nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06788 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06788 MiAaI MiAaI Availability and Use of Intermediate Sanctions by Judges and Corrections Professionals in the United States, 1994 [electronic resource] Helen G. Corrothers 2013-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6788 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey is part of a larger project designed to explore ways to increase the availability and use of intermediate sanctions (IS) on a national level without jeopardizing public safety. A model for an Intermediate Punishment System is suggested. The survey was undertaken to ascertain attitudes and practices concerning IS for three groups: state and federal judges (Part 3), correctional system administrators responsible for community corrections in their state or jurisdiction (Part 1), and program directors who actually operated community programs (Part 2). The units of analysis were intermediate sanctions/programs operating in jurisdictions across the United States. Data were collected on the availability and frequency of use of IS, as well as costs, client/staffing ratios, use of rehabilitative programming, respondents' opinions concerning the field's needs, and program eligibility criteria. Information was also gathered on how decisions were made to place offenders into the various programs, program outcome and whether the program was viewed as being successful (and how this was measured), and types of new programs needed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06788.v2 community service programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr judges icpsr offenders icpsr program evaluation icpsr public safety icpsr sanctions icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts Corrothers, Helen G. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6788 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06788.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27546 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27546 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27546 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were aggregated to the state level. The JRFC collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bed space in the facility to indicate whether the facility is experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the JRFC concatenated data file (ICPSR 27542) were aggregated to the state level and variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27546 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27545 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27545 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27545 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the state level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the state level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched state-level data provide information about the characteristics of juvenile residential facilities in the state from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in these facilities from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date were included in the concatenated matched file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not have been included in the file used for the aggregation. Variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were also added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27545 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27544 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27544 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Facility-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27544 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the facility level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the facility level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched facility-level data provide information about the characteristics of the facility from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in that facility from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched facility-level file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27544 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27543 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27543 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27543 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27541) and the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were matched on the facility identifier to create one data file. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Each record in the concatenated matched data file provides information about the juvenile and also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held from both the CJRP and JRFC collections. Therefore, these data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27543 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27542 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27542 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27542 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 pregnancy icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27542 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27541 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27541 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-02-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27541 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP, which is conducted biennially, asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. The concatenated data include the seven years of CJRP data in one file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27541 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30799 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30799 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30799 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Corrections Reporting Program gathers data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. The dataset is comprised of four types of data: prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), released from parole (Part 3), or in prison at year end (Part 4). The National Prison Statistics (NPS) program was established in 1926 by the Bureau of the Census in response to a congressional mandate to compile national information on the populations confined in correctional institutions. This program described the characteristics and counts of prison inmates during each calendar year. Since its initiation, responsibility for this program has shifted among several agencies -- in 1950 it was transferred to the Federal Bureau of Prisons and to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration in 1971. Since 1972, the Bureau of Census, under agreement with the Department of Justice, has had responsibility for compiling the statistical data. Census staff negotiates directly with each state, assembles and edits the data, and prepares the data for analysis and publication. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30799.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30799 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30799.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27742 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27742 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2005 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 27742 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Corrections Reporting Program gathers data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. The dataset is comprised of four types of data: prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), released from parole (Part 3), or in prison at year end (Part 4). The National Prison Statistics (NPS) program was established in 1926 by the Bureau of the Census in response to a congressional mandate to compile national information on the populations confined in correctional institutions. This program described the characteristics and counts of prison inmates during each calendar year. Since its initiation, responsibility for this program has shifted among several agencies -- in 1950 it was transferred to the Federal Bureau of Prisons and to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration in 1971. Since 1972, the Bureau of Census, under agreement with the Department of Justice, has had responsibility for compiling the statistical data. Census staff negotiates directly with each state, assembles and edits the data, and prepares the data for analysis and publication. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27742.v2 national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27742 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27742.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26521 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26521 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-01-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 26521 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Corrections Reporting Program gathers data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. The dataset is comprised of four types of data: prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), released from parole (Part 3), or in prison at year end (Part 4). The National Prison Statistics (NPS) program was established in 1926 by the Bureau of the Census in response to a congressional mandate to compile national information on the populations confined in correctional institutions. This program described the characteristics and counts of prison inmates during each calendar year. Since its initiation, responsibility for this program has shifted among several agencies -- in 1950 it was transferred to the Federal Bureau of Prisons and to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration in 1971. Since 1972, the Bureau of Census, under agreement with the Department of Justice, has had responsibility for compiling the statistical data. Census staff negotiates directly with each state, assembles and edits the data, and prepares the data for analysis and publication. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26521.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26521 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26521.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34449 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34449 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34449 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2010, the JRFC used three modules to collect information on the educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34449 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34402 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34402 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2008 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34402 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34402 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34448 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34448 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34448 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34448 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34401 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34401 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2007 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34401 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34401 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34354 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34354 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2011 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34354 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2011, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34354.v1 correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34354 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34354.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31981 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31981 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 31981 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2004, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31981.v1 Alaskan Natives icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31981 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31981.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04359 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04359 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates in Local Jails, 2002 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-08-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4359 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides nationally representative data on persons held prior to trial and on convicted offenders serving sentences in local jails or awaiting transfer to state prisons. Data cover individual characteristics of jail inmates, current offenses, sentences and time served, criminal histories, jail activities, conditions and programs, prior drug and alcohol use and treatment, and health care services provided while in jail. Part 1, Numeric Data, contains numeric data for all questions in the survey, while Part 2, Alphanumeric Data, consists of non-numeric answers to the "Other, Specify" selection available for some of the questions. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04359.v2 correctional facilities icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug use icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr offenses icpsr sentencing icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4359 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04359.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31441 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31441 MiAaI MiAaI National Former Prisoner Survey, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-08-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 31441 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Under the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003, Congress mandated that the United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) investigate former prisoners' experiences in prison to assist in understanding the incidence and prevalence of sexual victimization within the prison setting. BJS and its subcontractor, NORC at the University of Chicago, led a national data collection effort focusing on prison sexual assault as reported by former state prisoners. The focus of the National Former Prisoner Survey (NFPS) was sexual victimization among former state prisoners. The survey was divided into 6 sections. The first two sections were administered using a computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) method and focused on demographic and criminal history information. The remaining sections, covering more sensitive information, were administered using a touch-screen-audio-assisted-computer-self-interviewing (TACASI) method. Sections A and B of the instrument collected demographic and criminal history information, as well as information on placements during the last continuous incarceration. Sections C and D captured detailed inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization during the last continuous incarceration, including the type of sexual activity, identification of facilities at which such incidents occurred, frequency of occurrences, and other specifics regarding sexual victimization. Section E addressed staff-on-inmate sexual victimization and misconduct, whether considered willing or unwilling, and gathered specifics of activity indicated. The last section, F, focused on the impacts of sexual assault on victimized respondents, as well as parole supervision characteristics for all respondents. The National Former Prisoner Survey (NFPS) began in January 2008 and concluded in October 2008, and involved the random selection of approximately 250 parole offices across the country using probability proportional-to-size (PPS) sampling procedures. Completed interviews were obtained for 17,738 respondents; supplemental data was collected on all former prisoners sampled in order to develop weights for national estimations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31441.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional guards icpsr criminal histories icpsr inmates icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison violence icpsr rape icpsr sex offenders icpsr sex offenses icpsr sexual abuse icpsr sexual assault icpsr sexual behavior icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31441 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31441.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26361 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26361 MiAaI MiAaI National Inmate Survey, 2007 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-05-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 26361 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Data for this study were collected as part of the 2007 National Inmate Survey (NIS), which is comprised of two questionnaires -- a survey of sexual victimization and a survey of past drug and alcohol use and abuse. The survey of sexual victimization resulted in data from 23,398 inmates held in 146 sampled prisons and 40,419 inmates in 282 local jails in the NIS. Respondents were asked if they had been forced or otherwise coerced into any sexual contact with other inmates or facility staff while incarcerated. The respondents were asked about the type of sexual contact, the frequency, when it occurred, and where it occurred. The survey also sought information on any injuries received and treatment obtained for those injuries. Other questions pertained to the reporting of sexual contact -- if it was reported, to whom it was reported, and any results from reporting sexual contact. Respondents were also asked for reasons why they had not reported the sexual contact if no report was made. Background and demographic information collected included reasons for incarceration, sexual history, sexual orientation, marital status, gender, ethnicity, and physical characteristics such as height and weight. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26361.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional guards icpsr inmates icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison violence icpsr rape icpsr sex offenders icpsr sex offenses icpsr sexual abuse icpsr sexual assault icpsr sexual behavior icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26361 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26361.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33722 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33722 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2011 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-04-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33722 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2011 Annual Survey of Jails is the 24th such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. Starting in 2010, BJS enhanced the ASJ survey instruments to address topics on the number of convicted inmates that are unsentenced or sentenced and the number of unconvicted inmates awaiting trial/arraignment, or transfers/holds for other authorities. In order to reduce respondent burden, the ASJ no longer collects data on conviction status by sex. Also new to the survey, data are collected on jails’ operational capacity and design capacity. Incorporating enhanced capacity measurements enables BJS to describe more accurately the variation and volatility of inmate bed space and crowding, especially as they relate to safety and security in jails. To address more directly issues related to overcrowding and safety and security in jails, BJS started collecting data on staff and assaults against staff from the largest jails. In the modifications to the ASJ, starting in 2010, 335 jail jurisdictions (370 respondents) included with certainty in the ASJ sample survey were asked to provide additional information (forms CJ-5D or CJ-5DA) on the flow of inmates going through jails and the distribution of time served, staff characteristics and assaults on staff resulting in death, and inmate misconduct. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2011. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2011. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33722.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33722 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33722.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30641 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30641 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2006 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-03-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30641 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Corrections Reporting Program gathers data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. The dataset is comprised of four types of data: prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), released from parole (Part 3), or in prison at year end (Part 4). The National Prison Statistics (NPS) program was established in 1926 by the Bureau of the Census in response to a congressional mandate to compile national information on the populations confined in correctional institutions. This program described the characteristics and counts of prison inmates during each calendar year. Since its initiation, responsibility for this program has shifted among several agencies -- in 1950 it was transferred to the Federal Bureau of Prisons and to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration in 1971. Since 1972, the Bureau of Census, under agreement with the Department of Justice, has had responsibility for compiling the statistical data. Census staff negotiates directly with each state, assembles and edits the data, and prepares the data for analysis and publication. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30641.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30641 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30641.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30081 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30081 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2007 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-02-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30081 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Corrections Reporting Program gathers data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. The dataset is comprised of four types of data: prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), released from parole (Part 3), or in prison at year end (Part 4). The National Prison Statistics (NPS) program was established in 1926 by the Bureau of the Census in response to a congressional mandate to compile national information on the populations confined in correctional institutions. This program described the characteristics and counts of prison inmates during each calendar year. Since its initiation, responsibility for this program has shifted among several agencies -- in 1950 it was transferred to the Federal Bureau of Prisons and to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration in 1971. Since 1972, the Bureau of Census, under agreement with the Department of Justice, has had responsibility for compiling the statistical data. Census staff negotiates directly with each state, assembles and edits the data, and prepares the data for analysis and publication. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30081.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30081 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30081.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25981 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25981 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2006 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 25981 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2006, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25981 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25282 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25282 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2004 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 25282 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2004, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the physical health and educational services provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25282.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr pregnancy icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25282 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25282.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23520 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23520 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2002 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 23520 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2002, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the substance abuse treatment and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23520 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04672 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04672 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4672 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2000, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 census data icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4672 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR24300 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR24300 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2006 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 24300 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2006, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 24300 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23480 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23480 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2003 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 23480 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2003, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23480 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04674 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04674 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1999 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4674 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1999, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4674 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04670 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04670 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2001 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4670 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2001, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4670 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04673 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04673 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4673 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4673 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30082 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30082 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-01-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30082 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Corrections Reporting Program gathers data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. The dataset is comprised of four types of data: prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), released from parole (Part 3), or in prison at year end (Part 4). The National Prison Statistics (NPS) program was established in 1926 by the Bureau of the Census in response to a congressional mandate to compile national information on the populations confined in correctional institutions. This program described the characteristics and counts of prison inmates during each calendar year. Since its initiation, responsibility for this program has shifted among several agencies -- in 1950 it was transferred to the Federal Bureau of Prisons and to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration in 1971. Since 1972, the Bureau of Census, under agreement with the Department of Justice, has had responsibility for compiling the statistical data. Census staff negotiates directly with each state, assembles and edits the data, and prepares the data for analysis and publication. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30082.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30082 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30082.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32841 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32841 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-12-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32841 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2010, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32841.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32841 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32841.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31924 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31924 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2007 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-11-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31924 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2007, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31924.v1 Alaskan Natives icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31924 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31924.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31923 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31923 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-10-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31923 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2008, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31923.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31923 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31923.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31741 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31741 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-08-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31741 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2009, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31741.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31741 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31741.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31261 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31261 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-08-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31261 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2010 Annual Survey of Jails is the 23rd such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. Starting in 2010, BJS enhanced the ASJ survey instruments to address topics on the number of convicted inmates that are unsentenced or sentenced and the number of unconvicted inmates awaiting trial/arraignment, or transfers/holds for other authorities. In order to reduce respondent burden, the ASJ no longer collects data on conviction status by sex. Also new to 2010, data is collected on jails’ operational capacity and design capacity. Incorporating enhanced capacity measurements enables BJS to describe more accurately the variation and volatility of inmate bed space and crowding, especially as they relate to safety and security in jails. To address more directly issues related to overcrowding and safety and security in jails, BJS started collecting data on staff and assaults against staff from the largest jails. In the modifications to the ASJ, starting in 2010, 335 jail jurisdictions (370 respondents) included with certainty in the ASJ sample survey were asked to provide additional information (forms CJ-5D or CJ-5DA) on the flow of inmates going through jails and the distribution of time served, staff characteristics and assaults on staff resulting in death, and inmate misconduct. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2010. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2010. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31261.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31261 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31261.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29081 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29081 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-05-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29081 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2009 Annual Survey of Jails is the 22nd such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2009. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2009. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29081.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29081 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29081.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28281 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28281 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2008 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-05-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28281 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2008 Annual Survey of Jails is the 21st such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2008. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2008. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28281.v1 jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28281 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28281.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR24260 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR24260 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2011-01-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 24260 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the population and characteristics of public and private juvenile facilities in operation in the United States on February 15, 1995. Annual data for the 1994 calendar year are included as well. Questions designed to categorize each facility were asked of facility administrators concerning the number of adults held, the juvenile majority's custodial authority, reason for custody, and access to the community, as well as the facility's security arrangements, capacity, age, plans for renovation, type of administration, and setting. Extensive data on the total juvenile residential population of each facility were also gathered. The total population is broken down by admission type, legal status, type of offense, race, and age. The collection also contains information on the population's movement and average length of stay, as well as each facility's average daily population, personnel by race, number, and staff position, educational, treatment, and medical programs available, annual expenditures, court orders and consent decrees, and number of juvenile deaths that year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24260.v2 restitution centers icpsr status offenses icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 24260 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24260.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08495 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08495 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facility Census, 1984-1985 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention , United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-01-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8495 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey is the eighth in a series of data collection efforts aimed at providing information on the number and type of juveniles placed in state and local residential facilities for juvenile offenders. Six types of public and private facilities are covered: (1) detention centers, (2) shelters, (3) reception or diagnostic centers, (4) training schools, (5) ranches, forestry camps, and farms, and (6) halfway houses and group homes. Survey items include facility capacity, number of full-time and part-time staff, number of admissions and discharges, average quarterly population, and expenditures by the facility. Data for facility residents include age, sex, and average length of stay. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08495.v5 public expenditures icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr expenditures icpsr government agencies icpsr census data icpsr juvenile delinquency icpsr personnel work icpsr population icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8495 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08495.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08973 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08973 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, 1986-1987 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2011-01-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 8973 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the population and characteristics of public and private juvenile facilities in operation in the United States on February 2, 1987. Annual data for the 1986 calendar year are included as well. Questions designed to categorize each facility were asked concerning the number of adults held, the juvenile majority's custodial authority, reason for custody, and access to the community, as well as the facility's security arrangements, capacity, age, plans for renovation, type of administration, and setting. Extensive data on the total juvenile residential population of each facility was also gathered. The total population is broken down by admission type, legal status, type of offense, race, and age. The collection also contains information on the population's movement and average length of stay, as well as each facility's average daily population, number and types of personnel, educational, treatment, and medical programs available, annual expenditures, court orders and consent decrees, and availability of juvenile records. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08973.v3 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr offenses icpsr restitution centers icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8973 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08973.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09276 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09276 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1986 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-11-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9276 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 36 states, as well as the Federal Prison System, the California Youth Authority, and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09276.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9276 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09276.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26462 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26462 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations Surveys of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems Series, Waves 1-10, 1970-2006 [electronic resource] United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch 2010-07-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 26462 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The major goal of the United Nations Surveys on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems was to collect data on the incidence of reported crime and the operations of criminal justice systems with a view to improving the analysis and dissemination of that information globally. Surveys were distributed to officials in every member country of the United Nations. Designated officials completed the surveys to the best of their abilities given the country's available data. The survey questionnaire consisted of a series of questions which asked for data, primarily statistical, on the main components of the country's criminal justice system, for the given time period of the wave of data collection. To date, there have been ten waves of data collection. Crime variables include counts of recorded crime for homicide, assault, rape, robbery, theft, burglary, fraud, embezzlement, drug trafficking, drug possession, bribery, and corruption. There are also counts of suspects, persons prosecuted, persons convicted, and prison admissions by crime, gender, and adult or juvenile status. Other variables include the population of the country and largest city, budgets and salaries for police, courts, and prisons, and types of sanctions, including imprisonment, corporal punishment, deprivation of liberty, control of freedom, warning, fine, and community sentence. The countries participating in the survey and the variables available vary across the ten waves. There are two versions of the Wave 2 data (Part 2: Wave 2a , 1975-1980; Part 3: Wave 2b, 1975-1980) because, for various reasons, the variables from Wave 1 and some variables from Wave 2 were combined into one dataset. Similarly, some variables from Wave 2 were combined into one dataset with the variables from Wave 3. For this study, the combined Wave 1 and Wave 2 dataset was separated into Parts 1 and 2 (Wave 1, 1970-1975, and Wave 2a, 1976-1980, respectively) and the combined Wave 2 and Wave 3 dataset was separated into Parts 3 and 4 (Wave 2b, 1975-1980, and Wave 3, 1980-1986, respectively). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26462.v1 acquittals icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug traffic icpsr embezzlement icpsr fraud icpsr international crime statistics icpsr larceny icpsr assault icpsr law enforcement icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr police reports icpsr population characteristics icpsr prosecution icpsr punishment icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr burglary icpsr sentencing icpsr trends icpsr United Nations icpsr convictions (law) icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26462 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26462.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20741 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20741 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2003 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20741 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gather data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. Data refer to prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), or released from parole (Part 3) in 2003. Variables include incarceration history, current offenses, and total time served. Background information on individuals includes year of birth, sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and educational attainment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20741.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20741 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20741.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08918 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08918 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1985 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 8918 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 40 states, the Federal Prison System, and the California Youth Authority. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08918.v1 national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8918 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08918.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04345 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04345 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2002 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4345 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gather data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. Data refer to prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), or released from parole (Part 3) in 2002. Variables include incarceration history, current offenses, and total time served. Background information on individuals includes year of birth, sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and educational attainment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04345.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4345 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04345.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04052 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04052 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2001 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4052 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gather data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. Data refer to prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), or released from parole (Part 3) in 2001. Variables include incarceration history, current offenses, and total time served. Background information on individuals includes year of birth, sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and educational attainment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04052.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4052 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04052.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03761 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03761 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 2000 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3761 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gather data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. Data refer to prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), or released from parole (Part 3) in 2000. Variables include incarceration history, current offenses, and total time served. Background information on individuals includes year of birth, sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and educational attainment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03761.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3761 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03761.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09849 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09849 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1989 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9849 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 36 states, as well as the Federal Prison System, the California Youth Authority, and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09849.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9849 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09849.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09450 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09450 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1988 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9450 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 36 states, as well as the Federal Prison System, the California Youth Authority, and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09450.v3 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9450 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09450.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09402 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09402 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1987 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9402 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 35 states, as well as the Federal Prison System and the California Youth Authority, and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09402.v3 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9402 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09402.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08497 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08497 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1984 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8497 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 36 states and the Federal Prison System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08497.v3 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8497 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08497.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08363 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08363 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1983 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8363 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 32 states. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08363.v2 probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr correctional facilities icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8363 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08363.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06881 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06881 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1994 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6881 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gather data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. Data refer to prisoners who were admitted to prison, released from prison, or released from parole in 1994. Variables include incarceration history, current offenses, and total time served. Background information on individuals includes year of birth, sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and educational attainment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06881.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6881 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06881.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06823 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06823 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1993 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6823 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 38 states, as well as the Federal Prison System, the California Youth Authority, and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06823.v1 national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6823 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06823.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06400 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06400 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1992 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6400 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 38 states, as well as the Federal Prison System, the California Youth Authority, and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06400.v1 offenses icpsr parole icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6400 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06400.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06272 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06272 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1991 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6272 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 35 states, as well as the Federal Prison System, the California Youth Authority, and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06272.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6272 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06272.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06141 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06141 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1990 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 6141 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to provide a consistent and comprehensive description of convicted persons' entrance into and departure from correctional custody and correctional supervision. To accomplish this goal, data were gathered from official state prison records on topics such as race, sex, and age of inmates, length of time in jail, length of time in prison, and type of offense committed. The data were collected from the state prison systems of 35 states, as well as the Federal Prison System, the California Youth Authority, and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06141.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6141 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06141.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03339 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03339 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1999 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3339 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gather data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. Data refer to prisoners who were admitted to prison (Part 1), released from prison (Part 2), or released from parole (Part 3) in 1999. Variables include incarceration history, current offenses, and total time served. Background information on individuals includes year of birth, sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and educational attainment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03339.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3339 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03339.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03029 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03029 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3029 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gather data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. Data refer to prisoners who were admitted to prison, released from prison, or released from parole in 1998. Variables include incarceration history, current offenses, and total time served. Background information on individuals includes year of birth, sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and educational attainment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03029.v1 jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3029 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03029.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02613 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02613 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2613 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gather data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. Data refer to prisoners who were admitted to prison, released from prison, or released from parole in 1997. Variables include incarceration history, current offenses, and total time served. Background information on individuals includes year of birth, sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and educational attainment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02613.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2613 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02613.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02448 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02448 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1996 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 2448 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gather data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. Data refer to prisoners who were admitted to prison, released from prison, or released from parole in 1996. Variables include incarceration history, current offenses, and total time served. Background information on individuals includes year of birth, sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and educational attainment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02448.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2448 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02448.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02194 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02194 MiAaI MiAaI National Corrections Reporting Program, 1995 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 2194 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gather data on prisoners entering and leaving the custody or supervision of state and federal authorities. Data refer to prisoners who were admitted to prison, released from prison, or released from parole in 1995. Variables include incarceration history, current offenses, and total time served. Background information on individuals includes year of birth, sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and educational attainment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02194.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr correctional system icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2194 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02194.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR24641 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR24641 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Individual Reporting-Level Data, 2007 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-01-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 24641 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the Nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2007 Annual Survey of Jails is the 20th such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2007. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including Federal and State agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 29, 2007. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24641.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections DSDR VI. Population Characteristics United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 24641 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24641.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26602 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26602 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Jail Facilities, 2006 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-01-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 26602 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. To reduce respondent burden and improve data quality and timeliness, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) split the jail census into two parts: The Census of Jail Inmates was conducted with a reference date of June 30, 2005. The following spring it was followed by this enumeration, the Census of Jail Facilities, which collected data as of March 31, 2006. Previous jail enumerations were conducted in 1970 (ICPSR 7641), 1972 (ICPSR 7638), 1978 (ICPSR 7737), 1983 (ICPSR 8203), 1988 (ICPSR 9256), 1993 (ICPSR 6648), and 1999 (ICPSR 3318). The United States Census Bureau collected the data for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The 2006 Census of Jail Facilities gathered data from all jail detention facilities holding inmates beyond arraignment, a period normally exceeding 72 hours. Jail facilities were operated by cities and counties, by private entities under contract to correctional authorities, and by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). Excluded from the census were physically separate temporary holding facilities such as drunk tanks and police lockups that do not hold persons after being formally charged in court. Also excluded were state-operated facilities in Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Alaska, which have combined jail-prison systems. Fifteen independently operated jails in Alaska were included in the Census. The census collected jurisdictional level information on the number of confined inmates; average daily population; number of separate jail facilities; renovation and building plans; court orders and consent decrees; staff by occupational category and race/ethnicity; jail programs; and costs of operation. The census also collected individual jail facility information on the purpose for which the jail held offenders; gender of the inmates authorized to house; functions, such as general adult population confinement, work release, and medical treatment; whether a separate temporary holding area or lockup was operated; rated capacity; number of confined inmates by gender and adult or juvenile status; year of original construction; and whether the facility ever had a major renovation. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26602.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional officers icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr census data icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr personnel icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections DSDR VI. Population Characteristics United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26602 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26602.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03318 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03318 MiAaI MiAaI National Jail Census, 1999 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2009-07-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3318 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1999 Census of Jails is the seventh in a series of data collection efforts aimed at studying the nation's locally administered jails. Previous censuses were conducted in 1970, 1972, 1978, 1983, 1988, and 1993. The 1999 census enumerated 3,365 locally administered confinement facilities that held inmates beyond arraignment and were staffed by municipal or county employees. Among these were 47 privately operated jails under contract for local governments and 42 regional jails that were operated for two or more jail authorities. In addition, the census identified 11 facilities maintained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons that functioned as jails. The nationwide total of the number of jails in operation on June 30, 1999, was 3,376. For purposes of this data collection, a local jail was defined as a locally operated adult detention facility that receives individuals pending arraignment and holds them awaiting trial, conviction, or sentencing, readmits probation, parole, and bail-bond violators and absconders, temporarily detains juveniles pending transfer to juvenile authorities, holds mentally ill persons pending their movement to appropriate health facilities, holds individuals for the military, for protective custody, for contempt, and for the courts as witnesses, releases convicted inmates to the community upon completion of sentence, transfers inmates to federal, state, or other authorities, houses inmates for federal, state, or other authorities because of crowding of their facilities, relinquishes custody of temporary detainees to juvenile and medical authorities, operates community-based programs with day-reporting, home detention, electronic monitoring, or other types of supervision, and holds inmates sentenced to short terms. Variables include information on jail population by legal status, age and sex of prisoners, maximum sentence, admissions and releases, available services and programs, structure and capacity, facility age and use of space, expenditure, employment, staff information, and health issues, which include statistics on drugs, AIDS, and tuberculosis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03318.v3 census data icpsr jails icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3318 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03318.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07639 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07639 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facility Census, 1973 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-06-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7639 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey provides information on the characteristics and administration of juvenile detention and correctional facilities. Six types of facilities are covered in this study: (1) detention centers, (2) shelters, (3) reception or diagnostic centers, (4) ranches, forestry camps, and farms, (5) halfway houses and group homes, and (6) training schools. Survey items include facility capacity, number of full-and part-time staff, number of admissions and discharges, average quarterly population, and expenditures by the facility. Data for facility residents include age and sex, and average length of stay. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07639.v3 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr juvenile delinquency icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7639 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07639.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20349 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20349 MiAaI MiAaI Neuropsychological and Emotional Deficits as Predictors of Correctional Treatment Response in Maryland, 2003-2005 [electronic resource] RTI International 2008-03-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 20349 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The study was designed to elucidate underlying neuropsychological and emotional regulatory mechanisms in variable responses to a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program among prison inmates. This study tested the hypotheses that performance deficits in executive cognitive function (ECF) tasks and emotional responses will characterize aggressive and disruptive inmates and predict treatment response. All subjects were examined using noninvasive behavioral, psychological, ECF, and hormone tests. The data contain a total of 232 cases. Inmates volunteering to participate in the cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program offered by the Maryland correctional system were recruited from three facilities using a pseudo-random selection procedure during intake into the program. Consenting inmates received an extensive baseline testing battery of several complementary dimensions of higher order neuropsychological functions as well as conditions that influence them: (1) three ECF tasks and one emotional perception task, (2) collection of salivary cortisol during an acute stress task and the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) taken beforehand, (3) a short general neuropsychological test, (4) three psychological questionnaires, (5) an historical inventory to assess prior drug use and child and family background, and (6) a treatment readiness, responsivity, and gain scale. An events inventory and a success inventory were also administered. Several additional tests were administered repeatedly throughout treatment. A record review was conducted after program completion to ascertain incidents of institutional misconduct as well as treatment performance outcomes. Variables include IQ, demographics, background information, prior drug use, early trauma, psychopathy, aggression, stressful events, success, reactions to provocation, treatment readiness, emotional perception/regulation, executive cognitive performance, cortisol measures, treatment gain, treatment responsivity, treatment completion, Maryland Offender Based State Correctional Information System (OBSCIS) data, institutional infractions, segregations, and several other computed variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20349.v1 addiction icpsr aggression icpsr behavior modification icpsr behavior problems icpsr cognitive processes icpsr correctional facilities icpsr decision making icpsr emotional states icpsr evaluation icpsr human behavior icpsr inmates icpsr intervention strategies icpsr personality assessment icpsr program evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr treatment programs icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RTI International Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20349 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20349.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03882 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03882 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2000 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-03-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3882 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03882.v1 correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3882 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03882.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04635 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04635 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2003 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-03-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4635 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04635.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4635 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04635.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20348 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20348 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of Drug Treatment Programs at the State Correctional Institution in Chester, Pennsylvania, 2003-2004 [electronic resource] Wayne N. Welsh 2007-12-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20348 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment programs at a specialized treatment prison, the State Correctional Institution (SCI) at Chester, Pennsylvania. The Chester prison is a 1,215-bed medium security prison for male inmates with a documented history of substance abuse. Programs included an intensive, 12-month therapeutic community (TC) drug treatment for high-need inmates and a 12-month outpatient (OP) program for inmates requiring less intensive treatment. Inmates who met eligibility criteria for the Chester facility were randomly assigned to the TC (n = 347) or OP (n = 384) program. The researchers utilized individual measures and outcome measures in this study. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20348.v1 correctional facilities icpsr drug treatment icpsr inmates icpsr program evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Welsh, Wayne N. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20348 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20348.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09445 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09445 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, 1988-1989 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2007-10-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 9445 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the population and characteristics of public and private juvenile facilities in operation in the United States on February 15, 1989. Annual data for the 1988 calendar year are included as well. Questions designed to categorize each facility were asked concerning the number of adults held, the juvenile majority's custodial authority, reason for custody, and access to the community, as well as the facility's security arrangements, capacity, age, plans for renovation, type of administration, and setting. Extensive data on the total juvenile residential population of each facility was also gathered. The total population is broken down by admission type, legal status, type of offense, race, and age. The collection also contains information on the population's movement and average length of stay, as well as each facility's average daily population, number and types of personnel, educational, treatment, and medical programs available, annual expenditures, court orders and consent decrees, number of juvenile deaths that year, and availability of juvenile records. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09445.v3 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr offenses icpsr restitution centers icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9445 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09445.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09824 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09824 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, 1990-1991 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2007-10-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9824 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the population and characteristics of public and private juvenile facilities in operation in the United States on February 15, 1991. Annual data for the 1990 calendar year are included as well. Questions designed to categorize each facility were asked concerning the number of adults held, the juvenile majority's custodial authority, reason for custody, and access to the community, as well as the facility's security arrangements, capacity, age, plans for renovation, type of administration, and setting. Extensive data on the total juvenile residential population of each facility was also gathered. The total population is broken down by admission type, legal status, type of offense, race, and age. The collection also contains information on the population's movement and average length of stay, as well as each facility's average daily population, personnel by race, number, and staff position, educational, treatment, and medical programs available, annual expenditures, court orders and consent decrees, and number of juvenile deaths that year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09824.v2 offenses icpsr restitution centers icpsr status offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9824 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09824.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06491 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06491 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, 1992-1993 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2007-09-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6491 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the population and characteristics of public and private juvenile facilities in operation in the United States on February 16, 1993. Annual data for the 1992 calendar year are included as well. Questions designed to categorize each facility were asked of facility administrators concerning the number of adults held, the juvenile majority's custodial authority, reason for custody, and access to the community, as well as the facility's security arrangements, capacity, age, plans for renovation, type of administration, and setting. Extensive data on the total juvenile residential population of each facility were also gathered. The total population is broken down by admission type, legal status, type of offense, race, and age. The collection also contains information on the population's movement and average length of stay, as well as each facility's average daily population, personnel by race, number, and staff position, educational, treatment, and medical programs available, annual expenditures, court orders and consent decrees, and number of juvenile deaths that year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06491.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr offenses icpsr restitution centers icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6491 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06491.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20367 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20367 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Jail Inmates [electronic resource] Individual-Level Data, 2005 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2007-07-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20367 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Jail Inmates is the eighth in a series of data collection efforts aimed at studying the nation's locally-administered jails. Beginning in 2005, the National Jail Census was broken out into two collections. The 2005 Census of Jail Inmates (CJI) collects data on the facilities' supervised populations, inmate counts and movements, and persons supervised in the community. The forthcoming 2006 Census of Jail Facilities collects information on staffing levels, programming, and facility policies. Previous censuses were conducted in 1970, 1972, 1978, 1983, 1988, 1993, and 1999. The 2005 CJI enumerated 2,960 locally administered confinement facilities that held inmates beyond arraignment and were staffed by municipal or county employees. Among these were 42 privately-operated jails under contract to local governments and 65 regional jails that were operated for two or more jail authorities. In addition, the census identified 12 facilities maintained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons that functioned as jails. These 12 facilities, together with the 2,960 nonfederal facilities, brought the number of jails in operation on June 30, 2005, to a nationwide total of 2,972. The CJI supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, crowding issues, growth in the population supervised in the community, and changes in methods of community supervision. The CJI also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-United States citizens in custody. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20367.v1 census data icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20367 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20367.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20368 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20368 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2006 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2007-07-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20368 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20368.v1 correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr correctional system icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20368 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20368.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20200 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20200 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2004 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2007-07-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20200 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20200.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20200 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20200.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04572 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04572 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2007-02-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4572 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey provides nationally representative data on inmates held in state prisons and federally-owned and operated prisons. Through personal interviews conducted from October 2003 through May 2004, inmates in both state and federal prisons provided information about their current offense and sentence, criminal history, family background and personal characteristics, prior drug and alcohol use and treatment programs, gun possession and use, and prison activities, programs, and services. Prior surveys of State prison inmates were conducted in 1974, 1979, 1986, 1991, and 1997. Sentenced federal prison inmates were interviewed in the 1991 and 1997 surveys. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04572.v1 criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr HIV icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmate deaths icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr offenses icpsr prison conditions icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr corrections icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4572 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04572.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04556 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04556 MiAaI MiAaI Ethno-Methodological Study of the Subculture of Prison Inmate Sexuality in the United States, 2004-2005 [electronic resource] Mark S. Fleisher , Jessie L. Krienert 2006-12-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4556 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study of prison rapes used an ethnographic, culturally relativistic methodology and was conducted between April 2004 and September 2005. The study was conducted in 30 correctional institutions, 23 men's and 7 women's, in 10 states. All 23 men's institutions were the highest-security level men's prison available in each state. When women's institutions were multi-security level and housed minimum, medium, and high-security inmates, they were selected from the highest-security level housing units within the institution. A total of 564 (409 male and 155 female) inmates were interviewed. The inmates to be interviewed were selected from the general prison population using a probability sample design. Average interview length was just under an hour. The sole mode of data collection was an open-ended, semistructured inmate interview. To ensure comparability of answers, surveys were designed with each query resting on a particular concept or variable. The same interview instrument was used for both male and female inmates. Questions were asked about inmate prison history, mental health, rape, social process, domestic violence and relationships, staff, institutional factors, and perception of social roles, and demographic information. Also included are lexical responses and free list questions such as "Why do inmates have sex with other inmates?" Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04556.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional guards icpsr female inmates icpsr inmate attitudes icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmates icpsr male inmates icpsr perceptions icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison security icpsr prison violence icpsr sexual assault icpsr sexual attitudes icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Fleisher, Mark S. Krienert, Jessie L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4556 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04556.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04439 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04439 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Tribal Justice Agencies, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-07-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4439 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The study compiles data on the law enforcement, courts and administration, corrections and intermediate sanctions, criminal history records, and justice statistics of the federally recognized American Indian tribal governing bodies. The data determine which tribes have sworn law enforcement personnel and the source of authority, what the number and type of tribal court systems are, who performs the tribal detention function and what types of sanctions are imposed. It also looks at whether tribes have access to state and national criminal record systems. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04439.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections icpsr corrections management icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment programs icpsr RCMD IX.F. Native American ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD IX. Police United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4439 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04439.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04428 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04428 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2002 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-04-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4428 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04428.v1 correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4428 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04428.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03206 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03206 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of Three Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Programs in Ohio, 1998-1999 [electronic resource] Edward Latessa , Betsy Fulton , Jennifer Pealer 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3206 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. were collected on terminated cases from the date of release until August 30, 1999. Part 1, MonDay Data, consists of data from the LSI, ASUS, and intake, termination, and follow-up forms for offenders at MonDay. The LSI scores provided are: criminal history, employment, financial, family, accommodation, leisure and recreation, companion, alcohol and drug, emotions, attitude/orientation, and total. The ASUS variable measures severity of substance abuse problems and distinguishes between scores of 74 or less and 75 or higher. The intake form provides demographic variables, employment status prior to arrest, variables related to the current offense, date screened for RSAT, date placed in RSAT, criminal history, and substance use history. The discharge form provides variables on date of discharge, type of discharge, living arrangements upon discharge, whether continued drug/alcohol treatment was arranged for client, and criminal justice placement. The follow-up form provides variables on substance abuse treatment after release, other services received after release, employment status, reporting status, drug and alcohol tests after release, whether the offender was arrested after release and for what offense, whether a conviction resulted, and the offender's probation status. Several derived variables are also supplied in Part 1. Part 2, MonDay Client Self Rating Scales Data, includes the offender's date of placement, date of birth, the three dates on which the questionnaire was administered, whether inconsistencies appeared in answers to the questionnaires, and several scales derived from offenders' answers. These scales, which are provided for each of the three occasions the questionnaire was administered, include measures of anxiety, depression, self-esteem, decision-making, risk-taking, hostility, self-efficacy, and antisocial attitudes. Several derived variables are also included. Part 3, MonDay Personal Drug Use Data, consists of variables from MonDay's PDUQ. Scales and answers to the 20 items on the PDUQ questionnaire are provided for all three administrations of the questionnaire. In Part 4, Mohican Data, variables from the MYC intake, termination, and follow-up forms are identical to those from the MonDay forms except for additional intake variables on whether the youth was in school prior to arrest, whether the youth experienced certain school problems, where the youth was living prior to arrest, and whether the youth had a record of running away from home. Variables provide the JASAE summary score, date of YO-LSI administration, and YO-LSI scores in the categories of criminal history, family, education, peer, substance abuse, leisure and recreation, personality and behavior, attitudes/orientation, and total. For each YO-LSI score category an additional variable is provided that indicates whether the score was low, moderate, or high. Several derived variables are also provided. Part 5, Mohican Personal Drug Use Data, consists of scale variables calculated from responses to the MYC PDUQ for both administrations of the questionnaire. These scales are precontemplation, contemplation, determination, action, and maintenance. Part 6, Noble Data, consists of variables from Noble Choices intake, termination, and PII questionnaires. Variables from the intake and termination forms are identical to those taken from the MonDay intake and termination forms. Variables from the PII include scale variables that measure truthfulness, adjustment, judgment, alcohol, drug, antisocial attitudes, violence, distress, self-esteem, and stress. For each of these scales an additional variable is provided that indicates whether scores were low, medium, high, or maximum. Several derived variables are also provided. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03206.v1 correctional facilities icpsr counseling icpsr felons icpsr inmate programs icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr offender profiles icpsr process evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Latessa, Edward Fulton, Betsy Pealer, Jennifer Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3206 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03206.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03075 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03075 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of Pennsylvania's Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Program for Drug-Involved Parole Violators, 1998 [electronic resource] Douglas Young , Rachel Porter 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3075 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was a process evaluation of Pennsylvania's two Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) programs in their first year of implementation. These programs were maintained through the joint management of the state Department of Corrections (DOC), Board of Probation and Parole, Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, and two private sector providers that operated the programs. Opened in early 1998 in two correctional facilities for men, each of these programs could serve up to 60 male technical parole violators (TPVs) with a history of substance abuse. Instead of the nine- to 36-month terms typical for parolees recommitted for violations, RSAT participants served six months in prison-based intensive therapeutic communities (TCs), followed by six months of aftercare in a DOC-sponsored Community Corrections Center (CCC), similar to a halfway house. Both programs took a cognitive-behavioral approach to drug treatment. This study focused on the prison-based component of the RSAT programs. It examined the extent to which components of RSAT treatment were in place and the integrity of program operations. Interviews for this study were conducted between February and December 1998. At intake, program staff interviewed RSAT participants (Part 1, Intake Data), and Vera Institute of Justice onsite researchers conducted participant interviews upon exit (Part 2, Exit Data). Through December 31, 1998, 160 intake interviews and 77 exit interviews with program graduates were administered. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03075.v1 aftercare icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug treatment icpsr parole violation icpsr parolees icpsr process evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr treatment programs icpsr treatment outcome icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Young, Douglas Porter, Rachel Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3075 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03075.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02975 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02975 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of the Michigan Department of Corrections Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program, 1999 [electronic resource] James Austin , Dedel Johnson, Kelly , Wendy Naro 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 2975 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was a process evaluation of the Michigan Department of Corrections' (MDOC) residential substance abuse treatment (RSAT) program at the Cooper Street Correctional Facility in Jackson, Michigan. The 272-bed program was designed to treat male, minimum-custody inmates with a history of serious chemical dependency. The phase of treatment at the Jackson Cooper Street facility lasted six months, and was followed by a 12-month aftercare component. The main theory of change behind the program was that education about drugs and their physical, familial, and social effects, coupled with opportunities to learn about recovery and identify triggers for substance use, would help substance-abusing offenders to avoid both substance abuse and criminal behaviors once released into the community. This study used multiple data sources. Part 1, Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) Data, was acquired from the MDOC's Correctional Management Information System, which included demographic, criminal history, programming, and institutional misconduct information for a snapshot of the entire inmate population. These data provided information on all 44,061 inmates in the custody of MDOC on July 1, 1999. Part 2, RSAT Applications data, contains data for the 834 applications received by August 30, 1999. These data were received from University of Michigan (UM) researchers studying the long-term impact of the RSAT program on offender substance abuse and recidivism. The data were collected using a screening form for each application, and were initially generated and entered into an electronic format by RSAT program staff. Part 3, Service Tracking Data, contains RSAT admission and parole data, which were manually collected. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02975.v1 aftercare icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug education icpsr drug treatment icpsr inmate programs icpsr process evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Austin, James Dedel Johnson, Kelly Naro, Wendy Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2975 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02975.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02887 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02887 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at the W.J. Maxey Boys Training School in Michigan, 1995-1998 [electronic resource] William C. Birdsall , Maureen Okasinski 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 2887 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was an evaluation of a Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program intended to reduce substance abuse and recidivism among youth placed at the W.J. Maxey Boys Training School in Michigan. The purposes of the evaluation were to describe the activities of the RSAT program and the relationship between program participants and success in the new program. There were five primary evaluation questions: (1) Were the participants appropriate? (2) Was the staff trained to deliver the planned services? (3) How did service delivery vary over time? (4) Did the participants make timely progress? and (5) What organizational factors changed service delivery and participant progress? Residents were admitted to the RSAT program and its comparison group on the basis of three criteria: (1) the resident was not a sex offender, (2) he had a known substance abuse history, and (3) he was expected to be released within one year. Youth in the RSAT program underwent intensive substance abuse psycho-education and relapse prevention in addition to the treatment provided in the Maxey Model. Intake data from the Family Independence Agency Information System (Part 1) were gathered for youths who entered Maxey between 1995 and 1998. These data were used to determine if significant differences existed between the RSAT and comparison groups. Additional data were collected through a client survey (Parts 2 and 3), which included questions that evaluated youth satisfaction with services and their predictions for success. Variables in Part 1 include program admission date, whether the youth was a sex offender, substance abuse history, the group and wing to which the youth belonged, age of first offense, age of admission to Maxey, offense class, number of arrests, number of previous placements, number of truancies, legal status, and date of first and second offense. Demographic variables include race, age, marital status, and county. Variables in Parts 2 and 3 assess the youth's opinions about school, food, group sessions, hall staff, family sessions, family visits, the overall program at Maxey, teachers, police, and judges. Additional variables include last grade of school completed, expected educational goal upon leaving Maxey, family substance abuse history, and prevalence of substance abuse in neighborhood. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02887.v1 correctional facilities icpsr drug abuse icpsr process evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Birdsall, William C. Okasinski, Maureen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2887 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02887.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02765 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02765 MiAaI MiAaI Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Kyle, Texas, 1993-1995 [electronic resource] Kevin Knight , Matthew Hiller , D. Dwayne Simpson 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 2765 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. drug use, and arrests within the last six months, whether the counselor was easy to talk to, helped in motivating or building confidence, or assisted in making a treatment plan, whether the respondent felt a sense of family or closeness, if his family got along, enjoyed being together, got drunk together, used drugs together, or had arguments or fights, if the respondent had a job in the last six months to a year and if he enjoyed working, whether he was on time for his job, whether he had new friends or associated with old friends, and which specific drugs he had used in the last six months (e.g., hallucinogens, heroin, methadone, or other opiates). Part 10 (Treatment Background Data, Comparison Group): Treatment condition of the comparison group. Part 11 (Educational Demographic Data, Comparison Group): Whether respondents completed a GED and their highest grade completed. Parts 12 and 13 (Six-Month Follow-Up Interview Data, Comparison Group, and One-Year Follow-Up Interview Data, Comparison Group): How important church was to the respondent, whether the respondent had any educational or vocational training, if he had friends that had used drugs, got drunk, dealt drugs, or had been arrested, if within the last six months to a year the respondent had been arrested for drug use, drug sales, forgery, fencing, gambling, burglary, robbery, sexual offense, arson, or vandalism, whether drugs or alcohol affected the respondent's health, relations, attitude, attention, or ability to work, whether the respondent experienced symptoms of withdrawal, the number of drug treatment programs and AA or CA meetings the respondent attended, whether the respondent received help from parents, siblings, or other relatives, if treatment was considered helpful, and risky behavior engaged in (e.g., sharing needles, using dirty needles, and unprotected sex). Parts 14 and 16 (Probation Officer Data, Six-Month Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group, and Probation Officer Data, One-Year Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Date of departure from prison, supervision level, number of treatment team meetings, whether there was evidence of job hunting, problems with transportation, child care, or finding work, number of drug tests in the last six months, times tested positive for marijuana, cocaine, heroin, opiates, crack, or other drugs, and number of arrests, charges, convictions, and technicals. Parts 15 and 17 (Hair Specimen Data, Six-Month Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group, and Hair Specimen Data, One-Year Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Hair collection and its source at the six-month follow-up (Part 15) and one-year follow-up (Part 17) and whether parolee was positive or negative for cocaine or opiates. Part 18 (Texas Department of Public Safety Data, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Dates of first, second, and third offenses, if parolee was arrested, and first, second, and third offenses from the National Crime Information Center. Part 19 (Texas Department of Criminal Justice Data, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Treatment condition, date of release, race, and a Texas Department of Criminal Justice Salient Factor Risk Score. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02765.v2 recidivism icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr process evaluation icpsr addiction icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug use icpsr inmate programs icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Knight, Kevin Hiller, Matthew Simpson, D. Dwayne Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2765 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02765.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03153 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03153 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at the South Idaho Correctional Institution, 1999-2000 [electronic resource] Mary K. Stohr , Craig Hemmens 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3153 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study is a process evaluation of a Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program at the South Idaho Correctional Institution (SICI), addressing the following research questions: (1) Did the SICI RSAT program as delivered conform with its stated goals and objectives? (2) Did the program result in reduced recidivism, abstinence from drug and alcohol use, and reduced costs of incarceration? (3) Did the referral process identify the targeted population? (4) Would the SICI RSAT data, management, staffing, and design be suitably established within two years to allow for a full outcome evaluation? (5) Were there communication issues among the IDOC, Parole Commission, and contract providers that might interfere with program implementation and delivery? and (6) Were there any cooperative remedies that had been, or might be developed to address implementation and delivery difficulties? Researchers conducted field observations (Part 1, Observational Data) of program delivery by program leaders using both the Cognitive Change Program Module and the Minnesota Model-Based Chemical Dependency Treatment Modules in each of the three phases of the therapeutic community environment. Researchers administered questionnaires to inmates (Part 2, Inmate Interview Data) and staff (Part 3, Staff Interview Data) regarding their perceptions of program operations. Variables for Part 1 include the date and time of observation, nature of observation, clarity, organization, and substance of program delivery, the program leader's involvement and the quality of that involvement with inmates, how prepared the program leader was, and the general therapeutic atmosphere of the program. Demographic variables for Part 2 include the race, age, ethnicity, and level of education of each inmate. Other variables include use of alcohol and illegal drugs prior to incarceration, inmates' perceptions of the treatment personnel, their levels of involvement with the group meetings and cognitive self-change groups, the atmosphere of therapy, ratings of communication and delivery of treatment, quality of service, and the strengths and weaknesses of the RSAT program. Variables for Part 3 include staff's perceptions of the RSAT program and whether they felt the program content and delivery were well organized and easy to understand, perceptions of the program leader's preparation and involvement, perceptions of communication and consistency issues, the quality of service, and the strengths and weaknesses of the RSAT program. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03153.v1 correctional facilities icpsr drug treatment icpsr process evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr treatment programs icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Stohr, Mary K. Hemmens, Craig Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3153 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03153.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08684 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08684 MiAaI MiAaI Women Correctional Officers in California, 1979 [electronic resource] Herbert Holeman , Barbara J. Krepps-Hess 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8684 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined women correctional officers working in the 11 institutions for men operated by the California Department of Corrections in 1979. For Part 1, Census, researchers conducted a census of all 386 female correctional officers working in these institutions to collect demographic characteristics and baseline data. For Parts 2 (Staff) and 3 (Inmate), a survey was administered to staff and inmates asking their opinions about differences in performance between male and female correctional officers. Part 4, Profile, contains demographic and background data for the officers participating in the Part 2 survey. For Parts 5 (Female) and 6 (Male), researchers gathered job performance data for female correctional officers in 7 of the 11 institutions, as well as a matched sample of male correctional officers. Variables in Parts 1 and 4-6 include demographic information such as age, ethnicity, marital status, number of children, and educational and occupational history. Other variables measure attributes such as age, weight, and height, and record career information such as date and location of permanent assignment as a correctional officer, any breaks in service, and other criminal justice work experience. Additional variables in Parts 5 and 6 include job performance measures, such as ratings on skills, knowledge, work habits, learning ability, overall work habits, quality and quantity of work, and commendations. Parts 2 and 3 present information on staff and inmate evaluations of male and female correctional officers performing specific roles, such as control work officer, yard officer, or security squad officer. Additional variables include opinions on how well male and female officers handled emergency situations, maintained control under stress, and used firearms when necessary. Questions were also asked about whether inmates' or officers' safety was endangered with female officers, whether women should be hired as correctional officers, and whether female officers were gaining acceptance in correctional facilities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08684.v2 correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr gender roles icpsr women icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Holeman, Herbert Krepps-Hess, Barbara J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8684 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08684.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08921 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08921 MiAaI MiAaI Prison Crowding and Forced Releases in Illinois, 1979-1982 [electronic resource] James Austin 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8921 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data were collected in the Illinois prison system where, in response to a prison overcrowding crisis, approximately two-thirds of the inmates released by the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) were discharged prior to serving their expected sentences. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of an early release program on prisoners, prison populations, offense rates, local criminal justice systems, and the general public. The files contain extensive Federal Bureau of Investigation arrest history information and other personal and social indicators describing inmates released from the state prison system. Data are available for three comparison groups: (1) a sample of prisoners who served their regular sentences prior to the "forced release" program, (2) a group that served regular sentences after implementation of the program, and (3) a group of inmates who were released early under the program (i.e., before serving their full sentences). The "inmate jacket file," which is the comprehensive institutional file maintained for all inmates, contains variables for each inmate on social and personal characteristics, criminal history, risk scales, court decisions for each offense, institutional conduct, prior release and return records, method of release, condition of supervision, and parole violation records. The arrest file includes variables that describe the type and number of charges at arrest, case disposition of each charge, probation length, incarceration length, admission and release dates, and release type. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08921.v1 arrests icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmates icpsr parole system icpsr probation icpsr socioeconomic indicators icpsr United States icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Austin, James Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8921 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08921.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03579 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03579 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Program at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, 1999 [electronic resource] Todd C. Campbell 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3579 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of this process evaluation was to evaluate the integrity of the Minnesota Correctional Facility (MCF)-Red Wing Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program service delivery system in order to (1) provide feedback designed to enhance the existing strengths of the RSAT program and improve any existing or potential weaknesses, and (2) prepare for a subsequent outcome evaluation. The process evaluation data consist of two administrations of the Correctional Institution Environment Scale (CIES) (Parts 1 and 2) and three rounds of Rating of Facilitation of RSAT Groups (Parts 3-5). Resident-participants in this study were male juvenile offenders incarcerated at the MCF-Red Wing who had been determined to have significant substance abuse problems as an aspect of their delinquency. A total of 69 residents participated in the RSAT program during the course of the evaluation. All RSAT program residents were required to participate in all aspects of the program. Four caseworkers, one chemical dependency counselor, and two teachers participated in all aspects of the process evaluation. Ten corrections officers and three administrators participated in the CIES administration. There are four forms of the Correctional Institution Environment Scale (CIES): (1) The Real Form (Form R), (2) the Short Form (Form S), (3) the Ideal Form (Form I), and (4) the Expectations Form (Form E). Form R and Form I were employed in this study. Form R measures resident and staff perceptions of the current or "actual" climate of the program. Form I is worded to allow residents and staff to answer questions in terms of an ideal program. Both forms are comprised of 90 true-false statements. The CIES was administered twice for this study, with the first administration in September 1999. Participants in this administration of the CIES were 28 residents of the Princeton Cottage (the cottage that housed the RSAT participants) and 12 staff (administrators, caseworkers, and corrections officers). The second administration was in December 1999. Participants in this administration were 25 residents of the Princeton Cottage and 10 staff (administrators, caseworkers, and corrections officers). The surveys were collected and sent to Marquette University investigators for scoring and interpretation. An extensive evaluation of group facilitation was undertaken, with all groups videotaped between May 1999 and September 1999. These videotapes were shipped to Marquette University for review. In total, 122 videotapes were reviewed and rated. Two randomly selected raters evaluated each tape on the 22-item Red Wing Global Scale developed for this evaluation. The primary components of the sessions evaluated by the rating scale involved (1) the adherence of the facilitators to the treatment model, (2) the skill level of the facilitators, and (3) the contribution of the residents to the group processes. Following training, the raters began rating the videotapes in a progression of three rounds (each round consisting of a month) conducted in June, August, and October of 1999. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03579.v1 correctional facilities icpsr counseling services icpsr inmate programs icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr process evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment icpsr treatment facilities icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Campbell, Todd C. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3579 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03579.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08437 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08437 MiAaI MiAaI Improving Correctional Classification, New York, 1981-1983 [electronic resource] Kevin Wright 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8437 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. There were three specific goals of this research. The first was to evaluate three procedures currently available for the classification of correctional inmates: the Risk Analysis method, Megargee's Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Typology, and Toch's Prison Preference Inventory. Second, the research devised and tested a postdictive model of adjustment to prison life. Third, a new classification scheme was developed for predicting inmate adjustment to prison life that considers individual and organizational (contextual) factors and various interactions between the two. These data were collected from a sample of 942 volunteer inmates from ten New York state correctional facilities, five of which were maximum security and five of which were medium security facilities. Only one-half of the original 942 inmates completed the MMPI. Background and questionnaire data were collected during the summer and fall of 1983. Outcome data on each inmate infraction were collected for a three-year period prior to that time. Each case in Part 1, Merged Survey Response File [PPQ, PEI, PAQ], represents survey response data from an individual inmate, with variables from the Prison Preference Questionnaire (PPQ), the Prison Environment Inventory (PEI), and the Prison Adjustment Questionnaire (PAQ). Cases in Part 2, Medical Records, are records of medical contacts and diagnoses of inmates' illnesses. Part 3, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, contains personality assessment information and scores for each individual offender. Data in Part 4, Sample Data [Background Characteristics], consist of individual-based variables covering inmates' background characteristics. Part 5, Offenses and Disciplinary Action Records, contains records of offenses and disciplinary action by individual offender. The client number is unique and consistent across all data files. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08437.v1 criminal justice system icpsr correctional facilities icpsr health icpsr inmates icpsr mental health icpsr United States icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Wright, Kevin Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8437 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08437.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06945 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06945 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations World Crime Surveys [electronic resource] Fourth Survey, 1986-1990 United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6945 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Fourth United Nations Survey, covering the years 1986-1990, was designed to increase knowledge regarding the incidence of reported crime and the structure of criminal justice systems, as a basis for improving the international exchange of information. The main objectives of the survey were to determine which data are generally available in national databases and to provide an instrument for strengthening cooperation among member states of the United Nations by putting the review and analysis of national crime-related data in a broader context. Variables describe combined police and prosecution expenditure by year and by country, number of police personnel by gender, total number of homicides by country and by city, number of assaults, rapes, robberies, thefts, burglaries, frauds, and embezzlements, amount of drug crime, number of people formally charged with crime, age of suspects, number and gender of prosecutors, number of individuals prosecuted and the types of crimes prosecuted for, gender and age of individuals prosecuted, types of courts, number of individuals convicted and acquitted, numbers sentenced to capital punishment and to various other punishments, number of convictions on various charges, number of individuals sentenced and in detention, number of prisoners, sentence lengths, and prison demographics. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06945.v1 trends icpsr United Nations icpsr acquittals icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr convictions (law) icpsr courts icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug related crimes icpsr embezzlement icpsr fraud icpsr homicide icpsr international crime statistics icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr police reports icpsr population characteristics icpsr prosecution icpsr punishment icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sanctions icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6945 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06945.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03102 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03102 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at the Illinois Youth Center, St. Charles, 1999-2000 [electronic resource] Ernest L. Cowles , Laura Gransky Dorman 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3102 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. As part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Congress provided funding for the development of substance abuse treatment programs in state and local correctional facilities with the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) for State Prisoners Formula Grant Program. To be eligible for this funding, programs were required to last between six and 12 months, be provided in residential treatment facilities set apart from the general correctional population, be directed at the inmate's substance abuse problems, and be intended to develop the inmate's cognitive, behavioral, social, vocational, and other skills to address substance abuse and related problems. The Illinois Youth Center (IYC) in St. Charles started an RSAT program on September 30, 1999. The primary emphasis of this process evaluation was to describe why and how the St. Charles RSAT program was designed, implemented, and operated. To a lesser degree, attention was also directed toward examining the effects of program participation on offender pre-release behavior. This was considered to be a primary indicator of program impact. This project sought to answer the following research questions: (1) Did the program fit within the institutional environment? (2) Was the program operating as a therapeutic community? (3) Were the appropriate offenders selected for program participation? and (4) Were any short-term impacts evident within the youth? This study followed a process evaluation design with a focus on determining how a product or outcome was produced, rather than on assessing the product or outcome itself. Information in this data collection was collected from youth participants and youth files. Subjects consisted of the 44 youths who began the RSAT program in 1999 (the treatment group), as well as a matched sample of non-program participants (the comparison group). The comparison group was used to contrast institutional behavior of youths not in the treatment program and to establish a non-treatment cohort for an expected follow-up impact study. Part 1 contains data from two surveys of program youth only, and Parts 2-4 contained data on both program youth and the comparison group. Part 2 data were gathered from a review of the youths' master files at the correctional facility. Part 3 data were obtained from behavior action tickets (BATs), which were an institution-wide semi-formal mechanism to recognize positive and negative youth behavior. Part 4 data were collected from institutional disciplinary reports (IDRs). Part 1 surveyed youth about what they hoped to achieve in the RSAT program, whether they thought the program would help them, how well they understood the program, how they assessed their own substance abuse problems, what they liked and disliked about the program, their opinions about program staff, and their recommendations for changing the program. Demographic variables in Part 2 include age, race, and education level. Other variables record reading test scores, math test scores, IQ scores, location of parents, number of siblings, drug use and frequency, criminal history, types of prior substance abuse treatments, family history of drug use, suicidal ideations, and personality test scores. Part 3 contains monthly counts of positive and negative behavior action tickets. Part 4 contains information about the number and types of guilty institutional disciplinary reports, the severity of the offenses, and the number and types of punishments received. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03102.v1 correctional facilities icpsr drug treatment icpsr inmate programs icpsr intervention icpsr juvenile inmates icpsr program evaluation icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Cowles, Ernest L. Dorman, Laura Gransky Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3102 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03102.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02513 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02513 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations World Surveys on Crime Trends and Criminal Justice Systems, 1970-1994 [electronic resource] Restructured Five-Wave Data Burnham, R.W. , Burnham, Helen 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2513 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The United Nations International Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch began the Surveys of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (formerly known as the World Crime Surveys) in 1978. The goal of the data collection effort was to conduct a more focused inquiry into the incidence of crime worldwide. To date, there have been five quinquennial surveys, covering the years 1970-1975, 1975-1980, 1980-1986, 1986-1990, and 1990-1994, respectively. Starting with the 1980 data, the waves overlap by one year to allow for reliability and validity checks of the data. For this data collection, the original United Nations data were restructured into a standard contemporary file structure, with each file consisting of all data for one year. Naming conventions were standardized, and each country and each variable was given a unique identifying number. Crime variables include counts of recorded crime for homicide, assault, rape, robbery, theft, burglary, fraud, embezzlement, drug trafficking, drug possession, bribery, and corruption. There are also counts of suspects, persons prosecuted, persons convicted, and prison admissions by crime, gender, and adult or juvenile status. Other variables include the population of the country and largest city, budgets and salaries for police, courts, and prisons, and types of sanctions, including imprisonment, corporal punishment, deprivation of liberty, control of freedom, warning, fine, and community sentence. The countries participating in the survey and the variables available vary by year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02513.v1 acquittals icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr convictions (law) icpsr courts icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug traffic icpsr embezzlement icpsr fraud icpsr international crime statistics icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr police reports icpsr population characteristics icpsr prosecution icpsr punishment icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sanctions icpsr sentencing icpsr trends icpsr United Nations icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Burnham, R.W. Burnham, Helen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2513 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02513.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02788 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02788 MiAaI MiAaI National Study of Innovative and Promising Programs for Women Offenders, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] Merry Morash , Timothy Bynum 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2788 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. release centers, why it was possible to use intermediate sanctions, and how decisions were made to use intermediate sanctions. Variables dealing with funding and the provision of services to women include the type of private contractor or government agency that provided drug treatment, academic services, and vocational services to women, and the nature of the medical and food services provided to women. Variables unique to Part 2 pertain to the type of offender the jail housed, including whether the jurisdiction had a separate facility for pretrial or sentenced offenders, the total rated capacity of the jail, the average daily population of pretrial females, whether the jail was currently housing state inmates, and the impact on local inmates of being housed with state inmates. Variables concerning classification and assessment focused on the purpose of the classification process for female offenders, whether the classification process was different for male and female offenders, and a description of the process used. Variables specific to Part 3 deal with characteristics of the participants, such as whether program participants were involved in a case management system, the approximate number of women and men participating in the programs, whether offenders were tried and awaiting sentence or were on probation, and the number of hours a week that individuals participated in the program. Program structure variables include whether the program was culture- or gender-specific, restrictions on program participants, and who established the restrictions. Programming strategy variables cover identifying strategies used for meeting the needs of women offenders with short sentences, strategies for women with long sentences, and what stood in the way of greater use of intermediate sanctions. Part 4 contains variables on the size of the mental health program/unit, including the number of beds in the mental health unit, the number of beds set aside for different types of diagnoses, and the number of women served annually. Diagnosis variables provide information on who was responsible for screening women for mental health needs, whether women were re-evaluated at any time other than at intake, and the most common mental health problems of women in the unit. Variables on running the program include whether the program/unit worked with private or public hospitals, the factors that hindered coordination of services among local or state facilities, the types of services affected by budget constraints, and the strategies used to prevent women from harming themselves and others. Staffing variables cover the number of psychologists, social workers, nurses, and correctional officers that worked in the mental health unit. Demographic variables were similar for all four data files. These include the institution level, the type of respondent interviewed, respondents' gender and educational background, and the number of years they had been in their positions, were employed in corrections, and had worked in women's facilities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02788.v1 treatment programs icpsr child abuse icpsr correctional facilities icpsr female inmates icpsr female offenders icpsr inmate programs icpsr job training icpsr needs assessment icpsr parenting skills icpsr prerelease programs icpsr program evaluation icpsr self esteem icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Morash, Merry Bynum, Timothy Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2788 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02788.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06858 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06858 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates in Local Jails, 1996 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 6858 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides nationally representative data on persons held prior to trial and on convicted offenders serving sentences in local jails or awaiting transfer to state prisons. Data cover demographic characteristics of jail inmates (sex, race, ethnicity, Hispanic origin, employment), current offenses and sentences, detention status, trial, bail, characteristics of victims, criminal histories, incident characteristics, socioeconomic circumstances, jail conditions and activities, and prior drug and alcohol use and treatment. Part 1, Numeric Data, contains numeric data for all questions in the survey, while Part 2, Alphanumeric Data, consists of nonnumeric answers to the "Other, Specify" selection available for some of the questions. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06858.v1 offenses icpsr sentencing icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug use icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD V. Health and Well-Being RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6858 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06858.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02598 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02598 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities, 1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics , United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Prisons 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2598 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Conducted by the Bureau of the Census, this survey provides nationally representative data on state prison inmates and sentenced federal inmates held in federally owned and operated facilities. Through personal interviews from June-October 1997, inmates in both state and federal prisons provided information about their current offense and sentence, criminal history, family background and personal characteristics, prior drug and alcohol use and treatment programs, gun possession and use, gang membership, and prison activities, programs, and services. Prior surveys of state prison inmates, called SURVEY OF INMATES OF STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, were conducted in 1974, 1979, 1986, and 1991 (see ICPSR 7811, 7856, 8711, and 6086). Sentenced federal prison inmates were first interviewed in 1991 (see SURVEY OF INMATES OF FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, 1991 [ICPSR 6037]). The federal data are combined with the state data in this collection. Part 1, Numeric Data, consists of numerically-coded responses, while Part 2, Alphanumeric Data, contains free-field responses to "Specify, Other" questions in ASCII text form. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02598.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr corrections icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr HIV icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmate deaths icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr offenses icpsr prison conditions icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment programs icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Prisons Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2598 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02598.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02021 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02021 MiAaI MiAaI Work Release in the State of Washington, 1990-1993 [electronic resource] Susan Turner , Joan Petersilia 2006-03-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2021 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Work release programs allow selected prisoners nearing the end of their terms to work in the community, returning to correctional facilities or community residential facilities in nonworking hours. This project was designed as both a randomized and quasi-experimental field study to assess the effectiveness of work release in the Seattle area. It evaluated the impact of work release sentencing on recidivism and on corrections costs by comparing a sample of inmates who participated in work release with a comparable sample of inmates who completed their sentences in prison. The study was designed to answer the following questions: (1) What are the background and offense characteristics of offenders assigned to work release in the Seattle area? (2) What types of services are received by offenders in work release? and (3) How does the community experience of work release participants compare to that of similar offenders discharged directly into the Seattle community without having gone through work release? For each offender, detailed information was collected on measures relating to work release participation and recidivism outcomes. Information was gathered from Department of Corrections institutional files, work release program records, computerized payment information for legal and financial obligations, and statewide criminal history records. For each offender, background and six- and twelve-month reviews were completed. Part 1, Background Data, supplies variables that cover inmate demographics, employment history, drug use, current offense, prior criminal history, and risk/needs items. Part 2, Drug Testing Data, lists the types of drugs tested for, types of drugs for which there were positive results, and sanctions for drug use. Part 3, Offender Status Data, provides information on inmates' supervision status and the types of programs they participated in. Part 4, Prison Data, includes the number of days spent at different institutions and prerelease centers, work assignment, and prison infractions. Part 5, Work Release Data, contains information on the number of days spent at different work release facilities and any time spent in jail or on escape status while in work release. Data in this file also cover contacts and services received during work release, including personal and phone contacts between the work release participant and community corrections officer at the job and other sites, monitoring checks (employment verification, criminal records checks), sessions in outpatient counseling (drug, alcohol, family, other), employment (number of attempted and completed job interviews, primary job classification, length of employment, wages, and reason left), drug testing (date and type of test, type of positives, sanction imposed), infractions during work release and their sanctions, and arrests and their sanctions. Part 6, Community Placement Data, provides variables on the number of days each month that the offender was on the street, in work release, in pretrial detention, or in other custody, while Part 7, Post-Release Data, focuses on the number of days each month that the offender was on the street, in pretrial detention, or in prison or jail after being released from the work release program. Variables in Part 8, Infractions Data, pertain to the number and types of infractions and associated sanctions. Part 9, Recidivism Data, provides information on each offense after discharge from the program, including the date of the offense, nature of arrest, disposition, and sentence. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02021.v1 correctional facilities icpsr criminal histories icpsr inmate programs icpsr prerelease programs icpsr prison inmates icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr work release icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Turner, Susan Petersilia, Joan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2021 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02021.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09291 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09291 MiAaI MiAaI Intensive Supervision Program in New Jersey, 1983-1986 [electronic resource] Frank S. Pearson 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9291 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data evaluate the New Jersey Intensive Supervision Program (ISP), a program implemented by the New Jersey Department of Corrections in 1983-1986. The central premise of ISP is that certain felony offenders sentenced to prison can be resentenced to a program of intensive supervision in which they are successfully supervised in the community. The data collection evaluates the impact of ISP on recidivism rates, prison space availability, and cost effectiveness and also assesses the opinions of criminal justice professionals toward the program. In the first file data collected on four types of sentenced felons include education, psychological condition, financial status, substance abuse, prior and follow-up criminal records, earning and payment records, sentence and correctional histories, and case characteristics including sentences, offenses, and other dispositions. The second file presents data on type of criminal justice professional interviewed, opinion scale scores on aspects of ISP, and suggestions for ISP. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09291.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr community service programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr felons icpsr offender profiles icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism rates icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Pearson, Frank S. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9291 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09291.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08362 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08362 MiAaI MiAaI National Assessment of Criminal Justice Needs, 1983 [electronic resource] [United States] Kent Chabotar 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8362 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In 1983, the National Institute of Justice sponsored a program evaluation survey by Abt Associates that was designed to identify the highest priority needs for management and operational improvements in the criminal justice system. Six groups were surveyed: judges and trial court administrators, corrections officials, public defenders, police, prosecutors, and probation/parole officials. Variables in this study include background information on the respondents' agencies, such as operating budget and number of employees, financial resources available to the agency, and technical assistance, research, and initiative programs used by the agency. The codebook includes the mailed questionnaire sent to each of the six groups in the study as well as a copy of the telephone interview guide. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08362.v1 government agencies icpsr judicial process icpsr legal systems icpsr management icpsr organizational behavior icpsr parole services icpsr police icpsr policies and procedures icpsr program evaluation icpsr United States icpsr administration icpsr budgets icpsr correctional facilities icpsr court system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Chabotar, Kent Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8362 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08362.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03474 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03474 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of the Gender Appropriateness of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at Baylor Women's Correctional Institute, 1999-2001 [electronic resource] Arthur H. Garrison 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3474 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The overall goals of the process evaluation were to assess the participants' views on the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT), a Therapeutic Community program at Baylor Women's Correctional Institute, and to determine whether the women thought the program met their needs specifically based on gender. The specific goals of the study were: (1) to determine drop-out points along the continuum of the treatment model and to review the case files to discover any patterns in client participation and review demographic data in the program, and (2) to assess what current participants thought about the program and treatment model. For Part 1, Recent Graduate Data, data were secured from case files of women who had been discharged from the Therapeutic Community (Key Village) program in Baylor Women's Correctional Institute in 1999. This analysis was used to prepare the survey instrument used for the interviews given to the women currently participating in the program. For Part 2, Client Assessment Satisfaction Data, the current residents of the program were interviewed. During fall of 2000 and spring of 2001, a survey was developed to assess how the current participants viewed the Key Program. The questions were intended to gather information to assess the gender appropriateness of the program. A database was constructed to search for any consistencies or variables that would address the issue of gender appropriateness or lack of such in the operation of the program from the participants' point of view. During the interview period there were a total of 88 women in the Key Program. Of the 88 women, 76 agreed to participate in the study. For Part 1, the variables cover demographic data, criminal history information, medical information, prior drug treatment histories, and program success or failure. Part 2 variables cover demographic information, and questions dealing with prior drug use, the first four weeks of the program, the confrontation aspects of the program, sanctions and program rules, staff/participant interaction, program activities and responsibilities as opposed to the general population, readiness for change, support systems, children's visits and children as motivation, physical aspects of the program, mental health, the need for additional vocational and educational services, significant aspects and experiences from the program, and desired changes to the program. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03474.v1 process evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment outcome icpsr client satisfaction icpsr correctional facilities icpsr counseling services icpsr female inmates icpsr female offenders icpsr inmate programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Garrison, Arthur H. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3474 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03474.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02888 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02888 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at the Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility, 1997-1998 [electronic resource] Paul Guerin , Robert Hyde , Mitzi Wyatt 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 2888 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal for this study was to conduct a process evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program, called the Genesis program, at the Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility (SNMCD) by examining the program's structure and assessing its intermediate impact upon participating inmates. The study focuses on answering three research questions: (1) Who were the program participants? (2) What were the characteristics of the program? (3) Was the program reaching the most appropriate offenders, or were its participants primarily offenders who were not likely to become recidivists? The study contains information on every inmate who entered the Genesis program from July 31, 1997, to July 31, 1998. For evaluation purposes, the researchers designed their own data collection form which they used to collect relevant information from each participant's treatment program file. Each participant's file was maintained by Genesis program staff and was kept for the duration each inmate was in the program. From each program participant at intake, using the data collection instrument, the researchers collected demographic information, substance abuse history, and criminal history. The data are provided in two parts. Both parts are from the same data collection instrument. Part 1 covers Questions 1 through 15 of the data collection instrument, while Part 2 covers Questions 16 through 34 of the data collection instrument. Part 1 includes demographic variables about the inmate such as birth date, age, ethnicity, citizenship, years of education, prior employment status, longest employment, and average weekly income. It also includes incarceration information such as confinement date, length of current sentence, RSAT admission date, and expected parole date, and criminal history information such as age at first adult arrest, number of juvenile arrests, number of adult arrests, date of first adult arrest, date of last adult arrest, and number of years served in prison. There are also variables to address the inmate's drug use history as a juvenile and as an adult. Part 2 continues with the drug use history of the inmate as an adult with information about drugs used by IV injection, number of alcohol withdrawals, number of drug overdoses, number of detoxes, inpatient treatment received, outpatient treatment received, average amount of money spent on drugs, percentage of income spent on drugs, number of family members who use alcohol or drugs, and how they were related to the inmate. In addition, the file contains demographic information, such as current marital status and number of children, and the inmate's psychological history including depression, anxiety, anger, trouble understanding, concentrating, or remembering, attempted suicide, prescribed medication, and hospitalization. Criminal career variables include length of criminal career, all past charges, weapons used during any crime, number of times a weapon was used, and total number of convictions. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02888.v1 recidivism icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr addiction icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug use icpsr inmate programs icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr process evaluation icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Guerin, Paul Hyde, Robert Wyatt, Mitzi Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2888 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02888.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08700 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08700 MiAaI MiAaI Effects of Prison Versus Probation in California, 1980-1982 [electronic resource] Joan Petersilia , Susan Turner , Joyce Peterson 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8700 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was divided into two phases. The first assessed the effects of different sanctions on separate criminal populations, focusing on probation as a sentencing alternative for felons. The second phase used a quasi-experimental design to address how imprisonment affects criminal behavior when criminals are released. Specific issues included: (a) the effect that imprisonment (vs. probation) and length of time served have on recidivism, (b) the amount of crime prevented by imprisoning offenders rather than placing them on probation, and (c) costs to the system for achieving that reduction in crime. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08700.v1 arrests icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr government performance icpsr inmates icpsr probation icpsr sentencing icpsr social accounts icpsr social expenditures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Petersilia, Joan Turner, Susan Peterson, Joyce Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8700 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08700.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02914 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02914 MiAaI MiAaI National Evaluation of Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Programs in the United States, 1995-1999 [electronic resource] Douglas S. Lipton , Frank S. Pearson , Harry K. Wexler 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 2914 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) for State Prisoners Formula Grant Program, created by Title III (Subtitle U of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994), was designed by Congress to implement residential substance abuse programs providing individual and group treatment for inmates in residential facilities operated by state and local correctional agencies. Under the Corrections Program Office of the Office of Justice Programs of the United States Department of Justice, state and local correctional agencies received funds to develop or enhance existing programs that: (1) lasted between six and 12 months, (2) provided residential treatment facilities set apart from the general correctional population, (3) were directed at the substance abuse problems of the inmate, (4) were intended to develop the inmate's cognitive, behavioral, social, vocational, and other skills in order to treat related problems as well as the substance abuse, and (5) continued to require urinalysis and/or other proven reliable forms of drug and alcohol testing of individuals assigned to treatment programs during and after release from residential custody. The National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI) entered into a cooperative agreement with the National Institute of Justice wherein NDRI would evaluate the extent to which the goals of the RSAT program were being accomplished and the problems that were encountered by the participating states. The methods of this national evaluation were: (1) an initial state survey to ascertain the RSAT programs and program directors in each of the 50 states plus five territories and the District of Columbia and to collect basic information on the aggregate impact of the RSAT-funded programs in each state or territory (Part 1, State Data), (2) a follow-up state survey to collect more detailed information on the aggregate impact of the RSAT-funded programs in each state (Part 1, State Data), and (3) an initial program survey to describe the separate RSAT programs as they came on line and to assess whether a few of the programs might serve as model programs which could undergo subsequent intensive evaluation (Part 2, Program Data). The sampling method used was a census of all the existing RSAT-funded programs and all of the state RSAT officials. Part 1 variables include the amount of RSAT funds received by the state in fiscal years 1996 to 1998, amounts from other sources of funding, and amount spent on salaries, training, drug tests, other supplies, and facilities, as well as number of residents, number of staff, reasons why funding was delayed, RSAT award date, and RSAT end date. Part 2 variables include the number of clients in the program, number of beds available, number of staff by gender, race, age, education, profession, and years of experience, admission inclusion criteria, reporting procedures, treatment type and duration, type of drug testing and number of tests, annual budget, sources of funding, and cost per capita. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02914.v1 correctional facilities icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr grants icpsr inmate programs icpsr program evaluation icpsr substance abuse icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Lipton, Douglas S. Pearson, Frank S. Wexler, Harry K. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2914 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02914.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09665 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09665 MiAaI MiAaI Reducing Prison Violence By More Effective inmate Management [electronic resource] An Experiment Field Test of the Prisoner Management Classification (Pmc) System in Washington State, 1987-1988 James Austin 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9665 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this collection was to measure the extent to which the Prisoner Management Classification (PMC) system in Washington state improved overall operations of prison facilities and reduced safety risks to inmates and staff. Four primary issues were addressed: (1) To what extent the PMC reduces rates of assaults on staff and inmates, (2) To what extent the PMC reduces rates of other serious misconduct, (3) To what extent the PMC increases rates of inmate participation in work or vocational programs, and (4) To what extent the PMC enhances staff job satisfaction, morale, and staff performance. Information is included on outcome variables against which comparisons between the experimental and control groups can be made. For each correctional facility, figures were collected for the number of staff-inmate assaults, number of inmate-inmate assaults, number of suicides and suicide attempts, number of escapes and escape attempts, number of "serious" disciplinary incidents, number of total staff, number of inmates, number of security staff vacancies, rated capacity of the facility, number of staff transfers and reasons, and number of inmates involved in educational, vocational, and work programs. Demographic variables include date of birth, sex, and race. Additional information concerns the family structure of the inmates and conditions surrounding the inmates' lives prior to entering prison. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09665.v1 suicide icpsr assault icpsr correctional facilities icpsr corrections management icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmates icpsr prison violence icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Austin, James Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9665 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09665.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08619 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08619 MiAaI MiAaI Employment Services for Ex-Offenders, 1981-1984 [electronic resource] Boston, Chicago, and San Diego Raymond H. Milkman 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8619 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to test whether job counseling and placement services, accompanied by intensive follow-up after placement, would significantly increase the effectiveness of employment programs for individuals recently released from prison. Data were collected on personal, criminal, and employment backgrounds, including the type, duration, and pay of previous employment, living arrangements, marital status, criminal history, and characteristics of the employment placement. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08619.v2 correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr crime prevention icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr living conditions icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Milkman, Raymond H. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8619 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08619.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02582 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02582 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of a Local Jail Training Program in Sacramento County, California, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] Thomas McConnell 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2582 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection represents a process and outcome evaluation of the Office Technology Training program at the Rio Consumnes Correctional Center (RCCC) in Sacramento County. RCCC is a county jail for prisoners sentenced up to one year in custody. The Office Technology Training program, one of several training programs for inmates at RCCC, was designed to familiarize students with the use of computers in an office or business setting and to provide specific instruction in several types of common office software, including word processing and desktop publishing. The purpose of the evaluation research was (1) to refine the process of determining what types of training should be funded and (2) to establish research-based evaluation protocols for local jail inmate training programs. Data were collected on participants in the Office Technology Training class, on a control group that matched the participants in terms of demographic characteristics, and on a smaller group of nonparticipants who had signed up for the training program but did not participate. Part 1, Treatment and Control Group Data, contains administrative and survey data on both the trainees and the control group, while Part 2, Nonparticipant Data, includes administrative and survey data on the inmates who registered for the training but did not participate in the program. The survey consisted of an evaluation form filled out by inmates who participated in the training at RCCC, indicating their prior experience with computers and software, evaluating the training they received, and assessing whether the new skills would be helpful in securing employment upon their release. Administrative records on all respondents (trainees, control, and nonparticipants) were collected from four sources: a supplemental form on inmates' employment, a probation report that provided personal and criminal histories, a risk assessment form, and a follow-up form completed by the probation officer within one week of the six-month anniversary of the inmate's release from RCCC. Variables from the supplemental form included employment type and wages. The probation report covered employment, education, military history, marital status, substance abuse, domestic violence, gang behavior, psychiatric history, child abuse history, and criminal histories as juveniles and adults. Data on attitude, alcohol and drug problems, number of felony convictions, probation periods and violations, types of offenses, and history of institutionalization were taken from the risk assessment form. The follow-up form gathered information on release, disciplinary actions at RCCC, opinions about the Office Technology Training program, substance abuse, new arrests and convictions, gang behavior, job training, employment type, hourly wage, job satisfaction, and use of computers on the job. Additional administrative records data on trainees and nonparticipants were gathered from the class registration form, including gender, education, birth date, ethnicity, language spoken, occupation, Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE) scores, and class assignments. Other data on trainees came from an evaluation form filled out by the students' instructor upon their completion of the Office Technology class. It provided information on the behavior, attitude, and skills of the students. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02582.v1 computer literacy icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr ex-offender employment icpsr inmate programs icpsr jail inmates icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr probation icpsr process evaluation icpsr training icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System McConnell, Thomas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2582 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02582.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03714 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03714 MiAaI MiAaI Trends in Substance Abuse and Treatment Needs Among Inmates in the United States, 1996-1997 [electronic resource] Steven Belenko 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3714 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection consists of the SPSS syntax used to recode existing variables and create new variables from the SURVEY OF INMATES OF LOCAL JAILS, 1996 [ICPSR 6858] and the SURVEY OF INMATES IN STATE AND FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, 1997 [ICPSR 2598]. Using the data from these two national surveys on jail and prison inmates, this study sought to expand the analyses of these data in order to fully explore the relationship between type and intensity of substance abuse and other health and social problems, analyze access to treatment and services, and make estimates of the need for different types of treatment services in correctional systems. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03714.v1 causes of crime icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug laws icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drugs icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr social problems icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr substance abuse icpsr ICPSR X.B. Instructional Packages and Computer Programs, Computer Programs NACJD XII. Computer Programs and Instructional Packages Belenko, Steven Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3714 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03714.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06037 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06037 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates of Federal Correctional Facilities, 1991 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Prisons 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6037 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey provides nationally representative data on persons held in federal prisons. The survey was designed to supply information on individual characteristics of prison inmates, such as their current offenses and sentences, criminal histories, prior drug and alcohol use and treatment, gun possession and use, gang membership, and family background. Data on characteristics of victims and on prison activities, programs, and services are provided as well. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06037.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr corrections icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr HIV icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmate deaths icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr offenses icpsr prison conditions icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program RCMD V. Health and Well-Being RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Prisons Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6037 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06037.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09923 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09923 MiAaI MiAaI National Assessment Program Survey of Criminal Justice Personnel in the United States, 1986 [electronic resource] J. Thomas McEwen , Barbara Webster , Edward Connors 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9923 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey probed the needs and problems facing local criminal justice practitioners. Within each sampled county, survey questionnaires were distributed to the police chief of the largest city, the sheriff, the jail administrator, the prosecutor, the chief trial court judge, the trial court administrator (where applicable), and probation and parole agency heads. Although the general topics covered in the questionnaires are similar, specific items are not repeated across the questionnaires, except for those given to the sheriffs and the police chiefs. The sheriffs surveyed were those with law enforcement responsibilities, so the questions asked of the police chiefs and the sheriffs were identical. The questionnaires were tailored to each group of respondents, and dealt with five general areas: (1) background characteristics, including staff size, budget totals, and facility age, (2) criminal justice system problems, (3) prison crowding, (4) personnel issues such as training needs and programs, and (5) operations and procedures including management, management information, and the specific operations in which the respondents were involved. In some cases, sets of question items were grouped into question batteries that dealt with specific topic areas (e.g., staff recruitment, judicial training, and number of personnel). For example, the Staff Recruitment battery items in the Probation and Parole Questionnaire asked respondents to use a 4 point scale to indicate the seriousness of each of the following problems: low salaries, poor image of corrections work, high entrance requirements, location of qualified staff, shortage of qualified minority applicants, and hiring freezes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09923.v1 law enforcement agencies icpsr personnel icpsr personnel management icpsr police departments icpsr prison administration icpsr prison overcrowding icpsr training icpsr budgets icpsr criminal justice system icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System McEwen, J. Thomas Webster, Barbara Connors, Edward Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9923 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09923.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08407 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08407 MiAaI MiAaI Implementation of Community Corrections in Oregon, Colorado, and Connecticut [1981] [electronic resource] Dennis J. Palumbo , Michael Musheno , Steven Maynard-Moody 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8407 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Data were collected from three states to evaluate the success of community corrections programs and to identify the conditions that underlie these successes. In-person field interviews, telephone interviews, and mailback questionnaires were used at state, county, and district levels. The variables in the study were designed to examine the kinds of people who implement and maintain these programs, the level of commitment by judicial and prison officials to these programs, community support, and the goals of cost reduction, work training, and rehabilitation. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08407.v1 achievement icpsr communities icpsr community service programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr cost effectiveness icpsr criminal justice system icpsr goals icpsr parole services icpsr personnel icpsr program evaluation icpsr rehabilitation programs icpsr success icpsr training icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Palumbo, Dennis J. Musheno, Michael Maynard-Moody, Steven Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8407 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08407.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09917 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09917 MiAaI MiAaI Management of Death Row Inmates, 1986-1987 [electronic resource] [United States] Rauch W., et al Hardy , American Correctional Association 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9917 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data offer objective and subjective information about current death row inmates and the management policies and procedures related to their incarceration. The major objectives of the study were to gather data about the inmate population and current management policies and procedures, to identify issues facing correctional administrators in supervising the growing number of condemned inmates, and to offer options for improved management. Four survey instruments were developed: (1) a form for the Department of Corrections in each of the 37 states that had a capital punishment statute as of March 1986, (2) a form for each warden of an institution that housed death-sentenced inmates, (3) a form for staff members who worked with such inmates, and (4) a form for a sample of the inmates. The surveys included questions about inmate demographics (e.g., date of birth, sex, race, Hispanic origin, level of education, marital status, and number of children), the institutional facilities available to death row inmates, state laws pertaining to them, training for staff who deal with them, the usefulness of various counseling, medical, and recreational programs, whether the inmates expected to be executed, and the challenges in managing the death row population. The surveys did not probe legal, moral, or political arguments about the death penalty itself. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09917.v1 capital punishment icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional guards icpsr corrections management icpsr death row inmates icpsr imprisonment icpsr inmate populations icpsr policies and procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Hardy, Rauch W., et al American Correctional Association Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9917 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09917.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08278 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08278 MiAaI MiAaI Effects of Determinant Sentencing on Institutional Climate and Prison Administration [electronic resource] Connecticut, Minnesota, Illinois, 1981-1983 Lynne Goodstein , John H. Kramer , John R. Hepburn , Doris L. MacKenzie 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8278 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examines the effects of determinant sentencing on prison climate and administration. Three data collection periods are covered in the dataset. Parts 1-3 contain data taken from a total random sample of offenders housed at five prisons over all three data collection periods. Part 4 is an additional sample from the state of Connecticut of inmates serving determinate sentences, collected during the third period of data collection. Parts 5 and 6 comprise indeterminate sample data from all three data collection periods, while Parts 7-9 contain determinate panel sample data from all three collection periods. There were six questionnaires used in collecting these data, covering inmates' feelings about their arrest, court case, and conviction, their feelings about the law, physical problems developed during their prison term, how their time was spent in prison, family contacts outside prison, relationships with other prisoners and guards, involvement in prison programs, and criminal history. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08278.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional reform icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr imprisonment icpsr inmate attitudes icpsr justice icpsr parole icpsr prison administration icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Goodstein, Lynne Kramer, John H. Hepburn, John R. MacKenzie, Doris L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8278 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08278.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09038 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09038 MiAaI MiAaI Operation Hardcore [Crime] Evaluation [electronic resource] Los Angeles, 1976-1980 Los Angeles District Attorney's Office 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 9038 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This evaluation was developed and implemented by the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office to examine the effectiveness of specialized prosecutorial activities in dealing with the local problem of rising gang violence, in particular the special gang prosecution unit Operation Hardcore. One part of the evaluation was a system performance analysis. The purposes of this system performance analysis were (1) to describe the problems of gang violence in Los Angeles and the ways that incidents of gang violence were handled by the Los Angeles criminal justice system, and (2) to document the activities of Operation Hardcore and its effect on the criminal justice system's handling of the cases prosecuted by that unit. Computer-generated listings from the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office of all individuals referred for prosecution by local police agencies were used to identify those individuals who were subsequently prosecuted by the District Attorney. Data from working files on all cases prosecuted, including copies of police, court, and criminal history records as well as information on case prosecution, were used to describe criminal justice handling. Information from several supplementary sources was also included, such as the automated Prosecutors Management Information System (PROMIS) maintained by the District Attorney's Office, and court records from the Superior Court of California in Los Angeles County, the local felony court. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09038.v2 arrests icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr district attorneys icpsr driving under the influence icpsr drug possession icpsr felony offenses icpsr gang violence icpsr gangs icpsr hearings icpsr jails icpsr kidnapping icpsr murder icpsr plea negotiations icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sentencing icpsr theft icpsr victimization icpsr weapons icpsr witnesses icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Los Angeles District Attorney's Office Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9038 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09038.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09571 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09571 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations World Crime Surveys [electronic resource] First Survey, 1970-1975 and Second Survey, 1975-1980 Graeme Newman , Bruce DiCristina 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9571 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The United Nations began its World Crime Surveys in 1978. The first survey collected statistics on a small range of offenses and on the criminal justice process for the years 1970-1975. The second survey collected data on a wide range of offenses, offenders, and criminal justice process data for the years 1975-1980. Several factors make these two collections difficult to use in combination. Some 25 percent of those countries responding to the first survey did not respond to the second and, similarly, some 30 percent of those responding to the second survey did not respond to the first. In addition, many questions asked in the second survey were not asked in the first survey. This data collection represents the efforts of the investigators to combine, revise, and recheck the data of the first two surveys. The data are divided into two parts. Part 1 comprises all data on offenses and on some criminal justice personnel. Crime data are entered for 1970 through 1980. In most cases 1975 is entered twice, since both surveys collected data for this year. Part 2 includes data on offenders, prosecutions, convictions, and prisons. Data are entered for 1970 through 1980, for every even year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09571.v1 convictions (law) icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr international crime statistics icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr persecution icpsr trends icpsr United Nations icpsr IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Newman, Graeme DiCristina, Bruce Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9571 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09571.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09517 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09517 MiAaI MiAaI Gender of Prisoners Admitted to State and Federal Institutions in the United States, 1926-1987 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics , Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9517 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection includes tabulations of annual adult admissions to federal and state correctional institutions by gender for the years 1926 through 1987. The two data files have identical structures: Part 1 includes information on male admissions, and Part 2 includes information on female admissions. The 3,348 cases in each part include one case for each of the 62 years of the collection for each of the following 54 categories: the 50 states, the District of Columbia, federal institutional totals, state cumulative totals, and United States totals (the sum of the federal and state cumulative totals). The figures were drawn from a voluntary reporting program in which each state, the District of Columbia, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons reported summary and detailed statistics, as part of the National Prisoner Statistics reporting series. Each file also includes individual state and United States general population figures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09517.v1 correctional facilities icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr female inmates icpsr gender icpsr inmates icpsr male inmates icpsr state icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9517 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09517.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06437 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06437 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey of AIDS in Correctional Facilities, 1985-1990, 1992 [electronic resource] Abt Associates, Inc. 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6437 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In late 1985, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) began its first study of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) in correctional facilities. The objective of the study was to report on the incidence and institutional management of AIDS within the federal and state prison systems, as well as in the nation's largest jails. The study was conducted annually from 1985-1990 and biannually thereafter. This collection contains data collected in 1985-1990 and 1992 via a mail questionnaire. Questionnaires were sent each year to the correctional departments of all 50 states, the federal prison system, and 33 to 37 large city and county jail systems. In addition, in 1987-1990, Canadian prison systems were surveyed. A different questionnaire was used in each of the seven years of data collection. However, each questionnaire addressed the same major topics: inmate population, numbers of inmate cases of AIDS and AIDS-Related Complex (ARC), aggregate results of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) antibody testing programs, and major policies regarding AIDS (training and education, testing, medical and psycho-social services, housing, precautionary measures, confidentiality), as well as associated legal and cost issues. The 1992 questionnaire collected additional information on the prevalence of and policies toward inmates with tuberculosis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06437.v1 AIDS icpsr correctional facilities icpsr corrections management icpsr inmate populations icpsr policies and procedures icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Abt Associates, Inc. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6437 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06437.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09926 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09926 MiAaI MiAaI Shock Incarceration in Louisiana, 1987-1989 [electronic resource] Doris L. MacKenzie , James W. Shaw , Voncile B. Gowdy 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9926 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data describe the results of one component of an evaluation of the "shock incarceration" program in the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections (LDPSC). This program, formally called IMPACT (Intensive Motivational Program of Alternative Correctional Treatment), began in 1987 and consisted of two phases. In the first phase offenders spent 90 to 180 days in a medium security prison participating in a rigorous boot camp-type program. Offenders who successfully completed the program were released from prison and placed under intensive supervision in the community--the second phase of the program. Changes in offender behavior and attitudes during the prison and community supervision phases of the shock program were examined in a quasi-experimental design to determine the impact of the program on the individual offenders. Comparisons were made with similar offenders who were not in the shock program who had been sentenced to prison and parole/probation. Shock and nonshock incarcerated offenders were asked to complete self-report questionnaires. Information was also collected from LDPSC records and from monthly parole performance evaluations completed by parole and probation officers. Information collected from LDPSC records included demographics, sentence characteristics, release date, offense, criminal history, I.Q. (Beta II) and MMPI scores, and diagnostic personnel evaluations of mental health, substance abuse, general attitude, adjustment, and violence potential. Part 1 of the collection consists of inmate data collected from the incarcerated shock program participants (N = 208) and the incarcerated nonshock offenders (N = 98, with partial records for an additional 46). Information includes police record data, clinical diagnostic data, offender's self-reported demographic data, scales for self-reported attitudes and personality measures, and offender's self-reported criminal and substance abuse history. Part 2 contains demographic data collected for all samples, including police record data and clinical diagnostic data. Part 3 consists of parole and probation data for all inmates. Offenders were followed for 12 months after leaving prison or until they failed community supervision (by absconding, being jailed for a lengthy period of time, or having their parole/probation revoked). Consequently, there is monthly data for between 1 to 12 months for each offender. Information includes items relating to parolees' performance at work and school, personal adjustment, employment, substance abuse counseling, interpersonal relations, compliance with intensive supervision program requirements, and contacts with the criminal justice system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09926.v1 correctional facilities icpsr imprisonment icpsr offender profiles icpsr offenders icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr parole icpsr probation icpsr program evaluation icpsr shock incarceration programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections MacKenzie, Doris L. Shaw, James W. Gowdy, Voncile B. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9926 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09926.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03022 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03022 MiAaI MiAaI Religiousness and Post-Release Community Adjustment in the United States, 1990-1998 [electronic resource] Melvina T. Sumter 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3022 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study assessed the effects of male inmate religiosity on post-release community adjustment and investigated the circumstances under which these effects were most likely to take place. The researcher carried out this study by adding Federal Bureau of Investigation criminal history information to an existing database (Clear et al.) that studied the relationship between an inmate's religiousness and his adjustment to the correctional setting. Four types of information were used in this study. The first three types were obtained by the original research team and included an inmate values and religiousness instrument, a pre-release questionnaire, and a three-month post-release follow-up phone survey. The fourth type of information, official criminal history reports, was later added to the original dataset by the principal investigator for this study. The prisoner values survey collected information on what the respondent would do if a friend sold drugs from the cell or if inmates of his race attacked others. Respondents were also asked if they thought God was revealed in the scriptures, if they shared their faith with others, and if they took active part in religious services. Information collected from the pre-release questionnaire included whether the respondent attended group therapy, religious groups with whom he would live, types of treatment programs he would participate in after prison, employment plans, how often he would go to church, whether he would be angry more in prison or in the free world, and whether he would be more afraid of being attacked in prison or in the free world. Each inmate also described his criminal history and indicated whether he thought he was able to do things as well as most others, whether he was satisfied with himself on the whole or felt that he was a failure, whether religion was talked about in the home, how often he attended religious services, whether he had friends who were religious while growing up, whether he had friends who were religious while in prison, and how often he participated in religious inmate counseling, religious services, in-prison religious seminars, and community service projects. The three-month post-release follow-up phone survey collected information on whether the respondent was involved with a church group, if the respondent was working for pay, if the respondent and his household received public assistance, if he attended religious services since his release, with whom the respondent was living, and types of treatment programs attended. Official post-release criminal records include information on the offenses the respondent was arrested and incarcerated for, prior arrests and incarcerations, rearrests, outcomes of offenses of rearrests, follow-up period to first rearrest, prison adjustment indicator, self-esteem indicator, time served, and measurements of the respondent's level of religious belief and personal identity. Demographic variables include respondent's faith, race, marital status, education, age at first arrest and incarceration, and age at incarceration for rearrest. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03022.v1 arrest records icpsr church attendance icpsr church groups icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal histories icpsr male inmates icpsr parole icpsr postrelease programs icpsr prison adjustment icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr religious behavior icpsr social reintegration icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Sumter, Melvina T. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3022 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03022.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02575 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02575 MiAaI MiAaI Inventory of Data Elements in State and Federal Corrections Information Systems, 1998 [electronic resource] William J. Sabol 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2575 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey summarizes the data elements maintained by state and federal corrections information systems that track adult, sentenced offenders, and assesses the severity of obstacles in reporting statistical information. Two instruments, an Inventory Questionnaire and an Obstacles Survey, were mailed to Departments of Correction in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, and to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The Inventory Questionnaire asked 207 questions about data elements describing offenders, 15 questions about elements describing facility management, and 20 questions about the capabilities of the information system to process data electronically. For some elements, questions were asked to determine if more detailed information (subvalues) about the element existed. The Obstacles Survey asked departments to rate the severity of problems they may encounter when processing requests for statistical information. The items were grouped into five categories: legislative and institutional factors, hardware factors, software factors, staffing factors, and data factors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02575.v1 adults icpsr correctional facilities icpsr corrections management icpsr information systems icpsr information use icpsr offenders icpsr prison inmates icpsr program evaluation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Sabol, William J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2575 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02575.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02730 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02730 MiAaI MiAaI Assessment of a Single-Purpose Substance Abuse Facility for Committed Juvenile Offenders in Virginia, 1995-1997 [electronic resource] Jill A. Gordon 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2730 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of this data collection was to provide a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of treatment offered at the Barrett Juvenile Correctional Center, a substance abuse treatment facility in Virginia for convicted male offenders that began operation in late 1993. The center uses a holistic approach in the treatment of youth to identify the triggers for substance abuse and to investigate the relationship between substance abuse and delinquent behavior. For the facility assessment, various types of data from the Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice were gathered. Baseline data on each juvenile were obtained from the department's Reception and Diagnostic Center and consisted of demographic information and I.Q. scores, criminal history, and substance abuse history. Demographic variables include the youth's race, last grade placement, and with whom the youth lived. Youths' scores on standardized tests were also compiled, including SASSI, verbal I.Q., performance I.Q., and full-scale I.Q. scores. Criminal histories covered whether the committing offense was a felony or misdemeanor, the type of committing offense, the total number of committing offenses, whether a prior offense was a felony or a misdemeanor, the type of prior offense, the total number of prior offenses, the age at first criminal adjudication, age at commitment, and degree of delinquency. Alcohol and drug use data focused on the age at which alcohol was first used, number of times alcohol was used in the past year, age at which marijuana was first used, number of times marijuana was used in the past month, and whether the youth ever used cocaine, crack, inhalants, speed, depressants, hallucinogens, or other drugs. Another source of information was the youths' parole officers, who provided data on youths' criminal offending status and substance abuse at three, six, and twelve months after release from the center. Data obtained from parole officers assessing youths' improvement after leaving the center include whether they were rearrested, the type of offense if rearrested, the total number of offenses rearrested for, disposition, most serious offense overall, and youths' overall drug use. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02730.v1 treatment outcomes icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal histories icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug law offenses icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Gordon, Jill A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2730 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02730.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08087 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08087 MiAaI MiAaI Inmate Victimization in State Prisons in the United States, 1979 [electronic resource] Jan E. Schreiber 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8087 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was designed to determine the nature and extent of victimization in state prisons across the nation. In particular, it examines topics such as prison living conditions, prison programs, prison safety, and inmates' participation in or victimization by other inmates with respect to several types of property and bodily crimes. Also presented are a set of attitudinal measures dealing with inmates' thoughts and perceptions on a variety of subjects, including their reactions to general statements about prison life and to a series of hypothetical situations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08087.v1 assault icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmates icpsr parole icpsr victimization icpsr violence icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Schreiber, Jan E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8087 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08087.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03472 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03472 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2001 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3472 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is to gather data on all adult and juvenile jail facilities and detention centers in Indian country, which is defined for purposes of this collection as reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey, a complete enumeration of all 68 confinement facilities operated by tribal authorities or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), provides data on number of inmates and facility characteristics and needs. Variables describe each facility, including rated capacity, number of adult inmates, number of juveniles held, number of inmates held by sex and conviction status on June 29, number of admissions and discharges in the last 30 days, number of inmate deaths, the peak population during June, facility crowding, and renovation and building plans. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03472.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3472 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03472.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07973 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07973 MiAaI MiAaI Deterrent Effects of Arrests and Imprisonment in the United States, 1960-1977 [electronic resource] Thomas F. Pogue 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7973 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Emerging from the tradition of econometric models of deterrence and crime, this study attempts to improve estimates of how crime rates are affected by the apprehension and punishment of persons charged with criminal activity. These data are contained in two files: Part 1, State Data, consists of a panel of observations from each of the 50 states and contains information on crime rates, clearance rates, length of time served, probability of imprisonment, socioeconomic factors such as unemployment rates, population levels, and income levels, and state and local expenditures for police protection. Part 2, SMSA Data, consists of a panel of 77 SMSAs and contains information on crime rates, clearance rates, length of time served, probability of imprisonment, socioeconomic factors such as employment rates, population levels, and income levels, and taxation and expenditure information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07973.v1 police protection icpsr robbery icpsr social attitudes icpsr standard metropolitan statistical areas icpsr victimization icpsr arrests icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr convictions (law) icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmates icpsr jails icpsr larceny icpsr police icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Pogue, Thomas F. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7973 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07973.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09569 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09569 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1990 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9569 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a complete picture of the adult correctional system and the changes that occur in that system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity, court orders, conditions of confinement, and alternative programs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09569.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9569 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09569.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09373 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09373 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1989 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9373 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a complete picture of the adult correctional system and the changes that occur in that system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09373.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9373 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09373.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09074 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09074 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1987 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9074 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a complete picture of the adult correctional system and the changes that occur in that system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09074.v2 correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9074 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09074.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08871 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08871 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level and Jail-Level Data, 1986 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8871 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08871.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8871 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08871.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08687 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08687 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-level and Jail-level Data, 1985 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8687 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) sponsors the Sample Survey of Jails as part of a series of statistical programs measuring the correctional population. The Sample Survey meets BJS's need to analyze continuously the "spillover" effect on local jails of the growth in federal and state prison populations. The data are used in conjunction with statistics on federal and state prisoners to provide a complete picture of the adult correctional system and to measure changes in that system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08687.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8687 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08687.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06856 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06856 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1996 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6856 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, and adult or juvenile status. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity and average daily population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06856.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6856 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06856.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06784 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06784 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1995 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6784 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, and adult or juvenile status. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity and average daily population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06784.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6784 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06784.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06538 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06538 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1994 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6538 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, and adult or juvenile status. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity and average daily population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06538.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6538 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06538.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06511 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06511 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level and Jail-Level Data, 1991 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6511 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity, court orders, conditions of confinement, and alternative programs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06511.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6511 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06511.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06395 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06395 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level and Jail-Level Data, 1992 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6395 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Also added in the 1992 survey were variables on citizenship, population movement, and total number of inmate deaths for inmates originally confined to the facility in question who died either at that facility or elsewhere. Also, the 1992 version included a more complete survey of jail programs and a supplemental questionnaire (CJ-5S), which dealt with AIDS-related questions. In addition, information was collected for the first time on drug testing, programs that treated or educated inmates, boot camps, work release, and alternatives to incarceration such as electronic monitoring, house arrest, community service, and weekend or day reporting. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06395.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug testing icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr prerelease programs icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6395 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06395.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03883 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03883 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2001 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3883 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03883.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3883 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03883.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02682 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02682 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1998 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2682 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-U.S. citizens within the jail population. A special addendum to the 1998 survey included data on the prevalence and results of drug testing and treatment in jails. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02682.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug testing icpsr drugs icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2682 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02682.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02313 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02313 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1997 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 2313 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, and adult or juvenile status. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity and average daily population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02313.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2313 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02313.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07797 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07797 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of California Prison Inmates, 1976 [electronic resource] Mark A. Peterson , Suzanne Polich , Jan Michael Chaiken 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7797 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey of inmates in five California prisons was conducted by the RAND Corporation with a grant from the National Institute of Justice. Researchers distributed an anonymous self-administered questionnaire to groups of 10-20 inmates at a time. Using the self-report technique, the survey obtained detailed information about the crimes committed by these prisoners prior to their incarceration. Variables were calculated to examine the characteristics of repeatedly arrested or convicted offenders (recidivists) as well as offenders reporting the greatest number of serious crimes (habitual criminals). The variables include crimes committed leading to incarceration, rates of criminal activity, and social-psychological scales for analyzing motivations to commit crimes, as well as self-reports of age, race, education, marital status, employment, income, and drug use. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07797.v2 convictions (law) icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr prison inmates icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivists icpsr victimization icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Peterson, Mark A. Polich, Suzanne Chaiken, Jan Michael Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7797 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07797.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08274 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08274 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates in Local Jails, 1983 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8274 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey provides data on inmates' socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, previous military service, prior criminal history, jail activities, drug and alcohol use, health care, and current offenses. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08274.v1 correctional facilities icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug use icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr offenses icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD V. Health and Well-Being RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8274 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08274.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03016 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03016 MiAaI MiAaI Attitudes Toward Crime and Punishment in Vermont [electronic resource] Public Opinion About an Experiment With Restorative Justice, 1999 John Doble , Judith Greene 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3016 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. By the summer of 1998, the Vermont Department of Corrections (DOC) had completed three years of operational experience with "restorative justice," a concept that involves compensating victims and establishing community-based reparative boards that determine how offenders can make amends for their crimes. The purpose of this project was to update the benchmark findings from an earlier survey of Vermont residents in 1994, to assess public attitudes about the reforms and changes that had been instituted by the Vermont DOC, and to explore the possibility of expansion of responsibilities of the reparative community boards. This project involved a telephone survey of a new sample of 601 adult residents of Vermont. The interviewing was conducted on March 15-21, 1999. Respondents were asked a series of trend questions to update the 1994 findings. Respondents were also asked questions about two other programs: the diversion program, in which selected first offenders who fulfilled the terms of a community-based sanction could have their records expunged, and the furlough program, in which offenders making the transition from prison to the community were supervised for an interim period. The survey also explored whether Vermonters would like to see the responsibilities of the reparative boards expanded to include community notification and other types of cases. Residents assessed whether crime in general, violent crime, and illegal drug use had increased compared to five years prior, whether more prisons should be built, whether Vermont's jails and prisons were overcrowded, and whether violent offenders were being released before completing their sentences because of overcrowding. They commented on how often offenders in four scenarios should go to prison and how often they believed that these offenders in fact did go to prison. Respondents rated the performance of various segments of the Vermont criminal justice system and, given 15 offense scenarios, were asked whether the offender should spend time in jail or in community service and rehabilitation. In addition, respondents were asked whether anyone in their household had been a victim of a crime within the last three years and, if so, whether it was a violent crime. Demographic data include sex, employment, education, race/ethnicity, and age category of the respondent, and the county and region where the resident lived. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03016.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr communities icpsr violent offenders icpsr community service programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr corrections management icpsr criminal histories icpsr diversion programs icpsr program evaluation icpsr public opinion icpsr restitution programs icpsr restorative justice icpsr victim compensation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD I. Attitude Surveys Doble, John Greene, Judith Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3016 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03016.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09419 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09419 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates in Local Jails, 1989 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9419 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides nationally representative data on persons held prior to trial and on convicted offenders serving sentences in local jails or awaiting transfer to state prisons. Data cover demographic characteristics of jail inmates (sex, race, ethnicity, Hispanic origin, employment), current offenses and sentences, characteristics of victims, criminal histories, jail activities and programs, prior drug and alcohol use and treatment, and health care services provided while in jail. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09419.v1 correctional facilities icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug use icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr offenses icpsr sentencing icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD V. Health and Well-Being NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9419 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09419.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07856 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07856 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, 1979 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7856 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this survey was to obtain information on the characteristics of persons confined to prison and the circumstances and conditions of their confinement. The survey focuses on topics and issues that are of current and continuing concern to the correctional community and researchers. Information in the survey includes prison conditions such as staffing, space, and overcrowding, inmate rights and privileges, and rules and regulations concerning prison operation and inmate behavior. Additional data are provided on the presence of educational and vocational programs, drug and alcohol programs, medical treatment, and health care. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07856.v3 treatment programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr corrections icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmate deaths icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr offenses icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison overcrowding icpsr substance abuse icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program RCMD V. Health and Well-Being RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7856 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07856.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07751 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07751 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Jail Inmates, 1978 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7751 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In February of 1978, locally operated jails were surveyed on a national scale. Of the more than 158,000 persons who were estimated to be held in these jails at that time, a sample of 5,247 inmates was drawn. Information was gathered regarding type of facility, availability of health care in the facility, personal and educational backgrounds, reasons for incarceration, sentencing, numbers of offenses, and inmate drug use. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07751.v5 correctional facilities icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug use icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr offenses icpsr sentencing icpsr RCMD V. Health and Well-Being RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7751 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07751.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09256 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09256 MiAaI MiAaI National Jail Census, 1988 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9256 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. NATIONAL JAIL CENSUS, 1988, is the fifth in a series of data collection efforts aimed at studying the nation's locally administered jails. For purposes of this data collection, a jail was defined as a confinement facility intended for holding adults (and in some cases juveniles) pending adjudication or having sentences of a year or less. Jails were further defined as being administered and staffed by municipal or county employees. Also included in this collection were six jails privately operated under contract for local governments. Excluded from the census were federal or state-administered facilities, including the combined jail-prison systems in Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, and Vermont. The mailing list used for the census was derived from data gathered from the AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION DIRECTORY OF JUSTICE AGENCIES, publications such as AMERICAN JAILS, telephone calls to large metropolitan jail systems (e.g., New York City), state jail inspection bureaus, and newspaper articles. Following the initial mailout to 3,448 facilities, 44 jails were added and 176 deleted according to the criteria for inclusion, leaving a total of 3,316 facilities in 44 states. Variables include information on jail population by legal status, age and sex of prisoners, maximum sentence, admissions and releases, available services, structure and capacity, expenditure, and employment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09256.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9256 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09256.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08203 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08203 MiAaI MiAaI National Jail Census, 1983 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8203 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Jail Census was conducted by the United States Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The census was taken of all locally administered county and municipal jails with the authority to hold prisoners for more than 48 hours. Data are presented for 3,338 jails in 45 states. Excluded are Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Information includes jail population by legal status, age and sex of prisoners, maximum sentence, admissions and releases, available services, structure and capacity, expenditure, and employment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08203.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8203 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08203.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07737 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07737 MiAaI MiAaI National Jail Census, 1978 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7737 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Jail Census was conducted in early 1978 by the United States Census Bureau for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The census was taken of all locally administered county and municipal jails with the authority to hold prisoners for more than 48 hours. Data are presented for jails in 45 states. Excluded are Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Information includes jail population by legal status, age and sex of prisoners, maximum sentence, admissions and releases, available services, structure and capacity, expenditure, and employment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07737.v4 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7737 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07737.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07641 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07641 MiAaI MiAaI National Jail Census, 1970 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7641 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This census provides information on county and municipal jails facilities in the United States and their administration. For all jails, the data include number of prisoners and their reason for being held, age and sex of prisoners, maximum sentence that could be served in the facility, facility capacity and age, types of security available, and operating expenditures. For jails in counties and municipalities with populations of 25,000 or more, data are supplied on quarterly jail population, age of cells, and availability of service facilities and programs for inmates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07641.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7641 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07641.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08711 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08711 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, 1986 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8711 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides information about topics and issues of concern in research and policy within the field of corrections. Chief among these are the characteristics of persons confined to state prisons, their current and past offenses, and the circumstances or conditions of their confinement. Also included is extensive information on inmates' drug and alcohol use, program participation, and the victims of the inmates' most recent offenses. This information, which is not available on a national basis from any other source, is intended to assist the criminal justice community and other researchers in analysis and evaluation of correctional issues. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08711.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr corrections icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmate deaths icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr offenses icpsr prison conditions icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment programs icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program RCMD I. Crime RCMD V. Health and Well-Being United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8711 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08711.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08444 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08444 MiAaI MiAaI Census of State Adult Correctional Facilities, 1984 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8444 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study provides a descriptive analysis of confinement facilities and state-operated community-based correctional facilities nationwide. Decision-makers, practitioners, and researchers may use the census to analyze the current conditions and needs of state correctional facilities for adults. Variables of interest include physical security, age of facilities, functions of facilities, programs, inmate work assignments, staff employment, facilities under court order/consent decree for conditions of confinement, capital and operating expenditures, custody level of residents/inmates, one-day and average daily population counts, race/ethnicity of inmates, inmate work assignments, inmate deaths, special inmate counts, and assaults and incidents by inmates. The institution is the unit of analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08444.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr corrections icpsr corrections management icpsr inmate deaths icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jails icpsr personnel icpsr prison administration icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison construction icpsr prison overcrowding icpsr prison security icpsr prison violence icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8444 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08444.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07852 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07852 MiAaI MiAaI Census of State Adult Correctional Facilities, 1979 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7852 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This census, designed by the Bureau of Justice Statistics and conducted by the United States Census Bureau, includes all state correctional facilities known to the Census Bureau in 1979. Each facility is classified into one of ten categories such as community center, prison farm, road camp, or reception center. Data for 1979 include number of inmates by security classification and by sex, number of full- and part-time staff, number of paid and volunteer staff broken down by position, age, pay, and education, number and age of facilities, type of facilities provided in each cell by size of cell, hospital facilities available, programs provided for the inmates, job training, and inmate IQ scores. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07852.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr corrections icpsr corrections management icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmate deaths icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jails icpsr personnel icpsr prison administration icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison construction icpsr prison overcrowding icpsr prison violence icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7852 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07852.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03540 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03540 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of Prison-Based Drug Treatment in Pennsylvania, 2000-2001 [electronic resource] Wayne N. Welsh 2003-06-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3540 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to examine multiple treatment process measures and post-release outcomes for inmates who participated in Therapeutic Community (TC) drug treatment programs or comparison groups provided by the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections at five state prisons. The project attempted to examine more closely the relationships among inmate characteristics, treatment process, and treatment outcomes than previous studies in order to explore critical issues in prison-based drug treatment programming and policies. Researchers examined in-treatment measures and multiple post-release outcomes for inmates who participated in TC drug treatment programs or comparison groups at five state prisons: Graterford, Houtzdale, Cresson, Waymart, and Huntingdon. Matched comparison groups were made up of TC-eligible inmates who participated in less intensive forms of treatment (e.g., short-term drug education and outpatient treatment groups) due to a shortage of intensive treatment slots at the five institutions. Included in the treatment sample were all current TC residents as of January 1, 2000. New subjects were added to the study as they were admitted to treatment programs. Between January 1 and November 30, 2000, data on all inmates admitted to or discharged from alcohol or drug treatment programs were collected on a monthly basis. Monthly tracking was continued throughout the study to determine treatment outcomes (e.g., successful vs. unsuccessful). TC clients were asked to complete additional self-report measures that tapped psychological constructs and inmate perceptions of the treatment experience, and TC counselors were asked to complete periodic reassessments of each inmate's participation in treatment. Self-reports of treatment process and psychological functioning were gathered within 30 days after admission, again after six months, again at the end of 12 months, and again at discharge if the inmate remained in TC longer than 12 months. Counselor ratings of inmate participation in treatment were similarly gathered one month, six months, and 12 months following admission to treatment. After release, both treatment and comparison groups were tracked over time to monitor rearrest, reincarceration, drug use, and employment. Measures can be broken down into the following four categories and their sources: (1) Inmate Background Factors were collected from the Pennsylvania Additive Classification System (PACT), the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Screening Instrument (PACSI), and the TCU (Texas Christian University) Drug Screen. (2) Institutional Indicators: Impacts Internal to the Prison Environment were collected from the Department of Corrections Misconduct Database, research and program records, and TCU Resident Evaluation of Self and Treatment (REST) forms. (3) Intermediate or "Proximal" Outcomes: Reductions in Risk for Drug Use and Criminal Behavior were collected from research and program records, TCU Counselor Rating of Client (CRC) forms, and TCU Resident Evaluation of Self and Treatment (REST) forms. (4) Post-Release Indicators: Inmate Behavior Upon Release from Prison were collected from the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Pennsylvania state police records provided by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD), and the Department of Corrections inmate records system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03540.v1 treatment programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug treatment icpsr inmate programs icpsr program evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Welsh, Wayne N. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3540 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03540.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03716 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03716 MiAaI MiAaI Outcome Evaluation of a Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Dallas County, Texas, 1998-2000 [electronic resource] Kevin, D. Knight , Dwayne Simpson , Matthew L. Hiller 2003-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3716 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was an outcome evaluation of the Dallas County Judicial Treatment Center (DCJTC), a six-month residential substance abuse treatment (RSAT) facility in Dallas County, Texas. The primary goal of this evaluation was to assess offender recidivism following treatment in this six-month community-based modified therapeutic community for probationers. Secondary goals were to examine change in social functioning over time among probationers mandated to this program, to determine which characteristics at intake and which during-treatment social functioning indicators were predictive of dropping out of treatment early, and to identify which indicators predicted being arrested one to two years after treatment. These goals were accomplished by a comparison of outcomes between treated probationers and an untreated comparison group and by an assessment of the relationships among treatment, social functioning, and recidivism. For both treatment and comparison groups, a criminal records search was performed on the Institutional Division database of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for all of the study participants for the two years following discharge for treatment or following commitment to probation. In addition to these records, treatment participants were asked to complete a set of data collection forms over their course of treatment. These forms collected information about mental status, background and psychosocial functioning, substance abuse, psychological status, offenders' perceptions of the program and their experiences in treatment, evaluations of counselors, self-evaluations, and counselors' evaluations of clients. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03716.v1 correctional facilities icpsr inmate programs icpsr mental health icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr residential programs icpsr self evaluation icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment outcome icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Knight, Kevin, D. Simpson, Dwayne Hiller, Matthew L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3716 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03716.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03011 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03011 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Iowa State Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Program, 1998-1999 [electronic resource] Remi J. Cadoret 2003-04-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3011 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought (1) to set up a system to evaluate the operations and effectiveness of The Other Way (TOW) residential substance abuse treatment program at the Clarinda Correctional Facility in Clarinda, Iowa, and (2) to assist program staff in developing and implementing intake, discharge, and follow-up instruments and evaluation protocols to document inmate characteristics and changes over time related to substance use/abuse, mental health, social functioning, and criminal behavior and attitudes. Inmates are referred to this program if they have an identified need for residential-level substance abuse treatment and are within 12 months of release consideration. TOW is a voluntary, six-month long program that works with inmates to identify the causes of their addictive behaviors and encourage changes in unacceptable behaviors and criminal thinking. The sample for this study consists of adult male inmates at the Clarinda Correctional Facility between January 1998 and March 1999. The first point of data collection was the intake assessment. At intake, each subject completed an intake packet consisting of several instruments that measured variables relevant to TOW program goals. Each inmate was also given an Addiction Severity Index (ASI) interview by a counselor at intake. Upon discharge from the program, each subject completed a discharge packet, which contained instruments slightly different from those in the intake packet. Instruments were chosen for reliability and validity, ease of administration, potential for dual clinical and evaluation use, and whether they duplicated any existing efforts. Versions of the following instruments were included in both the intake and discharge packets: the Colorado Cognitive Assessment Questionnaire, Circumstances, Motivation, and Readiness (CMR) Scales for Substance Abuse Treatment, the Social Provisions Scale (SPS), the Self-Help Questionnaire, and the STEPS Questionnaire. A consumer satisfaction survey was also administered at the discharge interview. Variables obtained from answers to the ASI include gender, living situation, date of birth, race, religion, length of incarceration, medical status, education and employment history, sources of financial support, family/social relationships including abuse history, psychiatric status, drug and alcohol use including kinds of drugs used, length of use, age at first use, and frequency of use for each drug, personal problems caused by drug use, drug treatment history, legal history, and family history of drug, alcohol, and psychological problems. Intake assessment variables included are related to social attitudes, and include variables on life goals and the subjects' own views of their achievability, how subjects thought their friends viewed them, how wrong subjects thought certain illegal acts were, and criminal acts by the subjects' friends in the past six months. Discharge packet variables include the same variables on social attitudes as the intake packet as well as variables obtained from answers to the SPS relating to the amount of social support subjects felt they had, past involvement with self-help groups, and life attitudes related to drug/alcohol use. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03011.v1 residential programs icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr inmates icpsr inmate attitudes icpsr program evaluation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Cadoret, Remi J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3011 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03011.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03537 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03537 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Pine Lodge Pre-Release Residential Therapeutic Community for Women Offenders in Washington State, 1996-2001 [electronic resource] Clayton Mosher , Dretha Phillips 2003-02-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3537 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In 1996, Washington State's Department of Corrections (DOC) implemented "New Horizons" (referred to as "First Chance" from its inception in late 1996 to early 2000), a residential therapeutic treatment community for drug-addicted women offenders housed within the Pine Lodge Pre-Release minimum security and co-ed facility in the northeastern part of the state. The target population for the program was women who had been screened and identified as having a serious substance abuse problem and who had 12 months or less to serve on their sentences. Maximum capacity for this program was established at 72 treatment slots with members of the therapeutic community residing together and separate from the rest of the general population. The program approaches addiction as a biopsychosocial disease and strives to restructure and develop pro-social cognitive, behavioral, and affective skills of addicted women offenders. This study investigated (1) factors that affected successful completion of the program, and (2) outcomes (i.e., recidivism) for Pine Lodge participants compared to outcomes for a control group. This project was funded by the National Institute Justice as part of its initiative for local evaluations of prison-based residential substance abuse treatment programs. Data represent an outcome evaluation for Pine Lodge residents compared to outcomes for a matched control group provided by the Washington State Department of Corrections. Through a case-by-case examination of the datasets from Pine Lodge and the Washington State DOC, the researchers created a data file that contained program completion/non-completion data and demographic variables for 322 Pine Lodge participants and a control group of 279 women. Variables include the month and year admitted to the Pine Lodge program, reason for leaving the program, race/ethnicity, crime committed, month and year started the program, sentence length, age, number of months in the program, education level, number of previous offenses, number of months at risk to reoffend, whether reconvicted after release, number of months between release and reconviction, and reconviction offense. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03537.v1 correctional facilities icpsr drug treatment icpsr female offenders icpsr inmate programs icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr prerelease programs icpsr program evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Mosher, Clayton Phillips, Dretha Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3537 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03537.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03196 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03196 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2000 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2003-02-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3196 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is to gather data on all adult and juvenile jail facilities and detention centers in Indian country, which is defined for purposes of this collection as reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey, a complete enumeration of all 69 confinement facilities operated by tribal authorities or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), provides data on the number of inmates and facility characteristics and needs. Variables describe each facility, including the rated capacity, number of adult inmates, number of juveniles held, number of inmates held by sex and conviction status on June 30, number of admissions and discharges in the last 30 days, number of inmate deaths, peak population during June, facility crowding, and renovation and building plans. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03196.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3196 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03196.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09908 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09908 MiAaI MiAaI Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities, 1990 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001-12-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9908 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This census is the fourth enumeration of state adult correctional institutions and the first of federal institutions sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics and conducted by the Bureau of the Census. Earlier censuses were completed in 1974 (ICPSR 7811), 1979 (ICPSR 7852), and 1984 (ICPSR 8444). Separate questionnaires were devised for confinement facilities and for community-based facilities. Variables describing the facilities include physical security, age, functions, capacity, confinement space, available medical facilities, programs, inmate/resident work assignments, staff employment, facilities under court order/consent decree for conditions of confinement, capital and operating expenditures, custody level of inmates/residents, one-day count and average daily population, race/ethnicity of inmates/residents, inmate/resident deaths, special inmate/resident counts, and assaults and incidents by inmates. An addendum on drug control activities in state and federal facilities was included for the first time in the 1990 census. Facilities were asked to provide information on the following: procedures used with inmates/residents, visitors, and staff to keep out illegal drugs and drug paraphernalia, inmate/resident drug-testing practices, including the criteria for testing inmates/residents, the number of inmates/residents tested in total and by specific drug, and the number that tested positive, staff drug testing, including groups and basis for testing, number tested, and procedures when tests were positive, and capacity and enrollment in various types of drug treatment and intervention programs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09908.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr corrections management icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr inmate deaths icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jails icpsr prison administration icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison construction icpsr prison overcrowding icpsr prison violence icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9908 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09908.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02980 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02980 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 1999 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001-10-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2980 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is to gather data on all adult and juvenile jail facilities and detention centers in Indian country, which is defined for purposes of this collection as reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey, a complete enumeration of all 69 confinement facilities operated by tribal authorities or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), provides data on number of inmates, staffing, and facility characteristics and needs. Variables describe each facility, including who operated it, facility age, facility function, rated capacity, authority to house juveniles, number of juveniles held, number of admission and discharges in last 30 days, number of inmate deaths, the peak population during June, number of inmates held by sex and conviction status on June 30, number of facility staff by sex and function, facility crowding, renovation and building plans, types of programs available to inmates, and overview of facility and staffing needs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02980.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2980 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02980.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02979 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02979 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 1998 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001-10-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2979 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is to gather data on all adult and juvenile jail facilities and detention centers in Indian country, which is defined for purposes of this collection as reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey, a complete enumeration of all 69 confinement facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), provides data on number of inmates, staffing, and facility characteristics and needs. Variables describe each facility, including who operated it, facility age, facility function, rated capacity, authority to house juveniles, number of juveniles held, number of admission and discharges in last 30 days, number of inmate deaths, peak population during June, number of inmates held by sex and conviction status on June 30, number of facility staff by sex and function, facility crowding, renovation and building plans, types of programs available to inmates, and overview of facility and staffing needs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02979.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2979 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02979.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08481 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08481 MiAaI MiAaI Women in Prison, 1800-1935 [electronic resource] Tennessee, New York, and Ohio Nicole Hahn Rafter 2000-10-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8481 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection focused on problems in the women's correctional system over a 135-year period. More specifically, it examined the origins and development of prisoner and sentencing characteristics in three states. Demographic data on female inmates cover age, race, parents' place of birth, prisoner's occupation, religion, and marital status. Other variables include correctional facilities, offenses, minimum and maximum sentences, prior commitments, method of release from prison, and presence of crime partners. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08481.v2 correctional facilities icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr criminal justice system icpsr sentencing icpsr women icpsr United States icpsr New York icpsr Ohio icpsr Tennessee icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Rafter, Nicole Hahn Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8481 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08481.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08933 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08933 MiAaI MiAaI Improving Prison Classification Procedures in Vermont [electronic resource] Applying an Interaction Model, 1983-1985 William K. Apao 2000-03-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8933 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection was to develop and test an interactive model for classifying prisoners. The model includes person variables, environmental or situation variables, and prison-environmental interaction variables in order to study the interactions between individuals and their environments and to predict offender behaviors such as escape, misconduct, and violence. The model was designed to enhance the predictive validity of the National Institute of Corrections' classification system that was being used in Vermont prisons. Included are scores from the National Institute of Corrections' custody classification and reclassification instruments, scores from a needs assessment, sentencing information, and characteristics of the prison in which the inmate was housed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08933.v1 violence icpsr Vermont icpsr United States icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmates icpsr living conditions icpsr sentencing icpsr socioeconomic indicators icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Apao, William K. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8933 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08933.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09165 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09165 MiAaI MiAaI Race of Prisoners Admitted to State and Federal Institutions in the United States, 1926-1986 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics , Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research 1999-10-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9165 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection includes tabulations of annual adult admissions to federal and state correctional institutions by race. Data are provided for the years 1926 to 1986 and include tabulations for prisons in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as federal prison totals and United States totals. The figures were derived from a voluntary reporting program in which each state, the District of Columbia, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons reported summary and detailed statistics as a part of the National Prisoner Statistics series. Individual state and United States population figures according to racial categories also are provided. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09165.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr inmates icpsr race icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9165 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09165.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06147 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06147 MiAaI MiAaI National Assessment of Gangs in Correctional Facilities, 1992 [electronic resource] Dennis G., et al. Baugh 1997-04-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6147 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought to identify and examine current policies and strategies for controlling prison gangs and to determine the ways in which correctional facilities were dealing with gangs in their institutions. Respondents to the mail survey included 55 local jail systems and 52 state prison systems (the 50 state Departments of Corrections, the District of Columbia, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons). The survey question text used the term "security threat group" (STG), which was defined as "two or more inmates, acting together, who pose a threat to the security or safety of staff/inmates and/or are disruptive to programs and/or to the orderly management of the facility/system," rather than the generic term "gang." Data contain information on total inmate population, number of STGs, number of inmates identified as confirmed, suspected, associate, and drop-out members of STGs, total incidents of violence, number of violent incidents by STG members, management strategies to deal with gangs, and names of STGs known to be present within the system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06147.v1 inmates icpsr policies and procedures icpsr security icpsr correctional facilities icpsr gang members icpsr gangs icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Baugh, Dennis G., et al. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6147 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06147.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06648 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06648 MiAaI MiAaI National Jail Census, 1993 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1996-07-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6648 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is part of a series of data collection efforts aimed at studying the nation's locally administered jails. The 1993 census included all locally administered confinement facilities (3,287) that held inmates beyond arraignment and were staffed by municipal or county employees. The census also included 17 jails that were privately operated under contract for local governments and seven facilities maintained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and functioning as jails. For purposes of this data collection, a local jail was defined as a confinement facility intended for holding adults, and in some cases juveniles pending adjudication or having sentences of a year or less. Jails were further defined as being administered by a local law enforcement agency. Variables include information on jail population by legal status, age, and sex of prisoners, maximum sentence, admissions and releases, available services and programs, structure and capacity, facility age and use of space, expenditure, employment, staff information, and health issues, which include statistics on drugs, AIDS, and tuberculosis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06648.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr census data icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6648 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06648.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07638 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07638 MiAaI MiAaI National Jail Census, 1972 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1994-02-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7638 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this census was to provide information on jails throughout the United States. Information is supplied on the number of inmates held, types of accommodations, number of different types of staff personnel, procedures for segregating certain types of inmates, and selected programs and services. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07638.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7638 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07638.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06068 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06068 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, 1991 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1993-10-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 6068 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey provides nationally representative data on persons held in state prisons and is similar to surveys conducted in 1974 (ICPSR 7811), 1979 (ICPSR 7856), and 1986 (ICPSR 8711). The survey was designed to provide information on individual characteristics of prison inmates, their current offenses and sentences, characteristics of victims, criminal histories, prior drug and alcohol use and treatment, gun possession and use, gang membership, family background, and prison activities, programs, and services. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06068.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (adults) icpsr corrections icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr HIV icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmate deaths icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr offenses icpsr prison conditions icpsr substance abuse icpsr treatment programs icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD V. Health and Well-Being RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6068 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06068.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08920 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08920 MiAaI MiAaI Differential Use of Jail Confinement in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Yolo Counties, 1981 [electronic resource] James Austin , Barry Krisberg 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8920 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study provides detailed information on inmate characteristics, length of time in jail, methods of release, conditions of release, disciplinary violations, and types of program participation while in jail. The file contains variables for each inmate, including information about inmates' demographic characteristics, current offenses, prior records, confinement conditions, disciplinary problems, and nature and time of disposition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08920.v1 arrests icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmates icpsr United States icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Austin, James Krisberg, Barry Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8920 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08920.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08515 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08515 MiAaI MiAaI Matching Treatment and Offender [electronic resource] North Carolina, 1980-1982 Mary Ellen Marsden , Thomas Orsagh 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8515 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data were gathered in order to evaluate the implications of rational choice theory for offender rehabilitation. The hypothesis of the research was that income-enhancing prison rehabilitation programs are most effective for the economically motivated offender. The offender was characterized by demographic and socio-economic characteristics, criminal history and behavior, and work activities during incarceration. Information was also collected on type of release and post-release recidivistic and labor market measures. Recividism was measured by arrests, convictions, and reincarcerations, length of time until first arrest after release, and seriousness of offense leading to reincarceration. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08515.v1 arrests icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime prevention icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmates icpsr United States icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Marsden, Mary Ellen Orsagh, Thomas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8515 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08515.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07971 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07971 MiAaI MiAaI Characteristics and Movement of Felons in California Prisons, 1851-1964 [electronic resource] Sheldon Messinger 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 7971 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Felons in the California prison system are documented in this data collection. The data are arranged by year and type of movement within the prison system, and include admissions, paroles, parole violations, suspensions or reinstatements of parole, discharges, deaths, and executions. Each record contains information on certain characteristics of the person involved, such as age at admission, race, marital status, education, military history, occupation, number of prior arrests, escape record, date and type of releases, and parole violations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07971.v3 correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr fatalities icpsr felons icpsr inmates icpsr parole icpsr arrests icpsr convictions (law) icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Messinger, Sheldon Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7971 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07971.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07811 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07811 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities and Census of State Adult Correctional Facilities, 1974 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7811 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files.