nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06122 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06122 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Histories and Criminal Justice Processing of Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Sample Members in Washington, DC, 1989-1991 [electronic resource] Jay Carver , Eric Wish , Douglas A. Smith , Christina Polsenberg 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6122 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data provide information on the relationship between arrestee drug tests and future criminality once other risk factors, such as prior criminal history, are accounted for. Also explored is whether the association between drug test results and future offending varies depending upon the attributes of individual offenders. The dataset contains information drawn from the Pretrial Services Agency (PSA) in Washington, DC, and the National Institute of Justice's Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program. Data are available from each source for 1989 and 1990 with subsequent arrest data provided by PSA through August 1991. The 1989-1990 data supplied by PSA contain information on criminal history and drug test results taken at the time of arrest. Data provided from the DUF program include drug test results from a sample of persons arrested as well as information obtained from arrestee interviews on items such as family and work status. The combined data contain the arrestees' demographic characteristics, arrest and charge information, prior criminal history, and subsequent offending. Drugs tested for include cocaine, opiates, methadone, PCP, amphetamines, barbiturates, marijuana, methaqualone, Darvon, and Valium. In addition, self-reported information regarding an individual's use of and dependency on these drugs is supplied. Demographic information includes age, sex, income, and employment status. Due to changes in the DUF measurement instrument from 1989 to 1990, the variables contained in the two data files are not completely identical. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06122.v1 substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr criminal histories icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Carver, Jay Wish, Eric Smith, Douglas A. Polsenberg, Christina Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6122 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06122.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09477 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09477 MiAaI MiAaI Drug Use Forecasting in 24 Cities in the United States, 1987-1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 1998-07-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9477 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program measures levels of and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in the United States. The data address the following topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs, (3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the relationship between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5) the relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age, race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge at the time of booking. The recently modified DUF interview instrument (used for part of the 1995 data and all of the 1996 and 1997 data) also collected information about the arrestee's use of 15 drugs, including recent and past use (e.g., 3-day and 30-day drug use) of each of these drugs, age at first use, and whether the arrestee had ever been dependent on drugs. In the original DUF interview instrument (used for the 1987 to 1994 data and part of the 1995 data), the information collected was the same as above except that the use of 22 drugs was queried, and the age at which the arrestee first became dependent on the drug was included. Arrestees also were questioned in the original instrument about their history of intravenous drug use, whether the consideration of AIDS influenced whether they shared needles, history of drug and alcohol treatment, their past and current drug treatment needs, and how many persons they had sex with during the past 12 months. Finally, arrestees were asked to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). The Gun Addendum Data (Parts 27, 35, and 37) contain variables on topics such as arrestees' encounters with guns, whether they agreed or disagreed with statements about guns, gun possession, how they obtained handgun(s), whether they were armed with a gun at their arrest or during crimes, and if they had ever used a gun against another person. The Heroin Addendum Data, 1995 (Part 29) contains information that was formerly covered in the main annual file in 1992-1994, but in 1995 was revised and prepared as a separate dataset. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09477.v2 drug related crimes icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr substance abuse icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr criminal histories icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9477 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09477.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06567 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06567 MiAaI MiAaI Estimating the Elasticities of Demand for Cocaine and Heroin with Data from 21 Cities from the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program, 1987-1991 [electronic resource] Jonathan P. Caulkins 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6567 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of this research was to estimate the elasticity of the demand for cocaine and heroin with respect to the price. Price elasticity is the percentage of change in the dependent quantity corresponding to a one-percent change in price. The project involved the development of an econometric model to determine price elasticity, given that national- and city-level data on the consumption of cocaine and heroin are insufficient or nonexistent. The researchers circumvented this lack of data by partitioning the desired elasticity into the product of two elasticities, involving a measurable intermediate quantity whose relationship to the quantity of consumption could be modeled and estimated by measurable techniques. The intermediate quantity used for this project was the fraction of arrestees testing positive for cocaine or heroin as measured by the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) System. From the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA's) System to Retrieve Information from Drug Evidence (STRIDE) data, expected purity was computed by regressing on log quantity and dummy variables for location and quarter. Price series were produced by finding the median standardized price per expected pure gram for each location and quarter. Variables for Part 1, National Data, include year, quarter, standardized prices for a gram of cocaine and a gram of heroin, and expected purity of cocaine and heroin. The Cities Data, Part 2, cover city, year, quarter, number of observations used to compute the median price of cocaine and heroin, standardized prices, and expected purity. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06567.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr cocaine icpsr consumption icpsr criminal histories icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug use icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr heroin icpsr price fluctuations icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Caulkins, Jonathan P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6567 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06567.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02895 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02895 MiAaI MiAaI Examination of Crime Guns and Homicide in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1987-1998 [electronic resource] Jacqueline Cohen , Wilpen Gorr 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2895 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. state, county, and ZIP code of traced guns, population figures, and counts of crime guns recovered at various geographic locations (states, counties, and ZIP codes) where the traced guns first originated in sales by an FFL to a non-FFL individual. Data for individual guns are not provided in Part 7. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02895.v1 armed robbery icpsr assault icpsr criminality icpsr drug law offenses icpsr firearms icpsr forensic sciences icpsr gun control icpsr gun ownership icpsr gun registration icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr homicide icpsr neighborhoods icpsr public safety icpsr weapons offenses icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Cohen, Jacqueline Gorr, Wilpen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2895 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02895.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03145 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03145 MiAaI MiAaI Gun Density, Gun Type, and the Dallas Homicide Rate, 1980-1992 [electronic resource] Christopher S. Koper 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3145 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined the relationships among trends in deadly gun violence, overall gun availability, and the availability of more lethal types of guns. Using firearms confiscated by the Dallas, Texas, police department from 1980 to 1992 as indicators of the types of guns circulating among criminal/high-risk groups, the project examined changes over time in Dallas' street gun arsenal and assessed the impact these changes had upon gun violence mortality in Dallas. The focus of the project was on the characteristics of the guns rather than their numbers. All confiscated firearms were analyzed and characterized according to basic weapon type and caliber groupings. Dates of confiscation were missing from the majority of the pre-1988 records, but by aggregating the gun data into bimonthly (Part 1) and quarterly (Part 2) time series databases, it was possible to estimate the bimonthly and quarterly periods of confiscation for most of the 1980-1992 records. Records that could not be assigned to bimonthly or quarterly periods were dropped. Confiscated firearms were grouped into basic categories based on stopping power (i.e., wounding potential), rate of fire, and ammunition capacity. The following measures were created for each bimonthly and quarterly period: (1) weapons with high stopping power (large guns), (2) semiautomatic weaponry (semis), (3) weapons combining high stopping power and a semiautomatic firing mechanism (large semis), (4) handguns with high stopping power (large handguns), (5) semiautomatic handguns (semi handguns), and (6) handguns combining high stopping power and semiautomatic firing (large semi handguns). Several violence measures were obtained from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Uniform Crime Reports Supplemental Homicide Reports and Return A (or Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest) data files (see UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA [UNITED STATES]: 1975-1997 [ICPSR 9028]). These measures were also aggregated at bimonthly and quarterly levels. Data from the Dallas Police Department master gun property file include total handguns, total semiautomatic handguns, total large-caliber handguns, total large-caliber semiautomatic handguns, total shotguns, total semiautomatic shotguns, total rifles, total semiautomatic rifles, and total counts and total semiautomatic counts for various calibers of handguns, shotguns, and rifles. Data that were aggregated using the FBI data include total homicides, gun homicides, total robberies, gun robberies, and gun aggravated assaults. The data file also includes the year and the bimonthly or quarterly period counter. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03145.v1 assault weapons icpsr crime reporting icpsr firearms icpsr gun ownership icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr mortality rates icpsr police records icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Koper, Christopher S. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3145 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03145.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04552 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04552 MiAaI MiAaI National Firearms Survey, 1999 [electronic resource] David Hemenway 2007-07-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4552 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This survey was undertaken to obtain information on the characteristics of gun ownership, gun storage and gun carrying practices, and weapons-related incidents in the United States--specifically, use of guns and other weapons in self-defense against other people. Data were collected using national random-digit dial telephone surveys completed between March 19, 1999 and July 13, 1999. Sampling was suspended after the school shooting in Littleton, Colorado on April 20, 1999, and resumed after a cool-down period. Part 1, Survey Data, contains the coded data obtained during the interviews, and Part 2, Open-Ended Verbatim Responses, consists of open-ended answers provided by the respondents. Four qualifying questions were asked, dealing with: (1) gun ownership, (2) gun display against the respondent, (3) gun use in self-defense against another person, and (4) the use of a weapon other than a gun in self-defense against another person. A "yes" response to a qualifying question led to a series of additional questions on the same topic as the qualifying question. Information was collected from all respondents on the perceived safety of their neighborhood, whether they would feel safer if more people owned guns, whether guns should be allowed in public places, whether gun injuries were a problem in their community, whether they would favor or oppose a program to reduce gun injuries, and whether they had ever been shot with a gun. Respondents living in households that currently contained a gun were asked how many and what type of guns were present, the main reasons for owning a gun, whether any of the guns were loaded and unlocked, and whether they had received formal firearms training. Questions about incidents in which a gun was displayed in a hostile manner against the respondent included the number of times it took place, how long ago it had occurred, whether the respondent was in the military or police force at the time, the location of the incident, whether the individual displaying the gun was known to the respondent, whether the respondent had a gun, and whether the police were contacted. Respondents who had used a gun or other weapon in self-defense in the last five years were asked about the number of times it took place, the location of the incident, whether they were in the military or police force at the time, the type of weapon used, whether they knew the other person, whether this individual also had a weapon, whether the police were contacted and arrests made, and what crime was committed. Additional questions asked respondents whether they smoked cigarettes, drank alcohol, whether they had gotten married, had had a fire in their home, and had been hospitalized for a fracture in the past year, and whether they had ever had contact with extraterrestrial life. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, education level, household income, type of residential area (e.g., urban, rural, etc.), and age and number of children in the household. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04552.v1 attitudes icpsr fear of crime icpsr firearms icpsr gun ownership icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr reactions to crime icpsr personal security icpsr public opinion icpsr public safety icpsr self defense icpsr weapons offenses icpsr NACJD II. Community Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hemenway, David Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4552 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04552.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29681 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29681 MiAaI MiAaI National Firearm Survey, 2004 [electronic resource] Matthew Miller 2011-05-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29681 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This nationally representative, anonymous, household telephone survey was conducted to explore the distribution of privately owned firearms in the United States, as well as firearm acquisition, disposal, and storage in households with guns. The study updates an earlier (1994) study by Cook and Ludwig that examined household firearm ownership in the United States (Cook P.J., Ludwig J. Guns in America: Results of a comprehensive national survey of firearms ownership and use. Washington DC: Police Foundation 1997.) Other domains of the survey included (1) past year firearm use both by respondents with firearms in their households and those without (e.g., "In the past 12 months, have you handled any gun"); (2) guns and youth (e.g., "In the last 12 months, have you ever asked another parent whether their home contains guns?"); (3) awareness of and opinions regarding state and federal firearm laws (e.g., "To the best of your knowledge, does your state have a law that holds adults liable for misuse of their guns by children or minors"; "Do you favor or oppose the sale of military style firearms?"); (4) depression and suicide (e.g., "If the Golden Gate Bridge had a barrier to prevent suicide, about how many of the 1,000 jumpers (who have committed suicide by jumping off the bridge since 1937) do you think would have found some other way to kill themselves?") and (5) aggressive driving (e.g., "In the past 12 months, have you made obscene or rude gestures at another motorist"). The survey also included extensive demographic information about the respondent and his or her family. The demographic information that was collected includes respondents' sex, age, race, education level, household income, criminal arrest history, armed forces membership status, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), and political philosophy. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29681.v1 attitudes icpsr fear of crime icpsr firearms icpsr gun ownership icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr personal secruity icpsr public opinion icpsr public safety icpsr reactions to crime icpsr self defense icpsr weapons offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Miller, Matthew Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29681 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29681.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13701 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13701 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Fear and Guns, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2007-02-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 13701 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Fear and Guns instrument. It was administered to subjects in Cohorts 6, 9, and 12 and obtained information regarding the subject's fear in certain situations and the accessibility and use of guns. This instrument combined elements from PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): WHERE ARE YOU AFRAID? (FEAR), WAVE 2, 1997-2000 (ICPSR 13621) and PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): GUN OWNERSHIP, WAVE 2, 1997-2000 (ICPSR 13626). It is closely related to PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): GUN OWNERSHIP, WAVE 3, 2000-2002 (ICPSR 13711). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13701.v1 child development icpsr childhood icpsr fear of crime icpsr fear icpsr gun ownership icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr neighborhoods icpsr social behavior icpsr violence icpsr young adults icpsr adolescents icpsr caregivers icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies DSDR VI. Population Characteristics PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13701 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13701.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13626 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13626 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Gun Ownership, Wave 2, 1997-2000 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2006-04-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 13626 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Gun Ownership instrument that obtained information related to the accessibility and use of guns. It was conducted with subjects in Cohorts 9, 12, 15, and 18. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13626.v1 adolescents icpsr child development icpsr childhood icpsr gun ownership icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr neighborhoods icpsr social behavior icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency DSDR VI. Population Characteristics DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior RCMD IX. Minority Populations RCMD I. Crime PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13626 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13626.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13711 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13711 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Gun Ownership, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2007-02-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 13711 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Gun Ownership instrument. It was administered to subjects in Cohorts 15 and 18 and obtained information related to the accessibility and use of guns. It is related to PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): GUN OWNERSHIP, WAVE 2, 1997-2000 (ICPSR 13626) and PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): FEAR AND GUNS, WAVE 3, 2000-2002 (ICPSR 13701). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13711.v1 neighborhoods icpsr social behavior icpsr violence icpsr gun ownership icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr adolescents icpsr caregivers icpsr child development icpsr childhood icpsr PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies DSDR VI. Population Characteristics Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13711 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13711.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25561 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25561 MiAaI MiAaI United States National Church Shooting Database, 1980-2005 [electronic resource] Derek Bixby , Amy Kielmeyer , Dallas Drake 2010-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 25561 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. Founded in 1999, the Center for Homicide Research has made it its mission to increase case solvability and decrease the occurrence of homicide incidents. In working toward this goal, the Center has put together various databases of national homicide incidents. The Church Shooting Database uses online newspaper archive articles to document all cases of shootings on church property within the United States from 1980-2005. While extensive studies have been done exploring the details of other public shootings such as school campuses and workplaces, the phenomenon of shootings in churches has been left relatively untouched. Taking into account variables about the offenders, victims, and circumstances of each shooting, the database attempts to describe each incident as well as explore how the church context may play a role in the shooting. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25561.v1 gun use icpsr arson icpsr offenders icpsr religion icpsr religious affiliation icpsr rural areas icpsr suicide icpsr urban areas icpsr weapons icpsr weapons offenses icpsr assault weapons icpsr church buildings icpsr church membership icpsr explosives icpsr firearms icpsr handguns icpsr homicide icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System DSDR VI. Population Characteristics Bixby, Derek Kielmeyer, Amy Drake, Dallas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25561 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25561.v1