nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34564 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34564 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Domestic and Family Violence Court Evaluation in Contra Costa, Santa Clara, and San Francisco Counties, California, 1999-2005 [electronic resource] Brenda Uekert , Inger Sagatun-Edwards , Ann Crowe , Tracy Peters , Fred Cheesman , Dina Kameda 2013-05-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34564 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study tested the effectiveness of two court-based intervention programs in California (Santa Clara County, San Francisco County) that addressed juvenile domestic and family violence. The court-based intervention programs included an intake assessment process for domestic and family violence, specialized prosecution and defense, a dedicated docket, intensive supervision, offender programs, and victim services. Probation and court records of juvenile domestic/family violence offenders provided the source of data to compare the intervention programs with a third county that did not have a specialized response (Contra Costa County). The final study group included 303 closed cases (201 cases from Santa Clara County, 40 cases from San Francisco County, and 62 cases from Contra Costa County). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34564.v1 arrest records icpsr domestic violence icpsr family violence icpsr intervention icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivism rates icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD IV. Court Case Processing NACJD V. Courts Uekert, Brenda Sagatun-Edwards, Inger Crowe, Ann Peters, Tracy Cheesman, Fred Kameda, Dina Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34564 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34564.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34605 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34605 MiAaI MiAaI Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA] [electronic resource] Official Arrest Records, 2000-2010 [Restricted] Edward P. Mulvey 2013-05-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34605 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654), and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700). The official arrests records of all 1,354 youth were obtained from multiple sources. For arrest/petitions under the age of 18, this information is based on petitions appearing in the juvenile and adult court records in each site. In Philadelphia, this information was gathered based on a hand review of juvenile and adult court documents; in Phoenix, the information is based on reports from two computerized court tracking systems (JOLTS--Juvenile On-Line Tracking System for juvenile court information, ICIS--Maricopa County Superior Court database for adult court information). For arrests/petitions over 18, FBI arrest records are the source of information. There is no self-reported information contained in this set of data. Information from these different data sources is consolidated into the following categories: Information regarding petitions with a date that falls prior to the baseline interview date ("prior petitions"). Information regarding the study index petition (also called the "initial referring petition"; this is the adjudication that prompted study enrollment). Information regarding the study index petition can be found by accessing the "type" variable associated with the prior petitions (specific variable name: Official Record Prior PetitionXX: Petition type). Depending on the investigator's needs, this petition can remain combined with the "priors" or be used as a stand-alone petition. Information regarding arrests and court petitions with a date which falls after the baseline interview date in the Pathways study ("rearrests"). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v1 arrest records icpsr felony offenses icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr sex offenses icpsr weapons offenses icpsr substance abuse icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Mulvey, Edward P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34605 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33942 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33942 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey of Youth in Custody, 2008-2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-04-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 33942 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Survey of Youth in Custody (NSYC) is part of the BJS National Prison Rape Statistics Program to gather mandated data on the incidence of prevalence of sexual assault in juvenile facilities under the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA; P.L. 108-79). The Act requires a 10 percent sample of juvenile facilities to be listed by incidence of sexual assault. Data are collected directly from youth in a private setting using audio computer-assisted self interview (ACASI) technology with a touch-screen laptop and an audio feed to maximize inmate confidentiality and minimize literacy issues. The first year of collection includes nearly 200 juvenile facilities, with an estimated 10,000 completed interviews with youth. The NSYC utilized two questionnaires, based on the age of the respondent. The Older Youth questionnaire was administered to youths ages 15 and older, and the Younger Youth questionnaire was administered to those 14 and younger. The survey was divided into five sections. Section A collected background information, such as details of admission to facility and demographics including education, height, weight, race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and history of any forced sexual contact. Section B, Facility Perceptions and Victimization, included respondents' opinions of the facility and staff, any incidence of gang activity, and any injuries that had occurred. Section C, Sexual Activity Within Facility, captured the types of sexual contact that occurred and the circumstances of sexual contact. Section D, Description of Events with Youth, and Section E, Description of Events with Staff Member, focused on when and where the contact occurred, the race and gender of the other youths or staff members, if threats or coersion were involved, and outcomes, included whether or not the sexual contact was reported. Other variables include debriefing questions about respondents' experiences completing the survey, interviewer observations, created variables to summarize victimization reports (due to the complicated routing in Section C), weight and stratification data, and administrative data about the facilities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33942.v1 correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional guards icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juvenile victims icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison violence icpsr rape icpsr sex offenders icpsr sex offenses icpsr sexual abuse icpsr sexual assault icpsr sexual behavior icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33942 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33942.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26381 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26381 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey of Juvenile Justice Professionals, 2005-2007 [United States] [electronic resource] Janeen Buck Willison , Christy Visher , Daniel P. Mears , Jeffrey A. Butts 2013-03-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 26381 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study involved a survey of juvenile court judges, chief probation officers, prosecutors, and public defenders to measure their impressions of recent policy changes and the critical needs facing today's juvenile justice system. In addition the study garnered recommendations for improving the administration and effectiveness of this system. The study's primary objective was to provide policymakers, administrators, and practitioners with actionable information about how to improve the operations and effectiveness of the juvenile justice system, and to examine the role practitioners could play in constructing sound juvenile justice policy. A total of 534 juvenile court judges, chief probation officers, court administrators, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in 44 states and the District of Columbia participated in the Assessing the Policy Options (APO) national practitioner survey. The survey consisted of four major sections: demographics, critical needs, policies and practices, and practitioner recommendations. Critical needs facing the juvenile justice system were measured by asking respondents about the policy priority of 13 issues in their respective jurisdictions; topics ranged from staff training and development to effective juvenile defense counsel to information technology. Respondents were also asked to assess the effectiveness of 17 different policies and practices -- ranging from parental accountability laws to transfer and treatment -- in achieving 6 vital juvenile justice outcomes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26381.v1 juvenile justice icpsr curfew icpsr decision making icpsr gangs icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juvenile recidivists icpsr mental health services icpsr needs assessment icpsr policy making icpsr restorative justice icpsr risk assessment icpsr sex offenders icpsr social services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Willison, Janeen Buck Visher, Christy Mears, Daniel P. Butts, Jeffrey A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26381 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26381.v1