nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02826 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02826 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 1999-11-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2826 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program measures levels of and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in the United States. The ADAM Program is a redesigned version of the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]), upgraded methodologically and expanded to include 35 cities. The data address the following topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs, (3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the relationship between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5) the relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age, race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge at the time of booking. The recently modified ADAM/DUF interview instrument (used for part of the 1995 DUF data and all of the DUF 1996, DUF 1997, and ADAM 1998 data) also collected information about the arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type, arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the interview. Data from the new interview instrument also included information about whether arrestees had ever injected drugs and whether they were influenced by drugs when they allegedly committed the crimes for which they were arrested. The data also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had prior arrests in the last 12 months. Data that continue to be collected with the new version of the ADAM/DUF interview provide information about arrestees' histories of drug/alcohol treatment, including whether they ever received drug/alcohol treatment and whether they needed drug/alcohol treatment. As part of the ADAM program, arrestees were asked to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of the following ten drug types: marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02826.v1 drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2826 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02826.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02994 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02994 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 1999 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2994 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, the successor to the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]), measures levels of and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in 35 sites across the United States. The data address the following topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs, (3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the relationship between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5) the relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age, race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge at the time of booking. The modified ADAM/DUF interview instrument (used for part of the 1995 data and all of the 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999 data) also collected information about the arrestee's use of 15 drugs, including recent and past use (e.g., 3-day and 30-day drug use), age at first use, and whether the arrestee had ever been dependent on drugs. As part of the ADAM program, arrestees were asked to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02994.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2994 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02994.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03270 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03270 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2000 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3270 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. thadone, methaqualone, barbiturates, amphetamines, and methamphetamine. The adult data files include several derived variables. The male data also include four sampling weights, and stratum identifications and percents. For the juvenile data, demographic variables include age, race, sex, educational attainment, employment status, and living circumstances. Data also include each juvenile arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs (alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, powder cocaine, crack, heroin, PCP, amphetamines, barbiturates, quaaludes, methadone, crystal methamphetamine, Valium, LSD, and inhalants). For each drug type, arrestees reported whether they had ever used the drug, age of first use, whether they had used the drug in the past 30 days and past 72 hours, number of days they used the drug in past month, whether they tried to cut down or quit using the drug, if they were successful, whether they felt dependent on the drug, whether they were receiving treatment for the drug, whether they had received treatment for the drug in the past, and whether they thought they could use treatment for that drug. Additional variables include whether juvenile respondents had ever injected drugs, whether they were influenced by drugs when they allegedly committed the crime for which they were arrested, whether they had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents, and if so, whether in the past 12 months, and information on arrests and charges in the past 12 months. As with the adult data, urine test results are also provided. Finally, variables covering precinct (precinct of arrest) and law (penal law code associated with the crime for which the juvenile was arrested) are also provided for use by local law enforcement officials at each site. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03270.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3270 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03270.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03688 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03688 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3688 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2001 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 33 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2001 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3688 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03815 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03815 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3815 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2002 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 36 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2002 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3815 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04020 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04020 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4020 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2003 up to four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 39 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. The ADAM program in 2003 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult male and female files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) for males, weights. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug dependence icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4020 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28141 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28141 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Project in Rural Nebraska, 1998 [electronic resource] Denise C. Herz 2011-01-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28141 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. A pilot outreach project of the National Intstitute of Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program, the rural Nebraska ADAM program examined the prevalence and type of arrestee drug use in four rural Nebraska counties and compared the results to those found in Omaha, Nebraska, an established ADAM site. The data were collected in Madison (n=78), Dawson (n=50), Hall (n=53), and Scotts Bluff (n=149) counties, and Omaha, Nebraska, (n=202) in October and November of 1998. The catchment area for Omaha was the central city. The ADAM interview provided demographic and descriptive data, including race, age, marital status, source of income, screens of substance abuse and dependency, treatment history, arrest and incarceration experiences, and participation in local drug markets. At the conclusion of the interview, respondents were asked to provide a urine specimen. The current study included a supplemental questionnaire about methamphetamine use. The methamphetamine addendum included variables on why the respondent began and continued the use of methamphetamines, how often and how much methamphetamine was used, if and why the respondent had ever sought and completed treatment, source of the methamphetamine, and if the respondent had ever made or sold methamphetamine. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28141.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr methamphetamine icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Herz, Denise C. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28141 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28141.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30061 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30061 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2009 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2011-02-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30061 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 7,794 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2009. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 2009. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr susbstance abuse icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30061 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32321 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2010 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2011-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 8,332 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2010. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2010. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr susbstance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02874 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02874 MiAaI MiAaI CBS NEWS "CBS.Marketwatch.com" Millennium Poll, December 1999 [electronic resource] CBS News 2011-04-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2874 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This special topic poll, fielded December 17-19, 1999, focused on respondents' anticipation of life in the 21st century as the year 2000 approached. Those queried were asked to predict the quality of life in the 21st century on a variety of dimensions including war, terrorism, length of the working day, religion, the environment, equality for Blacks, and poverty. They were also asked to assess the impact of the United States on global popular culture, politics, art, music, and economics. Views were sought on the future of current prominent businesses including Coca-Cola, Microsoft, the Wall Street Journal, Amazon.com, General Electric, and Ford, and respondents were asked to select the most important business leader of the 20th century from a list including United States Steel founder Andrew Carnegie, Ford Motor Company founder Henry Ford, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, McDonald's founder Ray Kroc, Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller, Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton, and IBM founder Thomas Watson. Looking ahead to the end of the 21st century, respondents were asked which of the following innovations/trends would still be in use/existence: VCR, telephone, compact discs, printed books, the Internet, post office mail, cars fueled by gasoline, marriage, retirement at age 65, children raised by two parents, various languages, and going to the office to work. A series of questions addressed the use of medical technology in the 21st century, including the cloning of humans, women aged 50 and over bearing children, people living to age 100, genetically engineered babies, altering genes to limit the risk of developing certain genetic diseases, and altering the genetic make-up of plants, fruits, and vegetables. Additional topics covered whether intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe, robots that act like humans, vacation cruises to outerspace, whether the "new century" begins on January 1, 2000, or on January 1, 2001, belief in Armageddon, Internet commerce, and attention paid to the 2000 political campaigns. The results of this survey were announced on the CBS website CBS.Marketwatch.com. Background information on respondents includes age, sex, political party, political orientation, education, religion, race, Hispanic descent, marital status, family income, age of children in household, and computer access. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02874.v2 communications systems icpsr twenty-first century icpsr economic conditions icpsr international relations icpsr media influence icpsr prediction icpsr public opinion icpsr quality of life icpsr social life icpsr trends icpsr ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United States TPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA) CBS News Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2874 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02874.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09621 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09621 MiAaI MiAaI CBS News/New York Times Monthly Poll, March 1991 [electronic resource] CBS News , The New York Times 2011-02-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9621 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that evaluate the Bush presidency and solicit opinions on a variety of political and social issues. Demographic information collected includes sex, age, race, education, family members serving in the Armed Forces in the Persian Gulf, family income, religion, ethnicity, political orientation, party preference, and voting behavior. Issues addressed in this survey include Bush's handling of the economy and foreign policy, how things were going in the United States compared with five years ago and what the situation would be five years from now, whether the country was heading in the right direction, the most important problem facing the country, and the political party that could best handle it. Respondents were also asked for their opinions of various public figures including Dan Quayle, Norman Schwarzkopf, and Dick Cheney. Other questions concerned whether the United States was in decline as a world power, the trustworthiness of the government and military, the country that will be the number one economic power in the world in the next century, and what the future holds for the next generation of Americans. The survey also posed a series of questions pertaining to the likelihood and appropriateness of future military intervention elsewhere by the United States now that the Persian Gulf War was over, sympathy for Israel vs. sympathy for Arab nations, the economic recession, the homeless, the drug problem, education, the environment, comparison of the Democratic vs. Republican parties on a variety of topics, voting for congressmen based on whether they voted to authorize war or continue economic sanctions, reducing the federal budget deficit, comparison of the technological advancement of the United States and Japan, and the likelihood of voting for George Bush or the Democratic candidate in 1992. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09621.v2 education icpsr environment icpsr federal budget deficit icpsr Bush Administration (1989-1993) icpsr Bush, George H.W. icpsr Cheney, Dick icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr economic sanctions icpsr foreign policy icpsr homeless persons icpsr military intervention icpsr national economy icpsr party preferences icpsr Persian Gulf War icpsr political orientation icpsr presidential performance icpsr public opinion icpsr Quayle, Dan icpsr recession icpsr Schwartzkopf, Norman icpsr trends icpsr voter attitudes icpsr voting behavior icpsr ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United States CBS News The New York Times Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9621 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09621.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25481 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25481 MiAaI MiAaI Compstat and Organizational Change in the United States, 1999-2001 [electronic resource] David Weisburd , Rosann Greenspan , Stephen Mastrofski 2009-10-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25481 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to determine how Compstat programs were being implemented across the United States by examining the diffusion of Compstat and factors associated with its implementation. Another goal of the study was to assess the impact of Compstat on line or patrol officers at the bottom of the police organization. The researchers administered a national survey on Compstat and problem solving in police agencies (Part 1) by mail to all 515 American police agencies with over 100 sworn police officers, and to a random sample of 100 agencies with between 50 and 100 sworn officers. The researchers received a total of 530 completed surveys (Part 1) between June 1999 and April 2000. The researchers distributed an anonymous, voluntary, and self-administered survey (Part 2) between December 2000 and May 2001 to a total of 450 patrol officers at three police departments -- Lowell, Massachusetts (LPD), Minneapolis, Minnesota (MPD), and Newark, New Jersey (NPD). The Compstat Survey (Part 1) contains a total of 321 variables pertaining to executive views and departmental policy, organizational features and technology, and comments about problem solving in police agencies. The Line Officer Survey (Part 2) contains a total of 85 variables pertaining to the patrol officers' involvement in Compstat-generated activities, their motivation to participate in them, and their views on these activities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25481.v1 Compstat icpsr police officers icpsr statistical data icpsr trends icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime statistics icpsr decision making icpsr goals icpsr organizational structure icpsr performance icpsr police icpsr police departments icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Weisburd, David Greenspan, Rosann Mastrofski, Stephen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25481 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25481.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02564 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02564 MiAaI MiAaI Crack, Powder Cocaine, and Heroin [electronic resource] Drug Purchase and Use Patterns in Six Cities in the United States, 1995-1996 K. Jack Riley 2012-08-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2564 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was designed to address the practical and policy implications of various drug market participation patterns. In 1995, the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) collaborated on a project called the Procurement Study. This study was executed as an addendum to NIJ's Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]) with the goal of extending previous research in which heroin users were interviewed on various aspects of drug market activity. The present study sought to explore additional features of drug market participation and use, both within and across drug types and cities, and included two additional drugs -- powder cocaine and crack cocaine. Data were collected from recently arrested users of powder cocaine, crack cocaine, and heroin in six DUF cities (Chicago, New York, Portland, San Diego, San Antonio, and Washington, DC). Each of the three files in this collection, Crack Data (Part 1), Heroin Data (Part 2), and Powder Cocaine Data (Part 3), is comprised of data from a procurement interview, urine test variables, and a DUF interview. During the procurement interview, information was collected on purchase and use patterns for specific drugs. Variables from the procurement interview include the respondent's method of using the drug, the term used to refer to the drug, whether the respondent bought the drug in the neighborhood, the number of different dealers the respondent bought the drug from, how the respondent made the connection with the dealer (i.e., street, house, phone, beeper, business/store, or friends), their main drug source, whether the respondent went to someone else if the source was not available, how the respondent coped with not being able to find drugs to buy, whether the respondent got the drug for free, the means by which the respondent obtained money, the quantity and packaging of the drug, and the number of minutes spent searching for, traveling to, and waiting for their last purchase. Urine tests screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Data from the DUF interview provide detailed information about each arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type, arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the interview. Data from the DUF interview instrument also included alcohol/drug treatment history, information about whether arrestees had ever injected drugs, and whether they were influenced by drugs when the crime that they were charged with was committed. The data also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had had prior arrests in the past 12 months. Demographic data include the age, race, sex, educational attainment, marital status, employment status, and living circumstances of each respondent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 crack cocaine icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr heroin icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr arrests icpsr cocaine icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Riley, K. Jack Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2564 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06122 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06122 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Histories and Criminal Justice Processing of Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Sample Members in Washington, DC, 1989-1991 [electronic resource] Jay Carver , Eric Wish , Douglas A. Smith , Christina Polsenberg 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6122 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the relationship between arrestee drug tests and future criminality once other risk factors, such as prior criminal history, are accounted for. Also explored is whether the association between drug test results and future offending varies depending upon the attributes of individual offenders. The dataset contains information drawn from the Pretrial Services Agency (PSA) in Washington, DC, and the National Institute of Justice's Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program. Data are available from each source for 1989 and 1990 with subsequent arrest data provided by PSA through August 1991. The 1989-1990 data supplied by PSA contain information on criminal history and drug test results taken at the time of arrest. Data provided from the DUF program include drug test results from a sample of persons arrested as well as information obtained from arrestee interviews on items such as family and work status. The combined data contain the arrestees' demographic characteristics, arrest and charge information, prior criminal history, and subsequent offending. Drugs tested for include cocaine, opiates, methadone, PCP, amphetamines, barbiturates, marijuana, methaqualone, Darvon, and Valium. In addition, self-reported information regarding an individual's use of and dependency on these drugs is supplied. Demographic information includes age, sex, income, and employment status. Due to changes in the DUF measurement instrument from 1989 to 1990, the variables contained in the two data files are not completely identical. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06122.v1 substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr criminal histories icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Carver, Jay Wish, Eric Smith, Douglas A. Polsenberg, Christina Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6122 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06122.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09477 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09477 MiAaI MiAaI Drug Use Forecasting in 24 Cities in the United States, 1987-1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 1998-07-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9477 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program measures levels of and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in the United States. The data address the following topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs, (3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the relationship between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5) the relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age, race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge at the time of booking. The recently modified DUF interview instrument (used for part of the 1995 data and all of the 1996 and 1997 data) also collected information about the arrestee's use of 15 drugs, including recent and past use (e.g., 3-day and 30-day drug use) of each of these drugs, age at first use, and whether the arrestee had ever been dependent on drugs. In the original DUF interview instrument (used for the 1987 to 1994 data and part of the 1995 data), the information collected was the same as above except that the use of 22 drugs was queried, and the age at which the arrestee first became dependent on the drug was included. Arrestees also were questioned in the original instrument about their history of intravenous drug use, whether the consideration of AIDS influenced whether they shared needles, history of drug and alcohol treatment, their past and current drug treatment needs, and how many persons they had sex with during the past 12 months. Finally, arrestees were asked to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). The Gun Addendum Data (Parts 27, 35, and 37) contain variables on topics such as arrestees' encounters with guns, whether they agreed or disagreed with statements about guns, gun possession, how they obtained handgun(s), whether they were armed with a gun at their arrest or during crimes, and if they had ever used a gun against another person. The Heroin Addendum Data, 1995 (Part 29) contains information that was formerly covered in the main annual file in 1992-1994, but in 1995 was revised and prepared as a separate dataset. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09477.v2 drug related crimes icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr substance abuse icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr criminal histories icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9477 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09477.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26101 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26101 MiAaI MiAaI Empirical Investigation of "Going to Scale" in Drug Interventions in the United States, 1990, 2003 [electronic resource] Avinash Singh Bhati , John Roman 2009-08-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 26101 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Despite a growing consensus among scholars that substance abuse treatment is effective in reducing offending, strict eligibility rules have limited the impact of current models of therapeutic jurisprudence on public safety. This research effort was aimed at providing policy makers some guidance on whether expanding this model to more drug-involved offenders is cost-beneficial. Since data needed for providing evidence-based analysis of this issue were not readily available, micro-level data from three nationally representative sources were used to construct a 40,320 case synthetic dataset -- defined using population profiles rather than sampled observation -- that was used to estimate the benefits of going to scale in treating drug involved offenders. The principal investigators combined information from the NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH, 2003 (ICPSR 4138) and the ARRESTEE DRUG ABUSE MONITORING (ADAM) PROGRAM IN THE UNITED STATES, 2003 (ICPSR 4020) to estimate the likelihood of drug addiction or dependence problems and develop nationally representative prevalence estimates. They used information in the DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT OUTCOME STUDY (DATOS), 1991-1994 (ICPSR 2258) to compute expected crime reducing benefits of treating various types of drug involved offenders under four different treatment modalities. The project computed expected crime reducing benefits that were conditional on treatment modality as well as arrestee attributes and risk of drug dependence or abuse. Moreover, the principal investigators obtained estimates of crime reducing benefits for all crimes as well as select sub-types. Variables include age, race, gender, offense, history of violence, history of treatment, co-occurring alcohol problem, criminal justice system status, geographic location, arrest history, and a total of 134 prevalence and treatment effect estimates and variances. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26101.v1 drug offender profiles icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr simulation models icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr therapeutic jurisprudence icpsr treatment programs icpsr trends icpsr cost effectiveness icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime reduction icpsr criminality prediction icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug courts icpsr drug dependence icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Bhati, Avinash Singh Roman, John Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26101 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26101.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06567 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06567 MiAaI MiAaI Estimating the Elasticities of Demand for Cocaine and Heroin with Data from 21 Cities from the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program, 1987-1991 [electronic resource] Jonathan P. Caulkins 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6567 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of this research was to estimate the elasticity of the demand for cocaine and heroin with respect to the price. Price elasticity is the percentage of change in the dependent quantity corresponding to a one-percent change in price. The project involved the development of an econometric model to determine price elasticity, given that national- and city-level data on the consumption of cocaine and heroin are insufficient or nonexistent. The researchers circumvented this lack of data by partitioning the desired elasticity into the product of two elasticities, involving a measurable intermediate quantity whose relationship to the quantity of consumption could be modeled and estimated by measurable techniques. The intermediate quantity used for this project was the fraction of arrestees testing positive for cocaine or heroin as measured by the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) System. From the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA's) System to Retrieve Information from Drug Evidence (STRIDE) data, expected purity was computed by regressing on log quantity and dummy variables for location and quarter. Price series were produced by finding the median standardized price per expected pure gram for each location and quarter. Variables for Part 1, National Data, include year, quarter, standardized prices for a gram of cocaine and a gram of heroin, and expected purity of cocaine and heroin. The Cities Data, Part 2, cover city, year, quarter, number of observations used to compute the median price of cocaine and heroin, standardized prices, and expected purity. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06567.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr cocaine icpsr consumption icpsr criminal histories icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug use icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr heroin icpsr price fluctuations icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Caulkins, Jonathan P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6567 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06567.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28184 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28184 MiAaI MiAaI Eurobarometer 71.3 [electronic resource] Globalization, Personal Values and Priorities, European Identity, Future of the European Union, Social Problems and Welfare, and European Elections, June-July, 2009 Antonis Papacosta 2010-08-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 28184 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This round of Eurobarometer surveys queried respondents on standard Eurobarometer measures, such as how satisfied they were with their present life, whether they attempted to persuade others close to them to share their views on subjects they held strong opinions about, whether they discussed political matters, and how they viewed the need for societal change. Additional questions focused on the respondents' knowledge of and opinions on the European Union (EU), including how well-informed they felt about the EU, whether their country had benefited from being an EU member, and the extent of their personal interest in EU matters. Further questions on the EU included the extent of EU involvement in various policy areas and the importance of these issues, further European integration, economic growth, and trust in EU organizations. The survey also queried respondents about these six major topical areas: (1) Globalization, (2) Personal Values and Priorities, (3) European Identity, (4) Future of the European Union, (5) Social Problems and Welfare, and (6) European Elections. For the first major topic, respondents were asked for their opinions on globalization and its effect on the local community, companies, and the EU. For the second major topic, respondents were asked about their values and priorities. The survey then asked respondents about the third topic, European Identity. Respondents were questioned about their national and European identities, what they thought were the important characteristics and elements of their identities, and what their identities mean to them. For the fourth topic, the future of the European Union, respondents were asked about their predictions for the year 2030 in regards to the economy, expansion, societal norms, and culture. For the fifth topic, social problems and welfare, respondents were asked about social welfare and pensions, and the quality of their country's plans and possible future changes to the programs. Respondents were also questioned about employment possibilities in their country, including whether highly educated people had problems obtaining jobs. The sixth major topic focused on the European Parliament elections, respondents were asked their reasons for voting or not voting, what they felt were important policy issues, their attitudes toward the elections, their exposure to election campaigns, and their closeness to the political parties. In addition to the six major areas of focus, four minor topics were also covered: (1) Human Rights, (2) Public Authorities, (3) Minorities and Immigrants, and (4) Elderly Care. Demographic and other background information collected includes age, gender, origin of birth (personal and parental), marital status, occupation, age at completion of full-time education, left-right political self placement, level in society, household composition, ownership of a fixed or mobile telephone, ownership of household durables, financial situation, Internet usage, and quality of life pertaining to health. In addition, country-specific data includes region of residence, type and size of locality, and language of interview (select countries). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28184.v1 attitudes icpsr cultural identity icpsr economic integration icpsr elections icpsr European Parliament icpsr European unification icpsr European Union icpsr globalization icpsr health care icpsr human rights icpsr immigrants icpsr life satisfaction icpsr minorities icpsr national identity icpsr pensions icpsr political influence icpsr political participation icpsr political power icpsr political representation icpsr public officials icpsr public opinion icpsr quality of life icpsr social change icpsr social welfare icpsr trends icpsr values icpsr IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior ICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, Europe IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data Papacosta, Antonis Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28184 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28184.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27082 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27082 MiAaI MiAaI Gender and Violent Victimization, 1973-2005 [United States] [electronic resource] Janet Lauritsen , Karen Heimer 2012-09-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27082 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this project was to estimate long-term trends in violent victimization by gender and various socio-demographic factors. These factors included race and ethnicity, age, type of place (urban, suburban, rural), socio-economic status, marital status (for adults), and family status (for juveniles). The principal investigators also further disaggregated these violent victimization trends by victim-offender relationship to reveal trends in violence committed by strangers, intimate partners, and known/non-intimate offenders. The researchers produced these various trends in violent victimization by pooling and appropriately weighting the National Crime Survey and its successor, the National Crime Victimization Survey for the period 1973 to 2005, resulting in 33 years of data. In total, a series of 135 trends in violent victimization were developed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27082.v1 violence icpsr violent crime icpsr violent crime statistics icpsr age icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime statistics icpsr gender icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr marital status icpsr poverty icpsr race icpsr trends icpsr victimization icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization Lauritsen, Janet Heimer, Karen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27082 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27082.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06524 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06524 MiAaI MiAaI German Social Survey (ALLBUS), 1994 [electronic resource] Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung and Zentrum fuer Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) 1998-05-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6524 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The German Social Survey monitors social trends in Germany. The central topics of this investigation focus on economics, the job market, education and professional fulfillment, social inequality and the welfare state, attitudes toward and contacts with foreigners living in Germany, political attitudes, the united Germany, the family, and altered gender roles. Basic demographic characteristics of respondents also were collected. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06524.v1 economic conditions icpsr education icpsr families icpsr foreign workers icpsr gender roles icpsr German reunification icpsr job satisfaction icpsr life satisfaction icpsr occupations icpsr political attitudes icpsr public opinion icpsr social attitudes icpsr social inequality icpsr social issues icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr trends icpsr IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data IDRC II. Economic Data ICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United States Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung and Zentrum fuer Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6524 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06524.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02005 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02005 MiAaI MiAaI German Social Survey (ALLBUS), 1996 [electronic resource] Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung and Zentrum fuer Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) 1997-08-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 2005 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The German Social Survey monitors social trends in Germany. The central topics of the 1996 survey were attitudes toward ethnic minority groups, immigrant groups, and foreigners living in Germany. The survey elicited respondents' attitudes toward dual citizenship, the civil rights of foreigners, perceived cultural differences, advocating the teaching of Islam in the schools, various manifestations of anti-Semitism, and the distribution of foreigners in East and West Germany. Respondents were also queried on the first, second, or third country of citizenship and origin for themselves, for their spouse or living partner, and for their parents, and immigrants were asked how long they had been living in Germany. In addition, attitudes toward family, marriage, and partnership, the roles of women in the family, and the importance of special learning goals for children were collected. Other items probed for respondents' perceptions of the state and government, including attitudes toward various forms of protest against the government as well as toward increasing or decreasing government expenditures for environmental protection, public health, defense, unemployment, pensions, and culture. Additional topics included the economic situation and fear of unemployment, abortion, social inequality, political interests, things that a German can be proud of, and the Inglehart Index of respondent materialism/post-materialism category, coded according to which national goals the respondent thought should be given top priority: maintaining order and protecting freedom of speech, or giving people more say in important government decisions and fighting rising prices. Basic demographic characteristics of respondents were also collected, such as age, gender, education, occupation, religion, personal and household income, household size and composition, and marital status. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02005.v1 anti-Semitism icpsr cultural perceptions icpsr family life icpsr gender roles icpsr government spending icpsr immigrants icpsr life satisfaction icpsr marriage icpsr minorities icpsr political interest icpsr political attitudes icpsr public opinion icpsr social attitudes icpsr social issues icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr trends icpsr ICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United States IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior IDRC II. Economic Data Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung and Zentrum fuer Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2005 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02005.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08453 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08453 MiAaI MiAaI German Social Survey (ALLBUS) Cumulative File, 1980, 1982, 1984, 1986 [electronic resource] Zentrum fur Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) 2005-01-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8453 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection contains data from three multi-thematic inquiries into changes occurring within society in Germany. A variety of social and political topics were dealt with in each of the surveys. These include attitudes toward and personal importance of work, family and children, and religion. Self-described social status and sense of receiving one's "just share" from society were also investigated. Political topics treated include attitudes toward governmental priorities, desired levels of social and defense spending, and attitudes toward the political parties. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08453.v2 social issues icpsr social justice icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr trends icpsr children icpsr defense spending icpsr families icpsr government performance icpsr government spending icpsr life satisfaction icpsr political attitudes icpsr political parties icpsr public opinion icpsr religious attitudes icpsr social attitudes icpsr social expenditures icpsr IDRC II. Economic Data IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior ICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United States Zentrum fur Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8453 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08453.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06523 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06523 MiAaI MiAaI German Social Survey (ALLBUS) Cumulative File, 1980-1992 [electronic resource] Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung and Zentrum fuer Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) 1995-10-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6523 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This collection contains data from eight surveys concerning social trends within Germany. The surveys in 1991 and 1992 interviewed respondents throughout Germany, while the preceding surveys were restricted to West Germany and West Berlin. Each of the surveys covered a variety of social and political topics, which are represented by the following variables in the cumulative file: perceptions of the economic situation, political attitudes and involvement, attitudes toward the unification of Germany, social inequality and the welfare state, sources of national/ethnic pride, immigrants, family and upbringing, attitudes toward abortion, questions about Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), professional and life priorities, religion and church, environmental awareness, attitudes toward authority, and fear of crime. The demographic variables include the respondent's age, education, income, marital status, citizenship, residency in Germany, children, friends and acquaintances, membership in organizations or associations, parents' education and professions, and spouse's or partner's demographic characteristics. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06523.v1 abortion icpsr AIDS icpsr authority icpsr economic conditions icpsr environmental attitudes icpsr families icpsr German reunification icpsr immigrants icpsr life satisfaction icpsr national pride icpsr parental attitudes icpsr political attitudes icpsr political participation icpsr public opinion icpsr religious attitudes icpsr social attitudes icpsr social inequality icpsr social issues icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr trends icpsr ICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United States IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data IDRC II. Economic Data Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung and Zentrum fuer Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6523 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06523.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03066 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03066 MiAaI MiAaI German Social Survey (ALLBUS) Cumulative File, 1980-1996 [electronic resource] Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung and Zentrum fuer Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) 2001-01-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3066 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This collection contains data from ten surveys concerning social trends in Germany. Each of the surveys covered a variety of social and political topics, which are represented by the following variables in the cumulative file: perceptions of the economic situation, political attitudes and involvement, attitudes toward the unification of Germany, social inequality and the welfare state, sources of national/ethnic pride, immigrants, family and upbringing, attitudes toward abortion, questions about Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), professional and life priorities, religion and church, environmental awareness, attitudes toward authority, and fear of crime. The demographic variables include the respondent's age, education, income, marital status, citizenship, residency in Germany, children, friends and acquaintances, membership in organizations or associations, parents' education and professions, and spouse's or partner's demographic characteristics. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03066.v1 social expenditures icpsr social issues icpsr social justice icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr trends icpsr children icpsr defense spending icpsr families icpsr government performance icpsr government spending icpsr life satisfaction icpsr political attitudes icpsr political parties icpsr public opinion icpsr religious attitudes icpsr social attitudes icpsr IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior IDRC II. Economic Data ICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United States IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung and Zentrum fuer Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3066 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03066.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30981 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30981 MiAaI MiAaI Intercity Variation in Youth Homicide, Robbery, and Assault, 1984-2006 [United States] [electronic resource] Kevin Strom , Angela Browne 2012-09-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30981 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The research team collected data on homicide, robbery, and assault offending from 1984-2006 for youth 13 to 24 years of age in 91 of the 100 largest cities in the United States (based on the 1980 Census) from various existing data sources. Data on youth homicide perpetration were acquired from the Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) and data on nonlethal youth violence (robbery and assault) were obtained from the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR). Annual homicide, robbery, and assault arrest rates per 100,000 age-specific populations (i.e., 13 to 17 and 18 to 24 year olds) were calculated by year for each city in the study. Data on city characteristics were derived from several sources including the County and City Data Books, SHR, and the Vital Statistics Multiple Cause of Death File. The research team constructed a dataset representing lethal and nonlethal offending at the city level for 91 cities over the 23-year period from 1984 to 2006, resulting in 2,093 city year observations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30981.v1 age icpsr assault icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime statistics icpsr drug related crimes icpsr firearms icpsr gang violence icpsr gangs icpsr homicide icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juveniles icpsr robbery icpsr trends icpsr violence icpsr violent crime icpsr violent crime statistics icpsr youths icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Strom, Kevin Browne, Angela Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30981 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30981.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR22381 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR22381 MiAaI MiAaI Monitoring Drug Markets in Manhattan [New York City], With the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, 1998-2002 [electronic resource] Andrew Golub , Bruce D. Johnson 2009-06-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 22381 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to determine how much Manhattan (New York City) arrestees surveyed by the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program spend on drug expenses. The program obtained both self-report and urinalysis data from a total of 5,210 Manhattan arrestees surveyed by the ADAM program from 1998 to 2002. The principal investigators developed a formula for an episodic estimator of a respondent’s drug expense for cash, noncash, and cash-combination transactions. The dataset contains a total of 267 variables relating to Manhattan arrestees' demographics, interview information, criminal history, urinalysis test results, drug use, drug market transactions, and drug expenses. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22381.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Golub, Andrew Johnson, Bruce D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 22381 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22381.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03926 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03926 MiAaI MiAaI National Survey of Third Generation Members of the Youth-Parent Political Socialization Study, 1997 [electronic resource] M. Kent Jennings , Laura Stoker 2004-04-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3926 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This survey, conducted April-July 1997, is part of a series of surveys designed to assess political continuity and change across time for biologically related generations. The focus of this survey was to assess political continuity and change between the respondents that were part of the youth generation in the original youth-parent study, STUDENT-PARENT SOCIALIZATION STUDY, 1965 (ICPSR 7286), and their offspring ages 15 and older. Respondents were polled on the accessibility, responsiveness, trustworthiness, and comprehensibility of the government and politicians, the importance of free speech and assembly, and the influence of interest groups in politics. Respondents were asked to rate the degree to which politicians were liberal or conservative on a scale of 1 to 7. Information was gathered on whether respondents voted in the 1996, 1992, and 1988 presidential elections and for whom they voted, whether respondents were involved in political and/or community activism, whether they performed any volunteer work, their level of Internet access and proficiency, their ratings of labor unions, activist groups, and politicians, whether they had tried to influence the political or social views of others, and their opinions on the role of the United States in world affairs. Respondents' views were also elicited about the role of political parties in the United States, the rights of criminals, the legalization of marijuana, their standard of living compared to that of their parents, equal rights measures concerning ethnicity, sexual orientation, and sex, and whether most people can be trusted, are helpful, and are fair. Respondents were polled on their life habits and were asked to give their opinions on issues such as whether the United States should have been involved in the Vietnam War, women in the workplace, the relevancy and accuracy of the Bible, and prayer in school. Background variables include age, sex, religious orientation, level of religious participation, marital status, ethnicity, educational status and background, and employment status. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03926.v1 adolescents icpsr attitudes icpsr family life icpsr family relations icpsr government icpsr parent child relationship icpsr political attitudes icpsr political behavior icpsr political change icpsr political participation icpsr political socialization icpsr social attitudes icpsr social behavior icpsr social studies icpsr student attitudes icpsr trends icpsr trust in government icpsr ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States RCMD X. Political Participation Jennings, M. Kent Stoker, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3926 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03926.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03499 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03499 MiAaI MiAaI Pathological Gambling in Arrestee Populations in Des Moines, Iowa, and Las Vegas, Nevada, 2000-2001 [electronic resource] Richard McCorkle 2003-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3499 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought to examine the extent, nature, and consequences of pathological gambling disorders in arrestee populations. Five research questions were addressed: (1) What is the prevalence of pathological gambling in arrestee populations? (2) What is the profile of the pathological gambler arrested for felony and misdemeanor offenses? (3) How does the nature and level of criminal activity among pathological gamblers compare to that of non- pathological gamblers? (4) What proportion of the crime committed by offenders with pathological gambling disorders is linked to their gambling activities (either to fund gambling or pay off gambling debts)? and (5) How does substance abuse interact with pathological gambling to affect the nature and extent of criminal activity? The data for this research were collected in conjunction with the National Institute of Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) programs. Arrestees in Las Vegas, Nevada, and Des Moines, Iowa, who had completed the ADAM interview and provided a urine specimen were asked if they would be willing to answer an additional set of questions concerning their gambling behavior. Data from the ADAM interview and drug screening were merged with data collected using the gambling addendum, producing the dataset for this study. Variables from the ADAM instruments were comprised of demographic data on each arrestee, calendar of admissions to drug treatment-related programs, data on dependence and abuse, drug market and use data, and urine test results. The gambling addendum was used to collect data on five topics: (1) past-year gambling activity, (2) the use of alcohol and illegal drugs prior to and during gambling, (3) substance abuse and/or self-reported gambling problems, (4) past-year criminal activity (property, drug, and violent offending), and (5) motivations for criminal activity (gambling or non-gambling related). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03499.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr addiction icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr gambling icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System McCorkle, Richard Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3499 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03499.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR05803 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR05803 MiAaI MiAaI Prospects for Peace, 1973-1977 [electronic resource] Walter C. Jr. Clemens 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 5803 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This study contains data derived from a survey of 151 respondents from leading American universities' centers of international studies and some United States government officials and non-United States scholars on the likelihood of war and peace in the period 1972-1977. Respondents were asked questions about the probability of a nuclear or major conventional war breaking out, the forces most dangerous and most conducive to international peace and economic development, and the future of the United Nations (UN). Other questions were asked concerning respondents' opinions of the United States-Soviet military balance, the viability of the 1972 Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) and the prospects for other arms control measures, the relationship of certain international events to the arms race, alternative scenarios for the future of Indochina, Middle East, and United States-Soviet relations, the probability of certain destabilizing political and ecological events occurring in Asia, Africa, and Latin America and the likely maximum United States' response to these events, the likely linkages between trade and political relations among the great powers, and the United States' position toward the UN. Most questions ask respondents to rate the relative probability of some events occurring within a four-year period on a scale of 1 to 5 and other questions ask respondents to select alternative future events considered most likely to have occurred by 1977. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR05803.v1 public opinion icpsr strategic arms limitation talks icpsr trends icpsr war icpsr arms control icpsr arms race icpsr Cold War icpsr disarmament icpsr foreign policy icpsr international conflict icpsr international relations icpsr nuclear war icpsr peace icpsr political conflict icpsr prediction icpsr IDRC I. Conflict Data ICPSR VI.A. Elites and Leadership, United States Clemens, Walter C. Jr. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 5803 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR05803.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04437 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04437 MiAaI MiAaI Second National Study on the Situation of Youth in the Philippines [1997] [electronic resource] Social Weather Stations 2006-10-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4437 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is the second round in a series of surveys (begun in 1996) of Filipino youth. Six surveys were implemented in November 1997 throughout the Philippines, and this data collection consists of four parts for each of the six surveys administered. In particular, this data collection (1) allows comparison with youth issues and concerns asked about in the 1996 set of surveys, (2) monitors new youth issues and concerns that might have appeared since 1996, and (3) provides a picture of special youth groups in other parts of the Philippines outside of the National Capital Region (NCR). Respondents were queried about such topics as needs and aspirations, education, employment, satisfaction on certain aspects of life, activities and involvement, experience of discrimination, and religiosity. Further questions covered mass media, exposure to mass media, role models, the youth legislature known as Sangguniang Kabataan (SK), government programs and policies, and their experiences with sexual, illegal, and socially undesirable activities. Economic indicators and sociodemographic characteristics were also collected. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04437.v1 adolescents icpsr career choice icpsr educational background icpsr employment icpsr entertainment icpsr high school students icpsr life plans icpsr life satisfaction icpsr peer groups icpsr political attitudes icpsr social attitudes icpsr social behavior icpsr student attitudes icpsr students icpsr trends icpsr youths icpsr DATAPASS I. NDIIPP IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data ICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United States IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior IDRC II. Economic Data Social Weather Stations Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4437 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04437.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07694 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07694 MiAaI MiAaI Status of the Elderly, 1972 [electronic resource] Social Security Administration 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7694 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This study contains merged data from the March 1972 Current Population Survey of the United States Census Bureau and the Social Security Administration's benefit record system. The primary objective of the survey was to provide the Social Security Administration with information on the population aged 60 and older in terms of work rates, amount and sources of total money income, and beneficiaries. Information provided by the survey focuses on three areas: (1) the effects of retirement benefit amount on decisions to work, (2) the effectiveness of old age, survivors', disability, and health insurance programs in meeting the needs of those who have retired, either partly or fully, because of ill health, poor skills, mandatory retirement, or the desire for leisure time, and (3) future trends in work and retirement patterns. Demographic variables specify age, sex, race, date of birth, ethnicity, occupation, and income. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07694.v1 health insurance icpsr income icpsr older adults icpsr older workers icpsr population characteristics icpsr retirement icpsr retirement income icpsr Social Security icpsr trends icpsr work icpsr ICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life Cycle Social Security Administration Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7694 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07694.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07286 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07286 MiAaI MiAaI Student-Parent Socialization Study, 1965 [electronic resource] M. Kent Jennings 2007-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7286 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection contains information on the evolution of political attitudes and intergenerational influences upon this process among 1,669 high school seniors and 1,992 parents of these students in 97 schools in the United States in 1965. Information collected for student respondents includes attitudes towards school, family life, political parties, and toward the political process in general, as well as personal data and plans for the future. Information obtained from parents includes their views of family life, intrafamily relations, political history, and the political process. Parents were also questioned on their attitudes when they were high school students. Data are also provided on the size and type of school, enrollment percentage of minority groups, types of activities offered by the school, tenure systems, religious affiliations of the student body, and juvenile offenses and dropout percentages. Demographic items specify age, place of birth, education, occupation, nationality, religion, social class, and place of residence. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07286.v3 adolescents icpsr peer groups icpsr personality icpsr political attitudes icpsr political behavior icpsr political change icpsr political parties icpsr political partisanship icpsr political socialization icpsr social attitudes icpsr social behavior icpsr family life icpsr social studies icpsr student attitudes icpsr trends icpsr trust in government icpsr family relations icpsr high school students icpsr high schools icpsr parent child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr parental influence icpsr parents icpsr ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States Jennings, M. Kent Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7286 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07286.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04024 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04024 MiAaI MiAaI Study of Political Socialization [electronic resource] Parent-Child Pairs Based on Survey of Youth Panel and Their Offspring, 1997 M. Kent Jennings , Laura Stoker 2004-10-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4024 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This panel study is part of a series of surveys designed to assess political continuity and change across time for biologically related generations and to gauge the impact of life-stage events and historical trends on their behaviors and attitudes. The purpose of this study was to obtain social, political, and economic information from the "youth" portion of the socialization panel study, which began in 1965 with a national sample of high school seniors, and from their offspring aged 15 and older as of 1997. This data collection combines the two sources of data in the form of parent-child pairs, with one key objective being the analysis of influence relationships within the family. The dataset is explicitly designed to facilitate the use of parent-child pairs as the units of analysis. The parent portion includes 478 cases, omitting the 457 cases (49 percent of the 935 total) for which there were no eligible offspring or where the offspring could not be located, did not receive the self-administered questionnaires (SAQ), or elected not to complete it. See YOUTH-PARENT SOCIALIZATION PANEL STUDY, 1965-1997: YOUTH WAVE IV, 1997 (ICPSR 4023) for the data file containing all of the Wave IV cases. The Offspring portion (the third generation) includes 769 cases and can be used in and of itself, but it omits 10 cases that could not be linked with a particular parent. See NATIONAL SURVEY OF THIRD GENERATION MEMBERS OF THE YOUTH-PARENT POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION STUDY, 1997 (ICPSR 3926) for a data file containing all cases. Collection of SAQ data from the offspring was dependent upon their parents' supplying the correct locations of their eligible offspring. Background variables include age, sex, religious orientation, level of religious participation, marital status, ethnicity, educational status and background, place of residence, family income, and employment status. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04024.v1 adolescents icpsr family life icpsr family relations icpsr high school students icpsr high schools icpsr life events icpsr parent child relationship icpsr peer groups icpsr personality icpsr political attitudes icpsr political behavior icpsr political change icpsr political participation icpsr political partisanship icpsr political socialization icpsr public policy icpsr social attitudes icpsr social behavior icpsr social protest icpsr social studies icpsr student attitudes icpsr trends icpsr trust in government icpsr ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States Jennings, M. Kent Stoker, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4024 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04024.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26462 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26462 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations Surveys of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems Series, Waves 1-10, 1970-2006 [electronic resource] United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch 2010-07-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 26462 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The major goal of the United Nations Surveys on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems was to collect data on the incidence of reported crime and the operations of criminal justice systems with a view to improving the analysis and dissemination of that information globally. Surveys were distributed to officials in every member country of the United Nations. Designated officials completed the surveys to the best of their abilities given the country's available data. The survey questionnaire consisted of a series of questions which asked for data, primarily statistical, on the main components of the country's criminal justice system, for the given time period of the wave of data collection. To date, there have been ten waves of data collection. Crime variables include counts of recorded crime for homicide, assault, rape, robbery, theft, burglary, fraud, embezzlement, drug trafficking, drug possession, bribery, and corruption. There are also counts of suspects, persons prosecuted, persons convicted, and prison admissions by crime, gender, and adult or juvenile status. Other variables include the population of the country and largest city, budgets and salaries for police, courts, and prisons, and types of sanctions, including imprisonment, corporal punishment, deprivation of liberty, control of freedom, warning, fine, and community sentence. The countries participating in the survey and the variables available vary across the ten waves. There are two versions of the Wave 2 data (Part 2: Wave 2a , 1975-1980; Part 3: Wave 2b, 1975-1980) because, for various reasons, the variables from Wave 1 and some variables from Wave 2 were combined into one dataset. Similarly, some variables from Wave 2 were combined into one dataset with the variables from Wave 3. For this study, the combined Wave 1 and Wave 2 dataset was separated into Parts 1 and 2 (Wave 1, 1970-1975, and Wave 2a, 1976-1980, respectively) and the combined Wave 2 and Wave 3 dataset was separated into Parts 3 and 4 (Wave 2b, 1975-1980, and Wave 3, 1980-1986, respectively). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26462.v1 acquittals icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug traffic icpsr embezzlement icpsr fraud icpsr international crime statistics icpsr larceny icpsr assault icpsr law enforcement icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr police reports icpsr population characteristics icpsr prosecution icpsr punishment icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr burglary icpsr sentencing icpsr trends icpsr United Nations icpsr convictions (law) icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26462 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26462.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06945 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06945 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations World Crime Surveys [electronic resource] Fourth Survey, 1986-1990 United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6945 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Fourth United Nations Survey, covering the years 1986-1990, was designed to increase knowledge regarding the incidence of reported crime and the structure of criminal justice systems, as a basis for improving the international exchange of information. The main objectives of the survey were to determine which data are generally available in national databases and to provide an instrument for strengthening cooperation among member states of the United Nations by putting the review and analysis of national crime-related data in a broader context. Variables describe combined police and prosecution expenditure by year and by country, number of police personnel by gender, total number of homicides by country and by city, number of assaults, rapes, robberies, thefts, burglaries, frauds, and embezzlements, amount of drug crime, number of people formally charged with crime, age of suspects, number and gender of prosecutors, number of individuals prosecuted and the types of crimes prosecuted for, gender and age of individuals prosecuted, types of courts, number of individuals convicted and acquitted, numbers sentenced to capital punishment and to various other punishments, number of convictions on various charges, number of individuals sentenced and in detention, number of prisoners, sentence lengths, and prison demographics. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06945.v1 trends icpsr United Nations icpsr acquittals icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr convictions (law) icpsr courts icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug related crimes icpsr embezzlement icpsr fraud icpsr homicide icpsr international crime statistics icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr police reports icpsr population characteristics icpsr prosecution icpsr punishment icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sanctions icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6945 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06945.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02513 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02513 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations World Surveys on Crime Trends and Criminal Justice Systems, 1970-1994 [electronic resource] Restructured Five-Wave Data Burnham, R.W. , Burnham, Helen 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2513 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The United Nations International Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch began the Surveys of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (formerly known as the World Crime Surveys) in 1978. The goal of the data collection effort was to conduct a more focused inquiry into the incidence of crime worldwide. To date, there have been five quinquennial surveys, covering the years 1970-1975, 1975-1980, 1980-1986, 1986-1990, and 1990-1994, respectively. Starting with the 1980 data, the waves overlap by one year to allow for reliability and validity checks of the data. For this data collection, the original United Nations data were restructured into a standard contemporary file structure, with each file consisting of all data for one year. Naming conventions were standardized, and each country and each variable was given a unique identifying number. Crime variables include counts of recorded crime for homicide, assault, rape, robbery, theft, burglary, fraud, embezzlement, drug trafficking, drug possession, bribery, and corruption. There are also counts of suspects, persons prosecuted, persons convicted, and prison admissions by crime, gender, and adult or juvenile status. Other variables include the population of the country and largest city, budgets and salaries for police, courts, and prisons, and types of sanctions, including imprisonment, corporal punishment, deprivation of liberty, control of freedom, warning, fine, and community sentence. The countries participating in the survey and the variables available vary by year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02513.v1 acquittals icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr convictions (law) icpsr courts icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug traffic icpsr embezzlement icpsr fraud icpsr international crime statistics icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr police reports icpsr population characteristics icpsr prosecution icpsr punishment icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sanctions icpsr sentencing icpsr trends icpsr United Nations icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Burnham, R.W. Burnham, Helen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2513 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02513.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09405 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09405 MiAaI MiAaI Voter Registration in the United States, 1968-1988 [electronic resource] Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research 1992-02-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9405 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This collection tabulates the number of registered voters who were eligible to cast ballots in biennial national elections in the United States between 1968 and 1988. Its purpose is to furnish additional research data on registration trends, the relationship between registration and voting, and the role and strength of political parties, and the degree of partisan competition. The unit of analysis is the county, and totals of registered voters are presented for all counties in 48 states (North Dakota does not require registration and Wisconsin does not report statewide voter registration figures). If available, county-level totals are also presented for registration by race, major or minor political party, or other similar category (e.g., declined to state, miscellaneous, other, etc.) provided by the reporting agency of the state. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09405.v1 counties icpsr political parties icpsr political partisanship icpsr trends icpsr voter registration icpsr voters icpsr voting behavior icpsr voting patterns icpsr ICPSR XIV.B.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Political Participation, United States RCMD X. Political Participation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9405 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09405.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09134 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09134 MiAaI MiAaI Youth-Parent Socialization Panel Study, 1965-1982 [electronic resource] Wave III M. Kent Jennings , Gregory B. Markus , Richard G. Niemi 2007-07-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9134 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. For this panel survey a national sample of high school seniors and their parents were interviewed in 1965, and twice later in 1973 and 1982. The survey gauges the impact of life-stage events and historical trends on the behaviors and attitudes of respondents. Each wave has a distinct focus. The 1965 data focus on high school experiences, while the 1973 data deal with the protest era. Data gathered in 1982 emphasize the maturing process and offer information relating to parental issues and family relationships. Other major areas of investigation include political participation, issue positions, group evaluations, civic orientations, personal change over time, stability in attitudes and behaviors over time, and partisanship and electoral behavior. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09134.v4 adolescents icpsr family life icpsr family relations icpsr high school students icpsr high schools icpsr life events icpsr parent child relationship icpsr peer groups icpsr personality icpsr political attitudes icpsr political behavior icpsr political change icpsr political participation icpsr political partisanship icpsr political socialization icpsr public policy icpsr social attitudes icpsr social behavior icpsr social protest icpsr social studies icpsr student attitudes icpsr trends icpsr trust in government icpsr ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States DSDR IX. NIA Supported Studies NACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older Adults RCMD X. Political Participation RCMD XII. Public Opinion Jennings, M. Kent Markus, Gregory B. Niemi, Richard G. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9134 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09134.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04023 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130618s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04023 MiAaI MiAaI Youth-Parent Socialization Panel Study, 1965-1997 [electronic resource] Youth Wave IV, 1997 M. Kent Jennings , Laura Stoker 2005-12-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4023 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-18. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This panel study is part of a series of surveys designed to assess political continuity and change across time for biologically related generations and to gauge the impact of life-stage events and historical trends on the behaviors and attitudes of respondents. A national sample of high school seniors and their parents was initially interviewed in 1965 with subsequent surveys of the same individuals conducted in 1973, 1982, and 1997. This data collection consists of the fourth wave of youth interviews conducted in 1997. Individuals who were identified and located from Wave III (1982) were reinterviewed for this wave. Information was gathered on respondents' political interest, party identification, political participation, interest in public affairs, issue positions, group evaluations, civic orientations, attitudes and behaviors over time, partisanship, and electoral behavior. Respondents were queried about their views on politics, concept of a good citizen, faith in government, and attitudes toward federal government. Respondents were also asked to indicate their feelings toward labor unions, activist groups, and politicians, and to rate the influence level of certain groups. Additional information was gathered on respondents' personal and family changes since 1982. Summary variables from previous waves of this study are also available. Background variables include age, sex, religious orientation, level of religious participation, marital status, ethnicity, educational status and background, place of residence, family income, and employment status. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04023.v2 adolescents icpsr family life icpsr life events icpsr parent child relationship icpsr peer groups icpsr personality icpsr political attitudes icpsr political behavior icpsr political socialization icpsr public policy icpsr social attitudes icpsr social behavior icpsr social protest icpsr social studies icpsr student attitudes icpsr trends icpsr trust in government icpsr family relations icpsr high school students icpsr high schools icpsr political change icpsr political participation icpsr political partisanship icpsr RCMD XII. Public Opinion RCMD X. Political Participation ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United States Jennings, M. Kent Stoker, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4023 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04023.v2