 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27542 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 pregnancy icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27542 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27541 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27541 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-02-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27541 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP, which is conducted biennially, asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. The concatenated data include the seven years of CJRP data in one file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27541 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR22661 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR22661 MiAaI MiAaI Family, Peer and Neighborhood-level Protective Factors within the Developmental Assets Framework [electronic resource] A Longitudinal Analysis of Behavioral Adaptation for Urban Youth Exposed to Community Violence in Chicago, 1994-2002 Sonia Jain , Alison Cohen , Anthony Petrosino 2013-01-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 22661 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study used longitudinal data from 1,114 youth ages 11-16 and their neighborhoods from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine whether baseline interpersonal and neighborhood protective factors predicted behavioral adjustment at waves 2 and 3 among youth who were victims of, witnesses of, or unexposed to violence, controlling for individual and neighborhood-level risks. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22661.v1 adolescents icpsr aggression icpsr behavior modification icpsr child development icpsr children icpsr communities icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr human behavior icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr neighborhoods icpsr violence icpsr NACJD II. Community Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Jain, Sonia Cohen, Alison Petrosino, Anthony Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 22661 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22661.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26881 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26881 MiAaI MiAaI Financial Exploitation and Psychological Abuse of Older Adults in the Chicago Metropolitan Area, 2007-2008 [United States] [electronic resource] Kendon Conrad , Madelyn Iris 2013-01-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 26881 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The research team developed two self-reporting questionnaires, the Older Adult Mistreatment Assessment (OAMA) Client Questionnaire and the OAMA Staff Questionnaire, in order to measure for financial exploitation and psychological abuse of the elderly. The OAMA Client Questionnaire was administered to clients aged 60 years and over who had been substantiated for at least one form of elderly mistreatment within the Chicago metropolitan area. In addition, a corresponding Staff Questionnaire was administered to each evaluator involved in the field test and submitted on behalf of each client in the study. In all, 227 client interviews with 227 corresponding staff questionnaires were compiled between 2007 and 2008, and scales were developed for measurements of both financial exploitation and psychological abuse. Financial exploitation of the elderly was measured through variables related to theft, scams, coercion, signs of abuse or financial entitlement by trusted friends or family members, and money management difficulties. Psychological abuse of the elderly was measured through variables related to isolation, disrespect, exploited vulnerability, shame, threats and intimidation, and risk factors related to the client's trusted friends or family. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26881.v1 abuse icpsr adult care services icpsr aging icpsr caregivers icpsr elder abuse icpsr eldercare icpsr emotional abuse icpsr exploitation icpsr older adults icpsr personal finances icpsr psychological effects icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr self evaluation icpsr victimization icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD I. Attitude Surveys Conrad, Kendon Iris, Madelyn Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26881 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26881.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33921 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33921 MiAaI MiAaI Comprehensive Investigation of the Role of Individuals, the Immediate Social Environment, and Neighborhoods in Trajectories of Adolescent Antisocial Behavior in Chicago, Illinois, 1994-2002 [electronic resource] Christopher Sullivan 2012-12-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33921 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The overall goal of this study was to acquire a greater understanding of the development of adolescent antisocial behavior using data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN). Longitudinal cohort data from PHDCN were analyzed to assess patterns of substance use and delinquency across three waves for three age cohorts and 78 neighborhoods. This analysis of existing PHDCN data used multiple cohort and multilevel latent growth models as well as several ancillary approaches to answer questions pertinent to the development of adolescent antisocial behavior. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33921.v1 adolescents icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr drug use icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr neighborhoods icpsr offenders icpsr parental influence icpsr peer influence icpsr social environment icpsr social influences icpsr social support icpsr substance abuse icpsr violent crime icpsr NACJD II. Community Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Sullivan, Christopher Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33921 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33921.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33201 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33201 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring Drug Epidemics and the Markets That Sustain Them, Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) and ADAM II Data, 2000-2003 and 2007-2010 [electronic resource] Andrew Golub , Henry H. Brownstein , Eloise Dunlap 2012-12-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33201 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined trends in the use of five widely abused drugs among arrestees at 10 geographically diverse locations from 2000 to 2010: Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Denver, Indianapolis, Manhattan, Minneapolis, Portland Oregon, Sacramento, and Washington DC. The data came from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program reintroduced in 2007 (ADAM II) and its predecessor the ADAM program. ADAM data included urinalysis results that provided an objective measure of recent drug use, provided location specific estimates over time, and provided sample weights that yielded unbiased estimates for each location. The ADAM data were analyzed according to a drug epidemics framework, which has been previously employed to understand the decline of the crack epidemic, the growth of marijuana use in the 1990s, and the persistence of heroin use. Similar to other diffusion of innovation processes, drug epidemics tend to follow a natural course passing through four distinct phases: incubation, expansion, plateau, and decline. The study also searched for changes in drug markets over the course of a drug epidemic. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33201.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr arrests icpsr cocaine icpsr crack cocaine icpsr crime patterns icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr methamphetamine icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Golub, Andrew Brownstein, Henry H. Dunlap, Eloise Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33201 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33201.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34449 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34449 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34449 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2010, the JRFC used three modules to collect information on the educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34449 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34402 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34402 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2008 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34402 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34402 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34448 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34448 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34448 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34448 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34401 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34401 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2007 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34401 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34401 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30983 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30983 MiAaI MiAaI Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation (MADCE), 2003-2009 [electronic resource] Shelli B. Rossman , John K. Roman , Janine M. Zweig , Michael Rempel , Christine H. Lindquist 2012-11-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30983 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation (MADCE) study included 23 drug courts and 6 comparison sites selected from 8 states across the country. The purpose of the study was to: (1) Test whether drug courts reduce drug use, crime, and multiple other problems associated with drug abuse, in comparision with similar offenders not exposed to drug courts, (2) address how drug courts work and for whom by isolating key individual and program factors that make drug courts more or less effective in achieving their desired outcomes, (3) explain how offender attitudes and behaviors change when they are exposed to drug courts and how these changes help explain the effectiveness of drug court programs, and (4) examine whether drug courts generate cost savings. Offenders in all 29 sites were surveyed in 3 waves, at baseline, 6 months later, and 18 months after enrollment. The research comprises three major components: process evaluation, impact evaluation, and a cost-benefit analysis. The process evaluation describes how the 23 drug court sites vary in program eligibility, supervision, treatment, team collaboration, and other key policies and practices. The impact evaluation examines whether drug courts produce better outcomes than comparison sites and tests which court policies and offender attitudes might explain those effects. The cost-benefit analysis evaluates drug court costs and benefits. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30983.v1 cost effectiveness icpsr court system icpsr courts icpsr crime control icpsr crime control policies icpsr crime control programs icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug courts icpsr drug law enforcement icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr process evaluation icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Rossman, Shelli B. Roman, John K. Zweig, Janine M. Rempel, Michael Lindquist, Christine H. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30983 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30983.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33970 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33970 MiAaI MiAaI Providing a Citywide System of Single Point Access to Domestic Violence Information, Resources, and Referrals to a Diverse Population [electronic resource] An Evaluation of the City of Chicago Domestic Violence Help Line, 2004-2005 Michelle Fugate , Christine George , Natalie Haber , Sarah Stawiski 2012-10-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33970 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was a 2-year evaluation of the City of Chicago Domestic Violence Help Line. The Help Line was a unique telephone service functioning as a clearinghouse for all domestic violence victim services in the Chicago metropolitan area. The service was toll-free, multi-lingual, confidential, and operated 24-hours, 7 days a week. The purpose of the Help Line was to connect domestic violence victims to specialized services through direct referrals and three-way phone linkages. In order to conduct a comprehensive evaluation, the perspective of a broad range of users of the Help Line was sought. Telephone interviews were conducted with domestic violence victim callers to the Help Line over the course of one year (Part 1 - Victims Data). Telephone interviews were also conducted with domestic violence service providers (Part 2 - Providers Data). As the largest referral source into the Help Line, Chicago Police Officers completed a written survey about their experiences with the Help Line (Part 3 - Police Data). Finally, to explore the general awareness of the Help Line, members of the District Advisory Committees across the city were surveyed (Part 4 - District Advisory Committee (DAC) Data). The Part 1 (Victims Data) data file contains 399 cases and 277 variables. The Part 2 (Providers Data) data file contains 74 cases and 137 variables. The Part 3 (Police Data) data file contains 1,205 cases and 128 variables. The Part 4 (District Advisory Committee (DAC) Data) data file contains 357 cases and 105 variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33970.v1 abuse icpsr advocacy icpsr domestic violence icpsr victim safety icpsr victim services icpsr violence icpsr violence against women icpsr womens shelters icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Fugate, Michelle George, Christine Haber, Natalie Stawiski, Sarah Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33970 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33970.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04100 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04100 MiAaI MiAaI Chicago Lawyers Survey, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] John P. Heinz , Edward O. Laumann , Robert L. Nelson , Rebecca Sandefur , Paul S. Schnorr 2012-08-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4100 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Conducted as a partial replication of the CHICAGO LAWYERS SURVEY, 1975 (ICPSR 8218), this 1994-1995 survey sought to analyze the processes of change that transformed the practice of law and the market for legal services over the two decades between 1975 and 1995. Randomly selected Chicago, Illinois, lawyers were asked about, for example, the nature of their work, work settings, fields of practice, job satisfaction, career histories, professional commitment, client characteristics, and social and political values. Results revealed important changes in the legal profession between 1975 and 1995: women entered the profession in substantial numbers, new specialties were created, law firms and corporate legal departments grew dramatically, and in many organizations the practice of law became constrained by bureaucratic rules and procedures. Background information includes state of residence during high school, college or university attended, law school attended, law school class rank, political preference, degree of political party affiliation, religious preference, marital status, nationality, year of birth, income, race, zip code, number of children, work status of spouse, spouse's nationality, respondents' mother's occupation, respondents' mother's law school, respondents' father's occupation, and respondents' father's law school. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04100.v1 attorneys icpsr career expectations icpsr career history icpsr memberships icpsr occupational mobility icpsr organizational behavior icpsr organizational elites icpsr professional associations icpsr professional ethics icpsr professionalism icpsr social status icpsr social stratification icpsr values icpsr ICPSR XII. Legal Systems DATAPASS I. NDIIPP NACJD V. Courts Heinz, John P. Laumann, Edward O. Nelson, Robert L. Sandefur, Rebecca Schnorr, Paul S. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4100 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04100.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02564 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02564 MiAaI MiAaI Crack, Powder Cocaine, and Heroin [electronic resource] Drug Purchase and Use Patterns in Six Cities in the United States, 1995-1996 K. Jack Riley 2012-08-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2564 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was designed to address the practical and policy implications of various drug market participation patterns. In 1995, the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) collaborated on a project called the Procurement Study. This study was executed as an addendum to NIJ's Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]) with the goal of extending previous research in which heroin users were interviewed on various aspects of drug market activity. The present study sought to explore additional features of drug market participation and use, both within and across drug types and cities, and included two additional drugs -- powder cocaine and crack cocaine. Data were collected from recently arrested users of powder cocaine, crack cocaine, and heroin in six DUF cities (Chicago, New York, Portland, San Diego, San Antonio, and Washington, DC). Each of the three files in this collection, Crack Data (Part 1), Heroin Data (Part 2), and Powder Cocaine Data (Part 3), is comprised of data from a procurement interview, urine test variables, and a DUF interview. During the procurement interview, information was collected on purchase and use patterns for specific drugs. Variables from the procurement interview include the respondent's method of using the drug, the term used to refer to the drug, whether the respondent bought the drug in the neighborhood, the number of different dealers the respondent bought the drug from, how the respondent made the connection with the dealer (i.e., street, house, phone, beeper, business/store, or friends), their main drug source, whether the respondent went to someone else if the source was not available, how the respondent coped with not being able to find drugs to buy, whether the respondent got the drug for free, the means by which the respondent obtained money, the quantity and packaging of the drug, and the number of minutes spent searching for, traveling to, and waiting for their last purchase. Urine tests screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Data from the DUF interview provide detailed information about each arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type, arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the interview. Data from the DUF interview instrument also included alcohol/drug treatment history, information about whether arrestees had ever injected drugs, and whether they were influenced by drugs when the crime that they were charged with was committed. The data also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had had prior arrests in the past 12 months. Demographic data include the age, race, sex, educational attainment, marital status, employment status, and living circumstances of each respondent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 crack cocaine icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr heroin icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr arrests icpsr cocaine icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Riley, K. Jack Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2564 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1