<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
	
		
		


 






	

	
 



<record>
	<leader>     nmm  22        4500</leader>
	<controlfield tag="001">ICPSR02558</controlfield> 
	<controlfield tag="003">MiAaI</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="006">m    f   a u      </controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="007">cr mn mmmmuuuu</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="008">130518s2000    miu    f   a        eng d</controlfield>
	<datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">(MiAaI)ICPSR02558</subfield> 
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">MiAaI</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">MiAaI</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
		
		
		
		
	
	<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">
			
				
				Increasing the Efficiency of Police Departments in Allegany County, New York, 1994-1995
			
		</subfield>
		<subfield code="h">[electronic resource]</subfield>
			
		<subfield code="c">
			
				
					
					William Hall
								
			
		</subfield>
	</datafield>				
	<datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">2006-03-30</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Ann Arbor, Mich.</subfield>
		<subfield code="b">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">2000</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">2558</subfield> 
	</datafield>	
	
	<datafield tag="516" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Numeric</subfield>
	</datafield>
	
	<datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18.</subfield>
	</datafield>
		
	
	
		<datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
	
	
	
	
	<datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Also available as downloadable files.</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
	
	<datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">
			This study sought to investigate the attitudes of residents
 and law enforcement personnel living or working in Allegany County,
 New York in order to (1) assess community support of law enforcement
 efforts to collaborate on projects, and (2) determine rural law
 enforcement agencies' willingness to work together on community
 policing projects and share resources in such a way as to improve and
 increase their overall individual and collective effectiveness and
 efficiency. Community policing, for this study, was defined as any law
 enforcement strategy designed to improve policy directed toward law
 enforcement interaction with community groups and citizens. Data were
 gathered from surveys that were distributed to two groups. First, to
 determine community perceptions of crime and attitudes toward the
 development of collaborative community policing strategies, surveys
 were distributed to the residents of the villages of Alfred and
 Wellsville and the town of Alfred in Allegany County, New York (Part
 1, Community Survey Data). Second, to capture the ideas and
 perceptions of different types of law enforcement agencies regarding
 their willingness to share training, communication, and technology,
 surveys were distributed to the law enforcement agencies of
 Wellsville, Alfred, the New York State Police substation (located in
 the town of Wellsville), the county sheriff's department, and the
 Alfred State College and Alfred University public safety departments
 (Part 2, Law Enforcement Survey Data). For Part 1 (Community Survey
 Data), the residents were asked to rate their level of fear of crime,
 the reason for most crime problems (i.e., gangs, drugs, or
 unsupervised children), positive and negative contact with police, the
 presence and overall level of police service in the neighborhoods, and
 the importance of motor vehicle patrols, foot patrols, crime
 prevention programs, and traffic enforcement. Respondents were also
 asked whether they agreed that police should concentrate more on
 catching criminals (as opposed to implementing community-based
 programs), and if community policing was a good idea. Demographic data
 on residents includes their age, sex, whether they had been the victim
 of a property or personal crime, and the number of years they had
 lived in their respective communities. Demographic information for
 Part 2 (Law Enforcement Survey Data) includes the sex, age, and
 educational level of law enforcement respondents, as well as the
 number of years they had worked with their respective
 departments. Respondents were asked if they believed in and would
 support programs targeted toward youth, adults, the elderly, and
 merchants. Further queries focused on the number of regular and
 overtime hours used to train, develop, and implement department
 programs. A series of questions dealing with degrees of trust between
 the departments and levels of optimism was also asked to gauge
 attitudes that might discourage collaboration efforts with other
 departments on community-oriented programs. Officers were also asked
to rate their willingness to work with the other agencies. 
			Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02558.v1
		</subfield>
	</datafield>	
		
		
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">crime prevention</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">fear of crime</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">police citizen interactions</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">police community relations</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">police departments</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">police effectiveness</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">police patrol</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">public approval</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">public interest</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">community policing</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
		
	<datafield tag="653" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
		
			<subfield code="a">ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System</subfield>
		
			<subfield code="a">NACJD IX. Police</subfield>
		
	</datafield>
	
		
			
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Hall, William</subfield>
					<subfield code="u"></subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
		
	
	<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR (Series)</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">2558</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="z">Access restricted ; authentication may be required:</subfield>
		<subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02558.v1</subfield>
	</datafield>
</record>


    
</collection>
