nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08355 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08355 MiAaI MiAaI Alternative Probation Strategies in Baltimore, Maryland [electronic resource] James J. Collins 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8355 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative cost-effectiveness of supervised probation, unsupervised probation, and community service. Data were collected from several sources: input-intake forms used by the State of Maryland, probation officers' case record files, Maryland state police rap sheets, FBI sources, and interviews with Maryland probationers. Non-violent, less serious offenders who normally received probation sentences of 12 months or less were offered randomly selected assignments to one of three treatment methods over a five-month period. Baseline data for probationers in each of the three samples were drawn from an intake form that was routinely completed for cases. An interim assessment of recidivism was made at the midpoint of the intervention for each probationer using information drawn from police records. Probationers were interviewed six and twelve months after probation ended. Demographic information on the probationers includes sex, race, age, birthplace, marital status, employment status, and education. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08355.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr community service programs icpsr cost effectiveness icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmate release plans icpsr offenders icpsr postrelease programs icpsr probation services icpsr probationers icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts Collins, James J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8355 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08355.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29668 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29668 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1994 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-12-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29668 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1994 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1994, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1994. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29668.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29668 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29668.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29669 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29669 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1995 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29669 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1995 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1995, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1995. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29669.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29669 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29669.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29670 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29670 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1996 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29670 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1996 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1996, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1996. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29670.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29670 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29670.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29671 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29671 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29671 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1997 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1997, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1997. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29671.v2 probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29671 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29671.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29672 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29672 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29672 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1998 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1998, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1998. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29672.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29672 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29672.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29673 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29673 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1999 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29673 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1999 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1999, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1999. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29673.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29673 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29673.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28361 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28361 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2000 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28361 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2000 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2000, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2000. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28361.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28361 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28361.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28362 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28362 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28362 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2001 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2001, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2001. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28362.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28362 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28362.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28363 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28363 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28363 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2002 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2002, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2002. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28363.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28363 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28363.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28364 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28364 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28364 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2003 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2003, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2003. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28364.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28364 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28364.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28365 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28365 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28365 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2004 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2004, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2004. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28365.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28365 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28365.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28366 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28366 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2005 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28366 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2005 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2005, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2005. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28366.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28366 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28366.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31323 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31323 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2006 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31323 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2006 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2006, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2006. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31323.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31323 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31323.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31324 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31324 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2007 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31324 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2007 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2007, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2007. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31324.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31324 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31324.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34319 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34319 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34319 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2008 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2008, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2008. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34319.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34319 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34319.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34320 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34320 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34320 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2009 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2009, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2009. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34320.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34320 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34320.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34321 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2010 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2010, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2010. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34321.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02023 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02023 MiAaI MiAaI Community Supervision of Drug-Involved Probationers in San Diego County, California, 1991-1993 [electronic resource] Darlanne Hoctor , Susan Pennell , Christine Curtis 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2023 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. he eight-month period. Variables in the tracking data file (Part 3) include sociodemographic characteristics, current offense and sentence imposed, probation conditions ordered, drug use history, offense and probation violations occurring before, during, and after an eight-month probation period, custody time, changes in level of probation supervision, and program interventions such as drug tests, services delivered, and sanctions imposed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02023.v1 communities icpsr crime prevention icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug treatment icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr postrelease programs icpsr probation conditions icpsr probationers icpsr process evaluation icpsr risk assessment icpsr supervised liberty icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Hoctor, Darlanne Pennell, Susan Curtis, Christine Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2023 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02023.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06214 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06214 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Focused Offender Disposition Program in Birmingham, Phoenix, and Chicago, 1988-1992 [electronic resource] John R. Hepburn 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 6214 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Drug Testing Technology/Focused Offender Disposition (FOD) program was designed to examine two issues regarding drug users in the criminal justice system: (1) the utility of need assessment instruments in appropriately determining the level of treatment and/or supervision needed by criminal offenders with a history of drug use, and (2) the use of urinalysis monitoring as a deterrent to subsequent drug use. This data collection consists of four datasets from three sites. The FOD program was first established in Birmingham, Alabama, and Phoenix, Arizona, in December 1988 and ran through August 1990. The Chicago, Illinois, program began in October 1990 and ended in March 1992. These first three programs studied probationers with a history of recent drug use who were not incarcerated while awaiting sentencing. The subjects were assessed with one of two different treatment instruments. Half of all clients were assessed with the objective Offender Profile Index (OPI) created by the National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors (NASADAD). The other half were assessed with the local instrument administered in each site by Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC), Inc. Regardless of which assessment procedure was used, offenders were then randomly assigned to one of two groups. Half of all offenders assessed by the OPI and half of the offenders assessed by the local instrument were assigned to a control group that received only random urinalysis monitoring regardless of the drug treatment intervention strategy prescribed by the assessment instrument. The other half of offenders in each assessment group were assigned to a treatment group that received appropriate drug intervention treatment. The Phoenix pilot study (Part 4), which ran from March 1991 to May 1992, was designed like the first Phoenix study, except that the sample for the pilot study was drawn from convicted felons who were jailed prior to sentencing and who were expected to be sentenced to probation. These data contain administrative information, such as current offense, number of arrests, number of convictions, and prior charges. The need assessment instruments were used to gather data on clients' living arrangements, educational and vocational backgrounds, friendships, history of mental problems, drug use history, and scores measuring stakes in conformity. In addition, the study specifically collected information on the monitoring of the clients while in the FOD program, including the number of urinalyses administered and their results, as well as the placement of clients in treatment programs. The files also contain demographic information, such as age, race, sex, and education. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06214.v1 criminal justice system icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr needs assessment icpsr probationers icpsr program evaluation icpsr treatment programs icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hepburn, John R. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6214 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06214.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27921 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27921 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Hawaii Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) Community Supervision Strategy, 2007-2009 [electronic resource] Angela Hawken 2011-07-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 27921 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the Hawaii Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) community supervision strategy for substance-abusing probationers. The study involved the administration of key stakeholder surveys as part of a process evaluation of the HOPE program and the comparison of HOPE probationers with control-group probationers on two primary outcome measures: no-shows for probation appointments and positive urine tests for illicit-substance use. For Part 1 and Part 2, data were collected from administrative data sources. Missed Appointments Data (Part 1) were collected from 2007 to 2009 on a total of 1,174 probationers including 1,078 HOPE probationers, 78 comparison probationers, and 18 probationers for which study group information was not available. Specifically, for Part 1, the research team compiled data on the proportion of missed appointments in the three-month period before the study start date (baseline), in the three-month period following baseline, and in the six-month period following baseline. Drug Test Results Data (Part 2) were collected from 2007 to 2009 on the same 1,174 probationers. Specifically, for Part 2, the research team compiled data on the proportion of positive urine tests in the three-month period before the study start date (baseline), in the three-month period following baseline, and in the six-month period following baseline. Stakeholder survey data were collected from September 2008 through March 2009 on 50 Integrated Community Sanctions or "Specialized Unit" probationers (Part 3), 28 probationers in treatment (Part 4), 16 probationers in jail (Part 5), 20 probation officers in the Integrated Community Sanctions Unit (Part 6), 11 public defenders (Part 7), 12 prosecutors (Part 8), 7 judges (Part 9), and 11 court staff (Part 10). Part 1 contains a total of eight variables including group (high intensity or control), demographics, and mean missed appointments scores for three periods. Part 2 contains a total of eight variables including group (high intensity or control), demographics, and mean positive urine tests for illicit-substance use scores for three periods. The Integrated Community Sanctions Probationers Survey Data (Part 3), the Probationers in Treatment Survey Data (Part 4), and the Probationers in Jail Survey Data (Part 5) each include variables about the respondent's general perceptions and opinions of the HOPE program. Part 3 contains 24 variables, Part 4 contains 30 variables, and Part 5 contains 30 variables. The Probation Officers Survey Data (Part 6), Public Defenders Survey Data (Part 7), Prosecutors Survey Data (Part 8), Judges Survey Data (Part 9), and Court Staff Survey Data (Part 10) include variables about workload issues and the respondent's general perceptions and opinions of the HOPE program. Part 6 contains 65 variables, Part 7 contains 45 variables, Part 8 contains 55 variables, Part 9 contains 36 variables, and Part 10 contains 36 variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27921.v1 drug offenders icpsr drug testing icpsr evaluation icpsr judges icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr probation icpsr probation conditions icpsr probation officers icpsr probationers icpsr process evaluation icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr public defenders icpsr sanctions icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Hawken, Angela Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27921 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27921.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09970 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09970 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Implementation and Impact of the Massachusetts Intensive Probation Supervision Project, 1984-1985 [electronic resource] James M. Byrne , Linda M. Kelly 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9970 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an Intensive Probation Supervision (IPS) program on high-risk offenders. The IPS program was characterized by four changes in usual procedures: (1) increased supervision, (2) risk/needs assessment for substance abuse, employment, and marital/family relationships, (3) stricter enforcement of probation, and (4) a four-stage revocation procedure for technical violations. The investigators also studied whether the additional caseload of the probation officers who implemented the IPS program reduced the number of supervision contacts with non-IPS probationers under normal minimum, moderate, and maximum supervision regimens. Offenders put on IPS probation in 1985 from 13 experimental courts were compared to high-risk offenders put on regular probation in the experimental courts in 1984, and to high-risk offenders on regular probation from 13 control courts for both 1984 and 1985. Data were derived from risk assessment forms, needs/strengths assessment forms, probation supervision records, and criminal history data obtained from the state's probation central field. For each offender, a full range of data were collected on (1) offender risk characteristics at initial, four-month, ten-month, and termination assessments, (2) offender needs characteristics at the same intervals, (3) probation officer/offender contact chronologies for the entire one-year follow-up period, and (4) offender prior criminal history and recidivism during a one-year follow-up period. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09970.v1 property crimes icpsr risk assessment icpsr arrest records icpsr caseloads icpsr criminal histories icpsr offenders icpsr probation icpsr probation officers icpsr probationers icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Byrne, James M. Kelly, Linda M. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9970 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09970.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08276 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08276 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of Intensive Probation in Milwaukee, 1980-1981 [electronic resource] Joseph Romm 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8276 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results and impact of a two-year experiment in innovative probation practices in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. After being classified according to the Wisconsin risk and needs assessment scale, individuals who had been sentenced to probation between January 2, 1980 and June 30, 1981 and had reported to the probation department for intake were randomly assigned to one of eight experimental and control groups. The experiment was limited to adult residents of Milwaukee County who were not already on probation, were not judged to be severe psychotic or severe sex-deviant cases, and were not assigned to jail work-release sentences of more than ten days followed by probation (Huber cases). There are three files in this data collection: the Reassessment file, the Admissions/Terminations file, and the Chronological file. Each case in the Reassessment and Admissions/Terminations files represents data on an individual probationer. There are 84 variables for 1343 cases in the Reassessment file and 218 variables for 1922 cases in the Admissions/Terminations file, both files have logical record lengths of 100 characters. Of the 1922 cases for which admissions data were collected (about 133 variables), 397 cases also have termination data available (an additional 85 variables). Cases in the Chronological file are records of probation agent contacts with probationers over the course of the study. There are 17 variables for 47,169 cases (contacts) in this file which includes information on 1781 probationers. As many as 270 contacts with a single probationer are recorded. This file has a logical record length of 80. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08276.v1 criminal justice system icpsr probation icpsr probation conditions icpsr probation officers icpsr probationers icpsr program evaluation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Romm, Joseph Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8276 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08276.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02652 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02652 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the New York City Department of Probation's Drug Treatment Initiative, 1991-1994 [electronic resource] Gregory P. Falkin , Shiela Straus , Timothy Bohen , Douglas Young , Laura Winterfield 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2652 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was undertaken to evaluate the New York City Department of Probation's initiative to place clients in specialized Substance Abuse Verification and Enforcement (SAVE) units for treatment and management. The main analytical strategy of this study was to determine whether clients who were appropriately matched to outpatient drug treatment were less likely to recidivate after treatment in this modality. The focus of the research was not so much on developing powerful prediction models, but rather on determining whether outpatient drug treatment was appropriate and effective for certain types of probationers. The evaluation research involved an in-depth analysis of a sample of 1,860 probationers who were sentenced between September 1991-September 1992 and referred to contracting outpatient drug treatment programs one or more times as of December 31, 1993. The following types of data were collected: (1) the New York City Department of Probation's demographic and drug use information, obtained during the presentence investigation and at intake to probation, (2) the Department of Probation's Central Placement Unit (CPU) database records for each referral made through the CPU, as well as monthly progress reports filled out by the treatment programs on each probationer admitted to drug treatment, (3) the New York State Department of Criminal Justice Statistics' data on criminal histories, and (4) probation officers' reports on whether clients were referred to treatment, the kind of treatment modality to which they were referred, and the dates of admission and discharge. Demographic and socioeconomic variables include age at first arrest and sentencing, gender, race or ethnicity, marital status, family composition, educational attainment, and employment status. Other variables include drug use history (e.g., age at which drugs were first used, if the client's family members used drugs, if the client was actively using heroin, cocaine, or alcohol at time of intake into treatment), criminal history (e.g., age at first arrest, number of arrests, types of crimes, prior convictions, and prior probation and jail sentences), and drug treatment history (e.g., number and types of prior times in drug treatment, months since last treatment program, number of admissions to a CPU program, and number of AIDS education programs attended). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02652.v1 criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug treatment icpsr family history icpsr probation services icpsr probationers icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr treatment programs icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Falkin, Gregory P. Straus, Shiela Bohen, Timothy Young, Douglas Winterfield, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2652 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02652.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20403 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20403 MiAaI MiAaI Examination of Actuarial Offender-Based Prediction Assessments in Texas, 1993-1996 [electronic resource] Michele M. Connolly 2008-06-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 20403 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive assessment of the usefulness and effectiveness of prediction and classification of offenders under community supervision. A felony cohort data collection instrument was developed to test the validity of the Wisconsin Risk and Need Instrument in use in Texas, as well as to develop "better" predictor variables for a variety of dependent variables. Using the felony cohort data instrument, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Community Justice Assistance Division (TDCJ-CJAD) collected detailed statewide information on 3,405 felony offenders placed on probation in Texas during October 1993. Specifically, the form was completed by a probation officer on all felony probation intakes at the time the initial case classification risk/needs assessment was conducted. Additionally, follow-up forms were developed and administered to track the offenders' progress at one year, two years, and three years. Variables include probationer information, current offense, criminal history, social history, substance abuse, probation sanctions, case classification risk items, and case classification need items. Additional variables include felony cohort one-year follow-up data form questions, felony cohort second-year follow-up data form questions, and felony cohort third-year follow-up data form questions. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20403.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr parole icpsr parole boards icpsr parole services icpsr parolees icpsr probation icpsr probation services icpsr probationers icpsr recidivism icpsr risk assessment icpsr risk factors icpsr correctional classification icpsr crime prediction icpsr criminality prediction icpsr evaluation icpsr inmate release plans icpsr offender classification icpsr offender profiles icpsr offenders icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Connolly, Michele M. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20403 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20403.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02025 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02025 MiAaI MiAaI Experimental Evaluation of Drug Testing and Treatment Interventions for Probationers in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1992-1994 [electronic resource] Elizabeth Piper Deschenes , Susan Turner , Peter W. Greenwood 2013-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2025 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection represents a combined experimental evaluation of a drug court program, implemented in 1992 in cooperation with the Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, in comparison to standard probation with different levels of drug testing. The experiment's objective was to compare the drug use and criminal behavior of probationers assigned to four alternative regimes or tracks: (1) standard probation, but no drug testing, (2) standard probation with random monthly drug tests, (3) standard probation with testing scheduled twice a week, and (4) drug court, an integrated program of drug testing, treatment, and sanctions that utilized a carefully structured set of rewards and punishments. The experiment was limited to first-time felony offenders convicted of drug possession or use (not sales) and sentenced to a term of three years' probation. A total of 630 probationers from Maricopa County were randomly assigned to one of the four experimental regimes and tracked for a 12-month period. Data collection efforts included: (1) background information on each participant, (2) process information on the characteristics of supervision and services provided under each experimental condition, and (3) follow-up data on subsequent drug use, crime, and pro-social activities for 12 full months. Background Data (Part 1) include demographic variables such as race, sex, education, marital status, living arrangements, and employment history. In addition, there are variables on prior drug use and abuse, drug treatment, criminal histories as both a juvenile and an adult, and risk and need assessment scores. Other variables include the results of drug testing and any sanctions taken for a positive result (Part 2), new arrests while on probation and corresponding disposition and conviction (Part 3), and technical violations and any actions taken for these violations (Part 4). For probationers assigned to drug court (Part 5) there are variables measuring probationers' status, probation recommendations, and judges' decisions at 11 different progress assessments. The follow-up information (Parts 6-8) includes monthly data on the status of the probationer, the number of face-to-face office contacts, phone contacts, work/school contacts, and community contacts, collateral checks, employment/school verification, counseling sessions, alcohol tests, drug tests, substance abuse treatment, the number of hours the probationer spent job hunting, in educational training, in vocational training, and in community service, the number of days employed full- and part-time, and the amount of earnings, fines paid, restitution paid, and fees paid. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02025.v2 criminal histories icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr felony offenses icpsr intervention icpsr probationers icpsr program evaluation icpsr treatment programs icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Deschenes, Elizabeth Piper Turner, Susan Greenwood, Peter W. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2025 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02025.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06527 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06527 MiAaI MiAaI Hair Assays for Drugs of Abuse in a Probation Population [electronic resource] Pilot Study in a Florida Correctional Field Setting, 1993 Tom Mieczkowski , Richard A. Newel , Gale Allison , Shirley Coletti 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6527 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The major objectives of this research project were: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of hair and urine assays in determining drug use among probationers, (2) to examine the concordance patterns of hair and urine specimens, (3) to explore the perceptions and attitudes of probation officers regarding the use of hair assays for drug testing, and (4) to assess the feasibility of implementing hair analysis in a probationary field setting. The 22 correctional officers who participated in this study were recruited from the Florida Department of Corrections Probation Field Services Divisions, and worked within Pinellas and Pasco counties. Each officer was requested to solicit from his or her caseload eight to ten probationers who would be eligible for the project because they would be undergoing at least monthly urinalysis or urine testing. Approximately 150 probationers participated in the project and were subject to hair assays for illicit drug use, along with standard urine testing. Specimens were collected and analyzed on 90 probationers over a six-month period and on 101 probationers for five consecutive months, as well as fewer numbers of samples for the other probationers. The drugs for which the hair and urine specimens were analyzed included cocaine, opiates, cannabinoids such as marijuana, PCP, and methadone. Survey questions asked of the probation officers (Part 1) covered personal information (gender, ethnicity, education level, years of experience in corrections, and satisfaction with job) and attitudes and opinions about their jobs and drug testing (estimated percentage of caseload using drugs, whether all clients should be tested, and whether knowing drug quantities is helpful). Data in Part 2 cover probationers' drug test results and self-reported drug use, personal information (gender, age, weight, ethnicity, and criminal charge), a variety of hair questions (color, texture, style, length, how often shampooed, and if dyed, tinted, bleached, relaxed, or jeried), and use of medications, along with the medication name and amount. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06527.v1 attitudes icpsr drug testing icpsr probation officers icpsr probationers icpsr process evaluation icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Mieczkowski, Tom Newel, Richard A. Allison, Gale Coletti, Shirley Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6527 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06527.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30281 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30281 MiAaI MiAaI Problem Solving Approaches to Issues of Inmate Reentry in Indianapolis, Indiana, 2000-2003 [electronic resource] Edmund F. McGarrell , Natalie Kroovand Hipple , Duren Banks 2012-10-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30281 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study involved an evaluation of the reentry component of the Indianapolis Violence Reduction Partnership (IVRP). The IVRP included a problem solving approach to the issue of inmate reentry. On the basis of a problem analysis, the IVRP officials decided to implement a pilot project that involved having recently released inmates attend a neighborhood-based group meeting convened by criminal justice officials and including community representatives and service providers. The meetings were based on the notion of combining deterrence and social support (linkage to services). The pilot project was evaluated using a quasi-experimental design. The treatment group consisted of 82 former inmates who attended one of five meetings. The comparison group consisted of 103 former inmates released at the same time period as the treatment group but in a different neighborhood. Reentry lever-pulling meeting participants and comparison group members were tracked for a period of up to 24 months to determine whether they had been re-arrested during the study period. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30281.v1 arrest records icpsr arrests icpsr conviction records icpsr convictions (law) icpsr criminal justice programs icpsr felony offenses icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmate release plans icpsr inmates icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr parole icpsr parole services icpsr parole violation icpsr parolees icpsr postrelease programs icpsr prisoner reentry icpsr probation icpsr probation services icpsr probationers icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivism rates icpsr recidivists icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD II. Community Studies McGarrell, Edmund F. Kroovand Hipple, Natalie Banks, Duren Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30281 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30281.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20357 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20357 MiAaI MiAaI Reducing Violent Crime and Firearms Violence in Indianapolis, Indiana, 2003-2005 [electronic resource] Steven Chermak 2009-01-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 20357 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The lever-pulling model was first developed as part of a broad-based, problem-solving effort implemented in Boston in the mid-1990s. The lever-pulling strategy was a foundational element of many collaborative partnerships across the country and it was a central element of the strategic plans of many Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) jurisdictions. This effort attempted to deter the future violent behavior of chronic offenders by first communicating directly to them about the impact that violence had on the community and the implementation of new efforts to respond to it, and then giving credibility to this communication effort by using all available legal sanctions (i.e., levers) against these offenders when violence occurred. The purpose of the study was to perform an experimental evaluation of a lever-pulling strategy implemented in Indianapolis, Indiana. Probationers were randomly assigned to the law enforcement focused lever-pulling group, the community leader lever-pulling group, or a regular probation control group during six months between June 2003 and March 2004. There were a total of 540 probationers in the study--180 probationers in each group. Probationers in the law enforcement focused lever-pulling group had face-to-face meetings with federal and local law enforcement officials and primarily received a deterrence-based message, but community officials also discussed various types of job and treatment opportunities. In contrast, probationers in the community leader lever-pulling group attended meetings with community leaders and service providers who exclusively focused on the impact of violence on the community and available services. Three types of data were collected to assess perceptions about the meeting: offending behavior, program participation behavior, and the levers pulled. First, data were collected using a self-report survey instrument (Part 1). Second, the complete criminal history for probationers (Part 2) was collected one-year after their meeting date. Third, all available probation data (Part 3) were collected 365 days after the meeting date. Part 1, Self-Report Survey Data, includes a total of 316 variables related to the following three types of data: Section I: meeting evaluation and perception of risk, Section II: Self-reported offense and gun use behavior, and Section III: Demographics. Part 2, Criminal History Data, includes a total of 94 variables collected about the probationer's complete offending history as well as their criminal activities after the treatment for one year. Part 3, Probation Data, includes a total of 249 variables related to probation history and other outcome data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20357.v1 arrest records icpsr gangs icpsr gun use icpsr law enforcement icpsr nonviolent crime icpsr probationers icpsr punishment icpsr recidivists icpsr victimization icpsr violence icpsr violent crime icpsr community leaders icpsr weapons icpsr weapons offenses icpsr conviction records icpsr crime control programs icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug traffic icpsr federal offenses icpsr firearms icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Chermak, Steven Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20357 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20357.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08647 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08647 MiAaI MiAaI A Sentencing Postscript [electronic resource] Felony Probationers Under Supervision in the Community, 1983 Mark A. Cunniff , National Association of Criminal Justice Planners 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8647 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study provides an overview of how the supervision of a class of felony probationers operates in a jurisdiction, and gives a baseline against which the impact of changes to probationary supervision can be measured. The objectives of this study were to describe the demographic characteristics of probationers, the nature and level of supervision that probationers receive, the extent and types of specified conditions imposed on probationers, the degree of probationer compliance with these specified conditions, the extent to which probationers are arrested and/or subjected to probationary disciplinary hearings while under supervision, and the exit status of probationers from community supervision. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08647.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr felony offenses icpsr offenders icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Cunniff, Mark A. National Association of Criminal Justice Planners Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8647 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08647.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02749 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02749 MiAaI MiAaI Strategies for Retaining Offenders in Mandatory Drug Treatment Programs in Kings County, New York, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] Douglas Young 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2749 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. track of attendance, whether someone explained the rules of participation in the program and the consequences if the subject failed the program, whether the rules and consequences were put in writing, who monitored program participants, the likelihood of using drugs while in treatment, the likelihood of leaving the program before completion, whether the subject understood the legal consequences of failing the program, the type and frequency of reports and contacts with the criminal justice system, and the subject's reaction to various penalties for not completing the program. Part 11 contains data from the Community Oriented Programs Environment Scale (COPES). Part 12, Treatment Services Review Data, includes data on the number of times the subject received medical attention, days in school, days employed, days intoxicated, days in substance abuse treatment, days tested for drugs, number of contacts with the criminal justice system, days treated for psychological problems, and time spent at recreational activities. Additional variables include the number of individual and group treatment sessions spent discussing medical problems, education and employment, substance abuse, legal problems, and psychological and emotional problems. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02749.v1 treatment compliance icpsr treatment programs icpsr alternatives to institutionalization icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug treatment icpsr offenders icpsr parolees icpsr probationers icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr substance abuse icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Young, Douglas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2749 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02749.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02039 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02039 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Adults on Probation, 1995 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2039 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1995 Survey of Adults on Probation (SAP) was the first national survey to gather information on the individual characteristics of adult probationers. The SAP was a two-part nationally representative survey consisting of a records check based on probation office administrative records and personal interviews with probationers. The records check provided detailed information for 5,867 probationers on current offenses and sentences, criminal histories, levels of supervision and contacts, disciplinary hearings and outcomes, and demographic characteristics. Only adults with a formal sentence to probation who were not considered absconders were included in the records check. Excluded were persons supervised by a federal probation agency, those only on parole, persons on presentence or pretrial diversion, juveniles, and absconders. The records check forms were completed by a probation officer or by another person knowledgeable about probation office records. A subset of the population selected for the records check was selected for a personal interview, resulting in a total of 2,030 completed interviews. The personal interview sample excluded from the records check sample probationers not on active probation (defined as being required to make office visits at any interval), those incarcerated, and those in residential treatment. Respondents were asked about current offense(s) and supervision, criminal history, alcohol and drug use and treatment, mental health treatment, demographic characteristics, and a variety of socioeconomic characteristics such as employment, income, receipt of welfare, housing, number of children and child support, and living conditions while growing up. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02039.v1 arrest records icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr offender profiles icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr supervised liberty icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2039 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02039.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03254 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03254 MiAaI MiAaI Validation of a Risk Assessment Instrument for Juvenile Probationers in Alameda County, California, 1996 [electronic resource] National Council on Crime and Delinquency 2001-12-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3254 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought to develop a risk assessment instrument to be used in the placement of adjudicated juveniles and determination of outcomes for juvenile probationers. The following research questions served as a guide in developing the risk assessment instrument: (1) Does the instrument measure what it purports to measure? (2) Do similar cases receive similar recommendations for placement services? (3) Is the instrument fair to dissimilar groups? (4) Is the instrument useful to practitioners? and (5) Will the instrument be simple to implement? The goal of the new risk assessment instrument was to address the relative risk of recidivism without taking into account the severity of the current offense. In order to develop a new risk assessment instrument, researchers adapted a pre-existing instrument that had been used and validated with juvenile probationers in California. The new instrument was used to evaluate youths for three measures of recidivism: intake actions, petitions filed, and petitions sustained through one year after the placement decisions were made. The sample of youths was comprised of those who in 1996 had received either a field supervision or a placement order as a disposition. The instrument measured age at first finding, prior criminal behavior, institutional commitments or placement of 30 consecutive days or more, drug/chemical use, alcohol use, parental skills, school disciplinary problems, and peer relationships. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03254.v1 criminal histories icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr postrelease programs icpsr probation services icpsr probationers icpsr recidivism icpsr risk assessment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System National Council on Crime and Delinquency Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3254 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03254.v1