nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09586 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09586 MiAaI MiAaI Variations in Criminal Patterns Among Narcotic Addicts in Baltimore and New York City, 1983-1984 [electronic resource] David N. Nurco , Thomas E. Hanlon , Timothy W. Kinlock , Evelyn Slaght 2013-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9586 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was undertaken to develop a typology of narcotic addicts according to the kind, frequency, and seriousness of their crimes and to identify the most serious criminal offenders, thereby determining which individuals were best suited to rehabilitation. The following questions are addressed by the data: (1) What "types" of narcotic addicts can be distinguished in terms of their criminal behavior? Which of these types are amenable to rehabilitation? (2) At what time during their addiction careers do addicts commit the most crime? Do narcotic addicts "mature" out of addiction? (3) What is the relationship between individuals' involvement in crime prior to addiction and their criminal activity and drug use over their addiction career? (4) Which demographic, personality, or other factors are associated with serious crime committed during periods of narcotic addiction? (5) What are the contributions of situational and dispositional factors to the relationship between addiction and crime? Part 1 of the collection details the subjects' addiction careers, the age they first used various drugs, the age they first became addicted to narcotics, the amount of time they were addicted/not addicted to narcotics, and the total length of their addiction careers. Part 2 contains variables generated by cluster analysis, including cluster assignment or "type." Part 3 includes the educational, occupational, and arrest histories of the subjects, as well as the drug use and arrest histories of their families. The Part 4 file consists of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and Raven Progressive Matrix scores. The frequency and types of crime that subjects committed during the preaddiction period comprise Part 5, while the frequency and nature of drug use during the preaddiction period comprise Part 6. Parts 7 and 8 contain crime variables and drug use variables, respectively, across all nonaddiction periods. Finally, Part 9 contains data characterizing crime across all addiction periods, and Part 10 contains variables regarding drug use across total addiction periods. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09586.v2 addiction icpsr controlled drugs icpsr crime patterns icpsr criminality prediction icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug treatment icpsr personality icpsr rehabilitation icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Nurco, David N. Hanlon, Thomas E. Kinlock, Timothy W. Slaght, Evelyn Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9586 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09586.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27546 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27546 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27546 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were aggregated to the state level. The JRFC collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bed space in the facility to indicate whether the facility is experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the JRFC concatenated data file (ICPSR 27542) were aggregated to the state level and variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27546 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27545 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27545 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27545 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the state level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the state level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched state-level data provide information about the characteristics of juvenile residential facilities in the state from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in these facilities from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date were included in the concatenated matched file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not have been included in the file used for the aggregation. Variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were also added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27545 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27544 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27544 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Facility-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27544 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the facility level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the facility level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched facility-level data provide information about the characteristics of the facility from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in that facility from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched facility-level file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27544 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27543 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27543 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27543 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27541) and the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were matched on the facility identifier to create one data file. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Each record in the concatenated matched data file provides information about the juvenile and also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held from both the CJRP and JRFC collections. Therefore, these data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27543 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27542 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27542 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27542 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 pregnancy icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27542 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27541 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27541 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-02-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27541 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP, which is conducted biennially, asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. The concatenated data include the seven years of CJRP data in one file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27541 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30321 MiAaI MiAaI Custody Evaluations When There Are Allegations of Domestic Violence [electronic resource] Practices, Beliefs and Recommendations of Professional Evaluators in New York City, 1997-2009 Michael S. Davis , Chris S. O'Sullivan , Kim Susser , Marjory D. Fields 2013-01-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 30321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the beliefs and investigative practices of psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers who had been appointed by a court to evaluate families in disputed custody cases when there were allegations of domestic violence. The research team conducted a Case Review study (Part 1) and administered an Evaluator Survey to corresponding case evaluators (Part 2) between August 2007 and December 2009. The case review study was implemented through four private non-profit legal services agencies in New York City that provide free legal representation to domestic violence victims in civil proceedings including custody and visitation litigation. A total of 69 cases involving custody or visitation issues that were litigated and resolved between 1997 and 2007 were identified for inclusion in the study. The case review study involved the development of a Coding Scale for Custody Evaluations with Domestic Violence (DV) Allegations in order to rate the characteristics of the custody evaluations and the court outcomes. Raters coded each of the 69 cases in the case review sample with the Evaluation Coding Scale. The research team administered the Evaluator Survey (Part 2) to 14 custody evaluators who had completed evaluation reports for the cases in the Part 1 case review study. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30321.v1 abuse icpsr child custody icpsr child custody hearings icpsr courts icpsr divorce icpsr domestic assault icpsr domestic violence icpsr evaluation icpsr family courts icpsr family relationships icpsr family violence icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr legal aid icpsr parents icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr social services icpsr social work icpsr spouse abuse icpsr violence icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women Davis, Michael S. O'Sullivan, Chris S. Susser, Kim Fields, Marjory D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33201 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33201 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring Drug Epidemics and the Markets That Sustain Them, Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) and ADAM II Data, 2000-2003 and 2007-2010 [electronic resource] Andrew Golub , Henry H. Brownstein , Eloise Dunlap 2012-12-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33201 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined trends in the use of five widely abused drugs among arrestees at 10 geographically diverse locations from 2000 to 2010: Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Denver, Indianapolis, Manhattan, Minneapolis, Portland Oregon, Sacramento, and Washington DC. The data came from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program reintroduced in 2007 (ADAM II) and its predecessor the ADAM program. ADAM data included urinalysis results that provided an objective measure of recent drug use, provided location specific estimates over time, and provided sample weights that yielded unbiased estimates for each location. The ADAM data were analyzed according to a drug epidemics framework, which has been previously employed to understand the decline of the crack epidemic, the growth of marijuana use in the 1990s, and the persistence of heroin use. Similar to other diffusion of innovation processes, drug epidemics tend to follow a natural course passing through four distinct phases: incubation, expansion, plateau, and decline. The study also searched for changes in drug markets over the course of a drug epidemic. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33201.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr arrests icpsr cocaine icpsr crack cocaine icpsr crime patterns icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr methamphetamine icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Golub, Andrew Brownstein, Henry H. Dunlap, Eloise Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33201 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33201.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34449 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34449 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34449 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2010, the JRFC used three modules to collect information on the educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34449 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34402 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34402 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2008 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34402 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34402 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34448 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34448 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34448 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34448 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34401 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34401 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2007 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34401 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34401 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02564 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02564 MiAaI MiAaI Crack, Powder Cocaine, and Heroin [electronic resource] Drug Purchase and Use Patterns in Six Cities in the United States, 1995-1996 K. Jack Riley 2012-08-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2564 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was designed to address the practical and policy implications of various drug market participation patterns. In 1995, the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) collaborated on a project called the Procurement Study. This study was executed as an addendum to NIJ's Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]) with the goal of extending previous research in which heroin users were interviewed on various aspects of drug market activity. The present study sought to explore additional features of drug market participation and use, both within and across drug types and cities, and included two additional drugs -- powder cocaine and crack cocaine. Data were collected from recently arrested users of powder cocaine, crack cocaine, and heroin in six DUF cities (Chicago, New York, Portland, San Diego, San Antonio, and Washington, DC). Each of the three files in this collection, Crack Data (Part 1), Heroin Data (Part 2), and Powder Cocaine Data (Part 3), is comprised of data from a procurement interview, urine test variables, and a DUF interview. During the procurement interview, information was collected on purchase and use patterns for specific drugs. Variables from the procurement interview include the respondent's method of using the drug, the term used to refer to the drug, whether the respondent bought the drug in the neighborhood, the number of different dealers the respondent bought the drug from, how the respondent made the connection with the dealer (i.e., street, house, phone, beeper, business/store, or friends), their main drug source, whether the respondent went to someone else if the source was not available, how the respondent coped with not being able to find drugs to buy, whether the respondent got the drug for free, the means by which the respondent obtained money, the quantity and packaging of the drug, and the number of minutes spent searching for, traveling to, and waiting for their last purchase. Urine tests screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Data from the DUF interview provide detailed information about each arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type, arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the interview. Data from the DUF interview instrument also included alcohol/drug treatment history, information about whether arrestees had ever injected drugs, and whether they were influenced by drugs when the crime that they were charged with was committed. The data also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had had prior arrests in the past 12 months. Demographic data include the age, race, sex, educational attainment, marital status, employment status, and living circumstances of each respondent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 crack cocaine icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr heroin icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr arrests icpsr cocaine icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Riley, K. Jack Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2564 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32901 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32901 MiAaI MiAaI Experimental Evaluation of a Youth Dating Violence Prevention Program in New York City Middle Schools, 2009-2010 [electronic resource] Bruce Taylor , Nan D. Stein , Dan Woods , Elizabeth Mumford 2012-05-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 32901 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The study sought to measure knowledge about laws related to domestic violence and harassment, resources for help, rape myths, and skills such as conflict resolution; attitudes about the acceptability of violent, abusive, and harassing behaviors; behavioral intentions to avoid committing violent acts in the future as well as intentions to intervene when in the position of a bystander; behavioral measures about peer and dating partner physical and sexual violence experienced as a victim or perpetrator, and sexual harassment experienced as a victim or perpetrator; and other items covering a demographic profile of the students and questions on prior attendance at an educational program about sexual assault, harassment, or violence, and prior history of dating. Researchers randomly assigned a school-based intervention to 6th and 7th grade classes (over 2,500 students) in 30 public middle schools in New York City to one of four conditions: (1) a classroom-based intervention; (2) a school-wide intervention; (3) interventions that included both classroom and school-wide components; or (4) a (no treatment) control group. The classroom based intervention was delivered through a six session curriculum that emphasized the consquences for perpetrators of domestic violence and harassment, state laws and penalties for domestic violence and harassment, the construction of gender roles, and healthy relationships. The school-wide intervention included the development and use of temporary school-based restraining orders, higher levels of faculty and security presence in areas identified by students and school personnel as unsafe "hot spots", and the use of posters to increase awareness and reporting of domestic violence and harassment to school personnel. Pencil and paper surveys were distributed to students at three different times: (1) immediately before the assignment to one of the four study conditions, (2) immediately after the treatment (or control condition) was completed, and (3) between five and six months after assignment to one of the four study conditions. The surveys took about 40 minutes to complete and were completed in the classroom during one class period. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32901.v1 children icpsr dating (social) icpsr domestic violence icpsr middle schools icpsr school age children icpsr sexual harassment icpsr social interaction icpsr social life icpsr students icpsr youths icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD I. Attitude Surveys ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Taylor, Bruce Stein, Nan D. Woods, Dan Mumford, Elizabeth Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32901 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32901.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30441 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30441 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Healthy Families New York Home Visiting Program, Age Seven Follow Up, 2007-2009 [electronic resource] Kimberly DuMont , Monica L. Rodriguez , Kristen Kirkland , Susan Mitchell-Herzfeld , Susan Ehrhard-Dietzel , Eunju Lee , China Layne , Rose Greene 2012-04-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30441 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Healthy Families New York (HFNY), which was based on the Healthy Families America (HFA) model, was established as a strengths-based, intensive home visitation program with the explicit goals of promoting positive parenting skills and parent-child interaction; preventing child abuse and neglect; supporting optimal prenatal care, and child health and development; and improving parent's self-sufficiency. In 2000, a randomized controlled trial was initiated at three sites with the HFNY home visiting program. Families eligible for HFNY at each site were randomly assigned to either an intervention group that was offered HFNY services or to a control group that was given information on and referral to appropriate services other than home visiting. Baseline interviews were conducted with 1,173 of the eligible women (intervention, n=579; control, n=594), and follow up interviews at Years 1, 2, and 3. In addition to data gathered during the follow up interviews, information regarding study participants' involvement in reports of child maltreatment was also extracted and coded from Child Protection Services records. For the current study, mothers in both the intervention and control groups were re-interviewed at the time of the target child's seventh birthday. Interviews (Dataset 1: Mother Interview Data, n=942) included information about parenting, the child, earnings, and household composition. Interviewers also completed face-to-face assessments (Dataset 2: Target Child Interview Data) with 800 of the children who were born and reached the age of 7 at the time of interview. The target child interviews assessed children's receptive vocabulary skills, emotional health, self-regulatory abilities, and problem behaviors. The research team also extracted or obtained administrative data pertaining to Child Protective Service reports, foster care placements, federal and state supported benefits, and programs services and costs (Datasets 3-8). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30441.v1 behavior problems icpsr child abuse icpsr child development icpsr child rearing icpsr child welfare icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr intervention icpsr outreach programs icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr parenting skills icpsr school age children icpsr service providers icpsr social services icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency DuMont, Kimberly Rodriguez, Monica L. Kirkland, Kristen Mitchell-Herzfeld, Susan Ehrhard-Dietzel, Susan Lee, Eunju Layne, China Greene, Rose Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30441 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30441.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25981 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25981 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2006 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 25981 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2006, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25981 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25282 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25282 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2004 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 25282 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2004, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the physical health and educational services provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25282.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr pregnancy icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25282 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25282.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23520 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23520 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2002 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 23520 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2002, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the substance abuse treatment and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23520 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04672 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04672 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4672 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2000, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 census data icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4672 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR24300 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR24300 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2006 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 24300 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2006, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 24300 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23480 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23480 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2003 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 23480 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2003, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23480 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04674 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04674 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1999 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4674 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1999, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4674 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04670 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04670 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2001 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4670 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2001, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4670 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04673 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04673 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4673 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4673 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32321 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2010 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2011-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 8,332 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2010. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2010. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr susbstance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31601 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31601 MiAaI MiAaI New York City Trafficking Assessment Project, 2007-2008 [electronic resource] Neil Weiner , Nicole Hala 2011-07-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31601 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the New York City Trafficking Assessment Project (NYCTAP) was to develop a screening tool to identify likely victims of trafficking and an accompanying toolkit for service providers to support the administration of the screening tool. The NYCTAP Community Advisory Board (CAB) consisted of twelve local organizations, including four social service agencies, four legal service agencies, three community-based organizations, and one advocacy organization. In May and June of 2007, (Part 1, Community Advisory Board (CAB) Agency Reviews Qualitative Data) a draft of the screening tool was circulated among the CAB agencies for review. The reviewers were asked to evaluate the screening tool for comprehensiveness, section organization, question wording, and question placement. The draft NYCTAP screening tool was also circulated among law enforcement agencies at the federal and local level in November and December of 2007. Reviewers (Part 3, Law Enforcement Agency Reviews Qualitative Data) were asked to review the screening tool from the perspective of federal and local law enforcement and to suggest modifications and additions to screening tool content. In October and November of 2007, semi-structured interviews (Part 2, Community Advisory Board (CAB) Agency Interviews Qualitative Data) were conducted with two CAB agencies that were unable to participate in the field application of the screening tool, but had extensive experience in trafficking victim assistance that could be shared. In January and February of 2008, (Part 4, Community Advisory Board (CAB) De-briefings Qualitative Data) six of participating CAB agencies that applied the draft NYCTAP screening tool in their work with clients were asked to provide feedback on the overall usability of the screening tool, as well as tool content and tool administration. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31601.v1 exploitation icpsr human rights icpsr human rights violations icpsr human services icpsr human trafficking icpsr identured servants icpsr law enforcement icpsr service providers icpsr sex trafficking icpsr slavery icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women Weiner, Neil Hala, Nicole Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31601 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31601.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25441 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25441 MiAaI MiAaI Long-Term Consequences of Delinquency [electronic resource] Child Maltreatment and Crime in Early Adulthood in New York, 1990-2006 Rebecca Colman 2011-04-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 25441 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. reports linked to a study participant, including variables relating to the participant's perpetration of child maltreatment, type of alleged maltreatment, investigation outcome, and outcome variables reflecting participants' involvement in various types of maltreatment allegations. Finally, Part 3 of the study contains 147 variables derived from specific adult arrest events associated with the participants, including arrest-specific variables, case outcome variables, and criminal history variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25441.v1 career criminals icpsr child abuse icpsr child neglect icpsr child welfare icpsr criminal histories icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr family relations icpsr female offenders icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juvenile recidivists icpsr postrelease programs icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivists icpsr social adjustment icpsr social reintegration icpsr substance abuse icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Colman, Rebecca Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25441 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25441.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25925 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25925 MiAaI MiAaI Preventing Repeat Incidents of Family Violence [electronic resource] A Reanalysis of Data From Three Field Tests in Manhattan [New York City], New York, 1987, 1995-1997 Robert C. Davis , Christopher D. Maxwell 2011-03-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 25925 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In the mid-1980s New York City officials developed an intervention program, the Domestic Violence Intervention Education Project (DVIEP), to reduce repeat incidents of family abuse. The program posited that repeat victimization would decline as victims extracted themselves from self-defeating relationships or by working with social services and criminal justice staff to develop strategies to end the abuse while staying in the relationship. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the DVIEP model in reducing repeat instances of family violence. Between 1987 and 1997, three separate, randomized field experiments in New York City's public housing projects evaluated whether or not the DVIEP program reduced the rate of subsequent victimization. All three studies tested the same intervention model: persons who reported family violence to the police were randomly assigned to receive or not to receive a follow-up visit from a domestic violence prevention police officer and a social worker. For this study, researchers concatenated the micro data from the 3 experiments into a single, 1,037 case dataset that contains identical treatment and control measures, and nearly identical outcome measures. Of the 1,037 total cases in the study, 434 are from the 1987 Domestic Violence Study, 406 are from the Elder Abuse study, EFFECTIVENESS OF A JOINT POLICE AND SOCIAL SERVICES RESPONSE TO ELDER ABUSE IN MANHATTAN [NEW YORK CITY], NEW YORK, 1996-1997 (ICPSR 3130), and 197 are from the Domestic Violence Arrestee Study in Manhattan's Police Services Area 2 (PSA2). The resulting data collection contains a total of 31 variables including which study (1987 Domestic Violence Study, Elder Abuse Study, or Domestic Violence Arrestee Study) the respondent participated in, whether the respondent was part of the experimental group or the control group, whether the respondent received public education or a home visit by a DVIEP team, the number of DVIEP services the respondent used, and whether the respondent completed a final interview with a DVIEP team after six months of tracking. Additionally, variables include the victim's age, whether the perpetrator of domestic abuse was a romantic partner of the victim, the number of incidents reported to the police, the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) violence score, and the number of days until the first new incident of domestic abuse. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25925.v1 abuse icpsr crime reporting icpsr domestic violence icpsr elder abuse icpsr family conflict icpsr family relations icpsr family violence icpsr households icpsr intervention icpsr marital relations icpsr older adults icpsr police response icpsr program evaluation icpsr spouse abuse icpsr victim services icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization Davis, Robert C. Maxwell, Christopher D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25925 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25925.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20345 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20345 MiAaI MiAaI Reducing Repeat Sexual Assault Victimization [electronic resource] Design and Testing of a Risk Reduction Program in New York City, New York, and Seattle, Washington, 2003-2005 Rob Davis , Pam Guthrie , Timothy Ross , Chris O'Sullivan 2011-02-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 20345 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the study was to develop an intervention that would be analogous to safety planning for battered women, and one that could be used by sexual assault counselors as an adjunct to psychological counseling. The project was conducted at Safe Horizon in New York City and at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle from August 2003 to May 2005. The client populations of the two programs were complementary. Safe Horizon’s clients were primarily Black (36 percent) and Latina (26 percent). In contrast, a majority of Harborview clients were White (59 percent), although Harborview also had many non-White, non-Hispanic clients. Approximately half of the eligible candidates were randomly assigned to participate in a four-hour workshop on avoiding sexual assault while the others were assigned to a control condition that did not receive the training. Both groups participated in a baseline assessment battery administered in person. After completion of the assessment, those assigned to the experimental condition began the workshop. Researchers contacted women in both groups six months later for a second assessment, this time conducted over the phone. The 14 data files contain information related to alcohol consumption, tonic immobility, knowledge of sexual assault risk factors, attributions for the most recent sexual assault, self-efficacy, risky behaviors, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomology, and sexual victimization. The data also contain one file with demographic information. Each data file contains 84 cases. Across all parts, the data collection has 612 variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20345.v1 alcohol consumption icpsr dating (social) icpsr post-traumatic stress disorder icpsr sexual assault icpsr violence icpsr violence against women icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Davis, Rob Guthrie, Pam Ross, Timothy O'Sullivan, Chris Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20345 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20345.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30061 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30061 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2009 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2011-02-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30061 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 7,794 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2009. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 2009. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr susbstance abuse icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30061 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27841 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27841 MiAaI MiAaI Effectiveness of Prisoner Reentry Services as Crime Control for Inmates Released in New York, 2000-2005 [electronic resource] Douglas McDonald , Christina Dyous , Kenneth Carlson 2010-08-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27841 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. identifier. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27841.v1 prisoner reentry icpsr probation icpsr criminal justice programs icpsr recidivism icpsr ex-offenders icpsr homelessness icpsr inmate release plans icpsr parole icpsr parole services icpsr postrelease programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections McDonald, Douglas Dyous, Christina Carlson, Kenneth Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27841 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27841.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27221 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27221 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2008 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2010-03-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27221 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc. have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implements two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collects data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Data collection has been conducted across two back-to-back quarters in each of 10 counties from a county-based representative sample of 250 male arrestees per quarter for a total of 500 arrestees annually per site or a total of 5,000 arrestees across sites annually. A total of 7,717 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2008. Collection occurs in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2007 and ending March 31, 2008. Additional data collection periods were optioned by ONDCP, and subsequent cycles of back-to-back data collection (not yet available) began April 1, 2008. Participation is voluntary and confidential, and the procedures include a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr methamphetamine icpsr urinalysis icpsr addiction icpsr alcoholism icpsr cocaine icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug use icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27221 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25821 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25821 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2007 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt 2010-01-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25821 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) II program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, the ONDCP and Abt Associates have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. A total of 8,296 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2007. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25821.v2 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr methamphetamine icpsr urinalysis icpsr addiction icpsr alcoholism icpsr cocaine icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug use icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Hunt, Dana Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25821 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25821.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20347 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20347 MiAaI MiAaI Impact of Institutional Placement on the Recidivism of Delinquent Youth in New York City, 2000-2003 [electronic resource] Jeffrey Lin 2009-08-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 20347 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The primary research goal of this study was to explore the effects of juvenile incarceration on future recidivism using social and legal history data about adjudicated juvenile delinquents in New York City. The secondary research goal of this study was to explore family court decision-making and the nature of family court processing. Study subjects were chosen by examining Family Court calendars in all five New York City boroughs for each day in April, May, and June of 2000, which identified every youth who received a disposition during this period. Research staff located case files for each subject in probation department file rooms in the five family courts, using personal and numeric identifiers taken from court calendars. Using a standardized data collection instrument that was developed by the research team, coded information was derived for 698 total cases by examining documents in each subject's probation case file. Coded data from probation case files offered a baseline portrait of this sample of delinquent youth. In order to measure recidivism, the principal investigator linked baseline records, using personal and numeric identifiers, to arrest and incarceration information provided by other city and state agencies. In this dataset, each record is essentially a snapshot of a particular youth at the time of his or her disposition. Variables about the sampled youth include: demographic profile, case processing, legal history, characteristics of present and past family environments, school performance indicators, community and peer relationships, history of alcohol and drug use, mental health history, and history of victimization. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20347.v2 correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr probation icpsr probation officers icpsr recidivism icpsr family courts icpsr imprisonment icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr offenders icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Lin, Jeffrey Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20347 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20347.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25621 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25621 MiAaI MiAaI Impact of Legal Advocacy on Intimate Partner Homicide in the United States, 1976-1997 [electronic resource] Laura Dugan 2009-07-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25621 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined the impacts of jurisdictions’ domestic violence policies on violent behavior of family members and intimate partners, on the likelihood that the police discovered an incident, and on the likelihood that the police made an arrest. The research combined two datasets. Part 1 contains information on police, prosecution policies, and local victim services. Informants within the local agencies of the 50 largest cities in the United States were contacted and asked to complete a survey inventorying policies and activities by type and year of implementation. Data from completed surveys covered 48 cities from 1976 to 1996. Part 2 contains data on domestic violence laws. Data on state statutes from 1976 to 1997 that related to protection orders were collected by a legal expert for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25621.v1 arrests icpsr crime reporting icpsr domestic violence icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr police reports icpsr policy analysis icpsr state legislatures icpsr victim services icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Dugan, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25621 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25621.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR22381 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR22381 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring Drug Markets in Manhattan [New York City], With the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, 1998-2002 [electronic resource] Andrew Golub , Bruce D. Johnson 2009-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 22381 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to determine how much Manhattan (New York City) arrestees surveyed by the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program spend on drug expenses. The program obtained both self-report and urinalysis data from a total of 5,210 Manhattan arrestees surveyed by the ADAM program from 1998 to 2002. The principal investigators developed a formula for an episodic estimator of a respondent’s drug expense for cash, noncash, and cash-combination transactions. The dataset contains a total of 267 variables relating to Manhattan arrestees' demographics, interview information, criminal history, urinalysis test results, drug use, drug market transactions, and drug expenses. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22381.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Golub, Andrew Johnson, Bruce D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 22381 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22381.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04583 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04583 MiAaI MiAaI Supervised and Unsupervised Parental Access in Domestic Violence Cases in New York City, New York, 2002-2005 [electronic resource] Chris O'Sullivan , Lori A. King , Kyla Levin-Russell , Emily Horowitz 2009-02-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 4583 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purposes of this study were (1) to examine factors associated with New York City Family Courts' visitation decisions and conformity to the provisions of the Model Code of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges when there was a history of abuse of the mother by the father, (2) to compare the different visitation conditions in regard to reabuse -- both psychological and physical, and (3) to examine children's psychological well-being as measured by maternal report on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), given their exposure to abuse. Two hundred forty-two participants were recruited from the Family Courts and supervised visitation centers in the five counties in New York City. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. There were two interviews with the mother, with an average interval of six months between interviews. Baseline interviews were conducted in person, at the court, or visitation center from 2002 to 2004. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 168 of the participants from 2003 to 2005 and were conducted over the phone, except on the rare occasions when a participant requested an in-person interview. Information in the the baseline interview included demographic information on the participant as well as on the father of the child(ren), information on the level of physical violence and the children's exposure, how often particular acts of violence took place, threats and coercion, an injury index, information regarding court orders, information regarding custody petitions, information regarding visitation orders, and visitation experience. The follow-up interview asked about abuse since the previous interview and included updates, changes, and modifications to the information provided in the baseline interview. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04583.v1 battered women icpsr threats icpsr violence icpsr violence against women icpsr child custody icpsr conflict icpsr court orders icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr family courts icpsr injuries icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr restraining orders icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System O'Sullivan, Chris King, Lori A. Levin-Russell, Kyla Horowitz, Emily Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4583 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04583.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07865 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07865 MiAaI MiAaI National Supported Work Evaluation Study, 1975-1979 [electronic resource] Public Use Files Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation 2009-02-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7865 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This study is an evaluation of the National Supported Work Demonstration project, a transitional, subsidized work experience program for four target groups of people with longstanding employment problems: ex-offenders, former drug addicts, women who were long-term recipients of welfare benefits, and school dropouts, many with criminal records. The program provided up to 12-18 months of employment to about 10,000 individuals at 15 locations across the country for four years. In ten of these sites -- Atlanta, Chicago, Hartford, Jersey City, Newark, New York, Philadelphia, Oakland, San Francisco, and Wisconsin, 6,600 eligible applicants were randomly assigned either to experimental groups (offered a job in supported work) or to control groups, and an evaluation was conducted on the effects of the Supported Work Program. At the time of enrollment, each respondent was given a retrospective baseline interview, generally covering the previous two years, followed by up to four follow-up interviews scheduled at nine-month intervals. Two public use files were originally distributed for this data collection: Supported Work Employment and Earnings File, and Supported Work Deviant Behavior File. Each file contained data for up to five interviews, a cross-document dataset and an Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients follow-up. The Employment and Earnings File contains data from all interview modules except the drug and crime sections, and the Deviant Behavior File contains all variables on the Employment and Earnings File as well as additional information on drugs and crime. Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients were further asked about children in school and welfare participation, while all non-AFDC respondents were questioned about any extralegal activities. Demographic items specify age, sex, race, marital status, education, number of children, employment history, job search, job training, mobility, household income, welfare assistance, housing, military discharge status, and drug use. Each respondent has up to six logical, fixed-length records, with each record corresponding to a completed interview (up to five) and one additional short "cross-document" record. A User's Guide describing the collection and its components is available and should be read before the collection or any part of it is ordered. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07865.v2 social attitudes icpsr criminal justice system icpsr deviance icpsr drug law offenses icpsr economic behavior icpsr employment icpsr government programs icpsr job history icpsr labor force icpsr occupations icpsr public assistance programs icpsr quality of life icpsr social behavior icpsr social indicators icpsr unemployment icpsr work environment icpsr workers icpsr ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7865 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07865.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR21184 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR21184 MiAaI MiAaI Developing and Validating a Brief Jail Mental Health Screen in Maryland and New York, 2005-2006 [electronic resource] Henry J. Steadman 2008-09-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 21184 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of this research project was to develop an efficient mental health screen that would aid in the early identification of severe mental illnesses and other acute psychiatric problems during the jail intake process. The researchers sought to validate the Brief Jail Mental Health Screen (BJMHS) as such a tool. Participants in the study included male and female jail detainees admitted to one of four county jails, two in Maryland and two in New York, from November 2005 to June 2006. A total of 10,562 jail detainees were screened using the BJMHS-R (Part 1). The screening data were used to identify a sub-sample of detainees who were systematically sampled for a detailed clinical assessment, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), which was conducted by a trained research interviewer in order to validate the screen. A subset of 464 jail detainees completed the SCID interviews (Part 2). Part 1, Tracking Data, contains 54 variables, including items and scores from the BJMHS-R, that were used to used to identify and generate a list of potential detainee participants for the SCID interview. Part 2, Interview Data, contains 326 variables, including items and scores from both the BJMHS-R and the SCID interviews, that were used to validate the screen. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21184.v1 emotional states icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr women icpsr female inmates icpsr female offenders icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr mental disorders icpsr mental health icpsr mental health services icpsr psychiatric services icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Steadman, Henry J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 21184 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21184.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR21660 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR21660 MiAaI MiAaI New York Police Department (NYPD) Stop, Question, and Frisk Database, 2006 [electronic resource] New York City Police Department 2008-06-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 21660 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data were originally collected by New York Police Department officers and record information gathered as a result of stop question and frisk (SQF) encounters during 2006. These data were used in a study carried out, under contract to the New York City Police Foundation, by the Rand Corporation's Center on Quality Policing. The release of the study, "Analysis of Racial Disparities in the New York Police Department's Stop, Question, and Frisk Practices" (Rand Document TR-534-NYCPF, 2007) generated interest in making the data available for secondary analysis. This data collection contains information on the officer's reasons for initiating a stop, whether the stop led to a summons or arrest, demographic information for the person stopped, and the suspected criminal behavior. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21660.v1 police icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr search and seizure icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police New York City Police Department Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 21660 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21660.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03382 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03382 MiAaI MiAaI Impact Evaluation of the Felony Domestic Violence Court in Kings County [Brooklyn], New York, 1994-2000 [electronic resource] Lisa Newmark , Mike Rempel , Kelly Diffily , Kamala Mallik Kane 2006-07-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3382 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. the defendant, whether the victim attempted to drop charges, whether the victim testified at trial, whether a victim advocate was assigned, total violations during pending case, predisposition violations, and number of probation violations. Demographic variables in Part 1 include defendant and victims' gender, race, victim age at defendant's arrest, defendant's income, employment status, and education. Variables in Part 2, Top Charge Data, relating to the defendant include number and types of prior arrests and convictions, top charge at arrest, severity of top charge at arrest, top charge at grand jury indictment, severity of top charge indictment, disposition details, Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) arrest indicators, child victim conviction indicator, drug conviction indicator, weapon conviction indicator, types of probation, sentence, disposition, and offenses. Demographic variables in Part 2 include sex and race of the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03382.v2 arrest records icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr courts icpsr domestic violence icpsr family courts icpsr felony offenses icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr restraining orders icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts Newmark, Lisa Rempel, Mike Diffily, Kelly Kane, Kamala Mallik Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3382 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03382.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02749 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02749 MiAaI MiAaI Strategies for Retaining Offenders in Mandatory Drug Treatment Programs in Kings County, New York, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] Douglas Young 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2749 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. track of attendance, whether someone explained the rules of participation in the program and the consequences if the subject failed the program, whether the rules and consequences were put in writing, who monitored program participants, the likelihood of using drugs while in treatment, the likelihood of leaving the program before completion, whether the subject understood the legal consequences of failing the program, the type and frequency of reports and contacts with the criminal justice system, and the subject's reaction to various penalties for not completing the program. Part 11 contains data from the Community Oriented Programs Environment Scale (COPES). Part 12, Treatment Services Review Data, includes data on the number of times the subject received medical attention, days in school, days employed, days intoxicated, days in substance abuse treatment, days tested for drugs, number of contacts with the criminal justice system, days treated for psychological problems, and time spent at recreational activities. Additional variables include the number of individual and group treatment sessions spent discussing medical problems, education and employment, substance abuse, legal problems, and psychological and emotional problems. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02749.v1 treatment compliance icpsr treatment programs icpsr alternatives to institutionalization icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug treatment icpsr offenders icpsr parolees icpsr probationers icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr substance abuse icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Young, Douglas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2749 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02749.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02311 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02311 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Midtown Community Court in New York City, 1992-1994 [electronic resource] David Rottman , Brian Ostrom , Michele Sviridoff , Richard Curtis 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2311 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In October 1993, the Midtown Community Court opened as a three-year demonstration project designed to forge links with the community in developing a problem-solving approach to quality-of-life offenses. The problems that this community-based courthouse sought to address were specific to the court's midtown New York City location: high concentration of quality-of-life crimes, broad community dissatisfaction with court outcomes, visible signs of disorder, and clusters of persistent high-rate offenders with serious problems, including addiction and homelessness. This study was conducted to evaluate how well the new court was able to dispense justice locally and whether the establishment of the Midtown Community Court made a difference in misdemeanor case processing. Data were collected at two time periods for a comparative analysis. First, a baseline dataset (Part 1, Baseline Data) was constructed from administrative records, consisting of a ten-percent random sample of all nonfelony arraignments in Manhattan during the 12 months prior to the opening of the Midtown Community Court. Second, comparable administrative data (Part 2, Comparison Data) were collected from all cases arraigned at the Midtown Court during its first 12 months of operation, as well as from a random sample of all downtown nonfelony arraignments held during this same time period. Both files contain variables on precinct of arrest, arraignment type, charges, bonds, dispositions, sentences, total number of court appearances, and total number of warrants issued, as well as prior felony and misdemeanor convictions. Demographic variables include age, sex, and race of offender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02311.v1 addiction icpsr case processing icpsr communities icpsr courts icpsr homelessness icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr offenders icpsr quality of life icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Rottman, David Ostrom, Brian Sviridoff, Michele Curtis, Richard Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2311 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02311.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02594 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02594 MiAaI MiAaI Soviet Emigre Organized Crime Networks in the United States, 1992-1995 [electronic resource] James O. Finckenauer , Elin Waring 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2594 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. reports, incident reports, search reports, interview reports, arrest reports, intelligence reports, criminal acts reports, confidential informant reports, newspaper reports, social surveillance reports, other surveillance reports, and company reports. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02594.v1 career criminals icpsr emigrants icpsr ethnicity icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr organized crime icpsr violence icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Finckenauer, James O. Waring, Elin Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2594 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02594.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03689 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03689 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of Hung Juries in Bronx County, New York, Los Angeles County, California, Maricopa County, Arizona, and Washington, DC, 2000-2001 [electronic resource] Paula L. Hannaford-Agor , Valerie P. Hans , Nicole L. Mott , G. Thomas Munsterman 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3689 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was undertaken for the purpose of providing an empirical picture of hung juries. Researchers were able to secure the cooperation of four courts: (1) Bronx County Supreme Court in New York, (2) Los Angeles County Superior Court in California, (3) Maricopa County Superior Court in Arizona, and (4) District of Columbia Superior Court in Washington, DC. The four sites were responsible for distributing and collecting questionnaire packets to all courtrooms hearing non-capital felony jury cases. Each packet contained a case data form requesting information about case characteristics (Part 1) and outcomes (Part 2), as well as survey questionnaires for the judges (Part 3), attorneys (Part 4), and jurors (Part 5). The case data form requested type of charge, sentence range, jury's decision, demographic information about the defendant(s) and the victim(s), voir dire (jury selection process), trial evidence and procedures, and jury deliberations. The judge questionnaire probed for evaluation of the evidence, case complexity, attorney skill, likelihood that the jury would hang, reaction to the verdict, opinions regarding the hung jury rate in the jurisdiction, and experience on the bench. The attorney questionnaire requested information assessing the voir dire, case complexity, attorney skill, evaluation of the evidence, reaction to the verdict, opinions regarding the hung jury rate in the jurisdiction, and experience in legal practice. If the jury hung, attorneys also provided their views about why the jury was unable to reach a verdict. Finally, the juror questionnaire requested responses regarding case complexity, attorney skill, evaluation of the evidence, formation of opinions, dynamics of the deliberations including the first and final votes, juror participation, conflict, reaction to the verdict, opinions about applicable law, assessment of criminal justice in the community, and demographic information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03689.v1 verdicts icpsr courts icpsr felony offenses icpsr hung juries icpsr jury deliberations icpsr jury instructions icpsr jury selection icpsr mistrials icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts Hannaford-Agor, Paula L. Hans, Valerie P. Mott, Nicole L. Munsterman, G. Thomas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3689 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03689.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03205 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03205 MiAaI MiAaI Classifying Inmates for Strategic Programming in the New York Department of Corrections, 1997-1998 [electronic resource] Eileen Sullivan 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3205 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The main goal of this study was to construct and test a statistically based system of classifying inmates for one or more types of Substance Abuse Intervention Division (SAID) sponsored treatment programs within the New York Department of Corrections (DOC) system. The sample used for the prediction models was a sample of recent jail inmates identified as eligible for admission to SAID. DOC provided data from its Inmate Information System (IIS) database on each of the cases. Researchers collected two sets of data: one that employed only DOC data (Part 1) and another that included supplementary data from the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) and the New York City Criminal Justice Agency (CJA) (Part 2). The DOC data (Part 1) fall into four main categories: demographic characteristics, information on the current case, prior criminal record information, and SAID eligibility information. Part 2, DOC and Supplementary Data, includes all the DOC items from Part 1 along with other data collected from DCJS and the New York City CJA. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03205.v1 inmate classification icpsr inmate programs icpsr jail inmates icpsr prison inmates icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Sullivan, Eileen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3205 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03205.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02558 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02558 MiAaI MiAaI Increasing the Efficiency of Police Departments in Allegany County, New York, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] William Hall 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2558 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought to investigate the attitudes of residents and law enforcement personnel living or working in Allegany County, New York in order to (1) assess community support of law enforcement efforts to collaborate on projects, and (2) determine rural law enforcement agencies' willingness to work together on community policing projects and share resources in such a way as to improve and increase their overall individual and collective effectiveness and efficiency. Community policing, for this study, was defined as any law enforcement strategy designed to improve policy directed toward law enforcement interaction with community groups and citizens. Data were gathered from surveys that were distributed to two groups. First, to determine community perceptions of crime and attitudes toward the development of collaborative community policing strategies, surveys were distributed to the residents of the villages of Alfred and Wellsville and the town of Alfred in Allegany County, New York (Part 1, Community Survey Data). Second, to capture the ideas and perceptions of different types of law enforcement agencies regarding their willingness to share training, communication, and technology, surveys were distributed to the law enforcement agencies of Wellsville, Alfred, the New York State Police substation (located in the town of Wellsville), the county sheriff's department, and the Alfred State College and Alfred University public safety departments (Part 2, Law Enforcement Survey Data). For Part 1 (Community Survey Data), the residents were asked to rate their level of fear of crime, the reason for most crime problems (i.e., gangs, drugs, or unsupervised children), positive and negative contact with police, the presence and overall level of police service in the neighborhoods, and the importance of motor vehicle patrols, foot patrols, crime prevention programs, and traffic enforcement. Respondents were also asked whether they agreed that police should concentrate more on catching criminals (as opposed to implementing community-based programs), and if community policing was a good idea. Demographic data on residents includes their age, sex, whether they had been the victim of a property or personal crime, and the number of years they had lived in their respective communities. Demographic information for Part 2 (Law Enforcement Survey Data) includes the sex, age, and educational level of law enforcement respondents, as well as the number of years they had worked with their respective departments. Respondents were asked if they believed in and would support programs targeted toward youth, adults, the elderly, and merchants. Further queries focused on the number of regular and overtime hours used to train, develop, and implement department programs. A series of questions dealing with degrees of trust between the departments and levels of optimism was also asked to gauge attitudes that might discourage collaboration efforts with other departments on community-oriented programs. Officers were also asked to rate their willingness to work with the other agencies. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02558.v1 crime prevention icpsr fear of crime icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police community relations icpsr police departments icpsr police effectiveness icpsr police patrol icpsr public approval icpsr public interest icpsr community policing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Hall, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2558 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02558.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03226 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03226 MiAaI MiAaI Homicides in New York City, 1797-1999 [And Various Historical Comparison Sites] [electronic resource] Eric Monkkonen 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3226 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. There has been little research on United States homicide rates from a long-term perspective, primarily because there has been no consistent data series on a particular place preceding the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR), which began its first full year in 1931. To fill this research gap, this project created a data series on homicides per capita for New York City that spans two centuries. The goal was to create a site-specific, individual-based data series that could be used to examine major social shifts related to homicide, such as mass immigration, urban growth, war, demographic changes, and changes in laws. Data were also gathered on various other sites, particularly in England, to allow for comparisons on important issues, such as the post-World War II wave of violence. The basic approach to the data collection was to obtain the best possible estimate of annual counts and the most complete information on individual homicides. The annual count data (Parts 1 and 3) were derived from multiple sources, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports and Supplementary Homicide Reports, as well as other official counts from the New York City Police Department and the City Inspector in the early 19th century. The data include a combined count of murder and manslaughter because charge bargaining often blurs this legal distinction. The individual-level data (Part 2) were drawn from coroners' indictments held by the New York City Municipal Archives, and from daily newspapers. Duplication was avoided by keeping a record for each victim. The estimation technique known as "capture-recapture" was used to estimate homicides not listed in either source. Part 1 variables include counts of New York City homicides, arrests, and convictions, as well as the homicide rate, race or ethnicity and gender of victims, type of weapon used, and source of data. Part 2 includes the date of the murder, the age, sex, and race of the offender and victim, and whether the case led to an arrest, trial, conviction, execution, or pardon. Part 3 contains annual homicide counts and rates for various comparison sites including Liverpool, London, Kent, Canada, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Seattle, and San Francisco. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03226.v1 crime statistics icpsr death records icpsr historical data icpsr homicide icpsr manslaughter icpsr murder icpsr nineteenth century icpsr social change icpsr twentieth century icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Monkkonen, Eric Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3226 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03226.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04020 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04020 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4020 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2003 up to four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 39 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. The ADAM program in 2003 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult male and female files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) for males, weights. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug dependence icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4020 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03815 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03815 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3815 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2002 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 36 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2002 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3815 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03688 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03688 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3688 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2001 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 33 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2001 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3688 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03604 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03604 MiAaI MiAaI Modeling Impacts of Policing Initiatives on Drug and Criminal Careers of Arrestees in New York City, New York, 1999 [electronic resource] Bruce D. Johnson , Andrew Golub 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3604 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought to understand the accuracy and validity of arrestee self-reports of drug use and the overall contact of arrestees with the criminal justice system, with a secondary focus on how arrestee self-reports of drug use correspond to urinalysis results. Moreover, this study investigated whether arrestees were aware of the New York City Police Department's Quality-of-Life (QOL) policing efforts and whether they had changed their criminal behavior as a result. A QOL Policing Supplement, designed to explore new means of evaluating police behavior, was administered to all adult arrestees in the five boroughs of New York City (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Staten Island, and Queens) who had completed an Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program interview, provided a urine specimen, and were willing to answer additional questions concerning QOL policing. Part 1, Policing Study Data, is a large integrated dataset containing all of the variables derived from the 1999 ADAM interviews, the Policing Supplement instrument, and administrative records data from the Criminal Justice Agency (CJA) and the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. This dataset is linked, via an anonymous case number, to Part 2, Arrestee Criminal History Data, which contains each arrestee's official criminal history. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03604.v1 arrest records icpsr career criminals icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr urinalysis icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Johnson, Bruce D. Golub, Andrew Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3604 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03604.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09479 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09479 MiAaI MiAaI Providing Help to Victims [electronic resource] A Study of Psychological and Material Outcomes in New York City, 1984-1985 Robert C. Davis 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9479 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was designed to examine the effectiveness of a New York City agency's attempt to decrease the negative emotions that result from victimization. The data address the following questions: (1) To what extent do specific treatments mitigate the negative psychological impact of victimization? (2) Are individuals from a particular demographic group more prone to suffer from psychological adjustment problems following victimization? (3) When victimized, do individuals blame themselves or the situation? (4) Are some crimes more difficult to cope with than others? (5) Does previous victimization affect the likelihood that an individual will have difficulty coping with current as well as future victimization? Data were collected in two waves, with Wave 1 interviews completed within one month of the victimization incident and Wave 2 interviews completed three months after treatment. The effects of three treatments were measured. They included: traditional crisis counseling (which incorporates psychological aid and material assistance such as food, shelter, cash, etc.), cognitive restructuring (challenges to "irrational" beliefs about the world and one's self used in conjunction with crisis counseling), and material assistance only (no psychological aid provided). A fourth group of victims received no treatment or services. Three standardized psychometric scales were used in the study. In addition to these standardized scales, the initial assessment battery included an index of fear of crime as well as an index that measured behavior adjustment. Another set of measures assessed how victims perceived their experience of victimization and included items on self-blame, selective evaluation, and control. Also included were questions about the crime and precautions taken to guard against future victimization. The follow-up assessment battery was virtually identical to the initial battery, except that questions about services and social support received by the victim were added. The following demographic variables are included in the data: sex, age, marital status, education, income, and race. The unit of analysis was the individual. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09479.v2 victims icpsr victim services icpsr anxiety icpsr coping icpsr counseling icpsr emotional states icpsr fear icpsr fear of crime icpsr guilt icpsr personal adjustment icpsr psychological effects icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr treatment icpsr victimization icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Davis, Robert C. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9479 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09479.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08185 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08185 MiAaI MiAaI Calling the Police [electronic resource] Citizen Reporting of Serious Crime, 1979 William Spelman , Dale K. Brown 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8185 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This dataset replicates the citizen reporting component of POLICE RESPONSE TIME ANALYSIS, 1975 (ICPSR 7760). Information is included on 4,095 reported incidents of aggravated assault, auto theft, burglary, larceny/theft offenses, forcible rape, and robbery. The data cover citizen calls to police between April 21 and December 7, 1979. There are four files in this collection, one each for Jacksonville, Florida, Peoria, Illinois, Rochester, New York, and San Diego, California. The data are taken from police dispatch records and police interviews of citizens who requested police assistance. Variables taken from the dispatch records include the dispatch time, call priority, police travel time, age, sex, and race of the caller, response code, number of suspects, and area of the city in which the call originated. Variables taken from the citizen interviews include respondent's role in the incident (victim, caller, victim-caller, witness-caller), incident location, relationship of caller to victim, number of victims, identification of suspect, and interaction with police. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08185.v1 assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr citizen crime reporting icpsr larceny icpsr offenses icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police protection icpsr police reports icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr victims icpsr witnesses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Spelman, William Brown, Dale K. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8185 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08185.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09988 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09988 MiAaI MiAaI Techniques for Assessing the Accuracy of Recidivism Prediction Scales, 1960-1980 [electronic resource] [Miami, Albuquerque, New York City, Alameda and Los Angeles Counties, and the State of California] Jacqueline Cohen , Sherwood Zimmerman , Stephen King 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9988 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection was to measure the validity or accuracy of four recidivism prediction instruments: the INSLAW, RAND, SFS81, and CGR scales. These scales estimate the probability that criminals will commit subsequent crimes quickly, that individuals will commit crime frequently, that inmates who are eligible for release on parole will commit subsequent crimes, and that defendants awaiting trial will commit crimes while on pretrial arrest or detention. The investigators used longitudinal data from five existing independent studies to assess the validity of the four predictive measures in question. The first data file was originally collected by the Vera Institute of Justice in New York City and was derived from an experimental evaluation of a jobs training program called the Alternative Youth Employment Strategies Project implemented in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Miami, Florida, and New York City, New York. The second file contains data from a RAND Corporation study, EFFECTS OF PRISON VERSUS PROBATION IN CALIFORNIA, 1980-1982 (ICPSR 8700), from offenders in Alameda and Los Angeles counties, California. Parts 3 through 5 pertain to serious juvenile offenders who were incarcerated during the 1960s and 1970s in three institutions of the California Youth Authority. A portion of the original data for these parts was taken from EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF THE CHRONIC OFFENDER, [1978-1980: CALIFORNIA] (ICPSR 8226). All files present demographic and socioeconomic variables such as birth information, race and ethnicity, education background, work and military experience, and criminal history, including involvement in criminal activities, drug addiction, and incarceration episodes. From the variables in each data file, standard variables across all data files were constructed. Constructed variables included those on background (such as drug use, arrest, conviction, employment, and education history), which were used to construct the four predictive scales, and follow-up variables concerning arrest and incarceration history. Scores on the four predictive scales were estimated. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09988.v1 recidivism prediction icpsr recidivists icpsr criminality prediction icpsr criminal histories icpsr imprisonment icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr probation icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Cohen, Jacqueline Zimmerman, Sherwood King, Stephen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9988 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09988.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02743 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02743 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Victimization and Perceptions of Community Safety in 12 United States Cities, 1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2743 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection presents survey data from 12 cities in the United States regarding criminal victimization, perceptions of community safety, and satisfaction with local police. Participating cities included Chicago, IL, Kansas City, MO, Knoxville, TN, Los Angeles, CA, Madison, WI, New York, NY, San Diego, CA, Savannah, GA, Spokane, WA, Springfield, MA, Tucson, AZ, and Washington, DC. The survey used the current National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) questionnaire with a series of supplemental questions measuring the attitudes in each city. Respondents were asked about incidents that occurred within the past 12 months. Information on the following crimes was collected: violent crimes of rape, robbery, aggravated assault, and simple assault, personal crimes of theft, and household crimes of burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft. Part 1, Household-Level Data, covers the number of household respondents, their ages, type of housing, size of residence, number of telephone lines and numbers, and language spoken in the household. Part 2, Person-Level Data, includes information on respondents' sex, relationship to householder, age, marital status, education, race, time spent in the housing unit, personal crime and victimization experiences, perceptions of neighborhood crime, job and professional demographics, and experience and satisfaction with local police. Variables in Part 3, Incident-Level Data, concern the details of crimes in which the respondents were involved, and the police response to the crimes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02743.v1 fear of crime icpsr neighborhoods icpsr perceptions icpsr petty theft icpsr police performance icpsr public safety icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr victimization icpsr assault icpsr attitudes icpsr burglary icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2743 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02743.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02929 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02929 MiAaI MiAaI Case Tracking and Mapping System Developed for the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, 1997-1998 [electronic resource] Colin Reilly , Victor Goldsmith 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2929 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection grew out of a prototype case tracking and crime mapping application that was developed for the United States Attorney's Office (USAO), Southern District of New York (SDNY). The purpose of creating the application was to move from the traditionally episodic way of handling cases to a comprehensive and strategic method of collecting case information and linking it to specific geographic locations, and collecting information either not handled at all or not handled with sufficient enough detail by SDNY's existing case management system. The result was an end-user application designed to be run largely by SDNY's nontechnical staff. It consisted of two components, a database to capture case tracking information and a mapping component to link case and geographic data. The case tracking data were contained in a Microsoft Access database and the client application contained all of the forms, queries, reports, macros, table links, and code necessary to enter, navigate through, and query the data. The mapping application was developed using Environmental Systems Research Institute's (ESRI) ArcView 3.0a GIS. This collection shows how the user-interface of the database and the mapping component were customized to allow the staff to perform spatial queries without having to be geographic information systems (GIS) experts. Part 1 of this collection contains the Visual Basic script used to customize the user-interface of the Microsoft Access database. Part 2 contains the Avenue script used to customize ArcView to link the data maintained in the server databases, to automate the office's most common queries, and to run simple analyses. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02929.v1 case management icpsr case processing icpsr crime mapping icpsr databases icpsr geographic information systems icpsr NACJD XII. Computer Programs and Instructional Packages ICPSR X.B. Instructional Packages and Computer Programs, Computer Programs Reilly, Colin Goldsmith, Victor Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2929 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02929.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09980 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09980 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the New York City Police Cadet Corps, 1986-1989 [electronic resource] Antony Pate , Edwin E. Hamilton 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 9980 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the Police Cadet Corps program in New York City had achieved its goal of improving the police force through additional training of applicants with higher education. The evaluation of the program was designed to answer questions such as (1) How was the program recruitment implemented, and with what success? (2) What were the role-related perceptions and attitudes of the cadets and how did they differ, if at all, among different types of cadets and from those of the members of the latest recruit class? (3) How, if at all, did the program experience affect the cadets' perceptions and attitudes? and (4) How did the attitudes and perceptions of cadets compare to non-cadet recruits with and without some college education in the same academy class? Four cohorts of cadets were asked to complete several different questionnaires throughout the course of the program, which culminated in graduation from the police academy. Two sets of non-cadet recruits from the academy were also included in the research. Major variables in the data collection detail reasons for entry into the police department, opinions regarding police, and perceptions and attitudes toward the police cadet program. Some questionnaires also provided information on demographic characteristics of the cadets (race, sex, marital status, military service and branch, highest level of education, family income, and year of birth). The unit of observation is the New York City police cadet. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09980.v1 attitudes icpsr educational background icpsr leadership icpsr police cadets icpsr police recruits icpsr police training icpsr program evaluation icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pate, Antony Hamilton, Edwin E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9980 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09980.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08003 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08003 MiAaI MiAaI Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1973-1977 [United States] [electronic resource] National Sample United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8003 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These Commercial Victimization Surveys were collected as part of the National Crime Surveys. They document burglary and robbery incidents for all types of commercial establishments, as well as political, cultural, and religious organizations. Business characteristics gathered include form of ownership and operation, size and type of business, and security measures. Information regarding the reported incidents includes time and place, weapon involvement, offender and entry characteristics, injuries and deaths, and type and value of stolen property. Data were collected by calendar quarter for four quarters in 1973-1976 and for two quarters in 1977, while the actual incidents reported in the files reflect those occurring six months prior to the interview date. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08003.v2 armed robbery icpsr security systems icpsr urban crime icpsr victimization icpsr burglary icpsr cities icpsr crime rates icpsr larceny icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr organizations icpsr robbery icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8003 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08003.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08002 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08002 MiAaI MiAaI Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1972-1975 [United States] [electronic resource] Cities Sample United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8002 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Crime Surveys, of which these Commercial Victimization Surveys are a part, were conducted to obtain current and reliable measures of serious crime in the United States. The Commercial Victimization Surveys are restricted to coverage of burglary and robbery incidents. They include all types of commercial establishments as well as political, cultural, and religious organizations. The survey includes a series of questions about the business, e.g., type and size, form of ownership, insurance, security, and break-in and robbery characteristics. Time and place, weapon, injury, entry evidence, offender characteristics, and stolen property data were collected for each of the incidents. Data on both victimized and nonvictimized establishments in 26 different cities were collected during 1972, 1973, and 1974. In the 1975 survey, data from the 13 cities surveyed during 1972 and 1973 were collected again. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08002.v2 armed robbery icpsr burglary icpsr businesses icpsr cities icpsr crime rates icpsr larceny icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr organizations icpsr robbery icpsr security systems icpsr urban crime icpsr victimization icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8002 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08002.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06501 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06501 MiAaI MiAaI Dynamics of Change in the Criminal Case Plea Bargaining System [electronic resource] New York City, 1800-1890 Chester L. Mirsky , Edelle Ortese 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6501 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study analyzes the ascendancy of a single form of dispute processing--the guilty plea--in New York City's principal indictment court, and its connection to law enforcement, judges, and lawyers. A major component of the study is a statistical analysis of data presented in the Minute Book of Court of General Sessions and maintained at the New York City Archives. A second data source is the New York City district attorney's case files, also maintained at the New York City Archives. Part 1, District Attorney Case File Data, contains a sample of cases throughout the century taken from the district attorney's files. Variables cover charge filed, method of arrest, nature of testimony, presence of the lawyers, role of police, private prosecutor, and magistrate, and demographic information about the defendant and victim. Part 2, Lawyer Data, records the frequency of the appearance of individual lawyers, the charges in the cases in which they appeared, the lawyering activities they undertook, and the method of case disposition. Part 3, Minute Book Data, reflects the workday of the Court of General Sessions, including the number of cases processed in court on any given day, the number of defendants tried, the details of charges, joinder, witness examinations, outcome and sentence, and the number pleading guilty. Part 4, Cases Tried Data, not only records cases tried but also includes the top count, legal representation, result, and sentence, and for cases pleading guilty contains the top count charged, top count accepted, and sentence imposed. District Attorney Reference Data, Part 5, contains cases in which copies of the district attorney's papers were not found. These cases occurred on the same day as cases for which copies of the district attorney's papers were recorded. This data served as a control group for the District Attorney Case File Data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06501.v1 attorneys icpsr case processing icpsr courts icpsr guilty pleas icpsr judges icpsr indictments icpsr law enforcement icpsr plea negotiations icpsr testimony icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Mirsky, Chester L. Ortese, Edelle Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6501 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06501.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09984 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09984 MiAaI MiAaI Intra- and Intergenerational Aspects of Serious Domestic Violence and Alcohol and Drug Abuse in Buffalo, 1987 [electronic resource] Howard T. Blane , Brenda A. Miller , Kenneth E. Leonard 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9984 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data examine the interrelationships among alcohol use, drug use, criminal violence, and domestic violence in a parolee population. More specifically, the data explore the contributions of parental substance abuse and domestic violence in prediction of parolee violence. The study also investigates the effects of drug and alcohol use on domestic violence for the parolee, the spouse, and the parents. The data were drawn from individual interviews conducted with parolees from the Buffalo, New York, area, half of whom were convicted of violent crimes and half of whom were convicted of nonviolent crimes. Interviews were also conducted with the spouses and partners of the parolees. In addition, data concerning the parolees' criminal histories were abstracted from arrest and parole records. Part 1, Demographic File 1, provides information on the demographic characteristics of offenders, arrests, convictions, and sentencing, institutional transfers, disciplinary reports, indications of psychiatric diagnosis or psychological disturbances, alcohol and drug use, criminal activity, and substance abuse while incarcerated. Part 2, Demographic File 2, includes the same variables as Part 1 (with the exception of information about psychiatric diagnoses, psychological disturbances, and disciplinary reports) for those individuals who declined to be interviewed and a random sample of those who could not be contacted. Part 3, the Interview File, contains information about childhood social histories (including sociodemographics, experience of family violence as a victim and as a witness, and parental drug and alcohol use), self-reported criminal histories, adult social histories (including data concerning violence in current relationships, and drug and alcohol use history), and information about the parolees' and spouses' discipline styles. The researchers discarded data on female parolees for the purposes of their analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09984.v1 alcohol abuse icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminality prediction icpsr domestic violence icpsr drug abuse icpsr family violence icpsr parental influence icpsr parolees icpsr substance abuse icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Blane, Howard T. Miller, Brenda A. Leonard, Kenneth E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9984 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09984.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09353 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09353 MiAaI MiAaI Adult Criminal Careers in New York, 1972-1983 [electronic resource] Alfred Blumstein , Jacqueline Cohen 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9353 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was designed to estimate the extent and variation of individual offending by crime type, race, age, and prior criminal record. Included in this collection are the criminal records of individuals aged 16 years or older who were arrested in the state of New York. Two separate data files are supplied. Part 1 contains data on all adults arrested in New York from 1972 to 1976 for rape, murder, robbery, aggravated assault, or burglary. Part 2 includes data on all adults arrested for larceny or auto theft in Albany and Erie counties. Variables include items such as sex, race, age, number of prior arrests, date and place of arrest, arrest charged, number of multiple counts, court disposition of charges, and type and length of sentence. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09353.v1 rape icpsr robbery icpsr adult offenders icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr career criminals icpsr criminal histories icpsr larceny icpsr murder icpsr offenders icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Blumstein, Alfred Cohen, Jacqueline Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9353 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09353.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07658 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07658 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Surveys [electronic resource] Cities, 1972-1975 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7658 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This sample of the National Crime Survey contains information about victimization in 26 central cities in the United States. The data are designed to achieve three primary objectives: 1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, 2) to estimate the numbers and types of crimes not reported to police, and 3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes and permit reliable comparisons over time and between areas of the country. Information about each household or personal victimization was recorded. The data include type of crime (attempts are covered as well), description of offender, severity of crime, injuries or losses, time and place of occurrence, age, race and sex of offender(s), relationship of offenders to victims, education, migration, labor force status, occupation, and income of persons involved. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07658.v3 census data icpsr cities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr households icpsr victimization icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7658 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07658.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09325 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09325 MiAaI MiAaI Disturbed Violent Offenders in New York, 1985 [electronic resource] Hans Toch , Kenneth Adams 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9325 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was designed to investigate the relationship between mental illness and violent involvement over an offender's criminal career and to develop a typology of violent offenders that takes into account both mental health history and substance use history. The collection is organized so that data for the violent offender cohort can be matched with records of offender mental health history, substance abuse history, and criminal career history. The offenders were convicted of statutorily-defined "violent offenses." Included in the collection are variables concerning conviction offenses, intoxication status, victim-offender relationship, injury result, type of violence, employment, marital status, gender, and race. The criminal history file contains variables on dates of arrest or juvenile contacts. The mental history file includes dates of entry and types of mental health services received. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09325.v2 career criminals icpsr criminal histories icpsr mental disorders icpsr mental health icpsr offenders icpsr substance abuse icpsr violence icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Toch, Hans Adams, Kenneth Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9325 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09325.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09399 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09399 MiAaI MiAaI Victims' Needs and Victim Services, 1988-1989 [electronic resource] Evanston, Rochester, Pima County, and Fayette County Wesley G. Skogan , Robert C. Davis , Arthur J. Lurigio 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9399 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examines the needs of burglary, robbery, and assault victims and the responses of local victim assistance programs to those needs in four metropolitan areas: Evanston, Illinois, Rochester, New York, Pima County, Arizona, and Fayette County, Kentucky. Four issues were explored in detail: the needs of victims, where they seek help, the kinds of help they receive, and which of their problems do and do not get resolved. Variables include (1) demographic information such as city of residence, length of residence, birth date, marital status, race, work status, education, and income, (2) information on the crime itself, such as type of crime, when the crime happened, and details of the attack and attacker, and (3) consequences of the crime, such as problems encountered as a result of the crime, emotional responses to the crime, and reactions to the crime on a practical level. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09399.v1 assault icpsr burglary icpsr needs assessment icpsr robbery icpsr victim services icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization Skogan, Wesley G. Davis, Robert C. Lurigio, Arthur J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9399 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09399.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03130 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03130 MiAaI MiAaI Effectiveness of a Joint Police and Social Services Response to Elder Abuse in Manhattan [New York City], New York, 1996-1997 [electronic resource] Robert C. Davis , Juan Medina , Nancy Avitabile 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3130 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This project consisted of an evaluation of an elder abuse program run by the New York Police Department and Victim Services Research. The focus of the study was domestic elder abuse, which generally refers to any of several forms of maltreatment, physical abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, neglect, and/or financial exploitation of an older person. The program, conducted in New York City public housing, had two complementary parts. First, public housing projects in Manhattan were assigned to one of two levels of public education (i.e., to receive or not to receive educational materials about elder abuse). Once the public education treatment had been implemented, 403 older adult residents of the housing projects who reported elder abuse to the police during the next ten months were assigned to one of two levels of follow-up to the initial police response (i.e., to receive or not to receive a home visit) as the second part of the project. The home visit intervention consisted of a strong law enforcement response designed to prevent repeat incidents of elder abuse. A team from the Domestic Violence Intervention and Education Program (DVIEP), consisting of a police officer and a social worker, followed up on domestic violence complaints with a home visit within a few days of the initial patrol response. Victims were interviewed about new victimizations following the intervention on three occasions: six weeks after the trigger incident, six months after the trigger incident, and twelve months after the trigger incident. Interviews at the three time points were identical except for the omission of background information on the second and third interviews. Demographic data collected during the first interview included age, gender, ethnicity, education, employment, income, legal relationship with abuser, living situation, number of people in the household, and health. For each time point, data provide measures of physical, psychological, and financial abuse, knowledge of elder abuse, knowledge and use of social services, satisfaction with the police, assessment of service delivery, and self-esteem and well-being. The DVIEP databases maintained on households at each of the three participating Police Service Areas (PSAs) were searched to identify new police reports of elder abuse for households in the sample within 12 months following the trigger incident. Variables from the DVIEP databases include age, race, ethnicity, and sex of the victim and the perpetrator, relationship of perpetrator to victim, type of abuse reported, charge, whether an arrest was made, if an order of protection had been obtained, if the order of protection was violated, use of weapons, if the victim had been injured, and if the victim was taken to the hospital. Several time lapse variables between different time points are also provided. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03130.v1 abuse icpsr crime reporting icpsr domestic violence icpsr elder abuse icpsr households icpsr intervention icpsr older adults icpsr police response icpsr program evaluation icpsr victim services icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Davis, Robert C. Medina, Juan Avitabile, Nancy Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3130 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03130.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02704 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02704 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of Violence Prevention Programs in Four New York City Middle Schools, 1993-1994 [electronic resource] Tanya Bannister 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2704 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This research project sought to evaluate the impact of broad-based multifaceted violence prevention programs versus programs that have a more limited focus. Two specific programs were evaluated in four New York City middle schools. The more limited program used Project S.T.O.P.(Students Teaching Options for Peace), a conflict resolution and peer mediation training program. The full multi-faceted program combined Project S.T.O.P. with Safe Harbor, a program that provided victimization counseling and taught violence prevention. The effects of this combined program, offered in three of the middle schools, were compared to those of just the Project S.T.O.P. program alone in one middle school. To study the program models, researchers used a quasi-experimental pre-post design, with nonequivalent comparison groups. Questionnaires were given to students to assess the impact of the two programs. Students were asked about their knowledge and use of prevention programs in their schools. Data were also collected on students' history of victimization, such as whether they were ever attacked at school, stolen from, mugged, or threatened with a weapon. Students were also asked about their attitudes toward verbal abuse, victims of violence, and conditions when revenge is acceptable, and their exposure to violence, including whether they knew anyone who was sexually abused, beaten, or attacked because of race, gender, or sexual orientation. Additional questions covered students' use of aggressive behaviors, such as whether they had threatened someone with a weapon or had beaten, slapped, hit, or kicked someone. Data were also gathered on the accessibility of alcohol, various drugs, weapons, and stolen property. Demographic variables include students' school grade, class, sex, number of brothers and sisters, and household composition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02704.v1 conflict resolution icpsr crime in schools icpsr crime prevention icpsr mediation icpsr middle schools icpsr peer groups icpsr program evaluation icpsr student attitudes icpsr victimization icpsr violence icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Bannister, Tanya Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2704 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02704.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09823 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09823 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Lawyers in the Metropolitan New York Media Market, 1989 [electronic resource] Carroll Seron 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9823 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection was twofold. The survey was designed to ascertain the attitudes of attorneys regarding new techniques for obtaining clients, such as media advertising and solicitation, as well as their attitudes toward pro bono service, and to test whether attitudinal differences are related to demographic or organizational characteristics of the profession. A second purpose of the study was to serve as a screener to identify a group of attorneys in solo and small-firm practice who use new types of business-getting techniques. Variables in the collection include respondent attitudes toward advertising, unions, and pro bono cases, information on type of firm, number of attorneys in the firm, type of legal practice and legal specialty, and demographic information such as religious affiliation, membership in local clubs or associations, college attended, marital status, number of children, income, number of years practicing law, and parents' occupations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09823.v2 advertising icpsr attorneys icpsr client relations icpsr legal representation icpsr marketing icpsr media use icpsr ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States NACJD V. Courts Seron, Carroll Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9823 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09823.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02652 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02652 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the New York City Department of Probation's Drug Treatment Initiative, 1991-1994 [electronic resource] Gregory P. Falkin , Shiela Straus , Timothy Bohen , Douglas Young , Laura Winterfield 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2652 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was undertaken to evaluate the New York City Department of Probation's initiative to place clients in specialized Substance Abuse Verification and Enforcement (SAVE) units for treatment and management. The main analytical strategy of this study was to determine whether clients who were appropriately matched to outpatient drug treatment were less likely to recidivate after treatment in this modality. The focus of the research was not so much on developing powerful prediction models, but rather on determining whether outpatient drug treatment was appropriate and effective for certain types of probationers. The evaluation research involved an in-depth analysis of a sample of 1,860 probationers who were sentenced between September 1991-September 1992 and referred to contracting outpatient drug treatment programs one or more times as of December 31, 1993. The following types of data were collected: (1) the New York City Department of Probation's demographic and drug use information, obtained during the presentence investigation and at intake to probation, (2) the Department of Probation's Central Placement Unit (CPU) database records for each referral made through the CPU, as well as monthly progress reports filled out by the treatment programs on each probationer admitted to drug treatment, (3) the New York State Department of Criminal Justice Statistics' data on criminal histories, and (4) probation officers' reports on whether clients were referred to treatment, the kind of treatment modality to which they were referred, and the dates of admission and discharge. Demographic and socioeconomic variables include age at first arrest and sentencing, gender, race or ethnicity, marital status, family composition, educational attainment, and employment status. Other variables include drug use history (e.g., age at which drugs were first used, if the client's family members used drugs, if the client was actively using heroin, cocaine, or alcohol at time of intake into treatment), criminal history (e.g., age at first arrest, number of arrests, types of crimes, prior convictions, and prior probation and jail sentences), and drug treatment history (e.g., number and types of prior times in drug treatment, months since last treatment program, number of admissions to a CPU program, and number of AIDS education programs attended). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02652.v1 criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug treatment icpsr family history icpsr probation services icpsr probationers icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Falkin, Gregory P. Straus, Shiela Bohen, Timothy Young, Douglas Winterfield, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2652 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02652.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09790 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09790 MiAaI MiAaI Changing Patterns of Drug Abuse and Criminality Among Crack Cocaine Users in New York City [electronic resource] Criminal Histories and Criminal Justice System Processing, 1983-1984, 1986 Jeffrey Fagan , Steven Belenko , Bruce D. Johnson 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9790 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection compares a sample of persons arrested for offenses related to crack cocaine with a sample arrested for offenses related to powdered cocaine. The collection is one of two parts of a study designed to examine the characteristics of crack users and sellers, the impact of large numbers of crack-related offenders on the criminal justice system, and their effects on drug treatment and community programs. Official arrest records and supplementary data bases are used to analyze the official arrest, conviction, and incarceration histories of powdered cocaine and crack defendants. Questions addressed by the collection include: (1) How are defendants charged with crack-related offenses different from defendants charged with offenses related to powdered cocaine? (2) Is there a difference between the ways the criminal justice system handles crack offenders and powdered cocaine offenders in pretrial detention, charges filed, case dispositions, and sentencing? (3) How do the criminal careers of crack offenders compare with the criminal careers of powdered cocaine offenders, especially in terms of total arrest rates, frequencies of nondrug crimes, and frequencies of violent crimes? (4) Is violence more strongly associated with crack dealing than with powdered cocaine dealing? and (5) How does the developmental history of powdered cocaine sales and possession compare with the history of crack sales and possession? Variables include demographic information such as gender, residence, and race, arrest, conviction, and incarceration histories, prior criminal record, community ties, and court outcomes of the arrests. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09790.v1 imprisonment icpsr arrest records icpsr case processing icpsr crack cocaine icpsr convictions (law) icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr criminality icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Fagan, Jeffrey Belenko, Steven Johnson, Bruce D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9790 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09790.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09324 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09324 MiAaI MiAaI Deterrent Effects of the New York Juvenile Offender Law, 1974-1984 [electronic resource] Simon I. Singer 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9324 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was designed to assess the effects of the New York Juvenile Offender Law on the rate of violent crime committed by juveniles. The data were collected to estimate the deterrent effects of the law and to permit the use of an interrupted time-series model to gauge the effects of intervention. The deterrent effects of the law are assessed on five types of violent offenses over a post-intervention period of 75 months using two comparison time series to control for temporal and geographical characteristics. One time series pertains to the monthly juvenile arrests of 16- to 19-year-olds in New York City, and the other covers monthly arrests of juveniles aged 13 to 15 years in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the control jurisdiction. Included in the collection are variables concerning the monthly rates of violent juvenile arrests for homicide, rape, assault, arson, and robbery for the two juvenile cohorts. These time series data were compiled from records of individual police jurisdictions that reported monthly arrests to the Uniform Crime Reporting Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09324.v1 juvenile crime icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr violent crime icpsr arson icpsr assault icpsr crime rates icpsr deterrence icpsr homicide icpsr intervention icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Singer, Simon I. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9324 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09324.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06793 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06793 MiAaI MiAaI Immigrant Populations as Victims in New York City and Philadelphia, 1994 [electronic resource] Robert C. Davis , Edna Erez 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6793 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to examine interrelated issues surrounding the use of the criminal justice system by immigrant victims and to identify ways to improve the criminal justice response to immigrants' needs and problems. Two cities, New York City and Philadelphia, were selected for intensive investigation of victimization of immigrants. In each of these cities, three immigrant communities in a neighborhood were chosen for participation. In New York's Jackson Heights area, Colombians, Dominicans, and Indians were the ethnic groups studied. In Philadelphia's Logan section, Vietnamese, Cambodians, and Koreans were surveyed. In all, 87 Jackson Heights victims were interviewed and 26 Philadelphia victims were interviewed. The victim survey questions addressed can be broadly divided into two categories: issues pertaining to crime reporting and involvement with the court system by immigrant victims. Variables include type of crime, respondent's role in the incident, relationship to the perpetrator, whether the incident was reported to police, and who reported the incident. Respondents were also asked whether they were asked to go to court, whether they understood what the people in court said to them, whether they understood what was happening in their case, and, if victimized again, whether they would report the incident to the police. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06793.v1 cities icpsr court cases icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice system icpsr immigrants icpsr needs assessment icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD VIII. Immigration NACJD X. Victimization Davis, Robert C. Erez, Edna Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6793 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06793.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09670 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09670 MiAaI MiAaI Changing Patterns of Drug Abuse and Criminality Among Crack Cocaine Users in New York City, 1988-1989 [electronic resource] Jeffrey Fagan , Steven Belenko , Bruce D. Johnson 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9670 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection examines the characteristics of users and sellers of crack cocaine and the impact of users and sellers on the criminal justice system and on drug treatment and community programs. Information was also collected concerning users of drugs other than crack cocaine and the attributes of those users. Topics covered include initiation into substance use and sales, expenses for drug use, involvement with crime, sources of income, and primary substance of abuse. Demographic information includes subject's race, educational level, living area, social setting, employment status, occupation, marital status, number of children, place of birth, and date of birth. Information was also collected about the subject's parents: education level, occupation, and place of birth. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09670.v2 crack cocaine icpsr criminality icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Fagan, Jeffrey Belenko, Steven Johnson, Bruce D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9670 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09670.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06191 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06191 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1990 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Idaho, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-09-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6191 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06191.v2 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6191 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06191.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09523 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09523 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1988 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9523 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09523.v5 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9523 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09523.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09287 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09287 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1987 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9287 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09287.v3 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9287 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09287.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09130 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09130 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1986 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9130 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09130.v2 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9130 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09130.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08911 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08911 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1985 [electronic resource] Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8911 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08911.v2 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr policies and procedures icpsr prosecution icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8911 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08911.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08449 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08449 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1983 [electronic resource] California, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virgin Islands, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8449 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08449.v7 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8449 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08449.v7 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08408 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08408 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1982 [electronic resource] California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New York, Virgin Islands, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8408 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08408.v6 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8408 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08408.v6 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08277 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08277 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1981 [electronic resource] California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New York, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8277 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08277.v5 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8277 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08277.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08248 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08248 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1980 [electronic resource] California, Ohio, New York, Pennsylvania, and Utah United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8248 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08248.v6 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8248 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08248.v6 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06190 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06190 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1989 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6190 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06190.v2 policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6190 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06190.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03490 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03490 MiAaI MiAaI Families As a Resource in Recovery From Drug Abuse in New York City, 1999-2001 [electronic resource] Eileen Sullivan 2005-01-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 3490 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined La Bodega de la Familia, an experimental program for drug-abusing offenders and their families in New York City. The study evaluated the outcomes of substance abusers and their families who participated in La Bodega's family case management by comparing them to a group of similar families that did not participate in the program. Data were collected on 93 La Bodega participants and 88 comparison subjects. Data were gathered through structured interviews conducted when subjects entered the study and six months later. The first round of interviews was conducted from January 1999 through August 2000, and the second round was conducted between August 1999 and January 2001. The interviews were based on a standardized instrument that assessed self-reported physical and mental health, family functioning, and social support. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03490.v1 case management icpsr drug abuse icpsr families icpsr health icpsr offenders icpsr social support icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Sullivan, Eileen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3490 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03490.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09979 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09979 MiAaI MiAaI Drug Abuse as a Predictor of Rearrest or Failure to Appear in Court in New York City, 1984 [electronic resource] Eric D. Wish 2000-04-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9979 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was undertaken to estimate the prevalence of drug use/drug use trends among booked arrestees in New York City and to analyze the relationship between drug use and crime. The data, which were collected over a six-month period, were generated from volunteer interviews with male arrestees, the analyses of their urine specimens, police and court records of prior criminal behavior and experience with the criminal justice system, and records of each arrestee's current case, including court warrants, rearrests, failures to appear, and court dispositions. Demographic variables include age, education, vocational training, marital status, residence, and employment. Items relating to prior and current drug use and drug dependency are provided, along with results from urinalysis tests for opiates, cocaine, PCP, and methadone. The collection also contains arrest data for index crimes and subsequent court records pertaining to those arrests (number of court warrants issued, number of pretrial rearrests, types of rearrests, failure to appear in court, and court dispositions), and prior criminal records (number of times arrested and convicted for certain offenses). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09979.v1 drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr police records icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr urinalysis icpsr arrest records icpsr court cases icpsr criminal histories icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug abuse icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Wish, Eric D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9979 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09979.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09588 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09588 MiAaI MiAaI Victim Impact Statements [electronic resource] Their Effect on Court Outcomes and Victim Satisfaction in New York, 1988-1990 Robert C. Davis , Madeline Henley , Barbara Smith 1999-12-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9588 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection was to assess the effects of victim impact statements on sentencing decisions and on victim satisfaction with the criminal justice system. Victims were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions: (1) Victims were interviewed, with an impact statement written and immediately distributed to the prosecutor, defense attorney, and judge on the case, (2) Victims were interviewed to assess impact but no statement was written, and (3) Victims were assigned to a control condition in which there was no interview or statement. Subsequent interviews evaluated victims' perceptions of their role in the proceedings and their satisfaction with the outcome. Data were also recorded on charges filed against the defendants (both the arraignment and final charges), sentences, and special conditions of sentences. Standard demographic information was gathered as well. The remaining variables fall into two categories. The first category includes questions about the defendant(s) in the case. For all defendants in each case (up to six per victim) the researchers recorded information on the nature and severity of the arraignment charges and final charges, and on the sentence received. Additional information was recorded for the first and second defendants in a case. This included information on special conditions of the sentence such as a drug treatment program or restraining order. Orders to pay restitution were noted. Also recorded was information on the defendant's status with the criminal justice system, including number of prior convictions and number of open cases against the defendant. Finally, whether the Victim Impact Statement appeared in the assistant district attorney's file on the case and whether the statement had been opened were noted. The second category of variables includes information about the victim's reactions to the crime and the criminal justice system. Victims were asked to assess the impact the crime had on them in terms of physical injury, financial losses, psychological effect, and behavioral effect (i.e., changes in behavior resulting from the experience). They were also questioned about their experiences with the criminal justice system. The researchers inquired about their participation in the sentencing decision, their satisfaction with the outcome, and how they felt they had been treated by various court officials. Victims were asked whether they felt that court officials were aware of and were concerned about the effect the crime had on them. They were also asked whether victims should have a greater role in the court proceedings and whether court officials should be aware of victim impact as part of the sentencing procedure. Finally, the researchers investigated whether the victims believed that going to court was a waste of time. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09588.v1 convictions (law) icpsr court cases icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr sentencing icpsr trials icpsr victims icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Davis, Robert C. Henley, Madeline Smith, Barbara Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9588 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09588.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09986 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09986 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Careers of Juveniles in New York City, 1977-1983 [electronic resource] Laura A. Winterfield 1999-03-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9986 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This longitudinal study of juvenile offenders traces the criminal histories of a sample of juveniles, including those who were "dropouts" (juvenile offenders who did not go on to become adult criminal offenders) and those who continued to be arrested, ranging from those with only one subsequent arrest to "persisters" (juveniles who did become career criminal offenders). The data are intended to address the following questions: (1) Are serious juvenile offenders more likely than nonserious juvenile offenders to become adult offenders? (2) Are offenders who begin at a younger age more likely to have more serious criminal careers than those who begin when they are older? (3) As a criminal career progresses, will the offender become more skilled at one type of offense and commit that type of crime more frequently, while decreasing the frequency of other types of crimes? (4) As a criminal career continues, will the offender commit progressively more serious offenses? (5) How well can it be predicted who will become a high-rate offender? Part 1 of this study, Juvenile Case File, contains data on a subsample of 14- and 15-year-olds who were brought to Probation Intake in the New York City Family Court for delinquency offenses. Included are variables for the date and type of arrest, disposition and sentence of the offender, and sex and race of the offender, as well as questions concerning the offender's home environment and highest school grade completed. Part 2, Arrest and Incarceration Event File, includes information on prior delinquency arrests, including the date of arrest, the charge and severity, and the disposition and sentence, as well as similar information on subsequent offenses that occurred up to six years after the original delinquency offense. Included for each incarceration is the status of the offender (juvenile or adult), the date of admission to a facility, and the length of time incarcerated. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09986.v2 recidivism prediction icpsr career criminals icpsr criminality prediction icpsr criminal histories icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr ex-offenders icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juvenile recidivists icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Winterfield, Laura A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9986 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09986.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09565 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09565 MiAaI MiAaI Mandatory Drug Offender Processing Data, 1987 [electronic resource] New York Bureau of Justice Assistance and Criminal Justice Statistics Association 1997-08-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9565 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Consortium for Assessing Drug Control Initiatives, funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance and coordinated by the Criminal Justice Statistics Association, collected drug offender processing data from the state of New York. The purpose of the project was to track adult drug offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final court disposition, regardless of whether the offender was released without trial, acquitted, or convicted. These data allow researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes drug offenders, to measure the changing volume of drug offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the drug offender population. For purposes of this project, a drug offender was defined as any person who had been charged with a felony drug offense. The data are structured into six segments pertaining to (1) record identification, (2) the offender (date of birth, sex, race, and ethnic origin), (3) arrest information (date of arrest, age at arrest, arrest charge code), (4) prosecution information (filed offense code and level, prosecution disposition and date), (5) court disposition information (disposition offense and level, court disposition, final disposition date, final pleading, type of trial), and (6) sentencing information (sentence and sentence date, sentence minimum and maximum). Also included are elapsed time variables. The unit of analysis is the felony drug offender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09565.v1 adults icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug offenders icpsr prosecution icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Bureau of Justice Assistance and Criminal Justice Statistics Association Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9565 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09565.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09978 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09978 MiAaI MiAaI Mental Disorder and Violent Crime [electronic resource] A 20-Year Cohort Study in New York State, 1968-1988 Henry J. Steadman , Pamela Clark Robbins , Carmen Cirincione 1996-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9978 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objectives of this study were (1) to compare long-term patterns of violent crime for mentally disordered patients and for prison inmates, and (2) to evaluate the predictive validity of a diagnosis of schizophrenia for subsequent arrests for violent crimes. For purposes of this data collection, violent crimes were defined as including murder, manslaughter, rape, assault, kidnapping, and sodomy. The study analyzed individual state mental hospital patients and inmates of state prisons in New York State over a 20-year span. In the process of obtaining information regarding the individuals, three different areas were focused on: hospital, incarceration, and arrest histories. Variables for hospital histories include inpatient hospitalizations, admission and discharge dates, legal status for all state hospitals through 1988, primary diagnosis for target and most recent admissions, and placements in New York State Department of Correctional Services mental hospitals. Incarceration history variables include time spent in adult state prisons, incarcerations through 1988, and dates of release (including re-entry to community on parole, outright release, or escape). Arrest histories include information on the subject's first adult arrest through 1988 (only the most serious charge for each incident is recorded) and out-of-state arrests, when available. Demographic variables include age, race, and date of birth. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09978.v3 assault icpsr kidnapping icpsr manslaughter icpsr mental disorders icpsr mental hospitals icpsr mental patients icpsr murder icpsr prison inmates icpsr rape icpsr schizophrenia icpsr violent crime icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Steadman, Henry J. Robbins, Pamela Clark Cirincione, Carmen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9978 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09978.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09326 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09326 MiAaI MiAaI Downtown Safety, Security, and Development in New York City, 1984 [electronic resource] N. David Milder 1992-02-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9326 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was designed to address problems of crime as a barrier to the economic health of three outlying commercial centers of New York City: Brooklyn, Fordham Road in the Bronx, and Jamaica Center in Queens. Included in the survey are variables concerning the respondent's age, race, gender, family income, length of residence, and personal victimization experience. Also included are variables pertaining to perceptions of safety, physical disorder in the area, and source of information about crime in the commercial center. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09326.v1 commercial districts icpsr crime icpsr economic conditions icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD II. Community Studies Milder, N. David Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9326 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09326.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08090 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08090 MiAaI MiAaI SLATS Truck Theft Data of New York City, 1976-1980 [electronic resource] John J. Gibbs , Peggy L. Shelly 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8090 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is one of three quantitative databases comprising the Commercial Theft Studies component of the Study of the Causes of Crime for Gain, which focuses on patterns of commercial theft and characteristics of commercial thieves. This data collection examines the methods used to commit various acts of theft that involved a truck or the contents of a truck. These data were collected from the files of a specialized New York City Police Department detective squad called the Safe, Loft, and Truck Squad (SLATS), which was created specifically to investigate commercial truck thefts. The variables include type and value of stolen property, weapon involvement, treatment of driver and helper, suspect characteristics, and recovery information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08090.v1 armed robbery icpsr arrests icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr cargo security icpsr cargo shipments icpsr carjacking icpsr commercial theft icpsr larceny icpsr police records icpsr property crime statistics icpsr property crimes icpsr punishment icpsr robbery icpsr stolen property icpsr stolen property recovery icpsr victimization icpsr weapons icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Gibbs, John J. Shelly, Peggy L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8090 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08090.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07832 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07832 MiAaI MiAaI New York City Court Employment Project Evaluation Study, 1976-1979 [electronic resource] Vera Institute of Justice 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7832 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study served as a controlled research evaluation of the New York City Court Employment Project (CEP) as it stood in 1976-1979. At the time of the study, CEP was an independent corporation under contract to New York City's Human Resources Administration. The ultimate aim of CEP was to change the income-generating behavior of its participants to reduce their subsequent criminal activity. CEP did this by diverting accused offenders from routine court procedures (criminal prosecution, sentencing, and possible incarceration) and instead placing them into jobs, training, or vocationally-oriented counseling services. Eligible defendants agreed to attend mandatory counseling sessions, to devise and execute individual plans for securing training and employment, and to avoid arrest and conviction during their participation. Charges were dismissed by the court if, at the end of six months, CEP counselors determined that the defendant had participated successfully. Research goals for this study were to accumulate data in order to: (1) assess the impact of diversion on recidivism and personal stability, (2) ascertain the outcome of court cases without diversion, and (3) assess the relationship of these outcomes to the social services aspect of diversion programs. The study compared a control group of non-CEP offenders with an experimental group of CEP participants to assess the program's effectiveness in helping offenders find and maintain employment or training and avoid criminal activity. Data were collected on 666 subjects, 410 in the experimental group and 256 in the control group. Three interviews were conducted at six-month intervals with each subject, initially to record self-reports about education, training, employment history, reliance on public assistance, criminal history, illegal activities, lifestyle, and utilization of social services, and then to maintain current information about their school, employment, income, and court processing status. In addition to the three personal interviews, official records data were obtained from a variety of agencies to gather information including criminal history, disposition of the case on which the defendant entered the research, information related to subsequent arrests, and (for members of the experimental group) information about participation in CEP. Other variables include attendance at counseling sessions, type of employment found, job attendance, self-evaluation of important life events and life satisfaction, social services programs utilized, and drug and alcohol use, as well as defendant's and defendant's parents' age, sex, and race. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07832.v1 conviction records icpsr courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr diversion programs icpsr education icpsr employment services icpsr intervention icpsr job history icpsr job placement icpsr job satisfaction icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr alternatives to institutionalization icpsr arrest records icpsr career guidance icpsr life events icpsr living arrangements icpsr occupational mobility icpsr personal adjustment icpsr probation icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism rates icpsr rehabilitation programs icpsr sentencing reforms icpsr social adjustment icpsr social services icpsr training icpsr ICPSR XII. Legal Systems NACJD V. Courts NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Vera Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7832 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07832.v1